like the composability of applications, but the decoupling of application
authoring from deployment is the sine qua non, in my opinion.
What would be involved to run Python on the web using FCGI without
WSGI? I can feel the flames already. This isn't the only reason I want
to know, but one
Thank you for the helpful and timely response.
My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
I actually have no applications that I wish to develop. I enjoy
developing these kinds of things from scratch
Phil phil...@gmail.com wrote:
My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
No offense intended, but that's probably the worst approach to
On Aug 25, 11:17 pm, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Phil phil...@gmail.com wrote:
My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
No
On Aug 26, 1:17 pm, alex23 wuwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Phil phil...@gmail.com wrote:
My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
No offense
and simply receives and responds to HTTP requests following
the WSGI specification?
Technically it receives and responses to request based on HTTP
specification, not WSGI specification. The underlying HTTP server
translates to and communicates with a Python web application using the
WSGI interface
Hello All,
Needless to say I am new to python and web programming. I am looking
for a quick Python-101 course / tutorial for using python to
implement dynamic content on web under some web server. Any pointers
what should I be reading?
Regards,
Atul.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Atul.atulskulka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
Needless to say I am new to python and web programming. I am looking
for a quick Python-101 course / tutorial for using python to
implement dynamic content on web under some web server. Any pointers
what should I
Hi All
I am trying to embed the python interpreter in to a web app but could
not get the way, any one can suggest me how to do this.
Thanks,
Sibtey Mehdi
This e-mail (and any attachments), is confidential and may be privileged. It
may be read, copied and used only
by intended
On Jul 29, 1:11 pm, Ryniek90 rynie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to embed the python interpreter in to a web app but could
not get the way, any one can suggest me how to do this.
Thanks,
Sibtey Mehdi
This e-mail (and any attachments), is confidential and may be privileged.
New submission from Jerry Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For people who are following HOWTO guides verbatim, there are two types
of Python 2.x'isms in HOWTO Use Python in the web
(http://www.python.org/doc/3.0/howto/webservers.html):
1. ``print`` statements instead of functions.
2. Use of beloved
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r67593.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4550
___
Apologies in advance if this is either a) the wrong board or b) been
answered a million times elsewhere, but...
I have been given an assignment to get a python module up and running
behind an existing web site. At the moment the rest of the site is
developed in PHP but the hosts have said they
the language with more web
frameworks than keywords. IOW, there's no simple straightforward answer
to your question. Fisrt choose which Python web development solution you
intend to use, then read the FineManual's deployment section of the
chosen solution.
You'll find pointers to most web-related libs
on your modules dependencies !-)
More seriously : Python is known has being the language with more web
frameworks than keywords. IOW, there's no simple straightforward answer
to your question. Fisrt choose which Python web development solution you
intend to use, then read the FineManual's
Hello,
I have developed a python tool that basically does two things:
1. Allow the user to search for a keyword or a group of Keywords in a
specailized collection of text files. This search option is part of a massive
custom tree control that was developed using wxpython.
2. The rest of the
Hello,
I have developed a python tool that basically does two things:
1. Allow the user to search for a keyword or a group of Keywords in a
specailized collection of text files. This search option is part of a
massive custom tree control that was developed using wxpython.
2. The rest of the
On 3月14日, 上午5时44分, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The reason I want to do simulation but not just crawling is : we have
to check many web pages' front page to see whether it conform to our
visual standard, e.g, it should put a search box on the top part of
the page. It's
On Mar 14, 9:02 am, imx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, but does it mean that I will need .net to run the code?
Yep - runtime is free though as is IronPython. For my program the
license is BSD.
Cheers,
Davy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The reason I want to do simulation but not just crawling is : we have
to check many web pages' front page to see whether it conform to our
visual standard, e.g, it should put a search box on the top part of
the page. It's tedious for human work. So I want to 'crawl and save
the visual
Hi there,
I wonder whether python can be used to simulate a real user to do the
following:
1) open a web site in a browser;
2) printscreen, so to copy the current active window image to
clipboard;
3) save the image file to a real file
Any pointer will be apprieciated!
Xiong
--
On Mar 12, 7:32 am, imx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder whether python can be used to simulate a real user to do the
following:
1) open a web site in a browser;
2) printscreen, so to copy the current active window image to
clipboard;
3) save the image file to a real file
Any pointer will
I wonder whether python can be used to simulate a real user to do the
following:
1) open a web site in a browser;
2) printscreen, so to copy the current active window image to
clipboard;
3) save the image file to a real file
Any pointer will be apprieciated!
Which OS?
--
You can definitely create a web bot with python. It doesn't require
that you drive A real web browser. There are libraries to open web
pages, scrape their contents, and do downloading. That would make your
bot platform neutral. Driving a GUI browser has the risk of being a
brittle script
Goldfish wrote:
I run a mediawiki web site, and found a handy python-based library
written to manage it called pywikipediabot at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pywikipediabot/.
This sounds interesting. My daughter had a nightmare that a hacker
invaded her Orkut and blanked all 1500+
Goldfish wrote:
You can definitely create a web bot with python. It doesn't require
that you drive A real web browser.
That's true, but if you want to print the page to a file, you need
something that can reproduce the intended layout. The Pyglet library
developers mention XML/HTML+CSS
On 3月13日, 上午4时26分, Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goldfish wrote:
You can definitely create a web bot with python. It doesn't require
that you drive A real web browser.
That's true, but if you want to print the page to a file, you need
something that can reproduce the intended layout
On 3月13日, 上午12时39分, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mar 12, 7:32 am, imx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder whether python can be used to simulate a real user to do the
following:
1) open a web site in a browser;
2) printscreen, so to copy the current active window image to
Is there any open source live web chat support program or script out
there? Any you can recommend?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
johnny sayeth, on 01/12/2007 11:11 AM:
Is there any open source live web chat support program or script out
there? Any you can recommend?
Why don't you install ejabberd (a Jabber server implemented in erlang)
and install Muckl (http://zeank.in-berlin.de/muckl/), an AJAX client for
pour ceux que ça intéresse
http://base.google.com/base/a/1438658/D18001067256043490325
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
des exemples de plugins pour IE oui mais qui ne sont pas embarqué dans
une page Web
je souhaiterai créer qqchose qui ressemble vraiment à Java VM ou
Flash
J'ai trouvé un début de réponse pour Firefox en télécharger le
GeckoSDK
mais je n'arrive pas à compiler les exemples pour le moment...
merci
Hi
I was looking for something similar in the past and could not find it. It
would be very useful to have Python applets in web pages. What would you use
them for?
kind regards
André
On 5 Dec 2006 23:59:29 -0800, Sébastien Ramage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
des exemples de plugins pour IE oui
Hi Sebastien
Yes, I am a developer, but not C/C++. I have done Java (and many other
languages) in the past, but use Python nowadays.
So, I am no help for developing the plugin, sorry. I would want to use it
though for developing richer Web sites in Python, rather than in
JavaScript/Ajax. Having
Re !
Je ne sais pas quel est ton objectif, mais il est possible de couplet
Python Javascript, de manière à générer/modifier/piloter le contenu
HTML de pages Web depuis Python. Je fais ça tous les jours (avec IE)
Pour cela je passe par COM.
Malheureusement, à cause de la paranoïa sécuritaire
!
Je ne sais pas quel est ton objectif, mais il est possible de couplet
Python Javascript, de manière à générer/modifier/piloter le contenu
HTML de pages Web depuis Python. Je fais ça tous les jours (avec IE)
Pour cela je passe par COM.
Malheureusement, à cause de la paranoïa sécuritaire
Bonsoir !
As-tu des connaissances en C++ ? avec Visual C++ ?
Ben, non, je ne pratique pas ces machins.
Par contre, je pense qu'il existe une autre démarche, qui consiste à
générer, à la volée, en Python, des sortes d'applets java/javascript.
Avantages : rien à installer ; milti-navigateurs
Par contre, je pense qu'il existe une autre démarche, qui consiste à
générer, à la volée, en Python, des sortes d'applets java/javascript.
Il est clair que mon projet est un peu plus complexe mais je l'espère
plus ambitieux aussi
Le but étant vraimment de faire des applets en Python et non
I've an idea and I've made some search but I found nothing really
interesting.
There is somebody who have (or can help me to) try to developp a python
plugin for web browser just like java ??
I search an how-to for creating a plugin for Firefox and only find how
create extension...
I've find
Bonjour !
Pour IE, il y a des exemples de plugins, fournis avec PyWin32.
Pour FF (comme pour Opera), je ne sais pas.
--
@-salutations
Michel Claveau
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ben Finney wrote:
I was under the impression that WSGI in mod_python was a rather kludgy
way to do WSGI, but I don't know what the alternatives are. CGI?
Python http server (e.g. CherryPy)? Something else?
You can use FastCGI or SCGI too, with Apache, lighttpd or Cherokee. I
have a short
Rob De Almeida wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
I was under the impression that WSGI in mod_python was a rather kludgy
way to do WSGI, but I don't know what the alternatives are. CGI?
Python http server (e.g. CherryPy)? Something else?
You can use FastCGI or SCGI too, with Apache, lighttpd or
through to a separate back end
web server if you are Apache phobic and want to use a web server
written in pure Python.
Overall, Apache/mod_python has a lot to offer, but from what I have
seen most Python web frameworks simply uses it as a jumping off point
and not much else.
Graham
--
http
Howdy all,
I'm working on a web application that is starting to gain a lot of
back-end code written in Python. However, all the current interface
code is written in legacy PHP. I'd like to slowly introduce new
features as Python WSGI programs.
Is it possible to write a Python WSGI program that
Ben Finney wrote:
Howdy all,
I'm working on a web application that is starting to gain a lot of
back-end code written in Python. However, all the current interface
code is written in legacy PHP. I'd like to slowly introduce new
features as Python WSGI programs.
Is it possible to write a
Ben Finney wrote:
Is it possible to write a Python WSGI program that talks to a PHP
program as its back end? Where can I find out how to do this,
preferably with examples?
Perhaps:
http://pythonpaste.org/wphp/
http://blog.ianbicking.org/2006-wphp.html
--
ToddG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Finney wrote:
Is it possible to write a Python WSGI program that talks to a
PHP program as its back end? Where can I find out how to do
this, preferably with examples?
Perhaps:
http://pythonpaste.org/wphp/
Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Look at mod_python for Apache. If you use it correctly you can on a
page by page basis as need be, replace the existing PHP pages with
equivalents written using Python. You could do this by programming
right at the level of mod_python, or again, if
Paul Boddie a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
To make a long story short, my opinion is that the only sensible thing
to do with Windows is to wipe it out and install an OS instead.
If you're convinced you won't be running Windows, why deal with the
problem so late in the game? Instead,
) that this is
possibly the best way to use plain mod_python, I'd disagree that it's a
good way to develop modern web applications in Python. By the time
you've decided on every bit of framework to use, and made all the little
decisions that go into turning a fresh, clean spot on your hard drive
Cliff Wells wrote:
For myself, I handle user-installation of TurboGears pretty much like I
do all user-installed Python packages: using setuptools. Any user who
uses easy_install or 'python setup.py install' gets their packages
automatically installed into a subdirectory of their home
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:13 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
Another one is that it seems (here I go again :) that there is something
like a marriage between Python and PostgreSQL (or in other words, that
Python fans that develop web apps have a tendency to favor PostgreSQL
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:51 +0200, paul kölle wrote:
Cliff Wells wrote:
For myself, I handle user-installation of TurboGears pretty much like I
do all user-installed Python packages: using setuptools. Any user who
uses easy_install or 'python setup.py install' gets their packages
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 09:49 +0200, Sybren Stuvel wrote:
Cliff Wells enlightened us with:
1) PostgreSQL fans are perhaps a bit paranoid about claims of MySQL
being better. There used to be a tiny bit of truth in this claim
for certain applications (mostly relating to performance and ease of
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:26 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
Or is there something in PostgreSQL that makes its users acidic? :)
Well, ACID is popular in PostgreSQL circles.
Cliff
--
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Conrad a écrit :
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:14:03 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
northband wrote:
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have a
few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS,
Luis M. González a écrit :
(snip).
I guess that the reason for not having used a framework already is
laziness...
Strange enough, laziness is my first reason for using frameworks ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
To make a long story short, my opinion is that the only sensible thing
to do with Windows is to wipe it out and install an OS instead.
If you're convinced you won't be running Windows, why deal with the
problem so late in the game? Instead, order a system from a
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:46 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
On 2006-08-02 00:51:28, Conrad wrote:
Which begins A few years ago
Exactly. Isn't this a good start for honesty? It doesn't claim to state
anything up to date.
It continues I did some research, some being a very clear indicator
, that
Python fans that develop web apps have a tendency to favor PostgreSQL). Is
there something like this? (Here is the question :)
Gerhard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
for someone ;-)
Another one is that it seems (here I go again :) that there is something
like a marriage between Python and PostgreSQL (or in other words, that
Python fans that develop web apps have a tendency to favor PostgreSQL). Is
there something like this? (Here is the question :)
I
that it's a
good way to develop modern web applications in Python. By the time
you've decided on every bit of framework to use, and made all the little
decisions that go into turning a fresh, clean spot on your hard drive
into an application, what you've done is reinvent TurboGears rather than
northband wrote:
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have
a few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS, currently Windows but considering
FreeBSD
2. Site consists of result pages for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
northband wrote:
[Specifications]
I am trying to have the fastest page loads, averaging 100 items per
result page. I have read about using Apache's mod_python so I could
use PSP. Any help or tips are appreciated.
So if I'm reading this correctly: you have a
Awesome response, thanks. I am definitely interested in the MVC and am
looking into it now.
Yes, we are migrating to Python mainly because we want unicode support,
more stability, and faster performance than what we are getting now.
We were going to move to php but seem python is the better
plain mod_python, I'd disagree that it's a
good way to develop modern web applications in Python. By the time
you've decided on every bit of framework to use, and made all the little
decisions that go into turning a fresh, clean spot on your hard drive
into an application, what you've done
On 2006-08-01 04:11:18, Cliff Wells wrote:
You say that you haven't tried Django or any other Python framework.
Perhaps you should. You seem to have at least the start of the right
idea about web application organization, so I think you'd be pleasantly
surprised with what you'll find already
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 10:41 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
On 2006-08-01 04:11:18, Cliff Wells wrote:
You say that you haven't tried Django or any other Python framework.
Perhaps you should. You seem to have at least the start of the right
idea about web application organization, so I
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 06:38 -0700, Luis M. González wrote:
Well... yes, you're right.
I guess that the reason for not having used a framework already is
laziness...
Trust me, I'm quite familiar with the laziness problem =)
I have experience with Karrigell, which rocks too, but it lacks some
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
northband [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just spoke with my department and looks like we still want to go with a
server scripting method. Although MVC may be better fit, for the sake
of the learning curve, we want to use a PSP style method.
.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:14:03 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
northband wrote:
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have a
few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS, currently
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:12:56 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
On 2006-07-31 15:00:15, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
In fact, the real question IMHO is: what would MySQL advantage over
PostgreSQL be ?-)
A few years ago I did some research, and the result was that while
PostgreSQL was claimed to
On 2006-08-01 21:04:07, Conrad wrote:
A few years ago I did some research, and the result was that while
PostgreSQL was claimed to have more features and a better design, the
reports of database corruption seemed to have been more frequent than with
MySQL.
I can't claim to have done your
.
Or is there something in PostgreSQL that makes its users acidic? :)
Gerhard
Well, maybe so -
I followed up to this message:
Subject: Re: Using Python for my web site
From: Gerhard Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:12:56 -0300
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have
a few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS, currently Windows but considering
FreeBSD
2. Site consists of result pages for auctions and items for
northband wrote:
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have
a few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS, currently Windows but considering
FreeBSD
2. Site consists of result pages for
Thanks I will look into it.
-Adam
Norman Khine wrote:
northband wrote:
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have
a few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS, currently Windows
northband wrote:
Hi, I am interested in re-writing my website in Python vs PHP but have
a few questions. Here are my specs, please advise as to which
configuration would be best:
1.Dell Poweredge Server, w/IIS, currently Windows but considering
FreeBSD
I may be a bit biased, but I would
Thanks for the info. Reason why we are interested in PSP is because we
think our developers would be able to quickly adapt to the migration,
they are familiar with php and asp.
I agree on the windows webserver, we are looking into using FreeBSD
instead.
What would postgre's advantage over MySQL
northband wrote:
Thanks for the info. Reason why we are interested in PSP is because we
think our developers would be able to quickly adapt to the migration,
they are familiar with php and asp.
Yes, I guessed it had do to with something like this. OTOH, the
ServerPage model can quickly lead
On 2006-07-31 15:00:15, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
In fact, the real question IMHO is: what would MySQL advantage over
PostgreSQL be ?-)
A few years ago I did some research, and the result was that while
PostgreSQL was claimed to have more features and a better design, the
reports of database
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:12 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
On 2006-07-31 15:00:15, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
In fact, the real question IMHO is: what would MySQL advantage over
PostgreSQL be ?-)
A few years ago I did some research, and the result was that while
PostgreSQL was claimed
On 2006-07-31 17:28:00, Cliff Wells wrote:
I assume you don't agree... :)
I certainly don't. [...]
Also, saying a few years ago I did some research in software terms is
pretty much equivalent to saying I don't know.
Exactly. So what's your point with this comment?
I stated what was my
So seems the best approach would be a MVC model rather than server
scripting? Currently our site is built with a closed source hypertext
preprocessor much like PHP. So it would be easier for us to script
another site, but if we would gain performance via a MVC model, then
that's what we need.
I
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:58 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
On 2006-07-31 17:28:00, Cliff Wells wrote:
I assume you don't agree... :)
I certainly don't. [...]
Also, saying a few years ago I did some research in software terms is
pretty much equivalent to saying I don't know.
Just spoke with my department and looks like we still want to go with a
server scripting method. Although MVC may be better fit, for the sake
of the learning curve, we want to use a PSP style method.
So as of now we are looking at using FreeBSD, MySQL, and some form of
Python that will allow us
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 14:40 -0700, northband wrote:
Just spoke with my department and looks like we still want to go with a
server scripting method. Although MVC may be better fit, for the sake
of the learning curve, we want to use a PSP style method.
I'm with the others who suggest using an
Makes sense, I will follow your advice. Sounds like more time invest
upfront will equal time saved over the long run. I am defitely
interested in proxy caching and load balancing. Which do you
recommend? I have used #Pound while working for a university.
-Adam
Cliff Wells wrote:
On Mon,
Gerhard Fiedler a écrit :
On 2006-07-31 15:00:15, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
In fact, the real question IMHO is: what would MySQL advantage over
PostgreSQL be ?-)
A few years ago I did some research, and the result was that while
PostgreSQL was claimed to have more features and a
northband schrieb:
So seems the best approach would be a MVC model rather than server
scripting? Currently our site is built with a closed source hypertext
preprocessor much like PHP. So it would be easier for us to script
another site, but if we would gain performance via a MVC model, then
northband a écrit :
So seems the best approach would be a MVC model rather than server
scripting?
This is still server-scripting - at least since on the server-side and
is done with something frequently labelled as a script language !-)
Currently our site is built with a closed source
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 15:06 -0700, northband wrote:
Makes sense, I will follow your advice. Sounds like more time invest
upfront will equal time saved over the long run. I am defitely
interested in proxy caching and load balancing. Which do you
recommend? I have used #Pound while working
northband a écrit :
Just spoke with my department and looks like we still want to go with a
server scripting method. Although MVC may be better fit, for the sake
of the learning curve, we want to use a PSP style method.
I really don't think the learning curve will be a problem. We learned
On 2006-07-31 18:23:17, Cliff Wells wrote:
My point is to stop FUD right at that comment. I don't doubt your
research from a few years ago, but ancient research is entirely
irrelevant for making a decision *today*.
That's exactly the reason why I added this information. It might not be for
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 21:57 -0300, Gerhard Fiedler wrote:
On 2006-07-31 18:23:17, Cliff Wells wrote:
My point is to stop FUD right at that comment. I don't doubt your
research from a few years ago, but ancient research is entirely
irrelevant for making a decision *today*.
That's
I don't have experience with Django or any other python framework, but
I have used bare-bones mod_python and it rocks.
I wouldn't use PSP though...
It is not very polished, and they way it handles the indentation
problem in python is a little bit confussing.
IMHO the best way of using mod_python
Hello everyone,I am learning Python and have heard it can be used similarly to PHP for web scripting. Because I find the latter not entirely to my liking, I would like to use Python. How should I configure my web server, what do I need, where should I start at, etc. I realise this sort of question
reddit is written with webpy (webpy.org), maybe you should give it a
try?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Gregory Petrosyan wrote:
reddit is written with webpy (webpy.org), maybe you should give it a
try?
I'm looking for a library that provides commenting on items in a
similar way to reddit/digg/slashdot. I would rather not write all that
code from scratch.
I don't think web.py comes with that
Amir Michail wrote:
Hi,
I'm building something like digg/reddit and would like to allow people
to have discussions on various items.
Is there a simple lightweight python library that I can use (as opposed
to a heavyweight web framework)? Although not necessary, some sort of
101 - 200 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
