Carl Banks wrote:
I'm surprised there is anyone who still gives castironpi credit for
being fully human.
His recent posts have generally been quite different from those of some
months ago. Even he recognizes that they were somewhat weird and has
tried to do better.
Did he ever make any
On 13 Sep, 08:38, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
His recent posts have generally been quite different from those of some
months ago. Even he recognizes that they were somewhat weird and has
tried to do better.
And I think we should at least go along with people if they're willing
to
castironpi wrote:
On Sep 7, 5:03 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:34:55 +1000, James Mills wrote:
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What the ?
Yeah, castironpi sometimes doesn't make much sense.
castironpi wrote:
[...]
For example, I sometimes hear people talk about salary as though it
were social approval, and vice versa. Even though the analogy doesn't
hold in every case generally, it is still a good way to express
yourself in many contexts, and especially when the more precise
On Sep 12, 7:23 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
castironpi wrote:
If you are flattered to be compared to an AI you must come from the same
race as Mr. Spock in Star Trek.
No, I said 'for my logic to compared'. Speaking of which, I think you
excluded the possibility of diligent and
Aaron Castironpi Brady wrote:
On Sep 12, 7:23 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
castironpi wrote:
If you are flattered to be compared to an AI you must come from the same
race as Mr. Spock in Star Trek.
No, I said 'for my logic to compared'. Speaking of which, I think you
Steve Holden wrote:
The defence rests.
can you please stop quoting that guy, so we don't have to killfile you
as well...
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
The defence rests.
can you please stop quoting that guy, so we don't have to killfile you
as well...
+1
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * http://www.pythoncraft.com/
Argue for your
On Sep 12, 12:35 pm, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
The defence rests.
can you please stop quoting that guy, so we don't have to killfile you
as well...
Guy?
Carl Banks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 12, 8:16 am, Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
castironpi wrote:
On Sep 7, 5:03 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:34:55 +1000, James Mills wrote:
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the wrong idea of what the group is. I would have thought
that
if one had a sufficiently developed idea and wanted to have it /
formally/
rejected, rather than merely sniped at, then writting a PEP would be
more
On Sep 8, 11:23 am, Dan Upton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:59 PM, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 7, 7:34 pm, MRAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:28 pm, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Bot
I think it's like duck typing: it doesn't matter
On Sep 8, 2:04 pm, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the wrong idea of what the group is. I would have thought
that
if one had a sufficiently developed idea and wanted to have it /
formally/
rejected,
On 2008-09-08, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To expand on this a little bit, I've been subscribed to this
group for a couple of months, but there seems to be a bit more
gray area between what would go to a
Chris Rebert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To expand on this a little bit, I've been subscribed to this group
for a couple of months, but there seems to be a bit more gray area
between what would go to a 'python-dev' group and a 'python-user'
Eric Wertman wrote:
Perhaps the wrong idea of what the group is. I would have thought
that
if one had a sufficiently developed idea and wanted to have it /
formally/
rejected, rather than merely sniped at, then writting a PEP would be
more
apposite than posting to c.l.py.
It's fine to post
On Sep 8, 2:21 pm, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-09-08, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To expand on this a little bit, I've been subscribed to this
group for a couple of months, but there seems
Perhaps the wrong idea of what the group is. I would have thought
that
if one had a sufficiently developed idea and wanted to have it /
formally/
rejected, rather than merely sniped at, then writting a PEP would be
more
apposite than posting to c.l.py.
It's fine to post your not
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:59 PM, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 7, 7:34 pm, MRAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:28 pm, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Bot
I think it's like duck typing: it doesn't matter whether he's actually
a bot, only whether he behaves like
I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have a wrong understanding
of group policy? Is it a good policy (defined with respect to the
future of Python and the welfare of humans at large) if so? Is there
a serious lack of
Hi,
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What the ?
cheers
James
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:00 AM, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have
En Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:00:30 -0300, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have a wrong understanding
of group policy? Is it a good policy (defined with respect to the
future of
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:34:55 +1000, James Mills wrote:
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What the ?
Yeah, castironpi sometimes doesn't make much sense. Maybe because it's a
bot!? :-)
Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
--
On Sep 7, 5:03 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:34:55 +1000, James Mills wrote:
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What the ?
Yeah, castironpi sometimes doesn't make much sense. Maybe because it's
+1 Bot
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
Yeah, castironpi sometimes doesn't make much sense. Maybe because it's a
bot!? :-)
if so, they sure don't make c.l.py bots like they used to, do they?
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 8, 8:36 am, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
Yeah, castironpi sometimes doesn't make much sense. Maybe because it's a
bot!? :-)
if so, they sure don't make c.l.py bots like they used to, do they?
/F
That's correct. This one seems to have an
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:34:55 +1000, James Mills wrote:
Hi,
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What the ?
Oh don't mind castironpi, many people think he's an IRC bot with some
experimental AI features that escaped onto Usenet *grins*. If you
On Sep 7, 5:45 pm, Steven D'Aprano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:34:55 +1000, James Mills wrote:
Hi,
This is the strangest post I've seen
since I've joined this list (only
recently). What the ?
Oh don't mind castironpi, many people think he's an IRC
On 7 Sep, 23:00, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have a wrong understanding
of group policy?
I think some people have taken exception to your contributions
previously, which I
On Sep 7, 11:28 pm, Eric Wertman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 Bot
I think it's like duck typing: it doesn't matter whether he's actually
a bot, only whether he behaves like one.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7 Sep, 23:00, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have a wrong
understanding of group policy?
I think some people have taken exception to
On Sep 8, 7:00 am, castironpi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have a wrong understanding
of group policy?
[snip]
Perhaps the wrong idea of what the group is. I would have thought
that
if
33 matches
Mail list logo
