overns the order of evaluation of a group of operators
*OF THE SAME PRECEDENCE*.
If you write
2**3**4
only the fact the '**' is right associative will tell you that the order is
2**(3**4)
and not
(2**3)**4
I remind you that 2^(3^4) != (2^3)^4.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s outdated?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/1/2012 1:02, Xah Lee wrote:
i missed a point in my original post. That is, when the same operator
are adjacent. e.g. 「3 ▲ 6 ▲ 5」.
This is pointed out by Kiuhnm 〔kiuhnm03.4t.yahoo.it〕 and Tim Bradshaw.
Thanks.
though, i disagree the way they expressed it, or any sense this is
different
On 3/2/2012 14:12, Xah Lee wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:00 am, Kiuhnm wrote:
They did not make up the terminology, if that is what you are saying.
The concepts of left and right associativity are well-known and accepted
in TCS (Theoretical CS).
Aho, Sethi and Ullman explain it this way in "Comp
eft and
right-associative.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/12/2012 20:00, Albert van der Horst wrote:
In article<[email protected]>,
Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/12/2012 12:27, Albert van der Horst wrote:
Interestingly in mathematics associative means that it doesn't matter
whether you use (a.b).c or a.(b.c)
On 3/12/2012 20:00, Albert van der Horst wrote:
In article<[email protected]>,
Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/12/2012 12:27, Albert van der Horst wrote:
Interestingly in mathematics associative means that it doesn't matter
whether you use (a.b).c or a.(b.c)
On 3/12/2012 20:00, Albert van der Horst wrote:
In article<[email protected]>,
Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/12/2012 12:27, Albert van der Horst wrote:
Interestingly in mathematics associative means that it doesn't matter
whether you use (a.b).c or a.(b.c)
On 3/12/2012 20:00, Albert van der Horst wrote:
[...]
Sorry for triple posting. I hadn't noticed the follow up and I was
blaming my newsserver.
BTW, Python is the next language (right after Perl) I'm going to learn.
Then I'll probably have a look at Ruby...
Kiuhnm
--
http://
27;s no
need to misrepresent Perl that way.
Now I'm wondering whether the author will show me "good" or "bad" Python
code throughout the book. Should I keep reading?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e. List comprehensions are not immediately obvious to new
Python users. The functionality of 'with' requires an understanding of
context managers. Python's readability has more to do with simplifying
code maintenance.
Let's try that.
Show me an example of "list comprehe
On 3/15/2012 11:50, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Let's try that.
Show me an example of "list comprehensions" and "with" (whatever they are).
I'll do a list comp, because they lend themselves well to one-liners.
what_a
On 3/15/2012 12:14, Thomas Rachel wrote:
Am 15.03.2012 11:44 schrieb Kiuhnm:
Let's try that.
Show me an example of "list comprehensions" and "with" (whatever they
are).
with open("filename", "w") as f:
f.write(stuff)
Here f is created b
On 3/15/2012 12:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Kiuhnm
Your first example suggests that range(n) is a sequence iterator which
returns, if queried n times,
0,...,n-1
(which is a bit counterintuitive, IMHO).
It's a little odd, perhaps, if seen in a vacuum
On 3/15/2012 13:21, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
On 3/15/2012 12:47, Chris Angelico wrote:
It's a little odd, perhaps, if seen in a vacuum. But everything counts
from zero - list indices, etc - so it makes sense for range(len(lst))
to return in
On 3/15/2012 15:06, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 15/03/2012 11:48, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/15/2012 12:14, Thomas Rachel wrote:
Am 15.03.2012 11:44 schrieb Kiuhnm:
Let's try that.
Show me an example of "list comprehensions" and "with" (whatever they
are).
with open("
On 3/15/2012 15:23, Duncan Booth wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
BTW, aren't those ':' redundant?
They are required by the grammar, but in a sense you are correct. You could
modify Python's grammar to make the colons optional and still keep it
unambiguous but that would make it ha
On 3/15/2012 15:29, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Don't worry. Soon you'll be using C++0x :)))
I use gcc/g++ with most of the new features enabled. There's some
pretty handy features in it. Frankly, though, if I'd known about
Cytho
On 3/15/2012 15:28, Tim Golden wrote:
On 15/03/2012 14:19, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/15/2012 15:06, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 15/03/2012 11:48, Kiuhnm wrote:
BTW, aren't those ':' redundant?
Kiuhnm
Nope.
Python 2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on w
On 3/15/2012 15:48, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Sorry, but I can't see how it would make it harder for humans to understand.
Are there particular situations you're referring to?
In a trivial example, it's mostly just noise:
if a == b
On 3/15/2012 15:43, Robert Kern wrote:
On 3/15/12 2:30 PM, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/15/2012 15:23, Duncan Booth wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
BTW, aren't those ':' redundant?
They are required by the grammar, but in a sense you are correct. You
could
modify Python's grammar to make
On 3/15/2012 16:08, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
By the way, the more elaborate parsing consists of looking for an
END_OF_LINE followed by one or more spaces. It doesn't sound that
complicated.
Only in the trivial case. What if you want to break
On 3/15/2012 23:17, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 03/15/2012 09:18 AM, Kiuhnm wrote:
> After early user testing without the colon, it was discovered that
the meaning of the indentation was unclear to beginners being taught the
first steps of programming.<
The addition of the
On 3/16/2012 0:00, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
On 15 March 2012 22:35, Ben Finney wrote:
Kiuhnm writes:
Moreover, I think that
if (
):
is not very readable anyway.
I agree, and am
On 3/16/2012 0:58, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 15/03/2012 23:46, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/16/2012 0:00, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
On 15 March 2012 22:35, Ben Finney wrote:
Kiuhnm writes:
Moreover, I think that
if (
):
is not
On 3/16/2012 4:55, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:32:52 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
Pick up two math books about the same topic but on two different levels
(e.g. under-graduated and graduated). If you compare the proofs you'll
see that those in the higher-level book are alm
On 3/16/2012 0:52, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Sorry, but I can't see how it would make it harder for humans to
understand. Are there particular situations you're referring to?
In a trivial example, it's mostly just noise:
if a
On 3/16/2012 2:53, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:34:47 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've just started to read
The Quick Python Book (2nd ed.)
Is this the one?
http://manning.com/ceder/
The author claims that Python code is more readable than Perl code and
pro
f(a, b)
?-)
That would be
f (a b) # Haskell
f(a(b)) # Python
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
lways forget if it should be
f a b
or
f ( a b )
You wouldn't, because Haskel's way is more regular and makes a lot of
sense: parentheses are for grouping and that's it.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/16/2012 17:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:55:06 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
I don't understand the reason for $arg1 and $arg2. Is there some reason
why the code couldn't do this instead?
my(@list1, @list2) = @_;
@_ contains references to arrays. You
On 3/16/2012 17:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:31:06 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
You wouldn't, because Haskel's way is more regular and makes a lot of
sense: parentheses are for grouping and that's it.
If f is a function which normally takes (for the sake
vel + 1);
printTree(func(1), level + 1);
printTree(f);
print("\n--\n");
def f2(*args):
print(", ".join(["%3d"%(x) for x in args]));
def stress(f, n):
if n: stress(f(n), n - 1)
else: f(); # enough is enough
stress(cur(f2), 100);
<---
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
clear way to program Knuth with Python is the following
kind of a construct.
[...]
Your way is easy, but the result is poor.
Your should try to rewrite it. Decompilers do exactly that.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/17/2012 16:01, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 03/17/2012 08:45 AM, Kiuhnm wrote:
Your way is easy, but the result is poor.
In what way?
The resulting code is inefficient, difficult to comprehend and to mantain.
What is your recommended way?
One should rewrite the code. There is a reason
On 3/17/2012 16:53, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 03/17/2012 09:12 AM, Kiuhnm wrote:
>> On 3/17/2012 16:01, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>> On 03/17/2012 08:45 AM, Kiuhnm wrote:
>>>> Your way is easy, but the result is poor.
>>>
>>> In what way?
>&
On 3/16/2012 17:48, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:10:12 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
Maybe we should define *exactly* what readability is (in less then 500
lines, if possible).
If you can't be bothered to read my post before replying, save yourself
some more time and don&#
pply the grammatical rules used by people in real life. You know the
ones: linguists."
Then how do you know that there's nothing ungrammatical about "If you
can: take the bus" if people don't use it?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ould not precede a list unless it follows a complete
sentence; however, the colon is a style choice that some publications
allow."
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/colons.asp
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/17/2012 0:39, Michael Torrie wrote:
For someone who claims he's merely examining the language and seeking to
learn about it, Kiuhnm is jumping awfully quickly into the realm of
trolling.
I'm speechless... thanks, man!
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/17/2012 22:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Could you please explain to me in which way
mov eax, 3
should be less readable than
for i in x: print(i)
?
They are equally readable. The first one sets EAX to 3; the second
displays all
On 3/17/2012 2:21, Kiuhnm wrote:
Here we go.
I wrote an article about my approach to currying:
http://mtomassoli.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/currying-in-python/
Beginners should be able to understand it as well. Experienced
programmers will probably want to skip some sections.
Kiuhnm
--
http
rding labels and state, I simply meant that they're completely
different things, in fact this program has two labels but infinitely
many states:
A1: cur = cur + 1
A2: goto A1
I was being pedantic, to say it your way ;)
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/19/2012 6:02, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:02:23 +0100, Kiuhnm
declaimed the following in
gmane.comp.python.general:
Many ASM languages don't have structured control flow statements but
only jmps, which are roughly equivalent to gotos. A good decompiler will
ne
On 3/18/2012 0:04, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 03/17/2012 03:28 PM, Kiuhnm wrote:
They are equally readable. The first one sets EAX to 3; the second
displays all elements of x on the console. Assembly is readable on a
very low level, but it's by nature verbose at a high level, and thus
On 3/18/2012 2:36, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:59:34 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
Ok, so length and readability are orthogonal properties. Could you
please explain to me in which way
mov eax, 3
should be less readable than
for i in x: print(i)
?
"mov eax, 3
On 3/18/2012 2:46, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:23:45 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/16/2012 14:03, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
A one line routine is still a routine. There is nothing ungrammatical
about "If you can: take the bus.", although it is non-idiomatic
E
On 3/20/2012 0:20, Ian Kelly wrote:
I hope you don't mind if I critique your code a bit!
Not at all. Thank you for your time.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Here we go.
--->
def genCur(f, unique = True, minArgs = -1):
[...]
I'll update my code following you
note, "nonlocal" isn't needed in my code, in fact I removed it
right after my first post.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/20/2012 8:11, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
On 19 March 2012 23:20, Ian Kelly wrote:
I hope you don't mind if I critique your code a bit!
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
Here we go.
--->
def genCur(f, unique = True, minArgs = -1):
It is customary in Python for un
us because "nobody says them".
Nobody says "hesitant teapots sleep artistically".
Let's not mix syntax with semantics. "If I'm ok: I'll go." represents
all the possible sentences where the if-clause and the then-clause are
separated by a colon. I believe
s
- walk the dog
That's perfectly fine. Commas are conveniently omitted.
As a side note, titles of movies, newspapers etc... don't follow common
rules. Articles may be omitted, verbs may be missing, etc... They're
just titles.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
r.py
his is a es
his is a tes
Why wasnt the t removed ?
Because it's not a leading or trailing character.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
x27;), ge('med'))\
- ['same', 'same'] - streams(cat) - 'same'
It reads as
"take a list of numbers - save it - compute the average and named it
'med' - restore the flow - create two streams which have, respect., the
numbers less than &#x
On 3/23/2012 17:00, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I believe that a piece of code may very well start as complete
gib
y
sequence.
Flows can be saved (push) and restored (pop) :
[1,2,3,4] - push - by(2) - 'double' - pop | val('double')
<=> [1,2,3,4] | [2,4,6,8]
There are easier ways to achieve the same result, of course:
[1,2,3,4] - [id, by(2)]
You are grasping
at I wanted to do and, in fact, I did.
I'm afraid your cup is too full to understand simple things as the one I
wrote in my OP.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/23/2012 22:12, Ethan Furman wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
On 3/23/2012 17:33, Nathan Rice wrote:
Given the examples you pose here, it is clear that you are assuming
that the streams are synchronized in discrete time. Since you do not
provide any mechanism for temporal alignment of streams you are
stead of posting a message stating
that you have a superior way to compose code, you might want to try to
solve a problem and ask others their opinion of the structure and
techniques in your code.
Never said it was superior.
We've been talking about readability a lot, haven't we? I was just
proposing something different.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/24/2012 0:32, Ray Song wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I beli
On 3/24/2012 4:23, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:00:23 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I
Why do you write
// Print the number of words...
def printNumWords(): ...
and not
// Prints the number of words...
def printNumWords(): ...
where "it" is understood?
Is that an imperative or a base form or something else?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/24/2012 21:24, MRAB wrote:
On 24/03/2012 19:36, Kiuhnm wrote:
Why do you write
// Print the number of words...
def printNumWords(): ...
and not
// Prints the number of words...
def printNumWords(): ...
where "it" is understood?
Is that an imperative or a base form or something e
ce_example_combos()
print("tesdata generated")
q = Queue()
p = Pool(10, calc_init, [q])
results = p.imap(calc, combos)
p.close()
p.join()
for r in results:
print(q.get())
print(r)
input("")
<
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
n() and end().
Note the ampersand which means "get the reference of".
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
; in mathematics. The "right"
operator would have been "<-".
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 3/26/2012 10:52, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
On 3/25/2012 15:48, Tim Chase wrote:
The old curmudgeon in me likes the Pascal method of using "=" for
equality-testing, and ":=" for assignment which feels a little closer to
On 3/26/2012 11:27, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
[snip]
numbers - push - avrg - 'med' - pop - filter(lt('med'), ge('med'))\
- ['same', 'same'] - streams(cat) - 'same'
It reads as
"take a list of numbers - sa
On 3/26/2012 13:13, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
Kiuhnm writes:
On 3/26/2012 10:52, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kiuhnm
wrote:
On 3/25/2012 15:48, Tim Chase wrote:
The old curmudgeon in me likes the Pascal method of using "=" for
equality-testing, an
r a string.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ange(200):
print ( get_steps2() )
print("done")
input("")
<---
Now the limit is 1267650600228229401496703205376. I hope that's enough.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
notPropMult = cur(lambda n, x : x <= n or x % n, 2)
def findPrimes(upTo):
if (upTo <= 5): return [2, 3, 5]
filterAll = (findPrimes(floor(sqrt(upTo)))
>> map(lambda x : filter(notPropMult(x)))
>> reduce(lambda f, g : f - g))
return list(range(2, upTo + 1)) >> filterAll
findPrimes(1000) >> my_print
print("---")
# Example 8
# Finds the approximate number of hrefs in a web page.
def do(proc, arg):
proc()
return arg
do = cur(do)
cprint = cur(print)
("http://python.org";
>> do(cprint("The page http://python.org has about... ", end = ''))
>> do(sys.stdout.flush)
>> urlopen
>> cur(lambda x : x.read())
>> findall(b"href=\"")
>> cur(len)
>> cur("{} hrefs.".format)
>> cprint)
<---
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
't mix multi-threading libraries. Is Python one
of them?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
example is a job for
dict.setdefault().
[...]
That was just an example for the sake of the discussion.
My question is this: can I use 'threading' without interfering with the
program which will import my module?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/8/2012 7:04, Bryan wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
My question is this: can I use 'threading' without interfering with the
program which will import my module?
Yes. The things to avoid are described at the bottom of:
http://docs.python.org/library/threading.html
On platforms witho
Is it a known fact that ast.parse doesn't handle line continuations and
some multi-line expressions?
For instance, he doesn't like
for (x,
y) in each([1,
2]):
print(1)
at all.
Is there a workaround besides "repairing" the code on the
On 4/9/2012 14:43, Irmen de Jong wrote:
On 9-4-2012 13:53, Kiuhnm wrote:
Is it a known fact that ast.parse doesn't handle line continuations and some
multi-line
expressions?
For instance, he doesn't like
for (x,
y) in each([1,
2]):
print
On 4/10/2012 14:29, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Am 09.04.2012 20:57, schrieb Kiuhnm:
Do you have some real or realistic (but easy and self-contained)
examples when you had to define a (multi-statement) function and pass it
to another function?
Take a look at decorators, they not only take non
On 4/10/2012 23:43, Eelco wrote:
On Apr 10, 3:36 am, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 4/10/2012 14:29, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
Am 09.04.2012 20:57, schrieb Kiuhnm:
Do you have some real or realistic (but easy and self-contained)
examples when you had to define a (multi-statement) function and pass it
to
On 4/11/2012 16:01, Antti J Ylikoski wrote:
On 9.4.2012 21:57, Kiuhnm wrote:
Do you have some real or realistic (but easy and self-contained)
examples when you had to define a (multi-statement) function and pass it
to another function?
Thank you.
Kiuhnm
A function to numerically integrate
On 4/12/2012 8:07, Tim Roberts wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
That won't do. A good example is when you pass a function to re.sub, for
instance.
This is an odd request.
All shall be revealed :)
I often pass functions to functions in order to simulate a C switch
statement, such as in a lan
], [1,2,3,4]))
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
tes, but this could be the
intended behavior.
For instance, with the 'a' and 'b' above, the result would be
{'a':1}
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/12/2012 19:29, Jan Kuiken wrote:
On 4/9/12 20:57 , Kiuhnm wrote:
Do you have some real or realistic (but easy and self-contained)
examples when you had to define a (multi-statement) function and pass it
to another function?
I don't use it daily but the first argument of list.sort
On 4/13/2012 17:58, Alexander Blinne wrote:
Am 12.04.2012 18:38, schrieb Kiuhnm:
Almost. Since d.values() = [[1,2], [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]], you need to use
list(zip(*d.values()))
which is equivalent to
list(zip([1,2], [1,2,3], [1,2,3,4]))
Kiuhnm
While this accidently works in this
This is the behavior I need:
path = path.replace('\\', '')
msg = ". {} .. '{}' .. {} .".format(a, path, b)
Is there a better way?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/16/2012 4:42, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:07:36 +0200, Kiuhnm wrote:
This is the behavior I need:
path = path.replace('\\', '')
msg = ". {} .. '{}' .. {} .".format(a, path, b)
Is there a better way?
This wo
I'd like to share a module of mine with the Python community. I'd like
to encourage bug reports, suggestions, etc...
Where should I upload it to?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/16/2012 12:03, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 4/16/2012 4:42, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:07:36 +0200, Kiuhnm wrote:
This is the behavior I need:
path = path.replace('\\', '')
msg = ". {} .. '{}' .. {} .".format(a, path, b)
Is there a
On 4/16/2012 17:14, Jon Clements wrote:
On Monday, 16 April 2012 11:03:31 UTC+1, Kiuhnm wrote:
On 4/16/2012 4:42, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:07:36 +0200, Kiuhnm wrote:
This is the behavior I need:
path = path.replace('\\', &#x
On 4/16/2012 13:02, Thomas Rachel wrote:
Am 16.04.2012 12:23 schrieb Kiuhnm:
I'd like to share a module of mine with the Python community. I'd like
to encourage bug reports, suggestions, etc...
Where should I upload it to?
Kiuhnm
There are several ways to do this. One of the
On 4/17/2012 1:23, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
Wherever you host the code itself, you should also register it on PyPI.
Ok, thanks.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm using Python 3.2.2, 64 bit on Windows 7.
Consider this code:
--->
print(1)
print(2)
print(3)
with open('test') as f:
data = f.read()
with open('test') as f:
data = f.read()
<---
If I debug this code with
python -m pdb script.py
and I issue the comman
On 4/18/2012 6:47, Hans Mulder wrote:
On 18/04/12 03:08:08, Kiuhnm wrote:
print(1)
print(2)
print(3)
with open('test') as f:
data = f.read()
with open('test') as f:
data = f.read()
I get the same result with Pythin 3.3.0a0 on MacOS X 10.6:
93> ./python.ex
The bug was confirmed and a patch is now available:
http://bugs.python.org/issue14612
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
to defend your language against "infidels".
Python is a very good language, but so is Ruby, Scala and many other
languages. Denying that fact is deluding oneself.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/18/2012 3:08, Kiuhnm wrote:
I'm using Python 3.2.2, 64 bit on Windows 7.
Consider this code:
--->
print(1)
print(2)
print(3)
with open('test') as f:
data = f.read()
with open('test') as f:
data = f.read()
<---
If I debug this code with
python -m pdb script
On 4/19/2012 14:02, Roy Smith wrote:
In article<[email protected]>,
Kiuhnm wrote:
I don't like when a community imposes style on a programmer. For
instance, many told me that I shouldn't use camelCase and I should
adhere to PEP8.
Well, that'
On 4/19/2012 20:02, Jacob MacDonald wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 10:15:23 AM UTC-7, Kiuhnm wrote:
A with statement is not at the module level only if it appears inside a
function definition or a class definition.
Am I forgetting something?
Kiuhnm
That sounds about right to me. However
Read about it here:
http://mtomassoli.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/code-blocks-in-python/
or just download the module from here:
https://bitbucket.org/mtomassoli/codeblocks/
The module codeblocks (codeblocks.py) includes a detailed docstring.
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
