On Jul 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Robert Anton Patterson wrote:
> Hi I'm trying to install MySQLdb-1.2.1 on Mac OS X and would
> appreciate
> anyone's help on the matter.
Ben Gollmer just contributed a universal build of MySQLdb-1.2.1 for
Python 2.4, you can download it here:
http://pythonmac.org
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:06 PM, Robert Anton Patterson wrote:
> Dear Bob:
>
> Thanks for your help but still have problems.
>
> I've reinstalled SQL and actually downgraded it to
>
> Version 4 - sudo python setup.py install
>
> As this the same version on my server.
>
> Next I've re-installed the GC
On Jul 11, 2006, at 6:04 PM, Robert Anton Patterson wrote:
> Mac OS X - 10.4.6
>
> MYSQL version: 5.0.20a-standard + Apache 2 installed through
> WebServer X Kit
> ( www.rbsoftware.net/?page=wsxk)
>
> X-Code is upto date - I just re-installed the newest version off
> the Apple
> Developers sit
On Jul 11, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Robert Anton Patterson wrote:
> Hi I'm trying to install MySQLdb-1.2.1 on Mac OS X and would
> appreciate
> anyone's help on the matter.
What version of Mac OS X is this, and how did you install MySQL? Is
your Xcode installation up to date? I've never seen linker
Dear
Hi I'm trying to install MySQLdb-1.2.1 on Mac OS X and would appreciate
anyone's help on the matter.
I am able to access MySQL directly through the terminal, PHP, and PHPMyAdmin
But when I go to install MYSQL-python via
Python setup.py build:
I get the following error:
[Kolkata:~/deskto
[Trent]
> > ...the waste libs [are] obviously ancient, unmaintained
> > and [don't] provide near the functionality of other facilities
[Bob Ippolito wrote]
> Well, the WASTE license isn't all that friendly. I'd have thrown it
> out for that reason alone.
Happy coincidence! :)
Trent
--
Tren
On Apr 10, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Trent Mick wrote:
> [Bob Ippolito wrote]
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>
>>> On 10-apr-2006, at 23:14, Trent Mick wrote:
>>>
The old (now deprecated) Mac "Python IDE.app" was never included in
ActivePython.
>>>
>>> Good for you!
[Bob Ippolito wrote]
>
> On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> >On 10-apr-2006, at 23:14, Trent Mick wrote:
> >
> >>The old (now deprecated) Mac "Python IDE.app" was never included in
> >>ActivePython.
> >
> >Good for you! I hope we can completely remove it for Python 2.5 (and
On Apr 10, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> On 10-apr-2006, at 23:14, Trent Mick wrote:
>
>> The old (now deprecated) Mac "Python IDE.app" was never included in
>> ActivePython.
>
> Good for you! I hope we can completely remove it for Python 2.5
> (and my
> the universal build also do
On 10-apr-2006, at 23:14, Trent Mick wrote:
> [Timothy Reaves wrote]
>> Why is it the installer at http://www.python.org/download/releases/
>> 2.4.3/ install into /Applications ? Why does it not install as a
>> framework? ActiveState Python does, although they still user /usr/
>> local/bin
[Timothy Reaves wrote]
> Why is it the installer at http://www.python.org/download/releases/
> 2.4.3/ install into /Applications ? Why does it not install as a
> framework? ActiveState Python does, although they still user /usr/
> local/bin for the links.
As Bob and Ronald mentions the
On Monday, April 10, 2006, at 02:07AM, Timothy Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it the installer at http://www.python.org/download/releases/
>2.4.3/ install into /Applications ? Why does it not install as a
>framework? ActiveState Python does, although they still user /usr/
On Apr 9, 2006, at 8:32 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
>
>> Why is it the installer at http://www.python.org/download/releases/
>> 2.4.3/ install into /Applications ? Why does it not install as a
>> framework? ActiveState Python does, although
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> Why is it the installer at http://www.python.org/download/releases/
> 2.4.3/ install into /Applications ? Why does it not install as a
> framework? ActiveState Python does, although they still user /usr/
> local/bin for the links.
It pu
Why is it the installer at http://www.python.org/download/releases/
2.4.3/ install into /Applications ? Why does it not install as a
framework? ActiveState Python does, although they still user /usr/
local/bin for the links.
___
Pythonmac-
On 10-feb-2006, at 1:13, Christopher Barker wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
That's not really a problem, I need some kind of test to determine
if we
can get away with loading C++ code compiled with g++-3.3 into a
python
build with gcc 4. Boost might also be an option for testing.
matplotli
I know the reason that I got confused is I do not know Mac/UNIX well.
Is there any good tutorial to read (I understand there are many but
just no idea where to start)?
Thanks,
Linda.
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.pyth
Christopher Barker wrote:
> matplotlib has a lot of C++ in it.
and there are binaries built for 2.4 on 10.3 on pythonmac.org, if that
helps.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> That's not really a problem, I need some kind of test to determine if we
> can get away with loading C++ code compiled with g++-3.3 into a python
> build with gcc 4. Boost might also be an option for testing.
matplotlib has a lot of C++ in it.
-Chris
--
Christopher B
On 8-feb-2006, at 22:31, Bob Ippolito wrote:
BTW3. What is the plan w.r.t. merging our patches back into the
python repository? I'd like to get all of this into Python 2.5 at
the very least.
My plan is to make everything work first, and then worry about
upstream. I don't have time to go
On 8-feb-2006, at 22:45, Bill Noon wrote:
On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Is that this omniorb: http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/ ?
Yep.
Do you by any change have a binary of the python extension for
Panther lying about? (for python 2.4 of course). A script that woul
On 8-feb-2006, at 21:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 8-feb-2006, at 21:21, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 7-feb-2006, at 0:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Bob, what do you think the timescale is for a universal build?
If it's
soon, then we should wor
On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> Is that this omniorb: http://omniorb.sourceforge.net/ ?
Yep.
>
> Do you by any change have a binary of the python extension for
> Panther lying about? (for python 2.4 of course). A script that would
> tell if the c++ constructors would al
On Feb 8, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 8-feb-2006, at 21:42, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8-feb-2006, at 21:21, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>>
On 7-feb-2006, at 0:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>> Bob, w
On Feb 8, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Maybe it is necessary to ensure proper behaviour for C++ extensions
> with global
> variables that have constructors, in which case we'd probably be
> hosed. Does anyone
> has a Python extension that does this lying around (compiled using g
On 8-feb-2006, at 21:53, Bill Noon wrote:
On Feb 8, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Maybe it is necessary to ensure proper behaviour for C++
extensions with global
variables that have constructors, in which case we'd probably be
hosed. Does anyone
has a Python extension that does
On Feb 8, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 8-feb-2006, at 21:21, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 7-feb-2006, at 0:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> Bob, what do you think the timescale is for a universal build?
On 8-feb-2006, at 21:21, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 7-feb-2006, at 0:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Bob, what do you think the timescale is for a universal build?
If it's
soon, then we should work on re-0writing the web site as though
it's
rea
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 7-feb-2006, at 0:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>>
>>> Bob, what do you think the timescale is for a universal build? If
>>> it's
>>> soon, then we should work on re-0writing the web site as though it's
>>> ready to go.
>>
>> I'd say soon...
On 7-feb-2006, at 0:59, Bob Ippolito wrote:
Bob, what do you think the timescale is for a universal build? If
it's
soon, then we should work on re-0writing the web site as though it's
ready to go.
I'd say soon... The only issues left are to sort out the distribution
scripts and some more t
On 7-feb-2006, at 22:32, Christopher Barker wrote:
Bob Ippolito wrote:
I'll tell you what: I'll drop the ego and get a new pair of
glasses in
exchange for five or six million dollars..
I'll bet I could package up Python, PyObjC etc. with good
installers and
tutorials for only about a on
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> I'll tell you what: I'll drop the ego and get a new pair of glasses in
> exchange for five or six million dollars..
I'll bet I could package up Python, PyObjC etc. with good installers and
tutorials for only about a one million dollars. Then maybe another
million to start
On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I agree pretty much completely with Charles Harman, Bill Janssen, and
>> others.
>
> So do I, however
Who doesn't? I want world peace too ;)
> This is Open Source software! Which doesn't mean that it can't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree pretty much completely with Charles Harman, Bill Janssen, and
> others.
So do I, however
This is Open Source software! Which doesn't mean that it can't be great
in every way, but it does mean that it is developed for different
reasons than commercial sof
I agree pretty much completely with Charles Harman, Bill Janssen, and
others. I learned programming in 1974 and have programmed ever since
for my own engineering work. I use and have used many languages,
trying to pick the best one for the job. I have gripes with many of
the specialized lan
On Feb 6, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> Caveat emptor. You can not build extensions on 10.3.9 when using a
>> universal build.
>
> Fair enough. No is going to be running 10.3 on an Intel Mac. If you
> want
> to develop for Intel users, you need 10.4. Peri
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> Caveat emptor. You can not build extensions on 10.3.9 when using a
> universal build.
Fair enough. No is going to be running 10.3 on an Intel Mac. If you want
to develop for Intel users, you need 10.4. Period.
However, given that, I think we should perhaps just suggest th
Charles Hartman wrote:
> Me & my big mouth. OK, I will take a serious look at the page, and
> see whether I can construct something that at least gets to the point
> of having blanks that someone with knowledge can fill in.
>
> Charles
>
>
Charles,
It might not be a big job. If you get it
On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> NOTE: I think we can recommend the same thing at this point for all
> users of OS-X 10.3 and 10.4. It also looks like the new Universal
> build
> may become the news recommended Python for OS-X 10.3.9 and above, but
> it's not ready yet.
Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> I don't think there is blaming: more like expression of frustration and
> suggestions for improvement.
>
> Charles, if you want to help, here's my suggestion:
>
> Re-write the main pythonmac.org page, then post your version to this
> list for discussion. If it is well
Me & my big mouth. OK, I will take a serious look at the page, and
see whether I can construct something that at least gets to the point
of having blanks that someone with knowledge can fill in.
Charles
On Feb 6, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Charles, if you want to help, her
On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Kevin Walzer replies to Charles Hartman:
>> Charles Hartman wrote:
>>> Hence, yet again, a plea for newbies everywhere:
>>>
>>> I continue to believe that it really, really shouldn't be
>>> necessary for
>>> people who want to write programs in
Charles Hartman wrote:
> Maybe linda.s might have a more useful perspective
> at this point?
Charles, I totally agree with you about newbies and Python. However,
linda.s compiled python from source. Anyone who is compiling from source
should darn well be able to figure out how to add something to
Kevin Walzer replies to Charles Hartman:
> Charles Hartman wrote:
> > Hence, yet again, a plea for newbies everywhere:
> >
> > I continue to believe that it really, really shouldn't be necessary for
> > people who want to write programs in Python for the Mac to do all this.
> > Great to learn as m
Of course I don't disagree with any of this (except that a version of
Revolution is available under academic license for about $60 as I
recall). *Certainly* I'm grateful for the work Bob, Ronald, and
others are doing to make the whole edifice stand up. I'm not
complaining. I'm speculating t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Hartman wrote:
>
> There are a lot of programming environments on the Mac besides
> Applescript that work from the GUI without any need to delve. Runtime
> Revolution and Breve are two examples that come to mind immediately. I'm
> thinking, fo
Oh well, "other platforms" -- if that means Linux of course you have to learn those same things, but you undoubtedly already know them. If it means Windows, I'd rather drive a truck, and I'm thinking particularly of potential users who feel the same way.There are a lot of programming environments o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Hartman wrote:
> Hence, yet again, a plea for newbies everywhere:
>
> I continue to believe that it really, really shouldn't be necessary for
> people who want to write programs in Python for the Mac to do all this.
> Great to learn as much as
On 2/6/06, Louis Pecora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> linda.s wrote:
> > On 2/6/06, Larry Meyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Create the following text file and save it as ".bash_profile" in your home
> >> directory.
> >> --Larry
> >>
> >> # .bash_profile
> >>
> >> # Get the aliases and functio
Hence, yet again, a plea for newbies everywhere:I continue to believe that it really, really shouldn't be necessary for people who want to write programs in Python for the Mac to do all this. Great to learn as much as possible, yes, always -- but to require people, just to get started, to learn abo
linda.s wrote:
> On 2/6/06, Larry Meyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Create the following text file and save it as ".bash_profile" in your home
>> directory.
>> --Larry
>>
>> # .bash_profile
>>
>> # Get the aliases and functions
>> if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
>> . ~/.bashrc
>> fi
>>
>> #
On 2/6/06, Larry Meyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Create the following text file and save it as ".bash_profile" in your home
> directory.
> --Larry
>
> # .bash_profile
>
> # Get the aliases and functions
> if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then
> . ~/.bashrc
> fi
>
> # User specific environment and sta
Create the following text file and save it as ".bash_profile" in your home directory.--Larry# .bash_profile# Get the aliases and functionsif [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then . ~/.bashrcfi# User specific environment and startup programsPATH=/usr/local/bin:/$PATH;export PATH# End of FileOn Feb 6, 2006,
On 2/6/06, Charles Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:00 AM, linda.s wrote:
>
> Python 2.3.5 instead of Python 2.4.2, very confused... Some one
> suggested me to download MacPython. So I am thinking about removing
> the Python 2.4.2 from my machine (still curious why it d
On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:00 AM, linda.s wrote:Python 2.3.5 instead of Python 2.4.2, very confused... Some onesuggested me to download MacPython. So I am thinking about removingthe Python 2.4.2 from my machine (still curious why it did notappear).You just want to change your PATH. If your built-from-scr
On 6-Feb-06, at 5:00 AM, linda.s wrote:
> Actually I downloaded python 2.4.2 and install it from source. The
> installation appeared to be fine until "make install" was complete.
> However, after I reenter the terminal and call Python, it still showed
> Python 2.3.5 instead of Python 2.4.2, very
On 2/6/06, David Warde-Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6-Feb-06, at 4:46 AM, linda.s wrote:
>
> > How to smoothly remove two former pythons from my Mac?
> > I have Python 2.3.5 installed in the machine. I tried to install
> > Python 2.4.2 from source but it did not appear.
> > How can I sm
On 6-Feb-06, at 4:46 AM, linda.s wrote:
> How to smoothly remove two former pythons from my Mac?
> I have Python 2.3.5 installed in the machine. I tried to install
> Python 2.4.2 from source but it did not appear.
> How can I smoothly remove both of them and install a another python
> version?
How to smoothly remove two former pythons from my Mac?
I have Python 2.3.5 installed in the machine. I tried to install
Python 2.4.2 from source but it did not appear.
How can I smoothly remove both of them and install a another python version?
Thanks!
Linda
59 matches
Mail list logo
