On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:49:31PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> this adds the proposed solution to add a generic mechanism to zeroize
> a target in qemu-img if it has discard_zeroes but has_zero_init is 0.
>
> Peter Lieven (4):
> block: add discard_zeroes and max_unmap to BlockDriverInfo
> isc
Am 17.07.2013 um 17:12 schrieb Kevin Wolf :
> Am 17.07.2013 um 16:53 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> Il 17/07/2013 16:46, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>>>
Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> That would be ok if the p
Am 17.07.2013 um 16:53 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 17/07/2013 16:46, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>
>> Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>>
>>> Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could
ask Ke
Am 17.07.2013 um 16:53 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 17/07/2013 16:46, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> >
> > Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> >
> >> Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> >>> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could
>
Il 17/07/2013 16:46, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>
> Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>
>> Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could ask
>>> Kevin
>>> to merge my old series (except the iscsi_co_wr
Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could ask
>> Kevin
>> to merge my old series (except the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch as there
>> obviously is still room
Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> >> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could ask
>>> >> Kevin
>>> >> to merge my old series (except the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch as there
>>> >> obviously is still room for discussion and improvement) and you could
>>>
Am 17.07.2013 um 12:50 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 17/07/2013 12:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>
>> Am 17.07.2013 um 12:28 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>>
>>> Il 17/07/2013 12:23, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
Am 16.07.2013 um 13:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Pe
Il 17/07/2013 12:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>
> Am 17.07.2013 um 12:28 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>
>> Il 17/07/2013 12:23, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Am 16.07.2013 um 13:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>>>
Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>
> The conflict with your bloc
Am 17.07.2013 um 12:28 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 17/07/2013 12:23, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>
>> Am 16.07.2013 um 13:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>>
>>> Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
The conflict with your block status patches can't be large.
upstream/master ha
Il 17/07/2013 12:23, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>
> Am 16.07.2013 um 13:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
>
>> Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>
>>> The conflict with your block status patches can't be large.
>>> upstream/master has no
>>> iscsi_co_is_allocated yet, so there should be no t
Am 16.07.2013 um 13:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>
>> The conflict with your block status patches can't be large.
>> upstream/master has no
>> iscsi_co_is_allocated yet, so there should be no trouble.
>
> Yes, whoever goes second has to change it t
Il 16/07/2013 13:40, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>
> The conflict with your block status patches can't be large.
> upstream/master has no
> iscsi_co_is_allocated yet, so there should be no trouble.
Yes, whoever goes second has to change it to the new get_block_status
API. Kevin and Stefan can decid
On 16.07.2013 13:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 16/07/2013 13:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
Looks good. Perhaps, as a followup, you can use max_unmap (which I'd
rename to max_discard) in bdrv_co_discard to support splitting the
request. You could also export the discard alignment in BlockDriverInf
Il 16/07/2013 13:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>> Looks good. Perhaps, as a followup, you can use max_unmap (which I'd
>> rename to max_discard) in bdrv_co_discard to support splitting the
>> request. You could also export the discard alignment in BlockDriverInfo.
> I already did this in my previo
On 16.07.2013 12:55, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 15/07/2013 12:49, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
this adds the proposed solution to add a generic mechanism to zeroize
a target in qemu-img if it has discard_zeroes but has_zero_init is 0.
Peter Lieven (4):
block: add discard_zeroes and max_unmap to Blo
Il 15/07/2013 12:49, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
> this adds the proposed solution to add a generic mechanism to zeroize
> a target in qemu-img if it has discard_zeroes but has_zero_init is 0.
>
> Peter Lieven (4):
> block: add discard_zeroes and max_unmap to BlockDriverInfo
> iscsi: add .bdrv_ge
this adds the proposed solution to add a generic mechanism to zeroize
a target in qemu-img if it has discard_zeroes but has_zero_init is 0.
Peter Lieven (4):
block: add discard_zeroes and max_unmap to BlockDriverInfo
iscsi: add .bdrv_get_info
block/raw: add .bdrv_get_info
qemu-img: conditi
18 matches
Mail list logo