There is also a version of uQLx for Mac, by James Weatherley, which
used to be on Phoebus's website. Not being a Mac user, I have no idea
if this works on current Macs (like the OSX systems). Anyone know? I
could then post the info on my website.
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
Just to close off my original request, I have now
successfully recompiled C68 (as XTC68) under Open Watcom C
Version 1.8 and MinGW (Minimalist GNU for Windows) GCC 3.4.5.
The latter version is useful because it integrates very well
with the MinGW environment and allows MinGW Make to be
Urs,
As you said, to the QL community it means Just that one can compile
QDOS-programs under Windows. This is useful, however, for those only
running emulators, because it means compilation can happen at the full
speed of the native OS' CPU, rather than the (admittedly very
efficient) emulated
Good point Dil, never used this one myself.
Plus, for Mac users with a bang up to date Mac (ie. not me!) if you
have a Intel chip Mac, as opposed to a power PC based system, you can
just use Bootcamp or Parallels, Vrtual PC or similar, and run Windows
XP/Vista/7 on the Mac - and I would think QPC
On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:43, Darren Branagh wrote:
Good point Dil, never used this one myself.
Plus, for Mac users with a bang up to date Mac (ie. not me!) if you
have a Intel chip Mac, as opposed to a power PC based system, you can
just use Bootcamp or Parallels, Vrtual PC or similar, and run
I now have access to a larger screen size of Windows XP than before.
The first thing I noticed was that QPC2 had a limit on size. The
second thing I noticed was that although a fairly large size was
accepted by QPC2 the keys SHIFT/CTRL/F12 failed to work correctly.
Instead of the whole
George
I have an Intel iMac using Snow Leopard networked with a Laptop G4 and
an Epson printer, all networked wirelessly to a BT Modem.
No problems with Airport either.
I cannot speak about Microsoft emulation because I have no use for it.
Most of the problems were with printer drivers.
Apple
gdgqler wrote:
I now have access to a larger screen size of Windows XP than before.
The first thing I noticed was that QPC2 had a limit on size.
It has? I'm currently not aware of any practical limits, except memory
of course. What resolution did you try?
The second thing I noticed was that
gdgqler schreef:
I now have access to a larger screen size of Windows XP than before. The
first thing I noticed was that QPC2 had a limit on size. The second
thing I noticed was that although a fairly large size was accepted by
QPC2 the keys SHIFT/CTRL/F12 failed to work correctly. Instead of
John Taylor wrote, On 26/10/09 17:26:
George
I have an Intel iMac using Snow Leopard networked with a Laptop G4 and
an Epson printer, all networked wirelessly to a BT Modem.
No problems with Airport either.
I cannot speak about Microsoft emulation because I have no use for it.
Most of the
Hi George
I have windows XP on a 1680x1050 resolution and QPC2 - 3.13 on an 800x600
resolution. CTRL/Shift/F12 pops the QPC2 window to cover the complete XP
display
Duncan
-Original Message-
From: gdgqler gdgq...@gmail.com
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:11
If I remember right, there can be a 30% increase in speed.
I am not sure if this is correct, but I am sure that Prowess running
faster when compiled with XTC68.
Derek
Adrian D. Ives wrote:
Urs,
As you said, to the QL community it means Just that one can compile
QDOS-programs under Windows.
12 matches
Mail list logo
