Newson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
> > Right now am having enough trouble just getting windows to
work
> > reliably.
>
>
> Isn't th
Robert Newson wrote:
>
> > Right now am having enough trouble just getting windows to work
> > reliably.
>
> Isn't that a contradiciton in terms? The words 'windows' and "work
> reliably" can't exist together in one sentence, can they?
Of course they can, as in " you can't get Windows to work
At 09:46 ìì 9/1/2002 +, you wrote:
>>Right now am having enough trouble just getting windows to work
>>reliably.
>
>
>Isn't that a contradiciton in terms? The words 'windows' and "work
>reliably" can't exist together in one sentence, can they?
>
Of course in three cases
Case 1.
Prefix
> Right now am having enough trouble just getting windows to work
> reliably.
Isn't that a contradiciton in terms? The words 'windows' and "work
reliably" can't exist together in one sentence, can they?
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>> > Morning Dennis,
>> > I have the system installed on a 100Mb Zip disc which I take
>> > back and forth with me so I have the same setup at home and
>> > at work.
>I use a CD-RW for the same purpose...
My system used to be a CD-R with QPC on it which stayed at work (lik
Neater still. =8-)
>
> > > Morning Dennis,
> > > I have the system installed on a 100Mb Zip disc which I
take
> > > back and forth with me so I have the same setup at home
and
> > > at work.
> I use a CD-RW for the same purpose...
>
> Wolfgang
> -
> www.wlenerz.com
>
z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
> On 5 Jan 2002, at 2:29, Dennis Sutherland wrote:
>
>
> > I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal
pl
On 7 Jan 2002, at 21:59, Dennis Sutherland wrote:
> > Morning Dennis,
> > I have the system installed on a 100Mb Zip disc which I take
> > back and forth with me so I have the same setup at home and
> > at work.
I use a CD-RW for the same purpose...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 5 Jan 2002, at 2:29, Dennis Sutherland wrote:
> I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
> for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
> experience lately.
>
Hmm, I run QPC EVERY day on W98SE - no problem!
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Dunbar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
> Morning Dennis,
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Dunbar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
> Morning Dennis,
> I have the system installed on a 100Mb Zip di
In article <00ab01c196fc$3e5ea6c0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis
Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Imagine if Sinclair had been successful since the late 1980's,
>and QDOS
>> was the dominant OS ... then people may h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uk>, Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Morning Dennis,
>
>I use QPC2v2 on Win2K at work and on Win98 at home. I have the system
>installed on a 100Mb Zip disc which I take back and forth with me so I have
>the same setup at home and at work. Well, that's the t
In article <00ac01c19779$c818f3c0$ac065cc3@default>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>>Imagine if Sinclair had been successful since the late 1980's, and
>QDOS
>>was the dominant OS ... then people may have written Windows
>emulators
>>to run on 'QDOS2000' :-)
>
>Clive Sinclair=Bill Gate
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 at 10:19:17, Norman Dunbar wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>From: Thierry Godefroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:44 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
>
>
>
s Ltd.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Phoebus R. Dokos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] &q
At 11:51 ðì 7/1/2002 +, you wrote:
> >Imagine if Sinclair had been successful since the late 1980's, and
>QDOS
> >was the dominant OS ... then people may have written Windows
>emulators
> >to run on 'QDOS2000' :-)
Hehe but that has a dose of truth, if you consider WINE :-)
Perhaps file version would be of some interest too (to synchronise)
-Message d'origine-
De : Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : lundi 7 janvier 2002 09:51
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 at 08
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
A sort of Winback of the zip disk each time it's put in a machine I
suppose?
This email is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and
may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not an ad
January 2002 09:55
Subject: RE: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
>I Wonder why I never thought of doing that
>Like I said, brain problems.
>Thanks for the reminder Tony.
>
>Norman.
>
>-
>Norman Dunbar
>Databas
>Imagine if Sinclair had been successful since the late 1980's, and
QDOS
>was the dominant OS ... then people may have written Windows
emulators
>to run on 'QDOS2000' :-)
Clive Sinclair=Bill Gates? Windows emulator running on Q60? Yuk, no
thanks.
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sof
-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Godefroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
This programs already exists ! It's calle
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:51:16 +, Tony Firshman wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 at 08:23:12, Norman Dunbar wrote:
>
> >I use QPC2v2 on Win2K at work and on Win98 at home. I have the system
> >installed on a 100Mb Zip disc which I take back and forth with me so I have
> >the same setup at home and
://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 at 08:23:12, Nor
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 at 08:23:12, Norman Dunbar wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>I use QPC2v2 on Win2K at work and on Win98 at home. I have the system
>installed on a 100Mb Zip disc which I take back and forth with me so I have
>the same setup at home and at work. Well, that's the theory, at
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 8:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] "seasonal cheer, Silly Season"
I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
experience lately.
This email
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Imagine if Sinclair had been successful since the late 1980's,
and QDOS
> was the dominant OS ... then people may have written Windows
emulators
> to run on 'QDOS2000' :-)
I suspect that if Sir Clive was was driven by wh
In article <003c01c195d2$a700c1c0$86065cc3@default>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>>I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
>>for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
>>experience lately.
< clip >
>Basically, if a version of Windows works well and
>
> >I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
> >for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
> >experience lately.
> >
> >Dennis
> >N9VRB
> >ICQ# 801900
>
> Not necessarily. I still use WIndows 95 because my PC is quite
old and
> I suspect anything more recent wou
Dennis Sutherland wrote:
snip
> I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
> for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
> experience lately.
>
> Dennis
> N9VRB
> ICQ# 801900
Any Windows version is in IMHO only an ideal platform for the next
version of Windows, howe
>I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
>for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
>experience lately.
>
>Dennis
>N9VRB
>ICQ# 801900
Not necessarily. I still use WIndows 95 because my PC is quite old and
I suspect anything more recent would cripple it.
Some v
> John In Wales (wrote)
> I was amused to hear someone say recently
> "If it wasn't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all!"
> and Robert's
sure made me smile!
As it did I. =8-)
I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems,
32 matches
Mail list logo
