Re: [ql-users] How many items can print handle in one line ?

2003-02-06 Thread Lau
Norman Dunbar wrote: Ok, it's silly season ! I've written a small test program to generate another single line PRINT statement and found that the limit is 2,746 items in a print statement will be printed BUT any more than this will simply refuse to print or list. All you get is a blank screen.

Re: [ql-users] QL Pawn by Magnetic Scrolls

2003-02-06 Thread Roy Wood
Yes , it belonged to Ian Bruntlett so there is lots of programming stuff in it, Ian left it with me as he was going to dump it. It is taking up a lot of space in my garage so I would like to get rid of it, there's a working Cub monitor as well. Bill Richardson may buy the monitor. Ian wrote som

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Roy Wood
Thanks for the offer Roy - I have some myself, but customer has a Mac...!! Well it will keep him dry if nothing else ! -- Roy Wood Q Branch, 20 Locks Hill Portslade. Sussex. BN41 2LB. UK Tel : +44 (0)1273 386030 Fax : +44 (0)1273 430501 (New number!) Mobile +44(0)7836 745501 Web : www.qbranch.de

Re: [ql-users] QL Pawn by Magnetic Scrolls

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Waugh
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:22 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL Pawn by Magnetic Scrolls > In a message dated 06/02/03 22:04:42 GMT Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Did you get any replies for

Re: [ql-users] Display_cde GD2 update

2003-02-06 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 at 17:38:55, P Witte wrote: (ref: <009f01c2ce0a$84e218c0$0200a8c0@epsilon>) > >youd expect to be allowed up to 16380 parameters. Actually, for Smsq/e 2.99 >the answer appears to be that 'only' up to 5459 parameters are allowed >(provided the line length is not exceded). But t

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Waugh
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted > In a message dated 06/02/03 22:07:37 GMT Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Epson 800 has parallel, serial and mac

Re: [ql-users] QL Pawn by Magnetic Scrolls

2003-02-06 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 06/02/03 22:04:42 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you get any replies for this Rick. I have a load of stuff that an X Qlr "gave me" I think QLPawn is in there but have not had time to go through it and list it all to paper as yet. Two Miracle hard discs as I re

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 06/02/03 22:34:14 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a lot of these if you want one Thanks for the offer Roy - I have some myself, but customer has a Mac...!! -- Rich Mellor RWAP Software 35 Chantry Croft, Kinsley, Pontefract, West Yorkshire, WF9 5JH TEL: 019

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 06/02/03 22:07:37 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Epson 800 has parallel, serial and mac port, works just fine with Miracles ser/par converter for Ql Hmm customer has a mac and a broken Epson 800 - is looking to replace the printer, but Mac only has a serial port

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Waugh
- Original Message - From: "Jerome Grimbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:40 AM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] makes some magical things to make me read > > } Anyone got an Epson stylus 800 colour printer

Re: [ql-users] QL Pawn by Magnetic Scrolls

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Waugh
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:14 AM Subject: [ql-users] QL Pawn by Magnetic Scrolls > Does anyone have a copy of the Key cartridge which they can email me please - > one of the files is corrupt on my copy and I

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Roy Wood
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jerome Grimbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Jumping the technology back to the early age of QL, we had a serial to parallel converter then for your black hero! I have a lot of these if you want one. -- Roy Wood Q Branch, 20 Locks Hill Portslade. Sussex. BN41 2LB. U

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Roy Wood
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes The Epson Stylus 800 was indeed a Parallel printer - I had one. I think, but I'm not sure, that there was a serial interface available for it. Yes the Stylus 800 was a parallel printer and mono too. -- Roy Wood Q Branch,

Re: [ql-users] Display_cde GD2 update

2003-02-06 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED] uk>, Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >There's always one isn't there ! > >when the line gets too long - and I'm not quite there yet - you simply get a >'buffer full' error when loading a really really long line into S*Basic. So, >I suspect the limit on the

Re: [ql-users] Display_cde GD2 update

2003-02-06 Thread P Witte
Norman Dunbar writes: > There's always one isn't there ! > > when the line gets too long - and I'm not quite there yet - you simply get a > 'buffer full' error when loading a really really long line into S*Basic. So, > I suspect the limit on the number of parameters in a PRINT is defined by the >

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread P Witte
Jerome Grimbert writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] makes some magical things to make me read > > } Anyone got an Epson stylus 800 colour printer (or similar) for sale?? Needs > } to be a serial printer - I only have dot matrix ones here > > Are you sure the Epson is not a parallel printer ? > I have

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 at 05:42:03, wrote: (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) >In a message dated 06/02/03 10:19:45 GMT Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Jumping the technology back to the early age of QL, we had a serial > to parallel > converter then for your black hero! > But classical

[ql-users] How many items can print handle in one line ?

2003-02-06 Thread Norman Dunbar
Ok, it's silly season ! I've written a small test program to generate another single line PRINT statement and found that the limit is 2,746 items in a print statement will be printed BUT any more than this will simply refuse to print or list. All you get is a blank screen. The one line was simpl

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 at 11:05:50, Jerome Grimbert wrote: (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > >Norman Dunbar makes some magical things to make me read >} >} The Epson Stylus 800 was indeed a Parallel printer - I had one. I think, but >} I'm not sure, that there was a serial interface available for it. > >

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread RWAPSoftware
In a message dated 06/02/03 10:19:45 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jumping the technology back to the early age of QL, we had a serial to parallel converter then for your black hero! But classical serial speed is really slow for the amount of colour printing data of today (especial

Re: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Jerome Grimbert
Norman Dunbar makes some magical things to make me read } } The Epson Stylus 800 was indeed a Parallel printer - I had one. I think, but } I'm not sure, that there was a serial interface available for it. Jumping the technology back to the early age of QL, we had a serial to parallel converter t

RE: [ql-users] Epson 800 wanted

2003-02-06 Thread Norman Dunbar
The Epson Stylus 800 was indeed a Parallel printer - I had one. I think, but I'm not sure, that there was a serial interface available for it. Cheers, Norman. - Norman Dunbar Database/Unix administrator Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:

RE: [ql-users] Display_cde GD2 update

2003-02-06 Thread Norman Dunbar
There's always one isn't there ! when the line gets too long - and I'm not quite there yet - you simply get a 'buffer full' error when loading a really really long line into S*Basic. So, I suspect the limit on the number of parameters in a PRINT is defined by the length of the actual line of pre-