Has anyone been able to reach Mate's site of RPMs recently? FTP connects
but times out.
Alternatively, does anyone have a copy of his installation instructions?
Thanks,
Vince.
Hi,
I am using qmail 1.03 and sendmail 8.9.1 at the same server. Qmail used for receive
inbound letters and using sendmail -bs send our mailing list.
I had to say sometime sendmail is better than qmail,for example,
while talk to qmail,
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail Digest 3 Jun 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 660
Topics (messages 26193 through 26235):
qmail configuration as relay-only
26193 by: "Lanik, Laurenz (21)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26195 by: Peter Gradwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26197 by: Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26201 by:
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Hotdog wrote:
Hi,
I am using qmail 1.03 and sendmail 8.9.1 at the same server. Qmail used for receive
inbound letters and using sendmail -bs send our mailing list.
I had to say sometime sendmail is better than qmail,for example,
while talk to qmail,
rcpt to: [EMAIL
Could it be the IMAP server? I have several people (including myself)
running Outlook Express 4.72 which also wants an "Inbox" and I'm not getting
any errors. Our setup is qmail 1.03 with the patched for maildir UW Imap
server running both Maildirs and Mailboxs.
As for the suggestion of a non MS
I'm getting just a teensy bit fed up with Microsoft and their approach to
Internet Standards...
Outlook Express version 5 has fixed most of my issues with IMAP bar this
one: Outlook creates a 'special' folder called Inbox.
From "INTERNET-DRAFT: IMAP4rev1", the proposed revision of RFC2060
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:03:08AM -0400, Dave Teske wrote:
As for the suggestion of a non MS client, I've looked at eudora and a few
others and they are actually worse. Eudora blows for Imap. It always wants
to show every file in the users dir even the . files. I was able to work
around it
At 12:52 PM 6/3/99 +1200, you wrote:
Check the qmail FAQ under the allow selective relaying bit... chances are
this machine is no longer within the range you specified.
I assume you're using tcpserver, specifying an IP range here... if not,
specifically allow this machine to relay as well.
I
Thanks to all of you who cleared this up.
My goof and sorry for the confusion!
I caused part of the confusion because when I first asked Dave about it, I hadn't know
yet that the additional tcpserver/smtpd procs I saw came and went with the number of
active connections. Sorry...
Regards
Good morning,
I am looking for a patch to make tcpserver work with both the MAPS RBL and
ORBS. Has anyone implemented that yet, or am I just too stupid to figure it
out? ;-)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
Lars Marowsky-Brée
Network Management
teuto.net Netzdienste GmbH - DPN
Greetings,
I am trying to compile Qmail using gcc on an upgraded Solaris 2.6 (was
Solaris 2.5.1) box and keep getting the following error message:
#include ... search starts here:
/usr/local/include
/opt/FSFgcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.5/include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am looking for a patch to make tcpserver work with both the MAPS RBL and
ORBS. Has anyone implemented that yet, or am I just too stupid to figure
it out? ;-)
You don't patch - you simply run two rblsmtpds one after another:
tcpserver ...
Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a patch to make tcpserver work with both the MAPS RBL and
ORBS. Has anyone implemented that yet, or am I just too stupid to figure it
out? ;-)
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#rblsmtpd
(I don't have a sample
Patrick Durusau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to compile Qmail using gcc on an upgraded Solaris 2.6 (was
Solaris 2.5.1) box and keep getting the following error message:
GCC needs to be compiled for the version of the OS it's running on.
You need to install a 2.6 GCC.
-Dave
It's close. The basic IMAP stuff is there, but their seems to be a problem
with extra folder support. Of course this could be the IMAP server fault
too. Also I'm not crazy about the UI but I'll have to play with it for
awhile.
Thanks for the tip
--Dave
I haven't tried it yet, but the latest
Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
I am looking for a patch to make tcpserver work with both the MAPS RBL and
ORBS. Has anyone implemented that yet, or am I just too stupid to figure it
out? ;-)
I haven't implemented it in my patch, and mine is the only one.
However, you can run Dan's rblsmtpd
On 1999-06-03T16:51:51,
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I haven't implemented it in my patch, and mine is the only one.
However, you can run Dan's rblsmtpd twice, once with MAPS RBL (the
default) and once with ORBS.
Yeah, I figured this in between. Looks ugly, works. ;-)
Maybe we
Hi,
I started playing with qmail about 3 days ago, and I'vegot it up
and running on my internet gateway (a Linux box running kernel 2.2.9).
Everything is OK except for a minor detail: delivery latency.
When a message is being queued, I'd like it to be delivered immediately.
It isn't.I have to
That is definetly not the default behaviour of qmail. When i send a
message (in pine for example) to another host, it gets delivered
immediately. Usually before i can even exit the program and do a netstat
it's already been delievered.
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Emmanuel Mogenet wrote:
Everything is
Emmanuel Mogenet writes:
When a message is being queued, I'd like it to be delivered immediately.
It isn't.I have to wait from 5 to 25 minutes to finally see it go.
Your /var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger either isn't a pipe, or it's
permissions are hosed. cd /usr/local/src/qmail-1.03; make
Emmanuel Mogenet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started playing with qmail about 3 days ago, and I'vegot it up
and running on my internet gateway (a Linux box running kernel 2.2.9).
Everything is OK except for a minor detail: delivery latency.
When a message is being queued, I'd like it to be
Sounds like maybe your "trigger" is messed up. If you can, do a "make
check" from the source tree. Else, do:
ls -l /var/local/qmail/queue/lock/trigger
And make it look like:
prw--w--w-1 qmails qmail 0 Jun 3 13:25
/var/local/qmail/queue/lock/trigger
That did it.
I had it
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 10:39:34AM -0700, Emmanuel Mogenet wrote:
So I have to make it on a machine, make a tarball, and install it on the
other.
Somehow, the w bits got lost in the transfer. Maybe a tar bug on named pipes
??
You should always set umask to 0 before unpacking tar-balls.
--
Lars Balker Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| You should always set umask to 0 before unpacking tar-balls.
Better to use the "p" flag to tar.
A while ago, I posted a question about running the
tests from the TEST.receive. I wasn't able to perform the first
test.
Here's a printout of the
/var/log/maillog:
May 31 19:43:15 ns qmail: 928197795.355051 new msg
206346May 31 19:43:15 ns qmail: 928197795.356956 info msg 206346: bytes 201
Hi!
I'm trying to setup a virtal domain called "cryos.wiktor.dk", with
some emails. The domain is in control/rcpthosts and control/virtualdomains
I the dns-zone:
cryos A 212.97.129.68
MX 10 wiktor.dk.
When i try to send a email to ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED] the
I was trying out what would happen if some site incorrectly replied to
the empty recipient address in error. I expected the message to end up
going to postmaster.
When I tried this out I found that the message just gets dropped without
even a bounce. Setting up a catch all alias with a
Michael,
Michael Legart wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
Even though the header says:
From: Michael Legart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it seems you have user called henrik, but no mailbox as error message said.
Do you really have
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 06:47:07AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems you have user called henrik, but no mailbox as error message said.
Do you really have mailbox(or dir etc) to ~henrik/?
if you are using maildir format, did you do maildirmake ~henrik/Maildir ???
As I see it, it tries
oops..sorry
on your previous mail, it had mx record like
cryos IPaddress
wiktor.dk.
and not cryos.wiktor.dk
does it help bit?
Michael Legart wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 06:47:07AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems you have user called henrik, but no mailbox as
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 07:03:17AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on your previous mail, it had mx record like
cryos IPaddress
wiktor.dk.
and not cryos.wiktor.dk
Ok, thanks! That works. But why doesn't the other thing work?
Like - the MX for "nerd.dk" is "www100.image.dk"
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Michael Legart wrote:
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
Even though the header says:
From: Michael Legart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any ideas why this
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 11:37:03PM +0200, Michael Legart wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to setup a virtal domain called "cryos.wiktor.dk", with
some emails. The domain is in control/rcpthosts and control/virtualdomains
I the dns-zone:
cryos A 212.97.129.68
MX
Hi all.
Consider the following setup:
Each user of an ISP has a full "virtualhost" username.
Qmail is configured so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is delivered
into their individual Maildir/Pop3 box. Each user logs in with their
username 'theirname.domain.com'.
Assume this setup is running perfectly
Paul Gregg writes:
Assume this setup is running perfectly (ok, I have 4,000 users using it).
Essentially I'm thinking of enabling the user to login via POP3 as
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with their normal password. (I've written the
checkpasswd so it's easy to authenticate ok).
What
Yep I had this problem too when putting qmail on a machine in a DMZ.
Naturally I didn't want ny build tools on the machine.
It was a major pain to fix all the permissions and get qmail running. In
fact it took me about 4 - 6 hours to get it all bedded down (Luckily I had
another qmail
Hi,
I have some trouble with the Jedi's checklocalpwd.c programm. (see
ftp://ftp.ldh.org/pub/j/qmail/checklocalpwd.c )
I can compile it on a unix platform, but that's not possible on a linux
platform. (I tried a redhat 4.2 and a red hat 6.0 ..)
Here is the message that I got :
With gcc
%
try adding -lcrypt to the Makefile's CFLAGS or something
regards,
ratao
On 04-Jun-99 Stephane Morand wrote:
Hi,
I have some trouble with the Jedi's checklocalpwd.c programm. (see
ftp://ftp.ldh.org/pub/j/qmail/checklocalpwd.c )
I can compile it on a unix platform, but that's not
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 12:39:45PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#rblsmtpd
As usual, Dave, thanks for your useful resource. I highly
recommend it, whatever your level of Qmail expertise.
(I don't have a sample invocation, if someone would like to
Jay D Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Patrick Durusau wrote:
Comments, suggestions? (I have previously compiled qmail successfully
for Solaris 2.5.1 with the same version of gcc.)
That's the thing. You were running Solaris 2.5.1 and your GCC was built
for 2.5. Now
Dear all,
I've installed qmail on OSF1 and successfully,
the question is : How to make qmail daemon on OSF1, ? Why my daemon can't
execute at startup ? Can everybody give me a sample qmail daemon on OSF1?
Thank's
Could anyone help me?
I'm using the checkpoppasswd supplied on Qmail.org:
/* Alternative checkpassword for QPopup by Jedi/Sector One [EMAIL PROTECTED] */
/* Format of the configuration file is :
* pop_login:crypted_password:real_login:path */
In the file
/var/qmail/users/poppasswd there is a
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
...
Note that your uid and groupid will differ, as will the executable
paths. If you have perl a more portable construct is:
/opt/local/etc/tcpserver \
-u ` perl -e 'print scalar getpwnam qmaild' ` \
-g ` perl -e 'print
On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Peter Samuel wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
...
Note that your uid and groupid will differ, as will the executable
paths. If you have perl a more portable construct is:
/opt/local/etc/tcpserver \
-u ` perl -e 'print scalar getpwnam
This question has come up before on this list but I have not been able
to find a clear answer in the archives.
I tried to mail a friend at domain that only had an MX record.
i.e.
#nslookup -query=A site1.com
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
*** localhost can't find
45 matches
Mail list logo
