Check out:
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van:Md. Sifat Ullah Patwary [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 7:21 AM
Aan:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Problem with rcpthosts
Hi all,
I got a problem with
Hello!
I have downloaded qtools package. How can I use this with qmail. Can anyone
tell me in comprehensive way or documetation site?
TIA
manoj
well thanks a lot, it works. But every pop3 transaction will be echod to the
bash. Can I disable this?
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Tim Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2000 02:27
> An: Andreas Altenburg
> Betreff: Re: pop3 start
>
>
> At 01:00
At 11:19 AM 1/2/2000 -0800, you wrote:
> At LWQ 2.8.5, I ran into a problem where I couldn't get sv to do anythign
>useful with QMail. I'm certain this is a pretty boneheaded mistake,
>but for some reason, svc won't recognize the run scripts. For example,
>this is what I get. I include the first
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 04:46:32PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> Is there any kernel sysctl or otherwise parameters suggested for
> performance using qmail on Linux? Open file handle limits, share memory,
> whatever? I have a goal to send at least 1 million emails in a
> 24 hour period from
HI
I´ve got mny qmail to work but then I stopped it and started it with
tcpserver again and it won´t work. When i read the FAQ and doc they only
give examples how to start qmail-smptd directly via tcpserver, but I need to
start it via the /var/qmail/rc which starts qmail with procmail as local
d
qmail Digest 2 Feb 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 899
Topics (messages 36434 through 36557):
Is there anyt imap server work with (qmail + mySQL)?
36434 by: BAE SUNG SIK
36438 by: David Harris
Re: qmail + UUCP address
36435 by: Anand Buddhdev
Re: Filtering out email addresse
Hi everybody,
Does anyone know of a program that can analyze the qmail
logfiles
and supply the following stats:
1) output per domain?
2) domain that received/sent the most mail?
3) user that received/sent the most mail?
I have been using qmail-analog, but it is not sufficient for
what I need.
r
A customer at sbi.dk has no luck delivering mail to
mail.k.tera-house.ac.jp through our mail relay, mail.net.uni-c.dk.
Currently there are 875 letters queued for a user @mail.k.tera-house.ac.jp.
It has no MX, but an A record. mail.net.uni-c.dk has no trouble resolving
it. I just tried to generate
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 01:40:36PM +0100, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> A customer at sbi.dk has no luck delivering mail to
> mail.k.tera-house.ac.jp through our mail relay, mail.net.uni-c.dk.
>
> Currently there are 875 letters queued for a user @mail.k.tera-house.ac.jp.
> It has no MX, but an A
Andreas Altenburg wrote:
>
> i read "life with qmail" and set ip my server correctly. i did not find the
> part how to start the pop3d automatically. so i entered the lines of the doc
> ("tcpserver..." to my boot script of qmail. Now each transaction is logged
> to the console. Does anybody have
I'm running qmail under Solaris 7 (aka solaris 2.7). I have a problem: I
have many qmail-smtpd processes on the system which appear to have hung.
Some of them are many days old, as old as Jan 17, 2000. I noticed them
today when I saw that tcpserver's concurrency was quite high, yet there
wasn't th
Where can I get the patch?
At 04:27 PM 2/1/00 +1100, you wrote:
>Sifat,
>
>> Does qmail support ETRN, then how?
>
>Not natively, you'll have to patch it.
>
>Regards,
>
>Marc-Adrian Napoli
>Connect Infobahn Australia
>+61 2 92811750
>
>
>
Quick question?
Does qmail support MIME?
Thanks
Jeff
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:29:03AM -0500,
Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
>
> > I ried to send to wilson@[203.26.11.154] but it failed. Can someone tell me why ?
>
> Because this form of addressing is obsolete and deprecated. Once upon a
> time MX r
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 09:12:16AM -0500, Jeff Russell, AIT wrote:
> Quick question?
>
> Does qmail support MIME?
Why should it?
Greetz, Peter.
--
Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder
|
| 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot;
| C++ makes it h
* Jeff Russell, AIT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [ 2 Feb 2000 09:06]:
> Quick question?
> Does qmail support MIME?
MIME is something that is supported (or not) by your MUA
(Mail User Agent, e.g. Eudora or Outlook Express). Qmail
is a MTA (Mail Transfer Agent) and does not really care
whether the email
http://netflow.nac.net/mrtg/switch1.oct.nac.net/469/switch1.oct.nac.net-469.html
tempest.nac.net is a qmail box with ~18,000 pop boxes.
As you can see, our weekly average is ~350 kb/s, with a peak at 1 mb/s.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Russell P. Sutherland wrote:
> * Marek Narkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Mark Delany wrote:
> Sure. Just run two instances of qmail.
Actually, you don't even have to run two instances. "man qmail-smtpd" and
note that the DATABYTES environment variable overrides control/databytes,
if the variable exists. Tcpserver will let you specify environment
Sorry to say - it never got resolved. I believe it's an OS bug as I've
never seen it on other systems that I've run qmail on and the code looks
completely correct.
If you look at timeoutread.c you'll see that the code has issued the
read() as a consequence of the previous select() call indicating
Hi!
Where can I get the ETRN patch for qmail patch?
Sifat.
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 10:12:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Mark Delany wrote:
>
> > Sure. Just run two instances of qmail.
>
> Actually, you don't even have to run two instances. "man qmail-smtpd" and
> note that the DATABYTES environment variable overrides contro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:29:03AM -0500,
> Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
> > > I ried to send to wilson@[203.26.11.154] but it failed. Can someone tell me why ?
> > B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 03:03:22PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>>
>> Can someone explain to me what exactly makes ezmlm fast? I
>> would like to try to adapt some of its functionality and speed
>> to a customized list processor. Thanks for any input.
>
>One word: qmai
"Andreas Altenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i read "life with qmail" and set ip my server correctly. i did not find the
>part how to start the pop3d automatically. so i entered the lines of the doc
>("tcpserver..." to my boot script of qmail. Now each transaction is logged
>to the console. Do
Joao Bordalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Andreas Altenburg wrote:
>>
>> i read "life with qmail" and set ip my server correctly. i did not find the
>> part how to start the pop3d automatically. so i entered the lines of the doc
>> ("tcpserver..." to my boot script of qmail. Now each transaction
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:08:41AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 03:03:22PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> >>
> >> Can someone explain to me what exactly makes ezmlm fast? I
> >> would like to try to adapt some of its functionality and speed
> >>
> > >> Can someone explain to me what exactly makes ezmlm fast? I
> > >One word: qmail.
> >
> > Another word: cdb.
> >
> > MLM performance consists of two components: updating list databases,
> > and sending message to subscribers. With ezmlm, the sending part is
> > entirely the responsibilit
>> >> Any hints on where to start?
>> >
>> >Your maillogs. They contain all this information.
>>
>> Heh, true, but not when each mail was received or sent...now what?
>
>Yes they do, have another look :)
>
Ok, here is an sample from my current log file :)
949438248.678057 status: local 0/10 rem
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 09:33:50AM -0800, Bill Parker wrote:
> Do you see any time stamps in there, Peter (unless i'm blind,
> I sure don't)
> 949439132.351131 info msg 51564: bytes 1545 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp
That's a time stamp. Pipe this output into tailocal (from dae
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Bill Parker wrote:
> >> >> Any hints on where to start?
> >> >
> >> >Your maillogs. They contain all this information.
> >>
> >> Heh, true, but not when each mail was received or sent...now what?
> >
> >Yes they do, have another look :)
> >
>
> Ok, here is an sample from my
Morning,
I installed qmail and daemontools according to LWQ and the linked info on
daemontools. As a result, I'm using multilog.
QMail deliver works locally, and appears to stop and start normally.
However, the logs are not working as expected. For some reason tai64nlocal
does not appear to be
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 03:46:47AM -, John Conover wrote:
> Does anyone have a URL for a Red Hat SysV init rc.d script for qmail?
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail+patches/sources/qmail-rhinit.tar.gz
Requires my supervise-scripts and daemontools RPMS to work.
--
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
after trying to send
a mail with php3 mail() (the path to the sendmail wrapper is correct!) my
logfile tells me:
@400038987c19390ada14 new msg 26694
@400038987c19390b14ac info msg 26694: bytes 282
from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2576 uid 30
@400038987c193915ab9c end msg 26694
Why
[I'm not subscribed to the list, so please reply
directly. Thanks. ~PM]
Hello!
I have this strange problem, and I can't seem to figure it out.
I'm using qmail-1.03 (actually, this problem is with with qmail-pop3d)
with tcpserver and the modifications for selective relay, ala open-smtpd.
This
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, A Hoffman wrote:
[...] For some reason tai64nlocal
> does not appear to be kicking in.
> # more /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
> /var/log/qmail
>
> # more /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/l
Hi Folks,
I'm curious if I need this patch on RH 6.1 or higher?
Thanks,
Lance
Hmm, Thanks. Is this a build outside of the distribution?
I'll have a look. I'd like to know the specific patches
so I can applied this to any kernel, which I'm sure I can
extract from the SRPMS.
-jeremy
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 04:46:32PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> >
> > Is there any ke
Mads E Eilertsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, A Hoffman wrote:
>
>[...] For some reason tai64nlocal
>> does not appear to be kicking in.
>
>> # more /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/log/run
>> #!/bin/sh
>> exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
>> /var/lo
"Bolmehag, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I´ve got mny qmail to work but then I stopped it and started it with
>tcpserver again and it won´t work.
Details?
>When i read the FAQ and doc they only
>give examples how to start qmail-smptd directly via tcpserver, but I need to
>start it via the
"J.M. Roth \(iip\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok, then try putting a forwarder inside a .qmail-default file and try the
>mess ;)
I do it all the time. It works fine.
>If I simply put a forwarder instead of vdelivermail.
I don't grok "vdelivermail".
>inside
>.qmail-default all mail (to
"Adil Tahiri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it possible to get a copy of messages a certain user sends and receives ?
Sure. Use the FAQ method to capture all mail, then filter that for the
user in question.
-Dave
Paul Schinder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dave, you should make clear that 200 may need adjusting. This
>would likely have failed on my new Sun Ultra 5's as well, although I
>use my own scripts there, so I've never actually tried it.
Thanks. Will do.
-Dave
I've seen the same thing. After patching the machines with the latest
recommended patch set, it seems to have cleared up. It is definitely an
OS bug. I tried to determine if there was a specific bug ID or patch #
that specifically affected this issue, but I was not successful.
-Eric
On Wed, 2
On that note, what is an example of a startup script that includes
useful datestamping for multilog? I used the examples set forward in
section 2.8.2. 'System start-up files' in LWQ, and it is not working as I
had hoped. Thanks!
- A
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Mads E Eilertsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:20:30AM -0800, A Hoffman wrote:
> On that note, what is an example of a startup script that includes useful
> datestamping for multilog? I used the examples set forward in section 2.8.2.
> 'System start-up files' in LWQ, and it is not working as I had hoped. Thanks!
Don
Ok, an example of what is working: tested this on a wholly new domain
Feb 2 20:49:18 cents qmail: 949520958.764916 new msg 46207
Feb 2 20:49:18 cents qmail: 949520958.765144 info msg 46207: bytes 2552
from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 17605 uid 502
Feb 2 20:49:18 cents qmail: 949520958.767795 starti
Thanks Chris. Now that begs the question of why I should use multilog
instead of syslog which does datestamp if you tell it to. It doesn't seem
beneficial to add a superflous step. I apologize if this point seems
irrelevant.
However if there is a better method, I would appreciate pointers to th
> From: A Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:30:26 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> Thanks Chris. Now that begs the question of why I should use multilog
> instead of syslog which does datestamp if you tell it to. It doesn't seem
> beneficial to add a superflous step. I apologize if this
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:16:35 -0800, Mark Delany wrote:
>Furthermore, each of these files are pre-formatted so that they can be fed
>directly into qmail-queue without further manipulation. From memory, they are
>null terminated strings of recipients.
This is insignificant to list performance. Assu
A Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Chris. Now that begs the question of why I should use multilog
>instead of syslog which does datestamp if you tell it to. It doesn't seem
>beneficial to add a superflous step. I apologize if this point seems
>irrelevant.
Syslog is a nightmare: insecu
Hi everyone.
question:
I mentioned that there is open source virus scanning software for email to
my manager, he responded who updates the signature files? I didn't have an
answer.
I did some searching in the archives and haven't found anything yet. I
thought there was quite a discussion about
Thus spake A Hoffman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Thanks Chris. Now that begs the question of why I should use multilog
> instead of syslog which does datestamp if you tell it to. It doesn't seem
> beneficial to add a superflous step. I apologize if this point seems
> irrelevant.
I knew syslog had it
>I'm wondering the best place/way to log details about each email to a
>database of some sort.
>Specifically I need to log, from address, to address, and email size.
>
>Any hints on where to start?
Start with the following FAQ entry:
] How do I keep a copy of all incoming and outgoing mail
Am I right in assuming that you can use a command such as
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t !tai64nlocal
/var/log/qmail/smtpd
for logging qmail-smtpd and this will process the log through tai64nlocal
*after* completing the log?
I got this from skimming the p
HI
Well I can use:
echo to: me@wherever | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
to send to an outside adress.
I can use:
echo to: peter| /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
to send directly to a local user id.
But I cant telnet to port 25, it just hangs up without any message, not even
if I telnet to loca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I mentioned that there is open source virus scanning software for email to
> my manager, he responded who updates the signature files? I didn't have an
> answer.
>
> I did some searching in the archives and haven't found anything yet. I
> thought there was quite a disc
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 10:25:11PM +0100, Bolmehag, Peter wrote:
> HI
>
> Well I can use:
>
> echo to: me@wherever | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>
> to send to an outside adress.
>
> I can use:
>
> echo to: peter| /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>
> to send directly to a local user id.
>
>
>
Hello,
What is the equivalent of /usr/bin/mailq in qmail.
I need to check the queue and also run it manually so I am also wondering
what the equivalent of /usr/lib/sendmail -q is.
Thanks in advance.
Cliff
Clifford Thurber
Web Systems Administrator
LiveUniverse.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
565 5th Ave. 2
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 05:07:52PM -0500, clifford thurber wrote:
> What is the equivalent of /usr/bin/mailq in qmail.
> I need to check the queue and also run it manually so I am also wondering
> what the equivalent of /usr/lib/sendmail -q is.
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-qread. I symlink /usr/bin/mailq
Thus spake clifford thurber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What is the equivalent of /usr/bin/mailq in qmail.
qmail-qread
> I need to check the queue and also run it manually so I am also wondering
> what the equivalent of /usr/lib/sendmail -q is.
Send an ALRM signal to qmail-send.
Robbie
Hello all qmailers!
I'm new to qmail, so I'm still getting my sea legs. One question that has
come up is how does qmail handle delivery problems and what schedule does it
use?
I think I've found the retry schedule...
t(0) = start time [secs]
t(i) = t(0) + (sqrt(t(i - 1) - t(0)) + 10)^2 [Local]
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...] the retry schedule...
See http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#retry-schedule
> But I can't seem to find how qmail decides to give up on delivering a msg.
> My experience is that it's around 3 days, but I'd like to know exactly.
Try
Hi
I just moved from sendmail to qmail. Now I have domainaliases in the
sendmail configuratio that looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail is received for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is copied and sent out to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I have lots of these pairs where mail comes in to
man qmail-send, search for queuelifetime, or see
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#retry-schedule
qmail follows the quadratic retry schedule until the message is older than
the max lifetime for the queue. at that point, it tries one more delivery
and then bounces the message if it still fai
Hello!
I have this strange problem, and I can't seem to figure it out.
I'm using qmail-1.03 (actually, this problem is with with qmail-pop3d)
with tcpserver and the modifications for selective relay, ala open-smtpd.
This is the same setup (as far as I can tell) as I use on another server,
which w
Hi,
Im running Redhat
5.1 on our main server here, and I read an article on the front page of
qmail.org about hosts_options not compiled into tcp_wrappers which results in
tcpserver not working properly and looking up the remote hosts IP address...It
seems Redhat 5.1 and under has a broken
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:24:41AM +1100, Stephen Mills wrote:
> Im running Redhat 5.1 on our main server here, and I read an article on the
> front page of qmail.org about hosts_options not compiled into tcp_wrappers
> which results in tcpserver not working properly and looking up the remote
> ho
I disagreed too but I couldn't be bothered replying.
I'm using it at the moment for testing because our current domain is
handled by another server I don't want to change the MX records until I've
tested it a bit.
Wilson
--
From: Scott D. Yelich[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursd
A user has reported a problem receiving attachments from anybody outside our
network. At first I brushed him off as crazy. But the problem can be
duplicated on other pop3 accounts.
Some people not in our network (AOL is one) trying to send email to users on
our network will receive an error mes
I am using tcpserver, what I dont understand is that tcp_wrappers _makes_
(contains) tcpd.
[root@proxy tcp_wrappers_7.6]# ls tcpd* -al
-rwxrwxr-x 1 root root18933 Jan 17 14:57 tcpd
This is why Im puzzled as to why the suggestion on the qmail.org page
suggests to recompile tcp_wrap
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 12:44:25PM +1100, Stephen Mills wrote:
> I am using tcpserver, what I dont understand is that tcp_wrappers _makes_
> (contains) tcpd.
>
> [root@proxy tcp_wrappers_7.6]# ls tcpd* -al
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 root root18933 Jan 17 14:57 tcpd
>
> This is why Im puzzled
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 05:45:57PM -0800, Jose de Leon wrote:
> A user has reported a problem receiving attachments from anybody outside our
> network. At first I brushed him off as crazy. But the problem can be
> duplicated on other pop3 accounts.
>
> Some people not in our network (AOL is one
Thats part of the problem. There is no error message. Just a popup in
Outlook express or any other email client that says: "Error sending
message" Period. Nothing, nada, not even a bounce message.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jose de Leon <[EMAIL
Well ive installed about 8 servers with selective relaying with tcpserver
and they all work fine, but this one isnt, Ive went through everything I
know and still can't resolve it :) the only mention is on that page about a
problem with rh5.1 - its quite strange.
I might just upgrade and trust (ar
Title: RE: QMail SMTP Woes?
I had a similiar issue on a customers site were the user had an attachment, it would strip the attachment and turn in into a small file size and rename it (mssometing.dat), it turned out to be Outlook on the clients machine, i think I changed the MIME encoding from
>Thats part of the problem. There is no error message. Just a popup in
>Outlook express or any other email client that says: "Error sending
>message" Period. Nothing, nada, not even a bounce message.
Somewhere on that popup for Outlook Express, there's a way to get more
info (either a
The problem here is that it happens on any client. Even from some of the
web based email clients. Yahoo email is where one of the sites is that this
occurs. I'm just confused because I am getting and sending email
attachments up the wazoo all over the net. Except from certain domains that
this
Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any kernel sysctl or otherwise parameters suggested for
> performance using qmail on Linux? Open file handle limits, share
> memory, whatever? I have a goal to send at least 1 million emails in
> a 24 hour period from a single machine.
The
If your using IE5 you can actually activate a logfile on POP3 and SMTP and
IMAP connections which might be helpful. (there is an option in
Tools-Options-Maintenence)
It might also be helpful to check the Maildir or Mailbox file to see if it
made it correctly to the filesystem without corruption
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote:
> Jeremy Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is there any kernel sysctl or otherwise parameters suggested for
> > performance using qmail on Linux? Open file handle limits, share
> > memory, whatever? I have a goal to send at least 1 million emails i
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, [iso-8859-1] Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Derek Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 02 Feb 2000:
> > Another way to save memory is to terminate getty on all unnecessary
> > terminals. The Linux Small-Memory mini-HOWTO describes many ways to
> > conserve memory.
>
> I would
| i don't want everyone to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], just selected people.
| mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be delivered to all popboxen in this domain.
| so thats why
I could be missing something obvious (as the accepted answer seemed to be
ezmlm), but would it work to do something like (
| In short- you can get away with logging to syslogd on low volume
| servers, but if you want to get the best performance out of your
| server or if you're running high-volume mail services you need to drop
| syslogd and move to multilog.
I might disagree with this. My mail server is fairly low
Hello,
I am using qmail as my MTA on a RedHat Linux 5.2 server. I have setup
majordomo on the machine, but can't get it to work right. Here is what
my .qmail-majordomo file looks like:
|/usr/local/majordomo/wrapper majordomo
When ever I send a message to majordomo requesting help, for
I have three qmail servers in my LAN. Two of the
servers are directly connected to Internet. Those two servers send and recieve
mails for my LAN. The third one is a POP3 Server running qpopper. All mails are
stored in POP3 Server and users get their mails only when checking mail while
conne
Hello!
I want to delete mails that's in queue for the last four days. Does it
effect on qmail-send because few days ago I deleted mails in queue that's
caused qmail stop, and I had to restart the qmail. So, I want to know the
safest way to delete it.
Thanks.
manoj
I have three qmail servers for my LAN. Two are
directly connected to Internet for receiving and sending of mails for my LAN.
Third one is POP3 server. All users first send their mails to POP3 server which
then forwards outgoing mails to one of the two servers which are directly
connected to
Hi!
I sometimes encounter errors like "error writing to
network, error reading from network, connection reset
by remote side 10054, etc" even without attachments.Do
I need to adjust something? How is that.
Thanks.
=
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk
Hello All,
I'm getting wierd messages in my /var/log/qmail area, specifically:
949561301.842459 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
949561301.842489 starting delivery 784: msg 668402 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
949561301.842543 status: local 2/10 remote 0/20
949561301.842573 starting delivery
Mark Delany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to say - it never got resolved. I believe it's an OS bug as I've
> never seen it on other systems that I've run qmail on and the code looks
> completely correct.
> If you look at timeoutread.c you'll see that the code has issued the
> read() as a c
Bill Parker wrote:
How can I stop this from occurring, or remove the messages?
Create the maildir properly, or change the .qmail file to write to
a mailbox file. What's in your /var/qmail/rc?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:06:13PM -0800, Bill Parker wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm getting wierd messages in my /var/log/qmail area, specifically:
>
> 949561301.842459 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> 949561301.842489 starting delivery 784: msg 668402 to local
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 9495613
A Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On that note, what is an example of a startup script that includes
> useful datestamping for multilog? I used the examples set forward in
> section 2.8.2. 'System start-up files' in LWQ, and it is not working as
> I had hoped. Thanks!
I'm slowly converting
Robbie Honerkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I knew syslog had it's problems- it can drop log entries under load and
> has been the source of security problems in the past. But until last
> week I didn't know just how bad it was.
To be fair, some of this is caused by the fact that qmail is con
Andreas Altenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after trying to send a mail with php3 mail() (the path to the sendmail
> wrapper is correct!) my logfile tells me:
> @400038987c19390ada14 new msg 26694
> @400038987c19390b14ac info msg 26694: bytes 282 from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2576 u
Hi all,
i m using qmail 1.03 on rhl -6.1 and want auto reply with meaningful
text (say "message recieved, will reply soon"), when mail is delivered
to a user.
I tried using qreciept in .qmail, but that was not much of a help. Even
log file do not show any thing useful.
Also there is another probl
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To be fair, some of this is caused by the fact that qmail is
> considerably more verbose in its logging than what syslog really expects
> (and what programs like sendmail do).
But, to follow up to myself and give some more firm numbers, here's an
exampl
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 11:17:36PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> To be fair, some of this is caused by the fact that qmail is considerably
> more verbose in its logging than what syslog really expects (and what
> programs like sendmail do).
(Hmm. Russ is a pretty smart guy so I may be wrong here
So, you have asked qmail to deliver mail for root@ to the instructions in the file
~alias/.qmail-root
Since they are empty it uses the instructions supplied as part of the start up,
which in your case appear to be to deliver into the Maildir directory called
~alias/Maildir
Therefore your log mes
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
