Fred Lindberg wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:05:02 +0100, Henrik Öhman wrote:
The correct solution was of course to change ~/testlist/inlocal and
~/testlist/outlocal from user-testlist to saying just testlist.
The correct solution is to set up the list with the correct name right
away.
HI ALL,
I have used the maxrcpts patch and I want to configure it so that
certain user groups can have different settings to others.
The problem is I do not want them to be set by IP as we assign IP's to
dial-up users
PLESE HELP
MANY THANKS
Tonino
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:48:11AM +0200, TAG wrote:
I have used the maxrcpts patch and I want to configure it so that certain
user groups can have different settings to others.
The problem is I do not want them to be set by IP as we assign IP's to
dial-up users
If you don't disinguish one
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:47:08AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
However, the machine still crashes from time to time. And
apparently a few times it lost mail.
I guess my fsync patch would have helped.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 10:38:54PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:55:04AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA?
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
I'm not speaking for USA.NET as I have no clue what they use or do, but
it's
possible they have a non-qmail smtp mail server for incoming traffic,
and
separate qmail processes running for the outgoing traffic.
Bruce Guenter wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:44:16PM +, Blaine Lefler wrote:
SuSE.com and -- I'm presuming SuSE.de -- also use qmail, as well as ezmlm
for their mailing lists.
http://www.suse.com/Maillist/index_en.html
1 of the 3 lists I'm on (the English discussion list, suse-linux-e)
generates about 2 or 3 times as much traffic as this list daily. Can't say
much more
qmail Digest 10 Feb 2000 11:00:00 - Issue 907
Topics (messages 36965 through 37041):
Re: concurrencyremote
36965 by: Dave Sill
Documentation
36966 by: Allen Versfeld
36971 by: Russell Nelson
Re: qmail-imap, cyrus imap, qmail
36967 by: Dave Sill
SuSE.com and -- I'm presuming SuSE.de -- also use qmail, as well as ezmlm
for their mailing lists.
Not officially :)
SuSE stuff told me that they not agree with the mail administrator who set
this up. They force postfix.
I tried to get predefined qmail user ids into the distribution and
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
Well, hell, you'll probably lose mail even if you're running a
journaling filesystem, like that. Contrary to popular belief, a
journaling fs does not guarantee that all of your data is intact,
just that the integrity
I am trying to make an autoresponder work on a user in a virtual domain in
qmail.
the user has a .qmail file in /var/qmail/alias/ directory that directs the
mail to the users home directory on the default domain on the machine. I am
using a simple autoresponder script that works but it gives the
At 2:58 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
Paul Schinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:39 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
I installed Shinya Ohira's checkpw checkpassword replacement, and it
works fine with "checkpw" (standard USER + PASS authentication), but
with "checkapoppw" I get
At 2:39 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
I installed Shinya Ohira's checkpw checkpassword replacement, and it
works fine with "checkpw" (standard USER + PASS authentication), but
with "checkapoppw" I get "authorization failed". I'm using fetchmail,
but I have the same problem when I "manually"
Paul Schinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ fetchmail -vv
fetchmail: 5.1.0 querying emaildev (protocol APOP) at Thu, 10 Feb
2000 14:49:04 -0500 (EST)
fetchmail: POP3 +OK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fetchmail: POP3 APOP de5 377129bbb5e2a8e84b0576cddaf384c9
fetchmail: POP3 -ERR authorization failed
fetchmail:
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TAG writes:
Is it possible to set a databytes file for a specific user that will
overide the system wide databytes file??
Only if that user has a fixed IP address.
There's another way around that problem -- the pop-before-you-send-mail
Quoting Marek Narkiewicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Would it be possible to lmit the number of spawns that tcpserver can
make from one ip address concurrently to preven one ip spawning up
to the limit of concurrent daemons and denying access to that
daemon? I can't think of a way to do it from what
Hi All,
I'm want to apply a patch to rblsmtpd which allows it to use more than
one listing service. Where do I put the patch file and what are the
commands to apply the patch ?
My patch file multirbls.diff currently sits in the directory :
/TEMP/rblsmtpd-0.70
Is this right and how to I
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote:
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
Well, hell, you'll probably lose mail even if you're running a
journaling filesystem...
False. Mail will not be lost if if rename() or
I installed Shinya Ohira's checkpw checkpassword replacement, and it
works fine with "checkpw" (standard USER + PASS authentication), but
with "checkapoppw" I get "authorization failed". I'm using fetchmail,
but I have the same problem when I "manually" generate the APOP hash.
How can I debug
Title: Way too many messages in queue.
I have a puny machine that does mail for one of my clients. It appears that they have a ton of messages in the queue as such:
messages in queue: 418
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
How exactly would I interpret this data and what do I do
I'm looking for a way to add a Bcc: line to all e-mails that come
through my smtp server. I'm trying to log all the e-mail that people
send through my server to another pop box so I can just download the
messages, and then filter them or whatever I want with my mailreader.
has someone written a
Topica.com (highly modified)
something like 2.5-3 million messages a day
(I don't work there, but a lot of my friends do...)
Sean
messages in queue: 418
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
How exactly would I interpret this data and what do I do about it?
Normally no need to worry. There are 418 messages that could not be
delivered until now. There are several reasons possible: not enough
bandwith or no
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:01:31AM -0500, Voitenko, Denis mentioned:
I have a puny machine that does mail for one of my clients. It appears that
they have a ton of messages in the queue as such:
messages in queue: 418
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
How exactly would I
first look with ps, if qmail-send and its three little friends
(rspawn, lspawn, clean) are running.
then have glance at the output of qmail-qread. is there only one host
you are not reaching or are there many? you could ask qmail-tcpto, if
there are troubles specific to one special connections.
Paul Schinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:39 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
I installed Shinya Ohira's checkpw checkpassword replacement, and it
works fine with "checkpw" (standard USER + PASS authentication), but
with "checkapoppw" I get "authorization failed". I'm using fetchmail,
but I
I have a puny machine that does mail for one of my clients. It
appears that they have a ton of messages in the queue as such:
messages in queue: 418
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
How exactly would I interpret this data and what do I do about it?
1) Run qmail-qread
At 3:21 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
Solaris 7 SPARC, gcc 2.8.1.
Compiler bug, maybe? I'm using 2.95.2 now, and it was 2.95.1 that
compiled the checkpw that does this:
leprss% fetchmail -vv -c --protocol APOP mors.gsfc.nasa.gov
Enter password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fetchmail: 5.2.0
How about:
sunsite.auc.dk
and some big .edu domains like
Ohio State (orb1.osu.edu).
Sadly though, UIC does not run qmail on their mail servers.
I think one needs to be a bit more precise when listing sites that use
qmail. For example, RedHat uses qmail only to host the mailinglists
(on
I would like to know what the fields of qmail-qread mean .
For Example :
7 Feb 2000 15:35:40 GMT #635162 2305
local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't understand what the field means , it sometimes appear as
#@[] .
I would like to know How can I delete a mail from queue
Folks
I want to run multiple instances of qmail.
My question is: "If I already run 1 instance of qmail and I want to
run second, have I create another users (qmaild, qmails, ..) or I can use
these users from first qmail instance ?? Is there some problem if these
users have different home
I would like to know what the fields of qmail-qread mean .
For Example :
7 Feb 2000 15:35:40 GMT #635162 2305
local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't understand what the field means , it sometimes appear as
#@[] .
is a "null return path." When mail bounces, the
Hello list,
can someone recommend a virus-checking solution that will run with
qmail as well as without (i.e., run standalone and check non-mail
files)? Platform is debian. Help really appreciated!
TIA,
Daniel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do i go about reading from a maildir without ncroaching on the security of the
maildir? ie what is the
procedure for reading emails from one. Also where can i find the spec for maildirs
like an rfc or similar.
cheers
--
Marek Narkiewicz, Systems Director WelshDragon ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marek Narkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do i go about reading from a maildir without ncroaching on the
security of the maildir? ie what is the procedure for reading emails
from one.
Basically you need a MUA (Mail User Agent) which is capable of reading
from maildirs. Mutt is one. I
(Sam)
Well, hell, you'll probably lose mail even if you're running a
journaling filesystem...
(me)
False. Mail will not be lost if if rename() or link() (depending on
(Sam)
Who said anything about the message already being on the filesystem?
(me)
Then your
Hi,
presently I am fighting to setup pop3 access to the qmail server. I have
attempted to use both the commands/configurations from the FAQ (using
tcpserver) and from the Living With Qmail doco (using inetd) and I receive
the same error using both.
telnet hostname 110
+OK
Marek Narkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do i go about reading from a maildir without ncroaching on the
security of the maildir?
Depends what you mean by ``security''. If you really mean ``security'',
then the answer is: only do it if they're your emails (or you're
authorized).
If you
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote:
Which brings us back to link() or rename()...
And, if close() does not update the metadata, there's no reason why link
or rename should either.
What this REALLY brings us back to is the fact that the only thing that
Ok thanks a lot, you answered my (rather badly phrased) question perfectly.
I intend to offer my clients a web based interface to their pop3 mail in conjunction
with a java aplet based live notificationt that they have new mail. As the account
that they will be using will be their standard pop3
Marek Narkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now in order for the java server to update the client when new mail
is available it needs some way of knowing which mails have already
been read by the web client.
The easiest way, if your maildir clients all play nice, is that files
in maildir/new
Hello,
The last week, I tried a few webmail solutions, based on imap and
pop. Some are pretty, but actually, I think it is silly to use pop,
when we could simply use a CGI to read the mails _directely_ from
user Maildir (with password check naturally).
As I'm probably not the first one getting
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:15:41PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 15:12:00 -0500 (EST) , Russell Nelson writes:
ext2 has always honored fsync. You fsync a file, and its data goes
off to disk. You fsync a directory and its data goes off to
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 12:02:49AM +0100, Bolmehag, Peter wrote:
Hi
I just moved from sendmail to qmail. Now I have domainaliases in the
sendmail configuratio that looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail is received for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is copied and sent out
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 07:33:12AM +0100, Olivier M. wrote:
Hello,
The last week, I tried a few webmail solutions, based on imap and
pop. Some are pretty, but actually, I think it is silly to use pop,
when we could simply use a CGI to read the mails _directely_ from
user Maildir (with
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 11:21:08PM -0500, Len Budney wrote:
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote:
Which brings us back to your mistake; you make a claim about
``journalling filesystems'' which is true for some, and false for
others...
I did not
46 matches
Mail list logo
