On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 02:46:29AM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote:
! I tried to put @popsite.net in my badmailfrom but that didn't work.
badmailfrom is useless. :-) People can arbitrarily set their envelope
sender anyway.
! Is there any way to block all popsite.net connections? They always seem
!
'morning!
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 10:47:05PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
> > Currently trying qmail-autoresponder (http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/) :
> Great!
> > PS: the thing with "-s" is ok, but I like the "original" vac
Bruce Guenter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 02:17:19PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> > My question is thus - When does a host become well connected ?
>
> When the bandwidth required to send its mail is significantly smaller
> than the bandwidth available. That is, if you have to send 100,000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Well because of performance issue (Management wanted to send all the
> > messages out in quite a short time - for reasons as yet unexplained!) we
>
> I'm sure there are lots of valid reasons, for example it might be
> a late-breaking news email that ages very r
Hi
I'm still getting CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily errors when I try to
send posts to remote sites after trying for a week to figure out what is
causing it. I've read all the posts I can find about this error, but no one
explains what the error means exactly and how to fix it.
I understand t
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 11:16:35AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
> > > PS: the thing with "-s" is ok, but I like the "original" vacation
> > > feature with $SUBJECT in _BODY_ much better : do you plan to add
> > > it to qmail-autorespond ?
> > Reluctantly, yes. Would something like "%S" work for you?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:19:00PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> I have considered a similar change, having 2 maildirsmtp's running, one for
> mails under 32kbyte, one for bigger mails. That would do too.
> Looking at how maildirsmtp works, this shouldn't be that hard.
Thanks for your reply,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:50:09PM -0700, Jacob Scott wrote:
Hi Jacob
> I would be interested as well. I can help with IMAP SSL if you need it.
I would be interested in a bit of help with IMAP and perhaps SSL also
You obviously have good reasons for installing SSL other wise you would
have no
Hi,
Iam to trying qlogtools :) How can i make running to check my log file
?
rgds,
Al.
The list's posting address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please use the mailing list to ask questions.
Ronny
- Forwarded message from Gao Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> From: "Gao Kai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
> Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 23:10:04 +0800
>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 12:42:47PM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
! The list's posting address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! Please use the mailing list to ask questions.
Wow, isn't it nice to know that I wasn't the only one who received
that message. :-) I'll bet that the sender of that message harvested
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 05:48:00AM +1200, Chris, the Young One wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 12:42:47PM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> ! The list's posting address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ! Please use the mailing list to ask questions.
>
> Wow, isn't it nice to know that I wasn't the only one w
Qmail is working with LDAP though the patch at: http://www.nrg4u.com/
What I was looking for was "complete configuration" though LDAP. For
example, all users, all virtual domains, all aliases, all relayes, etc be
able taken from LDAP. For example, if I wanted to add a aliases, add it in
though
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 09:42:53PM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:19:00PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > I have considered a similar change, having 2 maildirsmtp's running, one for
> > mails under 32kbyte, one for bigger mails. That would do too.
>
> > Looking
* qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:50:09PM -0700, Jacob Scott wrote:
>> I would be interested as well. I can help with IMAP SSL if you need
>> it.
> I would be interested in a bit of help with IMAP and perhaps SSL also
I set up courier IMAP under OpenBSD yesterday.
SSL is sort of abnormal for email, but important notheless because it
protects user passwords. Now it is unrealistic to think you will be securing
the conntents of your email, because it will go through a plain text SMTP
server somewhere. But IMAP-SSL secures the Password, so it is encrypted
inst
>From: "asantos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
snip
> >I'm using named 8.2.2 as my primary DNS running on the same machine as
>the mail server.
>
>I don't have the bind documents handy now, but in essence you
>must tell named that it should answer to recursive queries.
>
named does recursive queries by
Hi,
try to use my SPAMCONTROL patch. It gives you REGEX capablility on the MAIL
FROM: name and other stuff.
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
cheers.
eh.
At 02:46 30.7.2000 -0400, Hubbard, David wrote:
>Hi everyone,
> I've been noticing a lot of spam coming in to users on my qmail
>serv
At 13:50 30.7.2000 GMT, Jens Hafsteinsson wrote:
>
>> >What I would like to know is what exactly qmail is trying to do. Why is
>>it
>> >doing a CNAME lookup in the first place? Why doesn't it just use the
>> >designated server in the MX records and be done with it? How does a DNS
>> >setup look l
>From: Erwin Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
snip
>
>Can't get your MX-Record ...
>
That's strange. Running dnsmxip axon.is. gives me 194.144.127.194 10 wich
corresponds to my MX record.
snip
> >>
> >>As a quick fix, try the following on your /etc/resolv.conf (saving the
> >>previous contents
Hi again,
No one seems to have an answer on this, which leads me to believe that my
question is either (1) a dumb question well covered in a doc somewhere, or
(2) an extremely difficult question that has everyone stumped. Could
someone at least clue me in on which one it is?
thanks,
Todd
Hi,
So, omail-admin (web administration tool for vmailmgr+qmail based systems)
ist getting quite old! During the next days I will work on a new version,
with will support the newest php interface, qmail-autoresponder, and will get
the rid of the current complicated and maybe insecure suid-perl w
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> Well we are now looking at a totaly scalable solution - where we just
> add boxes to scale. Generating the emails is simplistic and quick -
> injecting into a queue and then processing the queue is the fun part !
it is much better if you try the first del
From: Jens Hafsteinsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>named does recursive queries by default according to the docs.
Well.. is your installation the default one? ;)
>Sorry, no luck with that one. This strongly suggest some local
configuration
>problem, but I just can't put my finger on it.
Sure, it is
From: Erwin Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Can't get your MX-Record ...
I can get it. dnsmx axon.is retrieves triton.axon.is. dnsq mx axon.is
triton.axon.is also works. As does dnsq mx axon.is sprettur.isnet.is. Even
dig @triton.axon.is axos.is mx does.
However, all of this only tells us that th
http://cy.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
Good luck.:P
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 9:20 PM
Subject: From where to get tcpserver
> Dear friends and gurus,
>
> Could anybody tell me that from where to get the tar or rpms for
Todd Finney wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> No one seems to have an answer on this, which leads me to believe that my
> question is either (1) a dumb question well covered in a doc somewhere, or
> (2) an extremely difficult question that has everyone stumped. Could
> someone at least clue me in on
Dave,
There's some general info on anti-spam with qmail here:
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html
Hope this helps,
Chris
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Hubbard, David wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I've been noticing a lot of spam coming in to users on my qmail
> server
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:28:10AM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote:
> Thanks for responding Chris. I am currently using the MAPS
> relays.mail-abuse.org with rblsmtpd, I guess the spam I'm
> getting isn't coming from an open relay. Actually, the
> spammers usually relay through a valid mail server
Hi I need some help with qmail!! I've been running qmail and it's
been working ok! vhosts,
everything.
Today I've setted a NameServer Cause I've changed to a real domain
, example: example.com,
and i've changed h
I'd like to thank those on the list who pointed me in the right direction,
notably away from tcp-env and over to tcpwrappers. Half an hour later, it
works like a charm.
thanks again,
Todd
Dear All,
Sorry if I post to the wrong
list.
I have some question about license of
virus scan software.
If
1. I use qmail + amavis + McAfee on server that has 10,000
user.
2. I
config amavis to scan virus every incoming/outgoing e-mail.
The question is
1. Do I have to purchase
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 10:58:34AM +0700, joomy wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Sorry if I post to the wrong list.
>
> I have some question about license of virus scan software.
> If
> 1. I use qmail + amavis + McAfee on server that has 10,000 user.
> 2. I config amavis to scan virus every incoming/out
I understand from DJB's website that TAI is a better way to deal with
time functions than the typical unix localtime(). However, it seems to
make a lot of things really awkward when it is used as the time stamp in
a log file.
Any particular idea why DJB chose to use it for output in multilog? I
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 11:06:38PM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I understand from DJB's website that TAI is a better way to deal with
> time functions than the typical unix localtime(). However, it seems to
> make a lot of things really awkward when it is used as the time stamp in
> a log file.
Version 0.93 of qmail-autoresponder is now available at:
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/
See the documentation there for more details,
or join the mailing list by sending an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development versions of qmail-autoresponder are available via anonym
Hi,
I compiled and ran vpopmail successfully but then I noticed that the user
w/ shell acount does not receive any more mail. I check
/var/qmail/control/locals and there is no entry in it. After adding
hostname.domain.com in it then the user w/ user account start receiving
mails again (after
Hi,
I installed qmail in this order..
MySQL Version 3.22.32
tcpserver (ucspi-tcp-0.88)
qmail-1.03
qmail was working fine. Mails were being deleiverd to Mailbox file.
I switched to Maildir format according to instructions in qmail's
INSTALL.maildir file. I logged in as root and executed :
qmail Digest 30 Jul 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1078
Topics (messages 45799 through 45826):
bug in qmail-autoresponder version 0.92 ?
45799 by: Olivier M.
45823 by: Bruce Guenter
45826 by: Olivier M.
>From where to get tcpserver
45800 by: tejal.interoffice.worldga
From: Jens Hafsteinsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>What I would like to know is what exactly qmail is trying to do. Why is it
>doing a CNAME lookup in the first place? Why doesn't it just use the
>designated server in the MX records and be done with it? How does a DNS
>setup look like that works (the re
> >What I would like to know is what exactly qmail is trying to do. Why is
>it
> >doing a CNAME lookup in the first place? Why doesn't it just use the
> >designated server in the MX records and be done with it? How does a DNS
> >setup look like that works (the relevant parts)?
>
>
>Your MX *is*
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:28:10AM -0400, Hubbard, David wrote:
! I guess
! in this case my best bet would be to forward it to their
! admins since I can't block by originating IP...
By all means complain to their admin.
Why can't you block the
Thanks for responding Chris. I am currently using the MAPS
relays.mail-abuse.org with rblsmtpd, I guess the spam I'm
getting isn't coming from an open relay. Actually, the
spammers usually relay through a valid mail server for their
network that isn't an open relay on the internet, it's just
all
to contact spammers' mail server administrators i have found it very
useful to have signed up with
http://spamcop.net
via http://spamcop.net/anonsignup.shtml
they provide a form to paste the spam mail into and have all the necessary
DNS/whois lookups done
wolfgang
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 11:33:33AM -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The problem with your solution is that server to server encryption
> does not stop government and big corporations from looking at your
> mail on the mail server after it has arrived. Ask any system admin
> how hard it is to
45 matches
Mail list logo
