- Original Message -
From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: Outlook Express Prank
> * Hubbard, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
>
> Show me a comp
I'll guess MS has fixed that problem, since my OE5.5 did'nt freeze or react
at all on that mail. But then again, I'm preety eager on fixes for my W2K
machine.
--
IDG New MediaEinar Bordewich
Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420
E-Mail:
Am Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2000 09:31 schrieb Jimmy Newell:
> How do I completely open up my qmail smtp server to be a smtp relay?
nice joke.
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
www.bsws.de|
qmail Digest 13 Dec 2000 11:00:00 - Issue 1212
Topics (messages 53908 through 53949):
Re: Qmail source files - developer version
53908 by: Felix von Leitner
53913 by: Greg Owen
Qmail and RFC1894 - Delivery Status Notifications
53909 by: James Morgenstein
539
I am already doing that to catch bounces passing my server, but what will it
help me ? I don't want to forward a copy of the original e-mail to another
server, I want to send normally to the locals, and forward one with the rest
of recipients. Now then I think about it, I may implement this extern
Quoting Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * Hubbard, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What does the MUA have to do with an MTA?
> >
> > Show me a competent Unix admin using Outlook or a similar
> > abomination and I won't show you the difference
> Right. You're still using Outlook on a technical mailing list.
So? You're still a moron - yet that doesn't stop you.
Besides, he's using Outlook Express, not Outlook
> message still looks bad, has no reference headers (cf. "broken list
> archive") and so on.
Looks fine from here. Alpha-numeri
I am somewhat hesitant to rely upon VERP's because I have seen several
problems in how some email programs handle the = sign in the VERP. We all
know that the = sign is a valid character for the local part of an email
address according to the RFC, but there are many mail programs (definitely
some
* James Morgenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 09:23]:
> I am somewhat hesitant to rely upon VERP's because I have seen several
> problems in how some email programs handle the = sign in the VERP. We all
> know that the = sign is a valid character for the local part of an email
> address accordi
Hello all.
Sorry for boring you, but i have this problem i cannot understand:
I configured qmail with tcpserver following the installation instructions
step by step.
At this point i have a tcpserver at the moment allowing
connections only from localhost.
Everything is working fine and i send and r
Hi everybodyI have a problemI've set up
qmail-1.03 and all the others packages,
webmail,vpopmail,signup,autoresponders,etc...all working fine form
domain.comNow i have few others domains...domain1.com which can send and
receive e-mail internally, for the network192I can also send e-mail
> Has anyone else found problems with VERP's?
VERPs may cause the 'user name' part of the return-path email
address to become longer than 64 characters, and I have found
that some MTAs will not accept messages with such a return path.
It says in section 4.5.3. of RFC821
:
Is there any reason why I couldn't run qmail-pop3d as a non-root user? Using
tcpserver to start the process I could easily set it to run as a qmail user
(Or yet another user, with almost no permissions). Is this possible? And if
so, is there anything that I should be looking out for?
Thanks,
Laur
Can you post
relevant unedited logs to the list PLEASE!
The relevant
/var/qmail/control files would help too.
Without seeing the
error and setup we cannot help.
-Original Message-From: info
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:32
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECT
You have to make sure the user it runs as can access the $HOME/Maildir for
every user.
Usually this is only the root user, however if you have virtual domains ONLY
this might be an option.
-Original Message-
From: Laurence Brockman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13,
thanks tim
on my control's file i have:
locals: it's empity as i use vpopmail and i
followed the instructions
rcpthosts:
domain.com
domain1.com
domain2.com
virtualdomains:
domain.com:domain.com
domain1.com:domain1.com
Thanks
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Hunter
To:
Thanks all for the help, it works now.
--
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
where can i find relevant logs for qmail?
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Hunter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 7:30
AM
Subject: RE: qmail's problem
Can you post
relevant unedited logs to the list PLEASE!
The relevant
/var/qm
Hello,
i've 2 qmail-server, one intern (LAN) and one extern (DMZ), so how can i
configure, that qmail-extern received email per SMTP from anybody and can
send to anybody email per SMTP? Now i've set the remote hosts and domains in
the file rcpthosts.
And then, i want send the received mails to
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:21:16AM -0500, James Morgenstein wrote:
> I am somewhat hesitant to rely upon VERP's because I have seen several
> problems in how some email programs handle the = sign in the VERP. We all
Fair enough. Then use something other than the = sign. And if you're
worried abo
Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for boring you, but i have this problem i cannot understand:
> At this point i have a tcpserver at the moment allowing
> connections only from localhost.
You're preventing connections to port 25 completely?
Please post the contents of your smtp.rules
Dear All
I am considering using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue by buying another
256 meg DIM, as RAM prices appear to be quite low at the moment ;-)
This is for a personalised (time dependant) newsletter system. The RAM
disk would be made / formatted at boot, along with copying an empty
qmail q
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:21:16AM -0500, James Morgenstein wrote:
> I have experienced several problems with mailto: and reply links
> when using ezmlm. Some clients that I know have problems are Yahoo,
> Excite, etc.
As far as I am aware Excite Inbox handles mailto's and ezmlm VERPS
just fine
I want to get Qmail runs on a Solaris 8 (Intel) machine. Would you mind
telling me where to get the Qmail in the form of Solaris 8 (Intel) packages?
I hereby wish you every success in the new year.
Thank you,
Frank
CC>You're preventing connections to port 25 completely?
CC>Please post the contents of your smtp.rules file to be more clear on exactly
CC>what you are allowing/disallowing.
the rule is :
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
CC>
CC>> If i try to do relaying from a host that is not allowed i get the messag
I don't think there is a "package"
why not just compile it?
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Kin-San Frank Lo wrote:
> I want to get Qmail runs on a Solaris 8 (Intel) machine. Would you mind
> telling me where to get the Qmail in the form of Solaris 8 (Intel) packages?
>
> I hereby wish you every success
I have a file (/tmp/message) that looks like:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test
This is a test.
For some odd reason that I can't explain the
from address keeps getting rewritten to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was
the old hostname).
cat /tmp/message | /var/qmail/bin/qm
Yes, if you can't find a qmail package, just go to
http://www.sunfreeware.com and you can download
the GCC package for your Sol 8 x86 box and
you'll be ready to compile your own qmail, just
following the instructions from Dave Sill's LWQ
paper linked on www.qmail.org should get you through
it.
Go
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Rainer Link wrote:
> "Antonio S. Martins Jr." wrote:
> >There are someone using Amavis with Qmail? I had a Qmail+MySQL server
> > and want to put Amavis on it... I had tryed, and aparently all are working
> > but the load of the server start to increase until the watchdog
This depends on how you installed qmail, commonly this is
/var/log/qmail/current (if using LWQ and daemontools)
or /var/log/mail* if using syslog.
Also back to your original message, can you receive any mail for domain.com
from the internet?
If you posted your real hostnames we can verify if this
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 04:20:19PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
>Has anyone any empirical evidence for the speed increases I may expect
>(as opposed to a fast EIDI (ATA 66, 8.5ms seek) or SCSI system (eg 10k,
>5.3 ms seek 25mb/s) ?
10ns is much faster than 5.3ms... It works, I've done it, it's reason
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 04:40:26PM +, Peter Woods wrote:
> I have a file (/tmp/message) that looks like:
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Test
> This is a test.
>
> For some odd reason that I can't explain the
> from address keeps getting rewritten to
> [EMAIL
> > For some odd reason that I can't explain the
> > from address keeps getting rewritten to
> > Am I missing something obvious?
>
> Yes. You haven't shown us that qmail is rewritting that header. At
> what point is it rewritten? You need to experiment and catch the email
> at each point..
And
Sean Reifschneider wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 04:20:19PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
> >Has anyone any empirical evidence for the speed increases I may expect
> >(as opposed to a fast EIDI (ATA 66, 8.5ms seek) or SCSI system (eg 10k,
> >5.3 ms seek 25mb/s) ?
>
> 10ns is much faster than 5.3m
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Reifschneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:12 PM
>
> 10ns is much faster than 5.3ms... It works, I've done it,
> it's reasonably
I was thinking about doing this awhile back. I made a ramdisk and used both
bonnie an
This is a patch which gives similar functionality to qmail as
the databytes setup, but totaldatabytes instead. It looks at
the number of recipients a message is going to and applys the
value of /var/qmail/control/totaldatabytes as the limit when
size is multiplied by number of recipients. This
Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CC>You're preventing connections to port 25 completely? CC>Please post the
> CC>contents of your smtp.rules file to be more clear on exactly CC>what you
> CC>are allowing/disallowing.
>
> the rule is :
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Okay, you're not deny
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:43:25PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
>Would this still be a good idea ? As a 256 meg dim is 108 UK pounds
>sterling - or less than a SCSI card ...
I can't say... I used such a setup on a system with 1GB RAM sending
out 1+million e-mails of the sort you are. It was more
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 04:24:46PM +, Mark Delany wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:21:16AM -0500, James Morgenstein wrote:
> > I am somewhat hesitant to rely upon VERP's because I have seen several
> > problems in how some email programs handle the = sign in the VERP. We all
>
> Fair enou
Hello,
did anyone use a qmail without put users in /etc/passwd or qmail-users , like
using
LDAP ? Is it possible ? I want to use qmail without creating users or mboxes
and
using LDAP. Its possible with sendmail but i preffer to use qmail.
Thanks in advance,
Marcio
Hello,
I have two domaines: sendamildom.com (MTA is sendmail
maintained by my ISP) and qmaildom.com (MTA is qmail, it
will be my local mail server for all users).
All users receive/sent their mails fromto sendmaildom.com.
I created an account for each user on my local qmail
server.
How I can con
Thus spake Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Has anyone any empirical evidence for the speed increases I may expect
> (as opposed to a fast EIDI (ATA 66, 8.5ms seek) or SCSI system (eg 10k,
> 5.3 ms seek 25mb/s) ?
Why would you expect a speed increase at all?
And even if there were one, would anyo
Hello,
I'm working on configuring qmail with vpopmail.
I would like to be able to specify the location for mail storage
specifically for each virtual domain.
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks for your help.
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
I haved qmailadmin and I love it but I am not in love with its ezmlm interface
any one know of other options?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:31:48PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Has anyone any empirical evidence for the speed increases I may expect
> > (as opposed to a fast EIDI (ATA 66, 8.5ms seek) or SCSI system (eg 10k,
> > 5.3 ms seek 25mb/s) ?
>
> Why w
* Peter Brezny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 14:46]:
> I'm working on configuring qmail with vpopmail.
Er, you'd probably be better off, then, on the vpopmail mailing list. Send
e-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to subscribe.
> I would like to be able to specify the location for mail storage
> specifi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi I just want to know if there is a solution for Smtp AUTH. I
tried qmail-smtpd-auth-0.26.tar.gz but it doesn't work :-( ...
Please
help me cause i spend more than 5 hours on this fu. problem
thx
Charles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 05:01:20PM -0200, Marcio Sa wrote:
> Hello,
> did anyone use a qmail without put users in /etc/passwd or qmail-users , like
> using
> LDAP ? Is it possible ? I want to use qmail without creating users or mboxes
> and
> using LDAP. Its possible with sendmail but i preffer to
Thanks for the response. Could you please expand upon
this procedure? I am not familiar and I am not having much
luck with this procedure.
> 0. Stop qmail.
> 1. Check at initial injection:
> 1-1. Inject a local delivery email with qmail-inject
> 1-2. Inject a remote delivery email
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 07:11:12PM +, Peter Woods wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response. Could you please expand upon
> this procedure? I am not familiar and I am not having much
> luck with this procedure.
Which bit didn't you understand?
> > 0. Stop qmail.
> > 1. Check at initial injection
Peter Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand why these two are different:
> cat /tmp/message | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
> cat /tmp/message | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject -n
>
> The -n version shows the proper "from" contained in /tmp/message.
>From the man page for qmail-inje
Hi all,
I have been searching the whole message list and I have not found any clear
answer to my doubt.
My query is as follows:
I need to copy every message that goes out or that comes in to a determined
user to another local or remote mailbox.
I have learnt how to do it with the inbound message
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Charrua wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been searching the whole message list and I have not found any clear
> answer to my doubt.
> My query is as follows:
>
> I need to copy every message that goes out or that comes in to a determined
> user to another local or remote mailbox
Is the /var/qmail/users/assign file the only file that needs to be changed
to specify a new location for mail per virtual domain?
Peter Brezny
SysAdmin Services Inc.
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 13 December 2000 at 20:31:48 +0100
> Thus spake Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Has anyone any empirical evidence for the speed increases I may expect
> > (as opposed to a fast EIDI (ATA 66, 8.5ms seek) or SCSI system (eg 10k,
> > 5.3 ms seek
Is there a way to do this easily? I want to change the Mail from address of
double bounces from #@[] to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this possible?
Thanks,
Laurence
--
Laurence Brockman
Unix Administrator
Videon Cablesystems Alberta Inc
10450-178 St.
Edmonton, AB
T5S 1S2
[EMAIL PROTECTE
All-
Is there a way to block the delivery of messages through my smtp servers to
particular addresses?
I have qmail acting as a local relay sending mail from inside my network to
users on the outside. The users that I want to block would be on the
outside, but the mail is sent from the inside.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 07:26:01PM -0500, James Morgenstein wrote:
> Is there a way to block the delivery of messages through my smtp servers to
> particular addresses?
You may want to take a look at the SPAMCONTROL patch avail at
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmail_en.html
It has this (and als
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:20:42PM -0800, shukla raghvendra wrote:
>i have installed the qmail accord
Shukla,
>i have installed the qmail accordingly to life
> with qmail but after
> running it it says --
> if i do qmail queue
>
> messages in queue :1
> messages in queue but not yet preprossed :1
>
>how to debug it . what's it is doing .
You're probably running
Hi All,
I'm a newbie at Linux and qmail. The
problem I'm having is when doing a send / receive from outlook express it
connects to the server instantly but takes about 60 seconds plus to complete the
action?
any suggestions? please.
Richard.
Richard,
> I'm a newbie at Linux and qmail. The problem I'm having is when doing a
> send / receive from outlook express it connects to the server instantly
> but takes about 60 seconds plus to complete the action?
>
> any suggestions? please.
This is a qmail FAQ - see the description of tcpser
Do you have any trouble with your DNS?
Vennlig hilsen
Sigbj|rn Lie
Fauske Videreg}ende Skole
Tlf. 75 600 343
Mob. 40 87 19 42
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra:richard morris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 14. desember 2000 06:16
Til:qmail help
Emne: speed please
Viktighet: H
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Kin-San Frank Lo wrote:
> I want to get Qmail runs on a Solaris 8 (Intel) machine. Would you mind
> telling me where to get the Qmail in the form of Solaris 8 (Intel) packages?
you must get binaries package for gcc (gnu cc compiler) ver. 2.95.2
from Sun WWW Page (there are l
when I install rblsmtpd-0.70-1.i386.rpm
it need qmail-smtpd>=qmail-smtpd>=1.03+patches-7,
after I install qmail-smtpd>=1.03+patches-16
it need ucspi-tcp>=0.86-1
so I install ucspi-tcp and qmail-smtpd
but when I tried to install rblsmtpd.
it reported conflict with ucspi-tcp
what can I do??
Hi Everyone!
I use qmail as my MTA and I have vpopmail installed. The problem is I create
a virtualdomain with virtual users and I want to do this: All e-mail sent
to a pop user put the mail in the Maildir of the user, and all e-mail sent to
an address which do not exists like ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:08:45PM +0800, shaolei wrote:
> when I install rblsmtpd-0.70-1.i386.rpm
> it need qmail-smtpd>=qmail-smtpd>=1.03+patches-7,
> after I install qmail-smtpd>=1.03+patches-16
> it need ucspi-tcp>=0.86-1
> so I install ucspi-tcp and qmail-smtpd
> but when I tried to install r
Probably not supposed to talk about these addons herebut anyways:
I have vpopmail setup on a box now in use. Was wondering if there was some
tips on how to gently switch to vmailmgr.
Thinking about changing, since vmailmgr has also IP based vpop not only
namebased + directory struckture feat
68 matches
Mail list logo
