URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.

To all qmail members, I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail in Linux. My system configuration is give

tai64nlocal

Hi, I'm wondering what is the correct use of this command (TAI64NLOCAL) inside the supervise scripts. I havethree run scriptsin /var/qmail/supervise... and they look like: exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t s200 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d The other two are similar. I don't want the TAI

qmail Digest 20 Dec 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1219

qmail Digest 20 Dec 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1219 Topics (messages 54196 through 54265): Re: More on relay problem, something to do with tcpserver 54196 by: Andrew Richards Re: 501 Badly structured mime attachment 54197 by: Alex Kramarov How can I change return path "Return

accustamp....

From were can i get... accustamp Thankyou.. Seby...

Returned mail: Service unavailable - ERROR

Hi All ! I have problem with dilivering message from outern mail server to local mail server Outern (Sendmail), Local(QMail). While dilivering i have got hext message The original message was received at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:34:58 +0200 from t-rex.net.consul [192.168.1.204] - The

Problem authenticating to POP server

I am running Open BSD 2.8 and Qmail. I am calling SMTP and POP using TCPServer with the ff script: if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then echo -n ' Qmail-SMTP'; /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u 7791 -g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \ 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger

Collect all mail in one account. (Second try)

To all qmail members, I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail in Linux. My system configuration is give

Re: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.

I believe you are seeking the queue_extra settings in extra.h in the qmail source. You need to download the source package and read some documentation on what modifications you make to the source. Good luck! Nathan Harmon - Original Message - From: "Bhavesh Vakil" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: accustamp....

Seby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From were can i get... accustamp accustamp is a part of older version of Dan Bernstein's daemontools package. The functionality of accustamp has been put into multilog, which replaces cyclog. If you need accustamp, you'll have to go back to daemontools

Re: URGENT : Forward all mails in one account.

Bhavesh Vakil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.) receives any mail then all mail is also available in my alluser

Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link

Hi, I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for. I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog program. I see

Re: Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 20 December 2000 at 16:29:07 GMT I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog program. I see that they are both started independently and that

Re: ETRN

richard morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has anyone tried to use the ETRN command from behind a router using NAT. Our problem is we can send out the ETRN command to port 25 on the ISP's box but they cannot come in? Does your router know which server to forward the incoming connection to?

Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?

Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility. Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by the system. Very definitely the "filtered outs" ought to take steps to get off the RBL lists

Re: Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:36:05PM -0500, Jerry Keene wrote: Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility. Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by the system. Very

Qmail Web

Hi folks, This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before. Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes, which works well with Qmail ? Any pointers will be appreciated. Jean

Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?

Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers with 512MB each. Virus scanners don't solve the problem. http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zip

RE: Qmail Web

Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net. sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think. -Original Message- From: Jean Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Qmail Web Hi folks, This may or may not belong

svscan

Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail, and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file: Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes dont know how to

Re: svscan

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail, Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the manageability and reliability of starting qmail. and then i started qmail using csh

Re: svscan

Thomas, I'm finding theexact same problem here. I guess you are installing from Bruce's RPM packages ... well it seems that there is some kind of version mismatch between the packages. I couldn't solve it yet. I'd say you should check which are the recommended verisons of the

Re: svscan

Thanks for your prompt reply. The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the documentation: SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service /dev/null /dev/console 2/dev/console since svscan is located /usr/local/bin, it is clearly in the

Re: svscan

Actually mine is an install from the source which i have done. so i bet our problem is not the same then huh? unfortunately i downloaded the most recent version, so i wonder how i should go about this now? still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again. -tom On Wed,

Re: Life w/qmail: multilog qmail link

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for. I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the

?

hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4 local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for [newborn to linux / unix / qmail world]. there is an entry about spawn

Re: Qmail Web

Jean Caron wrote: Hi folks, This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before. Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes, which works well with Qmail ? Any pointers will be appreciated. Jean We use Squirrel Mail

Re: svscan

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:50:05PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: Thanks for your prompt reply. The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the documentation: SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service /dev/null /dev/console

Re: ?

richard morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4 local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for [newborn to linux / unix /

Re: svscan

Thomas, I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from 2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way. martin Thomas Holton wrote: still no clue here so i suppose i

Help! not working after upgrade from sendmail to qmail!

I don't have problem with sendmail. i've just upgrade to qmail few days ago and got this strange problem. some of the remote side randomly gives error 500! especially to aol and psi.net. any ideas? (my system is running bruceg's qmail 1.03+patch rpm on RH6.2) Dec 18 17:45:23 localhost

Re: svscan

Thanks again: SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service /dev/null /dev/console 2/dev/console All on one line? no, makes up two lines Are there any messages on /dev/console? no, there is nothing in /dev/console/ What happens if you start up

Re: svscan

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:32:46PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote: Thomas, I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from 2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way. I don't

Re: svscan

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: many messages: supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied Are these log entries

Re: svscan

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote: Thanks again: SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service /dev/null /dev/console 2/dev/console All on one line? no, makes up two lines Right. It needs to be one line. Are

Re: Arg! relay problems

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:28:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to send mail. my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such. 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow then after saving that

Re: a little more insight!

Hmm... check user and exec permissions on the file 'qmail-smtpd-wrapper'? That's all I can think of. Then maybe try another script that doesn't do much -- etc... Later, Ben. On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: diggin thru my logs i find this in

Re: Exception-lists to MAPS-RBL-Filtering?

Thanks Jon. Jerry R. Keene Senior Systems Analyst SCS ENGINEERS---1970-2000! Thirty Year Anniversary Partners With EPA Through The Landfill Methane Outreach Program Phone: 703.471.6150 Fax: 703.471.6676 http://www.scsengineers.com

Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?

Felix von Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 20 December 2000 at 19:54:33 +0100 Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers with

Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?

Yes they do. But they can also be misused, by for instance the zip file you provided the link for. My servers did'nt take harm of this file, but I'm sure that if I did'nt have the free disk space I have on my servers, they would. I'm not sure what qmail-scanner does if the process running out of

a little more insight!

diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25 zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format

Arg! relay problems

I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to send mail. my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such. 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow then after saving that i run tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp tcp.smtp and that goes through

Re: a little more insight!

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25 zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping

Source RPM

Hi guys, As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it. The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed. Does someone can tell me if is it ok? []s Davi

Problem when starting qmail.

[root@sphinx qmail]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail start Starting qmail: svscan. [root@sphinx qmail]# multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current directory: access denied I've followed Dave Sill's qmail installation manual.

Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?

So, do u use the external viru scan software? or only the qmail-scan defaut? Which external viru scanner r u using? how big is the difference both on speed and secutiy? On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:34:35 +0100 "Einar Bordewich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have been using qmail-scanner several

Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?

Hi guys and gals, I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8. uudecode fails with an option error __ bash-2.03# CC=gcc ./configure --admin postmaster --domain trevda.com --archive

relaying?

ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way i am confused about relaying rules this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" however this does not work...when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get this message Can't send to ". The

Re: relaying?

It should be an IP address. On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Kurth Bemis wrote: ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way i am confused about relaying rules this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" however this does not

Re: Source RPM

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:03:33PM -0200, Davi wrote: As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it. The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed. Does someone can tell me if is it ok? It seems to be. I mean, there's a link for SRPMs for

Re: Should I try the Qmail-scanner?

On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:45:41AM +0800, Paul Tan wrote: Hi guys and gals, I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8. uudecode fails with an option error broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component Error msg: test-uudecode.tst: No such

Re: a little more insight!

Is this a cut-n-paste or did you type it into your mail message by hand? If this is really what the script looks like, try adding a "!" after the "#", as indicated. usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper #/bin/bash ^- add ! here, so it looks like this: #!/bin/bash

user with no Maildir

Hi... How to configure mailder-daemon to reply back to the sender (with error message "No such user" or anything...) if the user don't have Maildir in their home directory? (Some of the users does not allowed to have email). TQ in advance.

Merry Christmas everyone.... and have a Great New Year too!

I hope this is not considered as spamming... Luke

Re: Qmail Web

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Tim Hunter wrote: Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net. sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think. I like TWIG very much. See http://www.screwdriver.net/twig Regards, Siaco. -- Ryszard ach, Internet Designers s.c., Przedmiejska