At 23:46 15.1.2001 +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:18:10PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
I'm considering removing the entire patches section from
www.qmail.org.
Why? Because a patch implies that something is wrong, and needs to be
fixed. However, when someone
Thus spake Piotr Kasztelowicz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If you want to use bloated, unreliable, immensely fat software with a
Where I have written, that EACH patch? Only USEFUL patch.
The world goes forward!
There is no objective measure for the usefulness of a patch.
Thus, there will be endless
Thus spake Kris Kelley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
If you want to use bloated, unreliable, immensely fat software with a
nice author who will include every patch anyone sends him, switch to
Exim. I mean it! Please go away and use Exim. It has all the features
anyone could ever want from an
Hi,
How do I authenticate for my default domain with
just the username ? ie If I use OE 5.0, I should give only username and not [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I have about
25 domains , but need to authenticate only for my primary domain this way
!!
This is a little urgent !!
Raghu
Mark Delany write:
I would (...) just
use the 250 responses from the remote SMTP servers.
I wouldn't bother chasing down the MX and then probing it, from the
perspective of Sendmail vs qmail vs the-rest, the queue-id responses
are sufficiently distinct with a few
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
There is no objective measure for the usefulness of a patch.
Thus, there will be endless fruitless discussions that make everyone
feel bad ...
Lets so Dan take way of further progress of qmail himself ...:-)
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz
Hi there,
I am searching for the Documentation of qmailanalog from last one
day on net. but unable to find it.Please suggest me
where i can get that or if somebody has with him pl. mail me.
Thanks,
Piyush Jain.
Hi,
did anyone make the attemt to get the output of qmailanalog in a
webpage. I think of kind of report-page where you get a short monthly
summary for each local/virtual domain (how many messages, how many Megs,
etc.)
If there is nothing like this around, would anyone else be interested in
such
How do I authenticate for my default domain with just
the username ? ie If I use OE 5.0, I should give only
username and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have
about 25 domains , but need to authenticate only for my
primary domain this way !!
This is a little urgent !!
Raghu,
You haven't told us
are you talking about SMTP-AUTH or POP3 auth?
-marlon
-Original Message-From: qmailu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 5:46
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Authenticate for
default domain
Hi,
How do I authenticate for my default domain with
Out of these 62,786 remote SMTP servers, 16,658 are running sendmail (27%)
and 5098 are running qmail (8%).
Perhaps it is also interesting to look at how many of the messages
were delivered to what type of server.
Out of the 3,016,454 messages in the sample, 484,010 were delivered
to
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:16:45AM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Johan Almqvist writes:
Quoting http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
Don't believe everything you read. :-)
My original design made QMTP-only mail exchangers easier but made
QMTP+SMTP mail exchangers harder. This was a bad
From: "Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:00:06 +1000
Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called
Courtesy Copy for nothing.
I thought it was Carbon Copy?
Considering that the majority of Internet users these days are so young that
Last week there was much discussion (some of it even on topic :) about
making multilog rotate files on receipt of a signal.
Here's my very simple patch to make multilog rotate its current file
on receipt of SIGHUP. I have tested it under RedHat Linux 6.2 ONLY.
However, as I have used Dan's
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:18:30PM -0700, James Stevens wrote:
Can someone point me to a web page that has some explanation of setting up
concurrent running qmails on the same machine and what edits I need to make
to avoid conflicks..
Just compile them using different dirs, and install them
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Doug Schmidt wrote:
I would like to increase qmail's concurrencyremote from the default 20 to
40. When I create:
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote
and put a value of 40 in the file,
I restart qmail and get the error:
Oct 10 16:53:14 server
hi everyone:
I have linux and qmail installed( Sorry, I am a chinese people and poor in English
),I want to make my server can let user configure their mailbox to reject certain
messages by MAIL-FROM,but I don't know how to do.Please help me.
Thanks.
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This question belongs on the vmailmgr mailing list.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:50PM -, Chris Cioffi wrote:
I'm digging into virtual domains and I'm having a problem with
logging into my virtual domain.
In /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains I have a line that looks like
this:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 09:33:57AM -0600, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
Does anybody know what variable i would need to get checkvpw to log
properly with qmail-pop3d?
This was discussed recently in the vmailmgr mailing list. Put a script
containing the following into
From: Martin Jespersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:00:41 +0200
Hi all
i have written an sms forward filter in perl that allows me to trigger an s
ms message to me if a
mail matches my criteria.
i then send an sms including the sender of the mail and the subject line.
From: "Austad, Jay" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:15:03 -0500
Doesn't the case change violate RFC821 or 822? I seem to remember reading
that case in the user portion of the email address should never be changed
because the accounts "Bob" and "bob" are two completely
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 06:50:59PM +0700, Joomy wrote:
Hi all,
sorry about this OT, but I can't find any good information about
vmailmgr/vpopmail.
If anyone have a nice url , please tell me. (not vmailmgr/vpopmail website)
I have some (stupid) question about vmailmgr and vpopmail
Some
From: "Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:00:06 +1000
Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called
Courtesy Copy for nothing.
I thought it was Carbon Copy?
Considering that the majority of Internet users these days are so young that
From: "Brett Randall" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:00:06 +1000
Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called
Courtesy Copy for nothing.
I thought it was Carbon Copy?
Considering that the majority of Internet users these days are so young that
don't open attachment emanuel.exe from "funky gao"
Emanuel.exe is not needed thx
-Message d'origine-
De?: funky gao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy¨¦?: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:41
¨¤?: Doug Schmidt
Cc?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet?: Re: concurrencyremote
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Doug Schmidt wrote:
I would like to
* Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010115 23:53]:
I don't see it. Russ's patch looks like this (at least, in the
version I downloaded):
+if (qmtp_priority(ip.ix[i].pref)) {
+ if (timeoutconn(smtpfd,ip.ix[i].ip,(unsigned int) qmtp_port,timeoutconnect)
== 0) {
+
In the last minute I have received 5 emails from this
list purporting to be from funky gao.
All have an attachment called Emanuel.exe.
4 are messages from regular contributors who are not
(apparently) Chinese. These appear to be from other than
their normal origins.
What is going on? I am
Hello everybody.
Our virus scanner detected a couple of mails that contain a virus.
The message looks like this:
Scanning file /var/tmp/qmail-local2076/unpacked/mm.eyj8Cr
Scanning file /var/tmp/qmail-local2076/unpacked/Emanuel.exe
Found the W32/Navidad.e@M trojan !!!
Please take care.
Best
Even though the message is in norwegian, you will recognize that it's
a QMAILSCANNER virus warning, and I've gotten 6 more last hour.
Please disinfect your computer and / or temporarly stop sending mail.
MVH Andr PaulsbergIDG New Media Support
Informasjon fra
Oliver, all of your emails are being sent with
a virus infected executable attached, Emanuel.exe,
you may want to have a look at your machine before
sending more emails.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: funky gao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:42 AM
To: Linux
Is everyone else receiving a bunch of emails
from 'funky gao'? Can someone remove this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list? I've
received quite a few messages from him this
morning, all containing the file Emanuel.exe
with a virus.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: funky gao [mailto:[EMAIL
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Please check your system I have recieved this attachment "Emanuel.exe" from
your addres six times It contains the "win32.Navidad.b" virus
thanks
- Original Message -
From: "funky gao" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Brett
your outlook has been afffected by W32.Navidad.16896... please take care!!
Hi,
my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
and cant figure out what is the problem!
Best Regards
Gonalo Gomes.
I can think of some very good reasons to run a second instance of SMTP, for instance,
providing roaming mail service to a large userbase who dialup through earthlink.
Earthlink blocks any other SMTP than their own when their users dial up, so with a
second SMTP server on another port, you
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:03:14PM +0800, Keith, Yeung Wai Kin wrote:
don't open attachment emanuel.exe from "funky gao"
Why should I?
wine emanuel.exe ?
Regards.
--
Jose AP Celestino [EMAIL PROTECTED] || SAPO / PTM.COM
Administrao de Sistemas / Operaes || http://www.sapo.pt
yea... so far 28 messages have posted back with the virus to the list
that have contracted W32/Navidad.e@M in the past 2 1/2 hours...
From:"funky gao" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ertan Payci wrote:
Hello everybody.
Our virus scanner detected a couple of mails that contain a virus.
The message
Hi,
this mail is important for all mail-users that mail under Windows .
A mail of the content qmailscan has included an attachment
Emanual.exe (or could)
This attachment is containing a new macrovirus, not cleanable with the
newest Mc Affee (using sdat4115).
Regards,
Ruprecht
Martin Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maildirmake /etc/skel/Maildir (even from within /cvar/qmail/bin) failed and
in the end I had to cd /etc/skel and do /var/qmail/bin/maildirmake
Maildir
[...]
I take it a .qmail file is also required in /etc/skel.
As noted by others, no. Provided
Rick Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail server is qmail and it plays well. But I can not send any mail to
371.net which has three mx server and one smtp server.
mx2.371.net
mx3.371.net
mx4.371.net
smtp.371.net
on its website, I got to know that smtp.371.net is recommended. but I can
On Tuesday 16 January 2001 13:04, you wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Please check your system I have recieved this attachment "Emanuel.exe" from
your addres six times It contains the "win32.Navidad.b" virus
thanks
I was just about to send
Gonalo Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
and cant figure out what is the problem!
This is in the FAQs. Read the man page for tcpserver, and pay attention to
the section on
Hi,
Sorry about that !! My setup -
I have test.com as my hostname with MX pointing to my IP address. I also
have added testmail1.com, testmail2.com testmail25.com as my virtual
domains with their MX pointing to the same IP. Now I need my users in
testmail1.com to give only username and not
Hi,
Sorry about that !! My setup -
I have test.com as my hostname with MX pointing to my IP address. I also
have added testmail1.com, testmail2.com testmail25.com as my virtual
domains with their MX pointing to the same IP. Now I need my users in
testmail1.com to give only username and not
--
B r e t t R a n d a l l
http://xbox.ipsware.com/
brett _ @ _ ipsware.com
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mutt is pretty nifty. Another good choice would be Gnus http://www.gnus.org/
which also supports Maildir natively if you use nnmaildir.
Since Google doesn't find it, I'll say that nnmaildir lives at
URL:http://multivac.cwru.edu/nnmaildir/
Otherwise,
I'm going to jump into the discussion here and ask why we don't do something
like perl has done with cpan? They don't call them patches, or upgrades, or
anything else. They call them Modules and have a central repository that
users can go and search from. I think this would be ideal for qmail.org
Okay I know the to aren't the same, but two seperate issues.
I am setting up qmail running Maildir/
I can get the server running and am able to send mail to my box
locally on the machine itself
If I try to send a message from another machine to that box the
messages goes. I never get a bouce
Hi !
I have 55 e-mail addresses of peoples that constantly send SPAMS for
my server.
I would like to block these addresses for the whole server.
How do I make that?
--
Best regards,
Ana
* Dale Herring [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010116 16:39]:
My tcpserver startup looks like this.
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
mail.mydomian.com \
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21 | \
/var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d
Suggesitons please
Ana, please don't start new threads by replying to old messages!
* Ana Paula [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010116 17:03]:
I have 55 e-mail addresses of peoples that constantly send SPAMS for
my server.
I would like to block these addresses for the whole server.
How do I make that?
Put the addresses,
Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010115 23:53]:
I don't see it. Russ's patch looks like this (at least, in the
version I downloaded):
+if (qmtp_priority(ip.ix[i].pref)) {
+ if (timeoutconn(smtpfd,ip.ix[i].ip,(unsigned int)
Hello All,
Is there some way to forward an individuals mail to a different ISP. For
example if a user has retired from this company and is using a private ISP
now can I forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the
help.
Regards,
Travis Turner
Information
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:31:16PM -, Gon?alo Gomes wrote:
my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
and cant figure out what is the problem!
You didn't gave sufficient information, but I could guess the problem.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:12:54AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Rick Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail server is qmail and it plays well. But I can not send any mail to
371.net which has three mx server and one smtp server.
mx2.371.net
mx3.371.net
mx4.371.net
smtp.371.net
on its
Hey, it took 30 minuttes for my message to go trough!
When I sent the message NOONE had complained,
later when the list catched up several warning-messages came.
Complain to the "fill in the blank" person who sent this virus :(
MVH Andr Paulsberg
Is there some way to forward an individuals mail to a different
ISP. For example if a user has retired from this company and is
using a private ISP now can I forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the help.
Edit his .qmail file to point
Travis Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some way to forward an individuals mail to a different ISP. For
example if a user has retired from this company and is using a private ISP
now can I forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course there is. It's clearly documented,
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:12:54AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Rick Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail server is qmail and it plays well. But I can not send any mail to
371.net which has three mx server and one smtp server. on its website, I
Yusuf Goolamabbas writes:
So, does the installation of mini-qmail require creating of user-ids for
installation and then one can delete them subsequently
Before running make setup check, you could edit conf-users
and conf-groups so that all the first eight lines of
conf-users have ``root''
@40003a636a5e07e6c22c tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
This means that there's already active a pop3-server, look with ps.
disable the pop3 entry in inetd.conf.
marco leeflang
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 11:33:06AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dnsmx 371.net gives mx.371.net, so this one is reachable from outside.
I meant that "smtp.371.net" might be an internal-only mail relay. Any host
named "mx\d" is probably a
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 06:00:21PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:31:16PM -, Gon?alo Gomes wrote:
my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
and cant figure out what is the problem!
We received an influx of mail today addressed to (probably bogus)
users at the domain 'groupprojects.net'. This domain has the
following MX record:
groupprojects.net preference = 0, mail exchanger = 0.0.0.0
When we received the message, qmail connected to 0.0.0.0 to deliver
the mail.
James R Grinter wrote:
"David L. Nicol" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What exactly is the threat this is supposed to guard against? Is
it directory descending on vms, or access to the .. directory somehow?
I think it's along the lines of something like 'user-/../foo@domain'
which would
At 07:21 PM 1/15/2001, you wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
If you want to use bloated, unreliable, immensely fat software with a
Where I have written, that EACH patch? Only USEFUL patch.
The world goes forward!
Ah...but what is useful to thee may not be useful to me :o)
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:18:10 -0500 (EST), Russell Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? Because a patch implies that something is wrong, and needs to be
fixed. However, when someone produces a "patch" for smtp-auth, that
This might be too simple, but why not call them 'modifications' or
I know that this question is being askedfrom time to time here,
but I have never seen a descriptive answer to it.
I have to rewrite the FROM field frommessages I recieve through
smtp.The only rewriting I have to do is if FROM = alex@a.b then i
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think there may be a problem with the patches to qmail-remote that make
it speak QMTP based on MXPS.
If the QMTP connection fails (because the remote host doesn't have a qmtpd
running) this failure will be logged as
deferral:
hi i write one
http://www.enderunix.org/isoqlog
it suppliess your request
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote:
Hi,
did anyone make the attemt to get the output of qmailanalog in a
webpage. I think of kind of report-page where you get a short monthly
summary for each
"Chris Garrigues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
patches are often released to fix bugs.
How about "addition" or "extension"?
I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
-Dave
Scott Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
127. is allowed to relay on my system, the message was accepted. Then
qmail would immediately begin delivering the message to itself again.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
I stopped this from happening by denying connections from 127. in my
TCP rules
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:02:44 EST, "Hubbard, David" wrote:
Is everyone else receiving a bunch of emails
from 'funky gao'? Can someone remove this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list? I've
received quite a few messages from him this
morning, all containing the file Emanuel.exe
with a virus.
: I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
:
: -Dave
:
Service pack 0.1 Beta?
TonyCam
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Change your rule to:
126.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="@localrelay"
127., of course. Typo.
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Chris Garrigues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
patches are often released to fix bugs.
How about "addition" or "extension"?
I vote for "source
* Laurence Brockman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm going to jump into the discussion here and ask why we don't do
something like perl has done with cpan? They don't call them patches,
or upgrades, or anything else. They call them Modules and have a
central repository that users can go and
Okay, i got rid of one error and picked up another one.
tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run qmail-smtpd: file
does not exist
And I still have mail that is going to the machine but it just disapears.
Instead of going to the Maildir/
-Original Message-
From: Charles
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:02:33PM -0600, Dale Herring wrote:
Okay, i got rid of one error and picked up another one.
tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run qmail-smtpd: file
does not exist
So you have yet another error to get rid of.
Is it too obvious to ask that you show
"Keith Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I followed the directions to the T in Life with Qmail -
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html. At the end of the install,
chapter 2, I re-booted.
After my system booted I type ps and there was only 2 processes
running:
1) bash
2) ps
You're not seeing
how about:
stuff-to-make-qmail-a-reasonable-tool-to-use-with-a-few-million-users-that-m
ay-encourage-others-to-write-stuff-that-may-introduce-security-holes-and-mak
e-the-original-author-uneasy
i'm grateful that qmail is security bug free. but i have the need to
control
the max number of
"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Chris Garrigues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
patches are often released to fix bugs.
How about "addition" or
Is it just me, or do you folks that run lists find that many of the messages stuck in
the queue are to @home.com recipients?
Whilst watching my logs, I see *many*
"Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establsih_an_SMTP_connection._". I knew they had mail
problems, but sheesh!
--
./mk
Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am noticing all the mail going into the queue and maybe
10 qmail-remote processes whereas I have 250 set for
concurrencyremote!
You restarted qmail after you modified concurrencyremote? Grep for
"status:" in your qmail-send logs to verify that qmail-send
"Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
Ummm... Nope.
Nope what? Nope, I don't vote for "source code plug-ins"? Or nope,
"source code plug-ins" is not a good rename for "patches"? You're
right either way--as the
Okay, yea I know its not disappearing. Lets just say like you said I can't
find it yet.
But at least its not getting bounced.
tcpserver startup scripts.
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd |
/var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3
Marc Knoop wrote:
Is it just me, or do you folks that run lists find that many of the
messages stuck in the queue are to @home.com recipients?
not so much @home, but usually half of aol's mail exchangers fail to
respond at any given point.
Funny you say that... We've had a broken link to them since
01-10-2001 ~ Tons of mail in the queue... =(
Following is a tracert snippet...
Tracing route to home.com [199.172.150.102]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
10 111 ms 110 ms 120 ms p1-0.lsanca1-br2.bbnplanet.net
Hi, I'm running qmail+vpopmail in a redhat 6.2 box.
Instaled yesterday
and never installed before, only managed some
systems already installed.
It seems I doesn't have a mail defined for the bounce mails to go for?
I mean, for checking I sended a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
thatemail
I'm
Sorry, if this is somewhat off topic, but I haven't found a ucspi-tcp list.
(and nothing approriate searching with search engines ;-)
Has someone written an addon to tcpserver that allows control of
connection frequency based on ip addresses?
I am thinking of something like specifing
1.2.3.4
+ Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Seriously, I suggest we call them "modifications", or "mods" for
| short.
This whole discussion reminds of a Lisp story I heard many years ago.
These folks were making a software package based on Lisp. A manager
actually requested that they rename the garbage
Try the docs that come with qmailanalog.
/usr/local/qmailanalog/doc/MATCHUP
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I am searching for the Documentation of qmailanalog from last one
day on net. but unable to find it.Please suggest me
where i can get that or
What's the point? If you have root on the machine you can view it from the
terminal session. Just output the results of the various reports that
qmailanalog has to a file that is available on your web server.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote:
Hi,
did anyone make the attemt to get
Use pine
On 17 Jan 2001, Brett Randall wrote:
I hate to add to the barrage of email about this, but, I feel that I must
throw in my 2 cents for the record.
My vote for the web site would be qmail-plugins or something to that effect.
It does not imply any shortcoming, defect or bug, it simply states that some
my find each particular plugin
On 17-Jan-01 at 01:05, Aaron Carr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I hate to add to the barrage of email about this, but, I feel that I must
throw in my 2 cents for the record.
My vote for the web site would be qmail-plugins or something to that
effect. It does not imply any shortcoming, defect
Sorry this is only partially qmail related;
In the Log files generated by ezmlm in DIR/Log, does "-probe" mean the
user was removed or only that the user was probed? I'm trying to run
statistics and can't find a conclusive answer in the man pages. Thanks!
Brian
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:56:19PM -0800, Brian Ghidinelli wrote:
In the Log files generated by ezmlm in DIR/Log, does "-probe" mean the
user was removed or only that the user was probed? I'm trying to run
statistics and can't find a conclusive answer in the man pages. Thanks!
+
Thus said "Robin S. Socha" on 16 Jan 2001 20:47:55 +0100:
A module is not a patch. You can apply as many well written modules as
you like - but you cannot simply patch away at an existing code base.
Unless you write code in Lisp... :-)
Andy
--
[---[system
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
