> --->
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at tuxar.com.
> I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!
>
> <@tuxar.com>:
> Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)
>
> --- Below this line is the original bounce.
>
> Return-Path: <>
> Received: (qmail
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, -= Ana Paula =- wrote:
>
> I have 55 e-mail addresses of peoples that constantly send SPAMS for
> my server.
on server - if you had qmail with tcpserver - try add the line
to tcp.smtp (or another file provided to access control throu
tcpserver):
the.spamhost.name:deny
Piot
yes network bandwitch is a problem.
but that does not explain why all the qmail-remote processes still would
not be there.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, David Talkington wrote:
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:26:12 -0600 (CST)
> From: David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Laurence Brockman writes:
> > I'm going to jump into the discussion here and ask why we don't do something
> > like perl has done with cpan? They don't call them patches, or upgrades, or
> > anything else. They call them Modules and have a central repository that
> > users can go and search
qmail-autoresponder MESSAGE_FILE
DIRECTORY
this is what qmail-autoresponder gives as
command..
the MESSAG?E_FILE should have certain arguments
...
could anybody pls give me a sample of the
same...
and is DIRECTORY mandatory...
if yes pls anybody could site me an
example...
D. J. Bernstein writes:
> Johan Almqvist writes:
> > Quoting http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
>
> Don't believe everything you read. :-)
>
> My original design made QMTP-only mail exchangers easier but made
> QMTP+SMTP mail exchangers harder. This was a bad tradeoff.
>
> Clients should i
Laurence Brockman writes:
> I'm going to jump into the discussion here and ask why we don't do something
> like perl has done with cpan? They don't call them patches, or upgrades, or
> anything else. They call them Modules and have a central repository that
> users can go and search from. I th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Dave Sill wrote:
>Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I am noticing all the mail going into the queue and maybe
>>10 qmail-remote processes whereas I have 250 set for
>>concurrencyremote!
>
>Could be a lot of things. Have you verified that resource starv
very very sorry, yestoday I was infected with a virus and before
I knew how to handle it , it had sent many mail bombs.
now it is ok , sorry for bring u so much trouble. sorry
-- funky gao
Quoting George Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This vius is diffenitely being sent through the list server??
Which is the best autoresponder to be used with
qmail and any suggestions as to how to inject the message with an attachment
using qmail-inject
This vius is diffenitely being sent through the list server??
Andy... He (or She??/It!!???) it is aware of it.. At least he/she has
been notified by me and a few others...
Could we collectively bomb his/her email server that would stop it...??
Regards
George
Andy Bradford wrote:
> On Tue,
Jose!
Even that is a waste of time...
Goto to www.europe.f-secure.com/v-descs/navidad.html for more
information...
It could still crash wine as it does some registery modificationa and
load itself into the system tray... as an icq like icon...
Regards
George Patterson
Jose AP Celestino wr
Andrew!
That is exactly the point, we all don't otherwise this %^&&ard program
wouldn't have made it to the list...
Can the list move to a "no attachment" policy ??... lets see 16k
mulitplied by 1500 recipients is about 20 odd Megabytes. That is just
the data for the one message without the mess
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:34:04PM -0600, Dale Herring wrote:
> Okay, yea I know its not disappearing. Lets just say like you said I can't
> find it yet.
> But at least its not getting bounced.
> tcpserver startup scripts.
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd |
> /var/qmail
Excellent stats, Gjermund.
Are you scripts suitable for general use? Can they be easily modified
to identify some of the missing 65% and 73% respectively?
Your latter numbers are more useful, 100 machines running sendmail and
accepting 1 email each "handle" less traffic than 1 machine running
qm
Thus said "Robin S. Socha" on 16 Jan 2001 20:47:55 +0100:
> A module is not a patch. You can apply as many well written modules as
> you like - but you cannot simply patch away at an existing code base.
Unless you write code in Lisp... :-)
Andy
--
[---[system uptime]---
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 05:56:19PM -0800, Brian Ghidinelli wrote:
> In the Log files generated by ezmlm in DIR/Log, does "-probe" mean the
> user was removed or only that the user was probed? I'm trying to run
> statistics and can't find a conclusive answer in the man pages. Thanks!
+
Sorry this is only partially qmail related;
In the Log files generated by ezmlm in DIR/Log, does "-probe" mean the
user was removed or only that the user was probed? I'm trying to run
statistics and can't find a conclusive answer in the man pages. Thanks!
Brian
On 17-Jan-01 at 01:05, Aaron Carr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I hate to add to the barrage of email about this, but, I feel that I must
> throw in my 2 cents for the record.
>
> My vote for the web site would be qmail-plugins or something to that
> effect. It does not imply any shortcoming, defe
I hate to add to the barrage of email about this, but, I feel that I must
throw in my 2 cents for the record.
My vote for the web site would be qmail-plugins or something to that effect.
It does not imply any shortcoming, defect or bug, it simply states that some
my find each particular plugin us
Use pine
On 17 Jan 2001, Brett Randall wrote:
>
>
What's the point? If you have root on the machine you can view it from the
terminal session. Just output the results of the various reports that
qmailanalog has to a file that is available on your web server.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did anyone make the attemt to ge
Try the docs that come with qmailanalog.
/usr/local/qmailanalog/doc/MATCHUP
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am searching for the Documentation of qmailanalog from last one
> day on net. but unable to find it.Please suggest me
> where i can get tha
+ Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Seriously, I suggest we call them "modifications", or "mods" for
| short.
This whole discussion reminds of a Lisp story I heard many years ago.
These folks were making a software package based on Lisp. A manager
actually requested that they rename the garbage
Sorry, if this is somewhat off topic, but I haven't found a ucspi-tcp list.
(and nothing approriate searching with search engines ;-)
Has someone written an addon to tcpserver that allows control of
connection frequency based on ip addresses?
I am thinking of something like specifing
1.2.3.4
Hi, I'm running qmail+vpopmail in a redhat 6.2 box.
Instaled yesterday
and never installed before, only managed some
systems already installed.
It seems I doesn't have a mail defined for the bounce mails to go for?
I mean, for checking I sended a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
that email
I'm su
Funny you say that... We've had a broken link to them since
01-10-2001 ~ Tons of mail in the queue... =(
Following is a tracert snippet...
Tracing route to home.com [199.172.150.102]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
10 111 ms 110 ms 120 ms p1-0.lsanca1-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.2
Marc Knoop wrote:
> Is it just me, or do you folks that run lists find that many of the
> messages stuck in the queue are to @home.com recipients?
not so much @home, but usually half of aol's mail exchangers fail to
respond at any given point.
Okay, yea I know its not disappearing. Lets just say like you said I can't
find it yet.
But at least its not getting bounced.
tcpserver startup scripts.
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd |
/var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd &
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bi
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
>
>Ummm... Nope.
Nope what? Nope, I don't vote for "source code plug-ins"? Or nope,
"source code plug-ins" is not a good rename for "patches"? You're
right either way
Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am noticing all the mail going into the queue and maybe
>10 qmail-remote processes whereas I have 250 set for
>concurrencyremote!
You restarted qmail after you modified concurrencyremote? Grep for
"status:" in your qmail-send logs to verify that qmail-se
Is it just me, or do you folks that run lists find that many of the messages stuck in
the queue are to @home.com recipients?
Whilst watching my logs, I see *many*
"Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establsih_an_SMTP_connection._". I knew they had mail
problems, but sheesh!
--
./mk
"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
>
> * Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> From: "David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >>> "Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
> >>> patches are often released to fix bugs.
>
> >
how about:
stuff-to-make-qmail-a-reasonable-tool-to-use-with-a-few-million-users-that-m
ay-encourage-others-to-write-stuff-that-may-introduce-security-holes-and-mak
e-the-original-author-uneasy
i'm grateful that qmail is security bug free. but i have the need to
control
the max number of recipi
"Keith Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I followed the directions to the T in Life with Qmail -
>http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html. At the end of the install,
>chapter 2, I re-booted.
>
>After my system booted I type ps and there was only 2 processes
>running:
>
>1) bash
>2) ps
You're not
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:02:33PM -0600, Dale Herring wrote:
> Okay, i got rid of one error and picked up another one.
>
> tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run qmail-smtpd: file
> does not exist
So you have yet another error to get rid of.
Is it too obvious to ask that you s
Okay, i got rid of one error and picked up another one.
tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run qmail-smtpd: file
does not exist
And I still have mail that is going to the machine but it just disapears.
Instead of going to the Maildir/
-Original Message-
From: Charles Ca
* Laurence Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm going to jump into the discussion here and ask why we don't do
> something like perl has done with cpan? They don't call them patches,
> or upgrades, or anything else. They call them Modules and have a
> central repository that users can go and
* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> From: "David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> "Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
>>> patches are often released to fix bugs.
>> How about "addition" or "extension"?
> I
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Change your rule to:
> 126.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="@localrelay"
127., of course. Typo.
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed soft
: I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
:
: -Dave
:
Service pack 0.1 Beta?
TonyCam
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:02:44 EST, "Hubbard, David" wrote:
> Is everyone else receiving a bunch of emails
> from 'funky gao'? Can someone remove this
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list? I've
> received quite a few messages from him this
> morning, all containing the file Emanuel.exe
> with a vir
Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> 127. is allowed to relay on my system, the message was accepted. Then
> qmail would immediately begin delivering the message to itself again.
> Wash, rinse, repeat.
>
> I stopped this from happening by denying connections from 127. in my
> TCP ru
"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: "David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> "Upgrade" suggests adding features, rather more than "patch" does;
>> patches are often released to fix bugs.
>
>How about "addition" or "extension"?
I vote for "source code plug-ins". :-)
-Dav
hi i write one
http://www.enderunix.org/isoqlog
it suppliess your request
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Clemens Hermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did anyone make the attemt to get the output of qmailanalog in a
> webpage. I think of kind of report-page where you get a short monthly
> summary for each local/vi
Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think there may be a problem with the patches to qmail-remote that make
> > it speak QMTP based on MXPS.
> >
> > If the QMTP connection fails (because the remote host doesn't have a qmtpd
> > running) this failure will be logged as
> >
> > defe
I know that this question is being asked from time to time here,
but I have never seen a descriptive answer to it.
I have to rewrite the FROM field from messages I recieve through
smtp. The only rewriting I have to do is if FROM = alex@a.b then i
re
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:18:10 -0500 (EST), Russell Nelson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why? Because a patch implies that something is wrong, and needs to be
>fixed. However, when someone produces a "patch" for smtp-auth, that
This might be too simple, but why not call them 'modifications' or
'cu
At 07:21 PM 1/15/2001, you wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Felix von Leitner wrote:
>
> > If you want to use bloated, unreliable, immensely fat software with a
>
>Where I have written, that EACH patch? Only USEFUL patch.
>The world goes forward!
Ah...but what is useful to thee may not be useful to m
James R Grinter wrote:
>
> "David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What exactly is the threat this is supposed to guard against? Is
> > it directory descending on vms, or access to the .. directory somehow?
>
> I think it's along the lines of something like 'user-/../foo@domain'
> whic
We received an influx of mail today addressed to (probably bogus)
users at the domain 'groupprojects.net'. This domain has the
following MX record:
groupprojects.net preference = 0, mail exchanger = 0.0.0.0
When we received the message, qmail connected to 0.0.0.0 to deliver
the mail.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 06:00:21PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:31:16PM -, Gon?alo Gomes wrote:
> > my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
> > i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
> > and cant figure out what is the proble
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 11:33:06AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dnsmx 371.net gives mx.371.net, so this one is reachable from outside.
> I meant that "smtp.371.net" might be an internal-only mail relay. Any host
> named "mx\d" is probably a public
>
> @40003a636a5e07e6c22c tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
>
This means that there's already active a pop3-server, look with ps.
disable the pop3 entry in inetd.conf.
marco leeflang
Yusuf Goolamabbas writes:
> So, does the installation of mini-qmail require creating of user-ids for
> installation and then one can delete them subsequently
Before running make setup check, you could edit conf-users
and conf-groups so that all the first eight lines of
conf-users have ``root''
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:12:54AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > Rick Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My mail server is qmail and it plays well. But I can not send any mail to
> > > 371.net which has three mx server and one smtp server. on its w
Travis Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there some way to forward an individuals mail to a different ISP. For
> example if a user has retired from this company and is using a private ISP
> now can I forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course there is. It's clearly documen
>Is there some way to forward an individuals mail to a different
ISP. For >example if a user has retired from this company and is
using a private ISP >now can I forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the >help.
Edit his .qmail file to poin
Hey, it took 30 minuttes for my message to go trough!
When I sent the message NOONE had complained,
later when the list catched up several warning-messages came.
Complain to the "fill in the blank" person who sent this virus :(
MVH André Paulsberg
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:12:54AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Rick Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My mail server is qmail and it plays well. But I can not send any mail to
> > 371.net which has three mx server and one smtp server.
> > mx2.371.net
> > mx3.371.net
> > mx4.371.net
> > smtp.37
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:31:16PM -, Gon?alo Gomes wrote:
> my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
> i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
> and cant figure out what is the problem!
You didn't gave sufficient information, but I could guess the proble
Hello All,
Is there some way to forward an individuals mail to a different ISP. For
example if a user has retired from this company and is using a private ISP
now can I forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the
help.
Regards,
Travis Turner
Information Technolo
Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 23:53]:
> > I don't see it. Russ's patch looks like this (at least, in the
> > version I downloaded):
> > +if (qmtp_priority(ip.ix[i].pref)) {
> > + if (timeoutconn(smtpfd,&ip.ix[i].ip,(unsigned
Ana, please don't start new threads by replying to old messages!
* Ana Paula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010116 17:03]:
> I have 55 e-mail addresses of peoples that constantly send SPAMS for
> my server.
> I would like to block these addresses for the whole server.
> How do I make that?
Put the address
* Dale Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010116 16:39]:
> My tcpserver startup looks like this.
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
> mail.mydomian.com \
> /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | \
> /var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d &
> Suggesito
Dale Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am able to check mail from a remote machine and retrieve it, when I
> send it from the same machine of course. but when I start qmail and
> tcpserver i get
> {pop3d: 979682833.124531 tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address
> already used}
Somethi
question for the list:
I am using qmail-1.03 (patched for bigdns and queuevar), ucspi-tcp-0.88,
daemontools-0.70 and vpopmail-4.9.6-1 on a SuSE GNU/Linux 6.4 box. I have all
the e-mail related daemons (vchkpw, qmail-qmtp, qmail-smtp and qmail-send) in a
setup like the one described in Life With q
Hi !
I have 55 e-mail addresses of peoples that constantly send SPAMS for
my server.
I would like to block these addresses for the whole server.
How do I make that?
--
Best regards,
Ana
Okay I know the to aren't the same, but two seperate issues.
I am setting up qmail running Maildir/
I can get the server running and am able to send mail to my box
locally on the machine itself
If I try to send a message from another machine to that box the
messages goes. I never get a bouce ba
Martin Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have noticed stuff like Dan says mkdir /supervise whereas LWQ has
>references to /var/qmail/supervise. Still I'd like to follow Dan's
>methodology.
mkdir /supervise
ln -s /var/qmail/supervise/* /supervise
Optionally, replace "/var/qmail/supervise" wi
I'm going to jump into the discussion here and ask why we don't do something
like perl has done with cpan? They don't call them patches, or upgrades, or
anything else. They call them Modules and have a central repository that
users can go and search from. I think this would be ideal for qmail.org
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mutt is pretty nifty. Another good choice would be Gnus http://www.gnus.org/
> which also supports Maildir natively if you use nnmaildir.
Since Google doesn't find it, I'll say that nnmaildir lives at
http://multivac.cwru.edu/nnmaildir/>
> Otherwise
--
B r e t t R a n d a l l
http://xbox.ipsware.com/
brett _ @ _ ipsware.com
Hi,
Sorry about that !! My setup -
I have test.com as my hostname with MX pointing to my IP address. I also
have added testmail1.com, testmail2.com testmail25.com as my virtual
domains with their MX pointing to the same IP. Now I need my users in
testmail1.com to give only username and not [
Hi,
Sorry about that !! My setup -
I have test.com as my hostname with MX pointing to my IP address. I also
have added testmail1.com, testmail2.com testmail25.com as my virtual
domains with their MX pointing to the same IP. Now I need my users in
testmail1.com to give only username and not [
Gonçalo Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
> i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
> and cant figure out what is the problem!
This is in the FAQs. Read the man page for tcpserver, and pay attention to
the section
On Tuesday 16 January 2001 13:04, you wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> Please check your system I have recieved this attachment "Emanuel.exe" from
> your addres six times It contains the "win32.Navidad.b" virus
> thanks
I was just about to send
Rick Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My mail server is qmail and it plays well. But I can not send any mail to
> 371.net which has three mx server and one smtp server.
> mx2.371.net
> mx3.371.net
> mx4.371.net
> smtp.371.net
>
> on its website, I got to know that smtp.371.net is recommended. b
Martin Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> maildirmake /etc/skel/Maildir (even from within /cvar/qmail/bin) failed and
> in the end I had to cd /etc/skel and do /var/qmail/bin/maildirmake
> Maildir
[...]
> I take it a .qmail file is also required in /etc/skel.
As noted by others, no. Prov
Hi,
this mail is important for all mail-users that mail under Windows .
A mail of the content qmailscan has included an attachment
Emanual.exe (or could)
This attachment is containing a new macrovirus, not cleanable with the
newest Mc Affee (using sdat4115).
Regards,
Ruprecht
yea... so far 28 messages have posted back with the virus to the list
that have contracted W32/Navidad.e@M in the past 2 1/2 hours...
From:"funky gao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ertan Payci wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> Our virus scanner detected a couple of mails that contain a virus.
> The mes
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:03:14PM +0800, Keith, Yeung Wai Kin wrote:
> don't open attachment emanuel.exe from "funky gao"
Why should I?
wine emanuel.exe ?
Regards.
--
Jose AP Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || SAPO / PTM.COM
Administração de Sistemas / Operações || http://www.sapo.pt
---
I can think of some very good reasons to run a second instance of SMTP, for instance,
providing roaming mail service to a large userbase who dialup through earthlink.
Earthlink blocks any other SMTP than their own when their users dial up, so with a
second SMTP server on another port, you effect
Hi,
my installed qmail server takes long to display its banner, i dont know why,
i've followed lifewithqmail step by step
and cant figure out what is the problem!
Best Regards
Gonçalo Gomes.
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: AVP found infected object
> /var/tmp/checkmail8395/receivedmail/[From: "funky gao"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]:\Emanuel.exe infected: I-Worm.Navidad.b2
your outlook has been afffected by W32.Navidad.16896... please take care!!
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Please check your system I have recieved this attachment "Emanuel.exe" from
your addres six times It contains the "win32.Navidad.b" virus
thanks
- Original Message -
From: "funky gao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brett
Is everyone else receiving a bunch of emails
from 'funky gao'? Can someone remove this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list? I've
received quite a few messages from him this
morning, all containing the file Emanuel.exe
with a virus.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: funky gao [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Oliver, all of your emails are being sent with
a virus infected executable attached, Emanuel.exe,
you may want to have a look at your machine before
sending more emails.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: funky gao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:42 AM
To: Linux
C
Even though the message is in norwegian, you will recognize that it's
a QMAILSCANNER virus warning, and I've gotten 6 more last hour.
Please disinfect your computer and / or temporarly stop sending mail.
MVH André PaulsbergIDG New Media Support
Informasjon fra I
Hello everybody.
Our virus scanner detected a couple of mails that contain a virus.
The message looks like this:
Scanning file /var/tmp/qmail-local2076/unpacked/mm.eyj8Cr
Scanning file /var/tmp/qmail-local2076/unpacked/Emanuel.exe
Found the W32/Navidad.e@M trojan !!!
Please take care.
Best re
In the last minute I have received 5 emails from this
list purporting to be from funky gao.
All have an attachment called Emanuel.exe.
4 are messages from regular contributors who are not
(apparently) Chinese. These appear to be from other than
their normal origins.
What is going on? I am ce
* Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 23:53]:
> I don't see it. Russ's patch looks like this (at least, in the
> version I downloaded):
> +if (qmtp_priority(ip.ix[i].pref)) {
> + if (timeoutconn(smtpfd,&ip.ix[i].ip,(unsigned int) qmtp_port,timeoutconnect)
>== 0) {
> + tcpto
Emanuel.exe is not needed thx
-Message d'origine-
De?: funky gao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy¨¦?: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:41
¨¤?: Doug Schmidt
Cc?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet?: Re: concurrencyremote
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:36:50PM -0400, Doug Schmidt wrote:
>
> I would like to
don't open attachment emanuel.exe from "funky gao"
> From: "Brett Randall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:00:06 +1000
>
> > Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called
> > Courtesy Copy for nothing.
>
> I thought it was Carbon Copy?
Considering that the majority of Internet users these days are so youn
> From: "Brett Randall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:00:06 +1000
>
> > Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called
> > Courtesy Copy for nothing.
>
> I thought it was Carbon Copy?
Considering that the majority of Internet users these days are so youn
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:46:24PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 06:50:59PM +0700, Joomy wrote:
> > 1. Can I use more then 8 chars password with both system ? like md5 in
> > shadow password ? or I have to user ldap authentication ?
> AFAIK, vmailmgr supports MD5 passwords, so
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Linux wrote:
> 2)I'm managing a mail server with qmail. I have about 200 users and 50
> virtual domains, and all my configuration works correctly.
> I have created about 180 real users (passwd and shadow files) in my system
> for managing virtual domains a
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 06:50:59PM +0700, Joomy wrote:
> Hi all,
> sorry about this OT, but I can't find any good information about
> vmailmgr/vpopmail.
> If anyone have a nice url , please tell me. (not vmailmgr/vpopmail website)
>
> I have some (stupid) question about vmailmgr and vpopmail
Som
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
