Today, Matthew Hunter wrote:
www.qmail.org is refusing my connections to port 80.
I *was* planning to set up a qmail server this weekend
with some of the patches on that site. Since it seems to be
down, does anyone know why? And, ideally, know where a working
mirror is?
Off the top of my
all,
I have a problem. I find there are some mail in the queue.
I want to delete them, How to do it?
Thanks.
==
lyndon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 04:33:52PM +0800, lyndon wrote:
all,
I have a problem. I find there are some mail in the queue.
I want to delete them, How to do it?
There are utilities for this but I prefer to change the time for the
relevant file under /var/qmail/queue/info/ with
$ touch -d '1
* lyndon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find there are some mail in the queue. I want to delete them, How
to do it?
http://www.io.com/~mick/soft/qmhandle.html
qmail Digest 4 Feb 2001 11:00:01 - Issue 1265
Topics (messages 56586 through 56607):
bind qmail-smtp to one IP-adress
56586 by: Clemens Hermann
56587 by: Greg Cope
Prepend message before forward to indicate original recipient
56588 by: Sean Brown
56591 by:
Matthew,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Matthew Hunter wrote:
www.qmail.org is refusing my connections to port 80.
I *was* planning to set up a qmail server this weekend
with some of the patches on that site. Since it seems to be
down, does anyone know why? And, ideally, know where a working
mirror
Hi Pratibha,
i have faced a problem regarding retreival of mails from mail browsers..
the problem is that the mails in my 'new' folder are automatically
transfered to 'cur' folder and the message id gets attached with ":2,".
and it gets appended again and again. the mails are readable
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:20:25AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
I am wondering if there is a qmail with the
qmail-ldap patch already applied.
Perhaps, but if you can't handle applying the patch, you're definitely
not ready for qmail-ldap.
Right. And we all are aware of Dan's licensing, so this
If there are a lot of mails in queue of qmail , how can I delete mails from queue
securely? Thanks!
--
»¶ÓʹÓà 21CN µç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ http://www.21cn.com
Thank you for using 21cn.com Email system
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:28:54PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
tcpserver [ opts ] host port prog
Port being an IP address (or 0 for all) to bind to.
Ert? Almost there. "Host being the address blablabla" is more accurate.
RC
--
+---
| Ricardo Cerqueira
| PGP Key fingerprint
Hello,
We have just received our server which is a Dual
PIII with 512 MB RAM , RH Linux 6.2 Box. I have installed qmail on this with
tcpserver, Now the meminfo showscat /proc/meminfo
total: used: free: shared:
buffers: cached:Mem: 529530880 364380160 165150720 72847360
300982272
Hello,
We have just received our server which is a Dual PIII with 512 MB RAM , RH Linux 6.2
Box. I have installed qmail on this with tcpserver, Now the meminfo shows
cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 529530880 364380160 165150720 72847360
Hello,
We have just received our server which is a Dual PIII with 512 MB RAM , RH Linux 6.2
Box. I have installed qmail on this with tcpserver, Now the meminfo shows
cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 529530880 364380160 165150720 72847360
Hello,
We have just received our server which is a Dual PIII with 512 MB RAM , RH Linux 6.2
Box. I have installed qmail on this with tcpserver, Now the meminfo shows
cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 529530880 364380160 165150720 72847360
Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:28:54PM +, Greg Cope wrote:
tcpserver [ opts ] host port prog
Port being an IP address (or 0 for all) to bind to.
Ert? Almost there. "Host being the address blablabla" is more accurate.
Thanks for the correction.
Whops,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is hardly anybody using this server...please let me know how can I find out
which process is using so much of memory.
This is really a LUG question, but try `ps auxw'
--
"Pascal, n.: A programming language named after a man who would turn
Well, this is hardly a qmail question. It's more a system
administration/Linux question. Have you got the 'top' command? Try
that? Have you got the 'ps' command? Try that.
I don't know about Linux so much, but some Operating Systems use
memory that has never had anything placed in it in
Er, one copy of this email to the list is more than enough. Three is
clearly excessive.
Regards.
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:31:44AM -0800, Sumith Ail wrote:
Hello,
We have just received our server which is a Dual PIII with 512 MB RAM , RH Linux 6.2
Box. I have installed qmail on this
From a security perspective, checkpassword is very much like the 'su'
program. If a user/password matches, it changes to the permissions of
that user. The major difference is that checkpassword is normally not
setuid root - it inherits root, originally from tcpserver.
Similarly, checkpassword is
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:01:18PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are a lot of mails in queue of qmail , how can I delete mails from queue
securely? Thanks!
I would use qmHandle
http://www.io.com/~mick/soft/qmhandle.html
Regards,
Olivier
--
Hello,
I am using qmail on solaris with some patches includin high
concurrency and getting this error whenever concurrency jumps high. Any
ideas why could that happen.
Example of the log:
"
Feb 5 00:18:04 smtp1 splogger: [ID 748625 mail.info] 981299884.297969
delivery 821: deferral:
Yee Siew Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can i put this "/var/spool/mail/logadmin" in
~alias/.qmail-log if i use qmail with /var/spool/mail
instead of Maildir or Mailbox?
Yes. That mbox will become very large if you have any significant mail
traffic.
Charles
--
Ian Matyssik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using qmail on solaris with some patches includin high
concurrency and getting this error whenever concurrency jumps high. Any
ideas why could that happen.
Example of the log:
"
Feb 5 00:18:04 smtp1 splogger: [ID 748625 mail.info]
Hi,
b) have tcpserver run as a nobody, thus have qmail-popup run as a
On all Unix I know, you couldn't do that, because tcpserver has to bind
to port 110 for pop, and only root has the permission to bind to ports
below 1024.
claudio
--
Claudio Nieder, Kanalweg
OK I hate answering my own e-mail but I figured it out.. I am an
idiot.. :)
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of my users when trying to send to aol or other off system sites are
getting this error.
sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts(#5.7.1)
Well
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:06:13PM +0100, Claudio Nieder wrote:
Hi,
b) have tcpserver run as a nobody, thus have qmail-popup run as a
On all Unix I know, you couldn't do that, because tcpserver has to bind
to port 110 for pop, and only root has the permission to bind to ports
below
Hi,
I am a dial-up user currently running sendmail and am planning to
migrate to qmail. This is my current setup:
Outgoing Mail:
* clients either run sendmail for connect to port 25 and send mail.
Sendmail queues the mail but does not send immediately.
* every 10 minutes I have a cron job
is it possible to somehow use a newline command in the message that the
bouncesaying command sends?
so that the error mail from the sending smtp server back to the envelope
sender would contain deliberate line breaks?
wolfgang
There are so many garbage mails in /var/qmail/queue. Is there a good and simple way to
delete all mails in the queue? Can I use OS commands as "mv" or "rm" ?
Thanks.
--
»¶ÓʹÓà 21CN µç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ http://www.21cn.com
Thank you for using 21cn.com Email
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:41:20AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are so many garbage mails in /var/qmail/queue. Is there a good and simple way
to delete all mails in the queue? Can I use OS commands as "mv" or "rm" ?
Sure. Here they are:
1. # Stop qmail
2. # rm -rf
Hi All,
Has anyone run NAI's anti-virus package via amavis on a system
which has qmail, vpopmail, tcpserver, as it's MTA and supporting packages.
I run a Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 box (pent 133 w/32MB, and the ./configure states:
Sorry, you need to install metamail or reformime
now, in
Bill Parker wrote:
Has anyone run NAI's anti-virus package via amavis on a system
which has qmail, vpopmail, tcpserver, as it's MTA and supporting packages.
I run a Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 box (pent 133 w/32MB, and the ./configure states:
Sorry, you need to install metamail or
hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well why should aol.com or msn.com or anything off site be in rcpthosts?
What am I missing on my qmail server to do this..
you propably should take a look at tcprules
;) alexander
Am 04.02.2001 um 16:31:12 schrieb Ross Burton:
Hi Ross,
I have installed qmail alongside sendmail and have tested it according
to the install documents. However, I do not know how to stop it sending
mails to remote addresses every time it gets a message.
How can I make qmail replicate the
Hi All,
I am a rookie at adding anti virus scanning software to my SMTP/POP3
(which is qmail 1.03), and I have a few questions.
I run OpenLinux 2.3 by Caldera), and the packages maildrop and tnef
were not available in rpm format for my system, so I downloaded tarballs
of
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Sam Trenholme wrote:
I love their claims of scalibility with their mail server. "UNIX-like
scalability at a fraction of the cost". Hurrumph. How much does it cost
to put Linux and Qmail on an old Pentium or Pentium II?
I would guess at around $10,000 for the
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would guess at around $10,000 for the installation, and then around
$1000/month ?
I'll do it for $7500 and $750 a month. Whatabargain!
Scott
Hi,
When I was using sendmail on my server and e-mail had in headers something
like this:
Disposition-Notification-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everytime, when e-mail was delivered to recepient mailbox I was getting
e-mail saying that message was delivered. How to make qmail to do same
thing?
On 04-Feb-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love their claims of scalibility with their mail server. "UNIX-like
scalability at a fraction of the cost". Hurrumph. How much does it cost
to put Linux and Qmail on an old Pentium or Pentium II?
I would guess at around $10,000 for the
On 04-Feb-2001 Sumith Ail wrote:
There is hardly anybody using this server...please let me know how can I find out
which
process is using so much of memory.
This is perfectly normal. Linux stashes as much files as possible into
its disk cache. When a process needs more memory, the cache is
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 05:40:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
is it possible to somehow use a newline command in the message that the
bouncesaying command sends?
try
|bouncesaying "`cat filename`"
or
|bouncesaying "`printf 'line1\nline2'`"
you can also try some other
:(
It's my problem with exchange and my private network...
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
---
Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for
Thus spake Stefaan A Eeckels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The European Commission just installed a new mail system based on
MS Exchange.
If you ask me, they deserve it.
Everyone deserves the software he is using.
AFAIK, NATO is using Exchange, too.
May their pain be barely sufferable.
Felix
Ok someone in English please.
Where do i set in environment. ? what file
I'm lost
1.2. How do I set up user masquerading? I'd like my own From lines to
show [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Answer: Add MAILHOST=af.mil and MAILUSER=boss to your environment. To
override From lines
Thanks for the advice, I also forgot to mention that I use solaris 8 latest
patchlevel release on Sparc.
I tried to do this in my /service/qmail/run file:
ulimit -Sn 4096
ulimit -Hn 16384
but still getting the same problem.
This page :http://www.voicenet.com/~orcutt/tech/save.tcptune.htm
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2? I
installed it from the ports and it does not work. When I try to run
it..the qmaill/q/r/p/s users don't even run the process, but instead some
unknown uid running the qmail-send and other processes. Then when i try to
connect to port 25, it says
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:07:15PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
Nothing.
I installed it from the ports and it does not work.
Ask the port's maintainer, or try installing it without the port, from the qmail
tarball, according to the instructions in the
I must be as thick as two short planks but for the file of me I can't get my
head around how SVSCAN works. Can someone please enlighten me, PLEASE !!
Yes, I have read, what little there is of the docs.
help !!
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:12:05PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 06:07:15PM -0800, Bruce Dang wrote:
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
Nothing.
I installed it from the ports and it does not work.
Ask the port's maintainer, or try installing it without the
Hmm, did you install from the ports or did you install from the tarball?
btw, do you know what hte ERROR, CAN"T READ CONTROLS #4.3.0 mean?
Bruce,
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Delany" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: Qmail
Slightly offtopic but are people allowed to distribute qmail in this
manner? I thought there was a clause somewhere for most DJB software?
I'm curious for cases like mass rollout, or maybe bundling as part of a
product. For example I prefer /var/dns/cache vs /etc/dnscache. Or qmail
spool
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 10:55:26AM +0800, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
Slightly offtopic but are people allowed to distribute qmail in this
manner? I thought there was a clause somewhere for most DJB software?
In what manner? Ports downloads the sources on your behalf, applies
patches as the ports
Yup, just went through it again today in fact *grin*
qmail works wonderfully well with 4.2 :)
Laurence
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Boudreaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 8:06 PM
To: Bruce Dang; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Qmail on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:28:16PM -0800, David Benfell wrote:
I see the error message printed out, but watching the log, I don't see
the bounce going out. Looking at some old mail, I see that
bouncesaying doesn't, by itself, bounce anything.
bouncesaying exits with 100, which qmail
- Original Message -
From:
Jagadish.N
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cr.yp.to log list
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:54
AM
Subject: Delay in POP and SMTP
response
Hello fellow qmailer's,
I have a problem with my qmail system, I get frequent
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 02:25:54PM +0800, lyndon wrote:
Feb 5 14:19:17 mail qmail: 981353957.038669 warning: trouble marking
remote/11/127109; message will be delivered twice!
Feb 5 14:19:17 mail qmail: 981353957.038881 warning: unable to unlink
remote/11/127109; will try again later
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:13:45PM +0530, Jagadish.N wrote:
I even telneted to 110 and 25 specifing
the mail server's ip address but it takes quite a long time to respond.
try starting tcpserver with the -R option.
Regards, Uwe
Am 04.02.2001 um 18:07:15 schrieb Bruce Dang:
Hi Bruce
What is wrong with qmail on FreeBSD 4.2?
I don't know. I installed it from the ports. Before that I patched it
with the smtp-auth patch. After installation I made some adjustments to
have it run LWQ-like. I did not run into any
Hello all,
I'm trying to get maildrop to invoke bouncesaying. This is what I
have right now:
if ( /lists.debian.org/ )
{
`/var/qmail/bin/bouncesaying "Numerous attempts to unsubscribe from all Debian
lists have failed."`
to /dev/null
}
I see the error message printed out, but
Today, I get the following message:
Feb 5 14:19:17 mail qmail: 981353957.038669 warning: trouble marking
remote/11/127109; message will be delivered twice!
Feb 5 14:19:17 mail qmail: 981353957.038881 warning: unable to unlink
remote/11/127109; will try again later
what is the matter?
Thus said "dennis" on Mon, 05 Feb 2001 13:23:55 +1100:
I must be as thick as two short planks but for the file of me I can't get my
head around how SVSCAN works. Can someone please enlighten me, PLEASE !!
svscan ``scans'' the directory that you give it for other directories.
For each
I seriously doubt that this belongs on the log mailing list even once,
let alone twice. Anyway, you don't provide enough information. You say
you telnet to your mail server and it takes a long time to respond. Do
you mean that it takes a long time to connect, or that after connecting
the server
62 matches
Mail list logo
