On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:38:53AM -, pop corn wrote:
I'm trying to head towards a setup with:
qmail/qmail-pop3/courier-imap/vmailmgr/ldap/squirrelmail
makes no sense IMHO tun run qmailp-ldap AND vmailmgr.
(1) I've been going over the life with qmail-ldap documentation and would
like
Mathew Chandy writes:
Whenever we send a external mail we get the following message in /var/log/maillog
Jun 28 15:36:10 mail qmail: 993722770.649384 starting delivery 558: msg 53658 to
remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 28 15:36:10 mail qmail: 993722770.649477 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
Any ideas anyone??
murpheous.
Hi,
I'm running some mailing lists using qmail+ezmlm-idx. Sometimes, I
get something like this in the logs:
Jun 28 08:22:56 bl qmail: 993730976.165287 delivery 859660: deferral:
Connected_to_64.94.200.235_but_connection_died._Possible_duplicate!_(#4.4.2)/
I understand that this is the result
Hi All,
I guess its not exactly a common problem - no so ones responding.
forget the rpms, and all that stuff. simply what would/could cause the
error?
cannot start: hath the daemon spawn no fire?
in /var/log/qmail/ log file?
Thanx in advance
Ben Murphy,
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I was running qmail-pop3d from inetd on FreeBSD 4.3 with no problems
getting my mail. I took a suggestion and moved to running it under
tcpserver. Now using the same username and password I get a -ERR
authorization failed.
qmail-pop3d start
CNAME_lookup_failed... implies that it could not resolve the recipient's
domain. Verify that your DNS server or /etc/resolv.conf is configured and
working correctly.
On Friday 29 June 2001 13:50, Mathew Chandy wrote:
Hi all,
We have qmail-1.0.3 installed in our server.
Whenever we send
Hi all.
Finally after 2-3 weks of playing with qmail on a server i succeded to
install it with courier-imap and vmailmgr.My last desire though is to have
the ability my users not to be UNIX users but virtual users.I have problems
with my vmailmgr program but i would like to know if there is a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Hi,
I'm running some mailing lists using qmail+ezmlm-idx. Sometimes, I
get something like this in the logs:
Jun 28 08:22:56 bl qmail: 993730976.165287 delivery 859660: deferral:
David T. Ashley([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.27 20:42:50 +:
If Free BSD breaks the 2G limit, I'd go with Free BSD.
what 2g limit?
/k
--
Love does not make the world go around, just up and down a bit.
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
Hey all,
I'm a newcomer to the list, but I've been using qmail for about a year or
so. Recently my original qmail server (RH 6.2 - Sparc) died (bad memory)
and in a rush I built a new qmail server on another machine (RH 7.1 -
486). The server seems to run fine, no error and such. The way my
are you sure, that your DNS server is set up correctly ?
it looks like a DNS problem..
what happens if you do a dig eximsoft.com in your shell ?
At 19:50 29.06.2001, Mathew Chandy wrote:
Hi all,
We have qmail-1.0.3 installed in our server.
Whenever we send a external mail we get the following
Thanks for answering my questions about vmailmgr, Kerberos, and pop. I've
just signed up on the qmail-ldap list and will try to post further
qmail-ldap questions there rather than here.
From: Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-ldap questions
Date: Fri,
screams dns, but not really. Very odd.
I'd take down the FW long enough to make sure it's not the cause, then start
looking for DNS issues. Usually something that won't work for a while then
suddenly starts working screams a DNS server is resolving 1/2 the time.
-Original Message-
From:
if you're behind a cisco PIX, see if disabling smtp fixup helps.
I'm a newcomer to the list, but I've been using qmail for about a year or
so. Recently my original qmail server (RH 6.2 - Sparc) died (bad memory)
and in a rush I built a new qmail server on another machine (RH 7.1 -
486).
I think I figured out the problem. Apparently my firewall rules weren't
reloading correctly. I just rebooted the firewall altogether and right
now it seems to be working.
I discovered this when I fired up the old qmail server. When I would
telnet to my IP on the port, sometimes it would go to
www.ezmlm.org/pub/patches/qmail-bigrem.patch
The code and reason is there. You should check
with the ezmlm group.
-Original Message-
From: MIS - Ben Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 7:30 AM
To: Mailing List - Qmail (E-mail)
Subject: RE: cannot start:
I have a question that has as of yet remained unanswered.
Is it possible to filter or forward mail based on envelope sender and/or
sender IP.
things I know:
1. I know you can block sender IPs with tcpserver, but that rejects the
connection, I need to set up an auto-response.
2. I know I can
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:20:19AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Omar Thameen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to make qmail less conscientious about re-delivery?
That is, where qmail normally reports the ...Possible_duplicate! error,
I'd like it to assume that it has been
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:08:22PM -, Paul Gregg wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Is there any way to make qmail less conscientious about re-delivery?
That is, where qmail normally reports the ...Possible_duplicate! error,
I'd like it to assume that it has been
BTW, sometimes, I get this error:
Use of uninitialized value at possible_duplicate.pl line 49, chunk 197077.
and I can't figure out why. Thus far, it has always happened with one
guy's email address and no others. Whoever can track down the cause
gets a cyber-cookie.
Omar
On Fri, Jun 29,
Mike Culbertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question that has as of yet remained unanswered.
Is it possible to filter or forward mail based on envelope sender and/or
sender IP.
things I know:
1. I know you can block sender IPs with tcpserver, but that rejects the
connection, I
Omar Thameen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few duplicate deliveries are harmless -- and as they're the fault of the
receiving system, if the recipient is annoyed, tell them to tell their
postmaster to fix their system, and not to be angry at you.
Do you have any idea what types of issues
side note on this... I had the same problem about 6 months ago from a mom
and pop type hosting outfit.. I called them to ask them what was up and
after about 30 mintes of them telling me there was no problem we hung up and
I was ready to ban them from my entire network.. Then mysteriously about
At 4:51 PM -0700 6/29/01, James Stevens wrote:
Oh gawd.. No we get spam.. laugh
--JT
- Original Message -
From: James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:45 PM
Subject: AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISION
AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISON
Dear Friend and
Ok, tell me this list has a black list attached to it please .. ;)
--JT
- Original Message -
From: John Groseclose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISION
At 4:51 PM -0700 6/29/01, James Stevens wrote:
I will try and get in contact with them because I'd like to have
a page to send offending administrators to so they can fix theselves.
To that end, if anyone has any data points, please email the list or
email me privately and I will post a summary if I discover anything.
By data, I mean:
27 matches
Mail list logo
