: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Keith Warno[h][EMAIL PROTECTED] || [w][EMAIL PROTECTED]
rage: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Keith Warno[h][EMAIL PROTECTED] || [w][EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2000-11-16 at 15:17 -0500, Scott Gifford uttered:
| Keith Warno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| One one my lusers insists on using emacs rmail for reading mail. I'm
| not an emacs user so I don't know a lick about it
OK, I know the "Network Failure System" is a bad thing to begin
with, but at work I have no choice but to use qmail with NFS.
Here's the scenario and then I'll get to the annoyance (yes, just
one, for now) I ran into. (All of this is happening on a GNU/Linux
platform).
We have a master file
Hi,
Can qmail be configured to do sender domain verification (as mentioned
below), ie, reject mail from domains that do not resolve?
Thanks,
kw
- Original Message -
From: "Michael T. Babcock" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "QMAIL List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 August 2000, Thursday 15:16
ere in coporate land.
Trouble is I an very unclear as to how to attack this, considering that the
filter box would be relaying mail for multiple domains for which it would be
an MX. Any pointers on where to begin would be appreciated greatly!
Thanks much,
kw
/* Keith Warno
** Develope
a mail like the one below my
signature.
Notice the lines:
"DO NOT SEND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUESTS TO THE MAILING LIST!
If you do, I won't see them, and subscribers will yell at you."
Sheesh.
kw
/* Keith Warno
** Developer Sys Admin
** http://www.HaggleWare.com/
*/
Hi! This is the ezmlm pr
Long name before short name in /etc/hosts
ie
64.66.10.180 ns.domain.com ns
kw
- Original Message -
From: "PPPindia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 May 2000, Wednesday 15:39
Subject: hostname -f query
My system: RH 6.1, dedicated connection.
As per the qmail
For those not on the BugTraq mailing list.
This is yet another update about the worm from the moderator of BugTraq.
There's all sorts of useful info here.
You may also want to poke around at www.securityfocus.com .
kw
- Original Message -
From: "Elias Levy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
ot; to do it. Or
install a 2nd copy of qmail and then write a quick, untested "hack".
qmail needs filtering rules for this "love bug" sort of thing, ie, a new
control file or set of control files. These days, filtering by the MTA is
probably more of a necessity than a feature.
Hmmm... On the machine that you are having the problems finding the alias
user, are you running a qmail-1.03 binary package that was compiled on a
different machine?
I had similar problems. I built qmail-1.03, tarred up the binaries, moved
them to a (seemingly) identical machine, and it failed
How about output of qmail-showctl and
egrep '(^alias:|^qmail[dlpqrs]:)' /etc/passwd
?
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: Problems with qmail-pw2u
Chris Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erm...
qmail-pw2u reads from standin. You ran it as "/usr/bin/qmail/qmail-pw2u
alias"; it was
waiting for input via stdin, not hanging.
Try 'strace qmail-getpw alias', which is probably what you meant to do!
Also, what is the output of qmail-showctl on the RPM box? And what is the
egrep
Thanks for the responses.
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Warno" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "qmail" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 9:55 PM
Subject: quick question (qmail-1.03)
Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users:
Are the numeric ui
Concerning uids and gids of the qmail system users:
Are the numeric uids and gids compiled into the qmail-1.03 programs, or are
the names used?
I'm assuming (after having some difficulties; read on) the numeric uids/gids
are compiled in. Is this a correct assumption? I moved qmail binaries
eh?
That would work; try "man forward" :)
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo Cerqueira" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: weird
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 04:24:33PM -0600, Jonathan Fortin wrote:
Sorry for not being
Hmmm.. Maildir _should_ be a directory.
Is the trailing slash missing from ./Maildir/ in the rc script?
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Fortin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 5:02 PM
Subject: Weird
I get as errors, Unable to open
hrmm.
All depends on how the master rc script processes links in the rc?.d/ dirs.
I would be inclined to rename the S*sendmail and K*sendmail links to
s*sendmail and k*sendmail (little 's' and little 'k').
Or you can edit the script that these links point to and put a big ol' exit
0 at the top.
If this variable is
unset, the shell disables mail checking.
Ciao,
kw
/*
** Keith Warno
** Make Us An Offer, Inc.
** Real-Time Online Haggling
** http://www.HaggleWare.com/
*/
a quick hack to reject mail from specific users or entire domains
(using regular expressions) but it's intended to be used in a .qmail file.
:-/
Cheers,
k
/*
** Keith Warno
** Make Us An Offer, Inc.
** Real-Time Online Haggling
** http://www.HaggleWare.com/
*/
- Original Message -
From
SuSE.com and -- I'm presuming SuSE.de -- also use qmail, as well as ezmlm
for their mailing lists.
http://www.suse.com/Maillist/index_en.html
1 of the 3 lists I'm on (the English discussion list, suse-linux-e)
generates about 2 or 3 times as much traffic as this list daily. Can't say
much more
The brackets are required.
From qmail-remote(8):
The remote host is qmail-remote's first argument, host.
qmail-remote sends the message to host, or to a mail
exchanger for host listed in the Domain Name System, via
the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
To be a little more verbose:
[www.xxx.yyy.zzz] (_with_ the brackets) must appear in control/rcpthosts
and, if mail to said address is to be delivered locally, it must also appear
(with the brackets) in control/locals.
- Original Message -
From: "Wilson Fletcher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
$PID
| kill -9 $PID
| rm -f /var/lock/subsys/qmail
| echo "done"
| ;;
|
|
| --
| From: Keith Warno[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 17:01
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: Sending to an IP address
|
| I tri
er..
Probably in the "splogger" part
eh?
Try:
tcpserver -v -u 7770 -g 2108 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3
(notice ya need a zero in there
too. check out the man on tcpserver!!)
- Original Message -
From:
Andreas Altenburg
| Hi
| I'm a new qmail user having a problem with relays. I'm using tcpserver
| with 3 domains in rcpthosts and the following in etc/tcp.smtp
|
| 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
| 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
|
| According to what I've read, this should allow only users with 192.168.1.*
| to use my
Hmm... sounds like you need to enable
relaying which can be done via tcpwrappers or tcpserver (preferrably
tcpserver).
Check the qmail FAQ from the source
distribution on how to enable relaying.
(FAQ question 5.4)
- Original Message -
From:
Eric
LaLonde
To: [EMAIL
Apologies for the previous HTML post.
- Original Message -
From: "Petr Novotny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| On 4 Jan 00, at 9:53, Keith Warno wrote:
| | The '' forwards are all collected together, and performed at the
| end | of the .qmail file processing. If the ma
) a reply-to line to the header I suppose.
Any idea how this could be achieved on the server side?
PS -- I don't use any mailing list package nor do I have any intention to do
so because the lists are tiny. I just use a couple of .qmail-* files. :
Regards,
kw
/*
** Keith Warno
** Make Us An Offer, Inc
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| "Keith Warno" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| I would like to add (or replace) a reply-to line to the header I suppose.
| Any idea how this could be achieved on the server side?
|
| PS -- I don't use any mail
Workaround (although a dirty one):
Make a symlink /var/spool/mail/$USER (replace /var/spool/mail/ with the path
to where your mail spool would normally live it you were using that holey
sendmail beast) to $HOME/Mailbox. Do this for each $USER. Make sure
/var/spool/mail/ (or whatever) has those
- Original Message -
From: "Frederik Lindberg" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 08:38:31AM -, Petr Novotny wrote:
On 22 Dec 99, at 5:46, Frederik Lindberg wrote:
They are just the message, but in dos/CRLF format. There are several
ways
to convert them. The easiest
tcpserver and company, v0.84
Thanks
/*
** Keith Warno
** Make Us An Offer, Inc.
** Real-Time Online Haggling
** http://www.makeusanoffer.com/
*/
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Keith Warno" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tcpserver -v -u 7770 -g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
21 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3
Um ok, the uid and gid are diff on my box : So's the
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: tcpserver logging
"Keith Warno" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "Dave Sill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Keith Warno" [
Hello all.
I would like to filter incoming messages, on a per-Mailbox basis, via a
user's .qmail and various calls to bouncesaying in that .qmail. Each call
to bouncsaying will run a program that checks for a particular condition,
and perhaps bounce the message if such a check fails. This is
When you untarred, did you FUBAR the file permissions?
When un-backing up using GNU tar ya should throw in a --same-permissions
option.
- Original Message -
From: "James Blackwell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 December 1999, Sunday 04:07
Subject: Please- qmail
Hmm this may sound silly, but did you add that host to locals and not
restart qmail?
- Original Message -
From: Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 1999, Monday 17:34
Subject: control/locals
Hi,
I keep getting bounces on a virtual domain.
Hi. This
PROTECTED] should go to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but winds up
going to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appeaers fastforward is taking the last rule that matches rather than the
first rule that matches.
Any clues? Probably my goof. If so, enlighten me :
Thanks,
kw
/*
** Keith Warno
** Make Us An Offer, Inc
my understanding
(or lack thereof) of fastforward, but it winds up going to AnotherRealUser
I'm stumped.
Thanks for any help.
/*
** Keith Warno
** Make Us An Offer, Inc.
** Real-time Online Haggling
** http://www.makeusanoffer.com/
*/
Well, like I said, I was just speculating. Chances are good that
fastforward works the way the documentation says it does. If you can
find a clear contradiction, post the details.
-Dave
Yeah I think I found a "clear contradiction".
I have two rules that demonstrate this:
postmaster:
OK, now where does the fastforward documentation say that it'll do
what you expect it to do?
-Dave
He'll never be able to show you that because the documentation says it
will do exactly what he is seeing. :)
quoting 'man setforward'
TARGETS
When fastforward sees the
Or IMAP's goof? I doubt
it's qmail's goof, but is there a way to convince qmail to stamp incoming,
locally-delivered mail with a time in EST rather than GMT?
Try to refrain from flames -- if I were my choice, all the windoze boxes
would be put to death w/ dynamite. :
Cheers,
kw
/*
** Keith Warno
**
43 matches
Mail list logo
