Re: Compile error

2001-07-30 Thread Arjen van Drie
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:29:01AM -0500, mick wrote: >Anyone know what component I'm missing: > ># make setup check >nroff -man qmail-clean.8 > qmail-clean.0 >troff: fatal error: can't find macro file tty-char >make: *** [qmail-clean.0] Error 1 I have /usr/share/groff/tmac/tmac.tty-char on my

Re: Compile error

2001-07-30 Thread mick
I have nroff 1.17 installed. Ran make with the -k option, continue running after errors. Compiled fine, just no man pages. On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Lukas Beeler wrote: > just a thought, but update nroff ? > GNU nroff (groff) version 1.17 > works fine for me... > > At 08:29 30.07.2001 -0500, mick w

Re: Compile error

2001-07-30 Thread Lukas Beeler
just a thought, but update nroff ? GNU nroff (groff) version 1.17 works fine for me... At 08:29 30.07.2001 -0500, mick wrote: Anyone know what component I'm missing: # make setup check nroff -man qmail-clean.8 > qmail-clean.0 troff: fatal error: can't find macro file tty-char make: *** [qmail-cl

Compile error

2001-07-30 Thread mick
Anyone know what component I'm missing: # make setup check nroff -man qmail-clean.8 > qmail-clean.0 troff: fatal error: can't find macro file tty-char make: *** [qmail-clean.0] Error 1 Thanks * Mick Dobra Systems Administrator MTCO Communications 1-800-85

Re[2]: compile error

2001-07-17 Thread Kenneth
Hello all, Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 10:39:11 PM, you wrote: KØ> * Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I encountered the following error in compiling qmail in my redhat >> 7.1 machine. Appreciate any idea to solve this problem. KØ> Did you create the user "alias"? Problem solved. Thank you for al

Re: compile error

2001-07-17 Thread Jake Roersma
On 2001.07.17 10:31 Kenneth wrote: > Hello all, > > I encountered the following error in compiling qmail in my redhat > 7.1 machine. Appreciate any idea to solve this problem. > > # make setup check > ( ./auto-uid auto_uida `head -1 conf-users` \ > &&./auto-uid auto_uidd `head -2 conf-users | t

Re: compile error

2001-07-17 Thread Kjetil Ødegaard
* Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I encountered the following error in compiling qmail in my redhat > 7.1 machine. Appreciate any idea to solve this problem. Did you create the user "alias"? -- Kjetil

compile error

2001-07-17 Thread Kenneth
Hello all, I encountered the following error in compiling qmail in my redhat 7.1 machine. Appreciate any idea to solve this problem. # make setup check ( ./auto-uid auto_uida `head -1 conf-users` \ &&./auto-uid auto_uidd `head -2 conf-users | tail -1` \ &&./auto-uid auto_uidl `head -3 conf-users

Re: Compile error Courier-imap

2001-02-13 Thread Kris Kelley
The Afif wrote: > I have some probelm when I compile courier-imap... Try the courier mailing list, available for subscription at http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users. This is off-topic for qmail. ---Kris Kelley

Re: Compile error Courier-imap

2001-02-12 Thread keng heng
your OS is solaris ? - Original Message - From: "The Afif" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 2:08 PM Subject: Compile error Courier-imap > Dear Miliser, > > I have some probelm when I compile courier-imap, the er

Compile error Courier-imap

2001-02-12 Thread The Afif
Dear Miliser, I have some probelm when I compile courier-imap, the error message when I compile is like this [afif@dodol courier-imap-1.3.3]$ ./configure checking whether the C++ compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler cannot cre ate exe

Re: qmail compile error

2001-01-25 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:06:49AM -0600, Fish Flowers wrote: [snip] > typdef struct __ns_msg { Are you sure it says 'typdef' there? It should be 'typedef'. Looks like someone messed with your includefiles. Greetz, Peter.

qmail compile error

2001-01-25 Thread Fish Flowers
Hi -- I'm trying to install qmail on a Solaris box, and when running "make setup check" I'm getting the following string: ... [happy compile messages] ... ./compile dns.c "/usr/include/arpa/nameser.h", line 127: warning: const is a keyword in ANSI C "/usr/include/arpa/nameser.h", line 127: synta

Re: qlogtools compile - error

2001-01-22 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 12:15:57PM +0100, Clemens Hermann wrote: > sorry, I used the wrong make but now it does not work anyway: > > gmake: *** No rules to make target 'qlogselect', needed by 'all'. Stop. > > what is wrong? on my Debian it compiles perfect but not under FreeBSD Did you remove t

Re: qlogtools compile - error

2001-01-20 Thread Clemens Hermann
Am 20.01.2001 um 12:01:10 schrieb Clemens Hermann: Hi, sorry, I used the wrong make but now it does not work anyway: gmake: *** No rules to make target 'qlogselect', needed by 'all'. Stop. what is wrong? on my Debian it compiles perfect but not under FreeBSD /ch

qlogtools compile - error

2001-01-20 Thread Clemens Hermann
Hi, while trying to compile Bruce's qlogtools-package on my FreeBSD-Box I get the error-message: gcc -g -o -multitail gcc: No input files specified *** Error code 1 gmake is installed. any hints? /ch

Re: Compile Error

2000-04-18 Thread John P. Looney
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 12:00:23PM -0400, Greg Owen mentioned: > There's a Solaris FAQ somewhere that gives the rundown on all the > stupid things Sun did on Solaris from a development point of view - the > compiler, the tools, the libs. The original poster, if interested in > compiling any

Re: Compile Error

2000-04-18 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 11:29:44AM -0400, Greg Owen wrote: > > to compile qmail. I received the error '/usr/ucb/cc: language optional > > software package not installed' '*** Error code 1' 'make: Fatal error: > > Command failed for target 'qmail-local.o' '. What does this > > mean and how can I

RE: Compile Error

2000-04-18 Thread Greg Owen
Matt Soffen wrote: > Greg Owen wrote: > > It means that Solaris ships without a C compiler, so you can't > > compile anything. > > > > To fix it, either purchase Sun's compiler, or download > > a precompiled version of GCC for Solaris. > > Nope.. Even that won't be a 100 % (so I found).

RE: Compile Error

2000-04-18 Thread Soffen, Matthew
= > -Original Message- > From: Greg Owen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 11:30 AM > To: qmail > Subject: RE: Compile Error > > > to compile qmail. I received the error '/usr/ucb/cc: language optional > > software package no

RE: Compile Error

2000-04-18 Thread Greg Owen
> to compile qmail. I received the error '/usr/ucb/cc: language optional > software package not installed' '*** Error code 1' 'make: Fatal error: > Command failed for target 'qmail-local.o' '. What does this > mean and how can I get around this? It means that Solaris ships without a C co

Re: Compile Error

2000-04-17 Thread Kristina
At 19:59 00/04/17 -0500, you wrote: > I am trying to install qmail. I have a sun sparc 5 with the new solaris > 8 installed. I installed the latest version of gcc (gcc2.95). I > downloaded qmail. Issued 'gunzip qmail-1.03.tar.gz' and then 'tar -xvf > qmail-1.03.tar'. I created the qmail users and

Compile Error

2000-04-17 Thread Nathaniel L. Keeling III
I am trying to install qmail. I have a sun sparc 5 with the new solaris 8 installed. I installed the latest version of gcc (gcc2.95). I downloaded qmail. Issued 'gunzip qmail-1.03.tar.gz' and then 'tar -xvf qmail-1.03.tar'. I created the qmail users and groups and then I tried to compile qmail. I

Qmail Compile Error on linux RH 6.1

2000-04-10 Thread Madhav
Hi all, I have got the following error while compiling(make setup check). I have searched for this in mailing list archive without any use. Here is my error. I am using RH 6.1 linux distro. [root@server1 qmail-1.03]# make setup check ./load auto-str substdio.a error.a str.a /usr/bin/ld: cannot op

Re: compile error

2000-01-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Russell Nelson wrote: > Greg Hudson writes: > > As to Russell Nelson's assertion that "int main" is a gratuitous > > innovation in C, I think that he's confused. > > In 1st edition K&R, main() wasn't treated as a subroutine, was never > declared "int main", and there was no

Re: Another compile error

2000-01-04 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Kristina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 04 Jan 2000: > Jan 4 11:14:49 ldaptest qmail: 946952089.151836 alert: unable to opendir to > do, > sleeping... > I do not understand why qmail is trying to open the directory > "todo" which is in the source directory of ldap: > ldap/doc/deve/todo !

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Russell Nelson
Greg Hudson writes: > As to Russell Nelson's assertion that "int main" is a gratuitous > innovation in C, I think that he's confused. In 1st edition K&R, main() wasn't treated as a subroutine, was never declared "int main", and there was no discussion of the meaning of a return value from main.

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Greg Hudson
Dan wrote, in 1996: > ``In case anyone's curious: I use void main() because it shuts gcc > up. Of course, a modern version of gcc (I just tested 2.8.1) will warn about "void main()" even if you don't give it warning flags. (I asked for this to be the case, back in 1996 when Dan said that; I can'

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Russell Nelson
Russ Allbery writes: > Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It's of no concern. At some point, some smart person decided that main > > should return the exit code of the program. So every program needed to > > have its 'main' routine changed from void to int, > > Mm... I'm f

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's of no concern. At some point, some smart person decided that main > should return the exit code of the program. So every program needed to > have its 'main' routine changed from void to int, Mm... I'm fairly certain that it's been int main() cl

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Russell Nelson
Kristina writes: > When I compile qmail-1.03 on Solaris 7 the following error is > produced throughout the compile for all *.c files. In the end, > qmail compiles okay so I am wondering if the following is > something I should be worried about? > > qmail-local.c:448: warning: return type o

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread lbudney-lists-qmail
"Chris L. Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Technically it's a bug. main() should always return int... Dan always calls _exit(stat), so main() _does_ return an integer, regardless of the declaration. > I always just assumed Dan was trying to make a statement of some > kind as he certainly

Re: compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Chris L. Mason
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:38:21AM +0900, Kristina wrote: > > > > When I compile qmail-1.03 on Solaris 7 the following error is produced throu > ghout > the compile for all *.c files. In the end, qmail compiles okay so I am wond > ering if > the following is something I should be worried about

Another compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Kristina
I get the following error during compile and after starting qmail: Jan 4 11:14:49 ldaptest qmail: 946952089.151836 alert: unable to opendir to do, sleeping... I do not understand why qmail is trying to open the directory "todo" which is in the source directory of ldap: ldap/doc/deve/todo

compile error

2000-01-03 Thread Kristina
When I compile qmail-1.03 on Solaris 7 the following error is produced throu ghout the compile for all *.c files. In the end, qmail compiles okay so I am wond ering if the following is something I should be worried about? qmail-local.c:448: warning: return type of `main' is not `int' Thanks

Re: Compile error with AIX 3.2.5

1999-07-14 Thread Jos Backus
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 12:58:27PM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > >AIX 3.2.5 doesn't have fchdir(2). > > > >Try replacing > > > > if (fchdir(fdsourcedir) == -1) > > > >with > > if (chdir(".") == -1) Looks like my (broken) suggestion a few years back (mine was a 3.2.4 system).

Compile error with AIX 3.2.5

1999-07-13 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
I have just tried to compile qmail on AIX 3.2.5 and it failed. I searched the archives and found some one who had the identical error. There was a reply that suggested a fix and then a reply from Bruno Wolff III on 26 August 1998 that suggested this would not work. Here is that reply that contain