Thanks for your help - all of you. Based on your advice, I nixed xinetd and
tcpserver is happy as a clam - so it is reading its config files and
forwarding is working. If/when I need ssh, I'll set that up with tcpserver.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 03:24:05PM -0500, Technology Strategic Planning, Inc. wrote:
> OK, so both xinetd and tcpserver are running. I get the feeling that I
> should pull xinetd out of the startup scripts. How will this effect apache
> and other services (most epically bind)?
>
> I assume the
- Original Message -
From: "Technology Strategic Planning, Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Relay IP address ranges - NEWBIE
> OK, so both xinetd and tcpserver are running. I get the feeling that I
&g
"Technology Strategic Planning, Inc." wrote:
>
> OK, so both xinetd and tcpserver are running. I get the feeling that I
> should pull xinetd out of the startup scripts. How will this effect apache
> and other services (most epically bind)?
>
> I assume the two don't coexist well? (A logical p
ke care of that on an emergency basis
(which is all I want locally).), however I need DNS on the mail box for the
internal (NAT) DNS configuration.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 2:04
Stephen Froehlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Config:
> RedHat 7.1
> qmail - 1.0.3
> daemontools-0.70
> dot-forward-0.71
> ucspi-tcp-0.88
>
> I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to relay
> mail through the server. I put the proper line in hosts.allow (per the
> FA
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:43:24PM -0500, Stephen Froehlich wrote:
> Config:
> RedHat 7.1
> qmail - 1.0.3
> daemontools-0.70
> dot-forward-0.71
> ucspi-tcp-0.88
>
> I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to relay
> mail through the server. I put the proper line in hos
Config:
RedHat 7.1
qmail - 1.0.3
daemontools-0.70
dot-forward-0.71
ucspi-tcp-0.88
I'm having a helluva time figuring out how to allow my local hosts to relay
mail through the server. I put the proper line in hosts.allow (per the
FAQ), however, I'm not familiar enough with xinetd to do the other
Leni Mayo writes:
> I'm thinking along the lines of the apache "BindAddress" keyword,
> so qmail would only use a specific ip address when listening and
> as a source address for outbound connections.
Sean showed how you can use tcpserver for listening. For outbo
+1000
> From: Leni Mayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: binding qmail to a specific ip address
>
> I'm qmail running on a box with 2 network interface cards and want
>
I'm qmail running on a box with 2 network interface cards and want
to bind qmail to a specific IP address in order to simplify
firewall rules.
I'm thinking along the lines of the apache "BindAddress" keyword,
so qmail would only use a specific ip address when listening and
It also sounds very similar to
what vpopmail does. vmailmgr doesn't need an external database, either.
> The script uses this information to delivery in the right directory,
> depending on the domain.
vmailmgr does this.
> I'd like to know once more information. About
Cleiton L. Siqueira writes:
> I need to know what enviroment variable is responsible to keep the IP
> ADDRESS of SENDER.
$TCPREMOTEIP.
You should look into tcpservers -x option and
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcprules.html>
If I understand you correctly, it will do what you want.
Vince.
information to delivery in the right directory, depending on
the domain.
I'd like to know once more information. About the IP ADDRESS of SENDER.
I need to know what enviroment variable is responsible to keep the IP ADDRESS of
SENDER.
Regards Cleiton
Charles Cazabon gravada:
> Cleiton L.
know once more information like RECIPIENT or SENDER.
I need to know What the IP address of the SENDER is. Because this way
I can check if he belongs in my network and avoiding he to send
anonymous
messages.
To do this I'd match the SENDER and IP ADDRESS and if they are right
I would permit if t
t delivery
target?
> I would like to implement in this script, the possibitity of avoiding the
> local users in my network to send anonymous messages to the others. But I
> need to know once more information like RECIPIENT or SENDER. I need to know
> What the IP address of the SENDER
know once more information like RECIPIENT or SENDER.
I need to know What the IP address of the SENDER is. Because this way
I can check if he belongs in my network and avoiding he to send
anonymous
messages.
To do this I'd match the SENDER and IP ADDRESS and if they are right
I would permit if t
You can't.
Only the IP for the server which is relaying or delivering mail to you, but that's
trivial right?
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:52:44AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There, I want to get IP address of mail sender, so I can add some choiced IPs to
>/etc/tcp.smtp.cd
There, I want to get IP address of mail sender, so I can add some choiced IPs to
/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb. But how can I get it?
Thanks!
--
»¶ÓʹÓà 21CN µç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ http://www.21cn.com
Thank you for using 21cn.com Email system
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Steve Marks wrote:
> I'm receiving the "I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address" error
> when sending email to a specific domain, savvy.com.
ups ..sorry.. that was my fault :-(... no clue what it could be
otherwisehmmm...
; <<
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Steve Marks wrote:
> I'm receiving the "I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address" error
> when sending email to a specific domain, savvy.com.
i couldn't find an mx-entry for this domain ??
; <<>> DiG 9.1.0 <<>> -ta
I'm receiving the "I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address" error
when sending email to a specific domain, savvy.com.
I've seen this question asked before by searching the qmail mailing list
archive. The answer has always been that the MX record points to an IP
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:33:12AM +0400, Antonio Ferri Charbone wrote:
> I need urgently to block IP Address in qmail, anybody knows what is the
> manner of make it ?
use tcpservers functionality (1.2.3.4:deny).
Regards, Uwe
> I need urgently to block IP Address in qmail, anybody knows what is the
> manner of make it ?
"man tcpserver" if you are running qmail-smtpd under tcpserver.
-x is the switch that helps you.
Your operating system may also be able to block packets from defined IP
addresses.
Regards, Frank
Antonio Ferri Charbone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need urgently to block IP Address in qmail, anybody knows what is the
> manner of make it ?
If you invoke qmail-smtpd with tcpserver, add a rule like
1.2.3.4:deny
somewhere in the appropriate tcprules file. Then recompi
Hello,
* Antonio Ferri Charbone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010216 16:40] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need urgently to block IP Address in qmail, anybody knows what is the
> manner of make it ?
Block the domain in /var/qmail/badmailfrom
or use firewall tool for block 25 port for this ip.
Hi,
I need urgently to block IP Address in qmail, anybody knows what is the
manner of make it ?
thanks
begin:vcard
n:Ferri Charbone;Antonio
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Telcel Celular C.A.;Gerencia de Operaciones
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Administrador de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 16 December 2000 at 23:36:34 +0100
> Hello,
>
> how can i define my IP-address and hostname to invisible when i send my
> email via smtp to the world ?
You can't; the line giving your IP is put in by the next server in t
Hello,
how can i define my IP-address and hostname to invisible when i send my
email via smtp to the world ?
I've seen the variable TCPLOCALIP and TCPLOCALHOST. I want only, that
other email systems the MX record of the DNS server see and use.
Thanks for the help
best regards
G
afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
> addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> :
> Sorry, I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4)
>
> Why would this work
7;ve given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
:
Sorry, I couldn't find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4)
Why would this work from Yahoo but not my own system? Thanks in advance for
any help you can shed on the problem.
- David
ed: from (HELO mensa) ()
by 192.168.100.10 with SMTP; 17 Oct 2000 20:26:18 -
-Original Message-
From: Mike A. Sauvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 4:34 PM
To: Tim Hunter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to hide the ip address of the client
192.168.100.:allow,TCPREMOTEHOST="needed out ip?"
,TCPREMOTEIP="",RELAYCLIENT=""
how i defined it ?. i was looking on different places, like site's and man's
but nothing really specific found.
Received: (qmail 391 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2000 08:43:48 -
Received: from freesurf.ch (HELO
like this in your rules file:
192.168.100.:allow,TCPREMOTEHOST="",TCPREMOTEIP="",RELAYCLIENT=""
Chris
-- Tim
-Original Message-
From: Mike A. Sauvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How t
How to hide the ip address of the client sender from the message header?
mail source:
Received: (qmail 391 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2000 08:43:48 -
Received: from freesurf.ch (HELO freesurfmail.sunrise.ch) (194.230.0.32)
by 192.168.1.20 with SMTP; 17 Oct 2000 08:43:48 -
A while back somebody mentioned in passing an add-on
that allowed connection limiting based on IP address.
I can't find it at on the webpage at qmail.org, or
in the FAQ or LWQ. I'm currently doing it with a
patched version of tcpserver, but would rather do it
the qmail way - any
^^^
> by 192.168.0.2 with SMTP; 16 Oct 2000 09:09:58 -
> ^^^^^^
> ...
>
> In the header appears the host name and the ip address
> of the client sender and the internal ip address of the
> qmail server (either protec
he host name and the ip address
of the client sender and the internal ip address of the
qmail server (either protected by firewall).
How to scrub the private ip addresses from the header?
Thanks in advance for any help.
francesco
I follow up myself..
> Hello all. I'm relatively new to qmail.
>
> I'm wondering if someone made newer version of following patch. (or like)
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1996/12/msg00261.html
>
> I really need this kind of patch, since some mail servers are configured
t
Hello all. I'm relatively new to qmail.
I'm wondering if someone made newer version of following patch. (or like)
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1996/12/msg00261.html
I really need this kind of patch, since some mail servers are configured to
reject mail
if
The correct syntax is:
to: user@[ip-address-of-hostB]
the square brackets are required in this case.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Jeff Mangewala wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can I use qmail-inject on hostA to send e-mail to a user at hostB by doing
> the following:
>
>
> qmail-inject
Hello,
Can I use qmail-inject on hostA to send e-mail to a user at hostB by doing
the following:
qmail-inject
to: user@ip-address-of-hostB
I saw an RFC that states that DNS aliases cannot be used.
Does this mean that the "to:" line has to be to something with an "A" r
>> is the firewall doing NAT
That was the problem exactly. I don't know how I missed it (I'm the guy
who set up the firewall!!) but I did.
Barry
Barry Dwyer writes:
> My tcp.smtp file has proper settings to allow the local clients to work
> as RELAYCLIENTS:
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
Just a speculation, but is the firewall doing NAT? Does the
mail server really see 192.168.0.n as client
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 05:00:11PM +0200, Giuliano Cocchi wrote:
> Yes, i receive mail from outside for my local and virtual domain,
> and only the listed networks can use my server to send mail to outside.
Something's wrong then... That final :deny rule should reject any outside TCP
connection
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 04:36:22PM +0200, Giuliano Cocchi wrote:
> Intruducing
> 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> (and each other network managed by your server)
> :deny
Are you sure? It shouldn't! Are you getting any mail from the outside at all?
RC
> it's works correctly !!
>
>
> On Tue, 0
Intruducing
192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
(and each other network managed by your server)
:deny
it's works correctly !!
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, ertan payci wrote:
> Im afraid, i had a wrong view of the system.
> Well i must admit that my idea was not very accurate. It was a very easy
> way to
> m
Im afraid, i had a wrong view of the system.
Well i must admit that my idea was not very accurate. It was a very easy
way to
make sure that it (somehow) works. But Adam McKenna ist absolutely
right.
Actually it ist not the right way.
So i reproduced your configuration but had no problems.
If your
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 04:04:37AM -0500, Christopher Tolley wrote:
> I'm not going to argue, but I HAVE had to kill and restart tcpserver for the
> changes to take effect. If that's wrong, then I don't know how to make the
> changes take and NOT restart tcpserver...perhaps you can enlighten me a
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:22:24AM +0200, ertan payci wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me see if i got it right: you have users using your mailbox as
> mailhost,and want
> them to be able to use your mailhost as relay. Right ?
> IMHO you should just delete rcpthosts and manage your relaying stuff
> throug
Yes, deleting rcphosts the relay works correcly. But this pose the problem to
deny the relay to unwanted people.
Through the tcp.smtpd i can really manage the relay?
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, ertan payci wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me see if i got it right: you have users using your mailbox as
> mail
Hello,
Let me see if i got it right: you have users using your mailbox as
mailhost,and want
them to be able to use your mailhost as relay. Right ?
IMHO you should just delete rcpthosts and manage your relaying stuff
through
your tcp.smtp.cdb stuff. Your tcp.smtp looks correct, so give it a
trial.
It may seem a bit stupid... have you tried to put a space between the -x and
the path to the cdb file?
If so, can you please post the relevant script line ?
Armando
>> did you run tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp <
/etc/tcp.smtp
after creating that /etc/tcp.smtp file?
Yes. A bunch of times.
Barry
That's an actual paste of the file.
BD
Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:43:52PM -0700, Barry Dwyer wrote:
> > >> Either there is a typo in your tcp.smtp .
> >
> > My tcp.smtp is included, in its entirety, in my original post. Can
> > *anyone* see any problems with it? Reproduced
That's an actual paste of the file.
BD
Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:43:52PM -0700, Barry Dwyer wrote:
> > >> Either there is a typo in your tcp.smtp .
> >
> > My tcp.smtp is included, in its entirety, in my original post. Can
> > *anyone* see any problems with it? Reproduced
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:43:52PM -0700, Barry Dwyer wrote:
> >> Either there is a typo in your tcp.smtp .
>
> My tcp.smtp is included, in its entirety, in my original post. Can
> *anyone* see any problems with it? Reproduced again:
>
> > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> > 192.168.0.:allow,RELA
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 01:10:05PM -0700, Barry Dwyer wrote:
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
did you run
tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp
after creating that /etc/tcp.smtp file?
--
wolfgang
___
>> Either there is a typo in your tcp.smtp .
My tcp.smtp is included, in its entirety, in my original post. Can
*anyone* see any problems with it? Reproduced again:
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
>> or some other problem.
OK, great, but WHAT OTHER
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 01:10:05PM -0700, Barry Dwyer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got qmail running properly on a system with a DMZ-firewall setup.
> All the local clients are behind the firewall, addressed as 192.168.0.n.
> The firewall (a debian box) and the mail server are connected to our
> ADS
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 06:12:26PM -0500, Christopher Tolley wrote:
> Make sure you've used tcprules to hash your /etc/tcp.smtp file into
> /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb and then RESTART your tcpserver -x
> /etc/tcp.smtp/cdb...etc. The changes to tcp.smtp.cdb won't take effect
> until you restart.
It seems
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "QMAIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 3:10 PM
Subject: tcprules, rcpthost, ip address problem
> Hi all,
>
> I've got qmail running properly on a system with a DMZ-firewall setup.
> All the local clients are behind the firew
Barry Dwyer writes:
> If I create a rcpthosts file with just the local domain in it (that's
> all I want), then every local client that tries to send mail out to the
> 'net gets a qmail error message saying the destination domain is not in
> the list of receipt hosts (or something to that effect).
Hi all,
I've got qmail running properly on a system with a DMZ-firewall setup.
All the local clients are behind the firewall, addressed as 192.168.0.n.
The firewall (a debian box) and the mail server are connected to our
ADSL router and both have class-C addresses. The clients all have hosts
file
Iman Budi Setiawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have problem with qmail when changing my hostname and IP address.
>Please, tell me the steps to set my qmail's configuration (like change the
>files in /var/qmail/control directory).
1) stop qmail
2) for all files i
Dear all,
I have problem with qmail when changing my hostname and IP address.
Please, tell me the steps to set my qmail's configuration (like change the
files in /var/qmail/control directory).
Regards,
~iman
also sprach jaybc1:
> Hello all,
>
> What is the best route for handling multiple domains and associated things
> like mail delivery / pop3 user logins over 1 ip address?
Probably either vpopmail (<http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/>) or vmailmgr
(<http://www.vmailmgr.org/>
Hello all,
What is the best route for handling multiple domains and associated things
like mail delivery / pop3 user logins over 1 ip address?
J
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 06:53:06PM +0200, Robert Sander wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Where has this message gone?
> Have you
Hello,
I have one Qmail Server with a few of domains (I use vpopmail).
This server has got one Internal IP Address (192.168.0.x), and another Linux
Server (with one internal IP address and one external IP address) use the
portfw sentence for redirect the email traffic.
The Qmail Server also has
>thank you very much for the info about the ip address i will bring back
the gateway.
>
>my real problem is this i can send mail successfully but the problem is
when i check the mail i send their gone.
>
>sample i have a user vhernz in my qmail server. i configured my outlook
m
he logs is like this
|
| "delivery 20: success:
| 216.42.80.32_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_961742865_qp_39020/"
|
|
| why there is an ip address 216.42.80.32 there may be thats the problem why
| my mails are gone in my qmail machine but when i send to to other like
| hotmail
why is that in my qmail/maillog when i send email the logs is like this
"delivery 20: success:
216.42.80.32_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_961742865_qp_39020/"
why there is an ip address 216.42.80.32 there may be thats the problem why
my mails are gone in my qmail m
why is that in my qmail/maillog when i send email the logs is like this
"delivery 20: success:
216.42.80.32_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_961742865_qp_39020/"
why there is an ip address 216.42.80.32 there may be thats the problem why
my mails are gone in my qma
me if I am wrong, but it appears that my choices are:
>
> 1) selectively relay based upon IP address
> 2) control relaying by envelope sender (using the "relaymailfrom" patch)
>
> Is it possible to combine the two? For example, can I allow relaying from
> my own netwo
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but it appears that my choices are:
>
> 1) selectively relay based upon IP address
> 2) control relaying by envelope sender (using the "relaymailfrom" patch)
>
> Is it possible to combine the two? For example, can I allow relaying from
>
have two classes of users, one
class which can use qmail for both "external" and "internal" mail, and
another class which is limited to "internal" mail only.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but it appears that my choices are:
1) selectively relay based upon IP
Thanks . Actually i made a mistake writing this mail. I will make it
255.255.255.0. Any other issue or should I finalize this scheme. I want
it for Intranet that means it should not contain any internet IP address.
Thank you
kapil
Anton Pirnat wrote:
> >>>>>>>&
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Am 19.05.00, 01:54:23, schrieb kapil sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
zum Thema ip address scheme:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I am implementing a fresh Intranet for our organization. i am assigning
the following IP scheme:
IP address range: 192.168.254.1- 192.168.254.254
netmask : 254.254.254.0
Is there any mistake in this scheme. Please help!!
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 10:40:03AM +0100, James Raftery wrote:
> To generalise the previous question a little, is there a simple way of
> getting qmail-rspawn/qmail-remote to bind to a particular local
> interface for sending outgoing mail? I would like to have a particular
> virtual interface us
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 05:48:04PM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
> This has nothing to do with qmail-smtpd (or any other part of qmail for that
> matter). Check your routing table.
To generalise the previous question a little, is there a simple way of
getting qmail-rspawn/qmail-remote to bind to a
This has nothing to do with qmail-smtpd (or any other part of qmail for that
matter). Check your routing table.
--Adam
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 03:44:13PM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
>
> Today, I bound another IP address to our ethernet card. Eth0 is
> 209.90.117.130, eth0:1 is 209.9
Today, I bound another IP address to our ethernet card. Eth0 is
209.90.117.130, eth0:1 is 209.90.117.144, and now, eth0:2 is 209.90.117.140
.
The first two IP's were running jim-dandy for some time, now that I've
added the third address, outgoing mail is sent from 209.90.117.140
I have a farm of qmail servers sitting behind a load balancer. I'm
having a problem with being a secondary MX for a domain, because the
individual qmail servers in the farm don't realize that the IP address
of the load balancer actually points to them. They keep trying to
re-deliver t
Hi,
I'm new to qmail and I want to use it for virtual domain mailing on a host
who has an IP address per domain (doing accounting per IP address):
Example: Host serves
DomainA on IpA (MX entry in DNS)
DomainB on IpB (MX entry in DNS)
Local bind for outgoing e-mail depending on sender d
AIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2000 2:51
To: Bruno Wolff III
Cc: Sam; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Sending to an IP address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:29:03AM -0500,
> Sam <
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:29:03AM -0500,
> Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
> > > I ried to send to wilson@[203.26.11.154] but it failed. Can someone tell me why ?
> > B
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 12:29:03AM -0500,
Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
>
> > I ried to send to wilson@[203.26.11.154] but it failed. Can someone tell me why ?
>
> Because this form of addressing is obsolete and deprecated. Once upon a
> time MX r
TP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 17:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Sending to an IP address
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 04:42:55PM +1100, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
> OK added [203.26.11.154] to both control/locals & control/rcpth
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 04:42:55PM +1100, Wilson Fletcher wrote:
> OK added [203.26.11.154] to both control/locals & control/rcpthosts
> still not luck (yes I restarted qmail)
That's because it's the wrong way of doing things. Read the qmail-smtpd
man page, and see the section about the control
tion.
If the bracketed IP address in the e-mail address is one of the computer's IP
addresses, then the contents of control/localiphost (which defaults to
control/me) is the domain that's checked for in control/rcpthosts.
So whatever's in control/me (or control/localiphost if you hav
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 02 February 2000, Wednesday 00:59
Subject: RE: Sending to an IP address
| I did this:
|
| # Stop qmail.
| set $(/bin/ps aux | /bin/grep qmail-lspawn)
| PID=$2
| echo -n "Killing qmai
hmmm no square brackets I might try removing them.
--
From: Tim Hunter[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 16:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Sending to an IP address
I just tested this with my qmail config
with my ip in rcpthosts and
th Warno[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 17:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sending to an IP address
I tried sending a message to wilson@[203.26.11.154].
The response I received is:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mailbox.muao-inc.net.
I'
I just tested this with my qmail config
with my ip in rcpthosts and locals I received mail sent to my ip from an
outside SMTP server
[root@mail control]# cat rcpthosts
mail.cimx.com
cimx.com
206.112.223.188
[root@mail control]# cat locals
mail.cimx.com
cimx.com
206.112.223.188
[root@mail contr
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tim Hunter'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 02 February 2000, Wednesday 00:28
Subject: RE: Sending to an IP address
| hmmm. I don't think so. Here is my rcpthosts file:
|
| mclachlan.com.au
| mclachlanlister.com.au
ROTECTED]>
To: "'Tim Hunter'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 02 February 2000, Wednesday 00:28
Subject: RE: Sending to an IP address
| hmmm. I don't think so. Here is my rcpthosts file:
|
| mclachlan.com.au
| mclachlanlister.com.au
| 203.26
59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Sending to an IP address
your reply is your answer
Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed
rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
put 203.26.11.154 in rcpthosts if you want to receive mail for that host
read Life with qmail for more inform
Protocol (SMTP). host can be
either a fully-qualified domain name:
silverton.berkeley.edu
or an IP address enclosed in brackets:
[128.32.183.163]
If the mail is to be delivered locally to IP www.xxx.yyy.zzz,
[www.xxx.yyy.zzz] must appear in control/lo
#x27;"
> Subject: Test
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:34:44 +1100
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Test
>
>
>
>
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
