Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Charles Cazabon
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > But I have messages that are getting stuck in the queue sometimes for > more than 3 weeks. I have /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime set to > 345600 (4 days). Anyone have any idea why this is happening? You broke something. You didn't restart q

RE: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Richard Underwood
Edward, I've had problems with qmail-remote hanging - it had nothing to do with the queue lifetime, but with some code in qmail-remote failing, possibly due to an O/S bug. A fix which works for me is to enable socket keep-alives. This will kill the socket if it has died after abo

RE: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Edward McLain
be appreciated from anyone. Later, Ed McLain -Original Message- From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: qmail-queue question Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > But I have messages

Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Charles Cazabon
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK... Let me explain this a little bit better and maybe clear some > things up. Okay. > 2. The only patch on this system is the qmailqueue-patch for the > qmailscanner. This can cause qmail-queue to not be run, but not qmail-remote to crash. > 5.

Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread MarkD
> 3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23 I > tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 30 of 2001, that is > unless qmail is doing something funking with date and time stamps. ;) But you didn't show the log entry that corresponds to this message. As a cons

RE: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Edward McLain
-Original Message- From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: qmail-queue question >> 3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23 I >> tend to think that it actually arrive at

Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread MarkD
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Edward McLain allegedly wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: qmail-queue question > > >> 3.

Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Charles Cazabon
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not to start anything else, but is there any better way to stop qmail > when using tcp-daemonts than svc -d /service/qmail-send ? No -- that is the proper way to stop qmail with daemontools. > This doesn't seem to always work [...] Nope -- it alway

RE: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Edward McLain
e- From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:04 PM To: Edward McLain Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: qmail-queue question On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Edward McLain allegedly wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: MarkD [m

Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread MarkD
> Ok.. so as someone pointed out I have to now search by the deliver > number.. So I ran: > > [root@mail send]# grep "delivery 366" * | /usr/local/bin/tai64nlocal > 2001-08-09 13:41:28.533103500.s:@40003b72c36a2839ff1c starting > delivery 366: msg 112603 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [ro

Re: qmail-queue question

2001-08-09 Thread Charles Cazabon
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok.. so qmail-remote crashed.. but why? Who knows? Did you kill it? > It had also been running for over 3 hours? So? Long messages to a slow host can do this. > Well to test it out I did the following: [...] You didn't use proper SMTP syntax, w