On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 12:21:07PM -0400, Daniluk, Chris wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about how initial injection is logged. qmail-smtpd via
> tcpserver is receiving the message, but I cannot find where (or if) it is
> logged. Regarding the user who requested to see logs, I did in fact send
> them
> From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:39:59 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Chris Garrigues writes:
> > Note the 10.x.x.x addresses...this is clearly all behind a firewall.
> > Presumably, he has an internal DNS that does have A and PTR records for
> > qta-ctah3-dev.queryto
David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 17 August 1999 at 13:33:38 -0500
> This particular message got both a local and a remote delivery. The
> local isn't important here, but the remote shows us some more; where
> it says "to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]", that's the envelope sender it'
Daniluk, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 17 August 1999 at 12:21:07 -0400
> I'm a bit confused about how initial injection is logged. qmail-smtpd via
> tcpserver is receiving the message, but I cannot find where (or if) it is
> logged.
Aug 17 12:02:44 gw qmail: 934909364.119294 new m
"Daniluk, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I dont understand why there is so much friction in this thread.
I repeat:
What we have here is a failure to communicate.
You made an extraordinary claim ("Qmail appears to be *occaisionally*
delivering email to the wrong people") without providi
Chris Garrigues writes:
> Note the 10.x.x.x addresses...this is clearly all behind a firewall.
> Presumably, he has an internal DNS that does have A and PTR records for
> qta-ctah3-dev.querytone.com.
That doesn't help me if he contacts my smtp server, and it says "HELO
hostname doesn't match
Daniluk, Chris writes:
> I'm a bit confused about how initial injection is logged. qmail-smtpd via
> tcpserver is receiving the message, but I cannot find where (or if) it is
> logged. Regarding the user who requested to see logs, I did in fact send
> them in an earlier message.
>
> 3457818
> From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 12:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Daniluk, Chris writes:
> > Received: from unknown (HELO qta-ctah3-dev.querytone.com) (10.10.177.152)
>
> I also hope that you're not actually sending mail from
> qta-ctah3-dev.querytone.com, because tha
I'd have to agree. A valid, if not necessarily correctly stated,
concern. Nothing in the original post to warrant the near-flames that
followed.
Lighten up, everyone.
Yan
"Daniluk, Chris" wrote:
>
> I dont understand why there is so much friction in this thread.
--
__ __
esent entries from other messages being delivered at
the same time.
Cris
> -Original Message-
> From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 5:11 PM
> To: QMail (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: bad deliver
>
>
> Daniluk, Chris <[EMAIL PR
It doesn't look to me like there will be a Delivered-To line, since it
appears qmail is accepting it via smtp and then sending it via smtp to
another host, mailgate.strategy.com.
I'm leaning towards a misconfiguration, perhaps in smtproutes. Think
we need to see the delivery logs and what's in h
Daniluk, Chris writes:
> Received: from mailtest1.strategy.com (10.10.209.10 [10.10.209.10]) by
> mailgate.strategy.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
> Version 5.5.2448.0)
> id Q5V89MBW; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 17:06:59 -0400
> Received: (qmail 24678 invoked from networ
nc.
> http://www.spcomstock.com/. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for NYSE and
> AMEX, 15 minutes for NASDAQ.
> Additional data provided by Zacks Investment Research.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
Daniluk, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 17 August 1999 at 11:51:48 -0400
> 6. After a few days of testing, we find that people are inexplicably
> receiving other people's emails. We dont know why, we have NO clue. Headers
> are all the way they should be. QMail doesn't report any errors,
mStock, Inc.
http://www.spcomstock.com/. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for NYSE and
AMEX, 15 minutes for NASDAQ.
Additional data provided by Zacks Investment Research.
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, Augus
Daniluk, Chris writes:
> I know there is nothing wrong with this. That's why I posted it. My question
> is, if this is fine, and the problem did not exist on a different SMTP
> server, why are we having this problem now?
Only you can find out the answer to that one. Given your earlier confusio
Daniluk, Chris writes:
> Emails ARE being sent to the wrong people. When someone named Cezary
> receives email that starts off saying "Dear Ian" and Ian's email address is
> all over the headers, but Cezary is no where, THAT is a problem.
Can we see one of these pieces of email, with all heade
Strategy
> -Original Message-
> From: 'Chris Johnson' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 4:41 PM
> To: Daniluk, Chris
> Cc: QMail (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: bad deliver
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Daniluk, Ch
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 11:02:10AM -0400, Daniluk, Chris wrote:
> I know there is nothing wrong with this. That's why I posted it. My question
> is, if this is fine, and the problem did not exist on a different SMTP
> server, why are we having this problem now?
You haven't defined "the problem."
"Daniluk, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I know there is nothing wrong with this. That's why I posted it. My question
>is, if this is fine, and the problem did not exist on a different SMTP
>server, why are we having this problem now?
What we have here is a failure to communicate. If there
I know there is nothing wrong with this. That's why I posted it. My question
is, if this is fine, and the problem did not exist on a different SMTP
server, why are we having this problem now?
[snip]
>What makes you think there's something wrong with this? Take a look at any
>message you've rec
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 10:51:25AM -0400, Daniluk, Chris wrote:
> I think you may misunderstand the situation--we are sending mail globally.
> The recipients may or may not (and most likely, based on statistical usage
> of qmail, do not) use qmail. We are experimenting with qmail as a drop-in
> re
D]>
> To: "Ian Fevrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Change in Consensus Estimate
> Date: 13 Aug 1999 09:07:38 EDT
> X-Comment: Produced By Cheetah, Telepath, MSI. MessageID=PortfolioID:22671
> EmailID:22196
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Simon Rae [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 3:47 PM
To: Daniluk, Chris
Subject: Re: bad deliver
Have you checked the intended recipient's .qmail file or the qmail/alias
directory for entries that could be redirecting mail e
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 10:34:30AM -0400, Daniluk, Chris wrote:
> We've been experiencing an unusual phenomenon--Qmail appears to be
> *occaisionally* delivering email to the wrong people. The message headers
> are fine, but they get delivered to completely wrong addresses. There's no
> similarity
We've been experiencing an unusual phenomenon--Qmail appears to be
*occaisionally* delivering email to the wrong people. The message headers
are fine, but they get delivered to completely wrong addresses. There's no
similarity or relationship between the messages and qmail doesn't log
anything rel
26 matches
Mail list logo
