Alex Pennace wrote:
> It is no more abusive than pestering a mailing list about conclusions
> reached while ignoring big bold blinking letters. RTFM.
>
>
>Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
What happened? when t
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:47:56AM +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> "John R. Levine" wrote:
>
> > I wish there were some way I could make this stuff more idiot
> > resistant, but some idiots can resist anything.
>
> This is helpful and informative in what manner?
> Degenerated to abuse, how approp
"John R. Levine" wrote:
> I wish there were some way I could make this stuff more idiot
> resistant, but some idiots can resist anything.
This is helpful and informative in what manner?
Degenerated to abuse, how appropriate from abuse.net
regards
Kevin Waterson
In the immortal words of Kevin Waterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > ORBS doesn't use the abuse.net tests to determine who is
> > an open relay.
> To quote from the ORBS site
> Try Abuse.Net's new relay tester (requires registration). This is the
> only web-based tester which carries out the sa
>I made a check of the server and all was well but
>when I checked it from the facility at
>abuse.net I found it was reporting an open relay.
Sigh. He must be referring to the place that says in large ugly
blinking letters:
THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
If it is really a
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 07:41:09AM +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> >Typically, ORBS requires the delivery of a
> > piece of email via the alleged open relay before adding
> > that host ot its list. A properly configured qmail server
> > will not act as an open relay even as it fails the abuse.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 20-Oct-2000 Kevin Waterson wrote:
> >
> > I made a check of the server and all was well but
> > when I checked it from the facility at
> > abuse.net I found it was reporting an open relay.
> >
> > The problem it seems stems from qmails handling of
> > one of the te
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:36:23PM +1100, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> Recently, after running qmail for 3 years on our
> primary mail server, we found ourselves listed on orbs.
> It seems we were acting as an open relay and that
> many mailers were simply bouncing mail from our
> domain.
>
> I made a
On 20-Oct-2000 Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> I made a check of the server and all was well but
> when I checked it from the facility at
> abuse.net I found it was reporting an open relay.
>
> The problem it seems stems from qmails handling of
> one of the tests has qmail accepting the mail and
> dea
Are your tcprules set up correctly to deny open relaying to everyone except your
internal users? Is your /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts set up correctly?
If not, then you may be acting as an open relay.
-c
At 3:36 PM +1100 10/20/00, Kevin Waterson wrote:
>Recently, after running qmail for 3 ye
Recently, after running qmail for 3 years on our
primary mail server, we found ourselves listed on orbs.
It seems we were acting as an open relay and that
many mailers were simply bouncing mail from our
domain.
I made a check of the server and all was well but
when I checked it from the facility
11 matches
Mail list logo
