[qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-16 Thread Steve Fulton
Hi all, Those of you who have seen my e-mails over the last day are aware of the compile problems I have been having with QmailAdmin 1.0.7. and Solaris. Those of you who have not now are. I am aware that a number of contributions have been made and those make up the 1.0.7 version. Howeve

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
I'm with Steve on this. When 1.06 came out, I had to go through a few hoops to get it to work on my solaris boxen, due to the same sorts of 'linux only' additions to the code. Let's remember folks, a major part of the philosophy behind Open Source is Interoperability. Solaris is not some backw

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Kolaci
Me too, I tried replying last night, however the "efilter" blocked my response. I use Solaris myself. But its not limited to Solaris. There would be problems with AIX, IRIX, HP-UX and any other *real* unix. Major businesses typically *only* use one of the *real* unix's, go check with Sony, Cit

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Steve Fulton
At 07:33 17/01/2003 -0500, you wrote: I use Solaris myself. But its not limited to Solaris. There would be problems with AIX, IRIX, HP-UX and any other *real* unix. This is an excellent point, thanks for expanding on it! Major businesses typically *only* use one of the *real* unix's, go ch

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 04:33 AM 01-17-2003, Brian Kolaci wrote: Me too, I tried replying last night, however the "efilter" blocked my response. I use Solaris myself. But its not limited to Solaris. There would be problems with AIX, IRIX, HP-UX and any other *real* unix. Major businesses typically *only* use wh

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Brian Kolaci
Didn't mean it to be a flame. I use both linux and solaris. For linux, I have red hat (which didn't have the fts functions) and slakware. I think they're great. What I meant by "real" was that they were licensed for the name "Unix", which implies a minimum level of API's will exist in all the

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
sorry - i didn't intend to accuse you of flaming. i meant more that it tends to be the sparc (heh) that can start a flame war. At 09:36 AM 01-17-2003, Brian Kolaci wrote: Didn't mean it to be a flame. I use both linux and solaris. For linux, I have red hat (which didn't have the fts functions

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Rick Widmer
Some thoughts for the Solaris/AIX/HPUX crowd: Bitching and moaning _might_ get something done, or it might just piss the authors off. Explicit lists of functions that are not available and other problems is a step in the right direction. At least if gives them something to work on. The best

RE: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Michael Bowe
Michael > -Original Message- > From: Steve Fulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 17 January 2003 1:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris. > > > Hi all, > > Those of you who have seen my e-mails ove

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 01:45 PM 01-17-2003, Rick Widmer wrote: Some thoughts for the Solaris/AIX/HPUX crowd: Bitching and moaning _might_ get something done, or it might just piss the authors off. please quote, and i mean chapter and verse, any bitching and moaning. i think it's been the opposite. gee, steve ful

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Steve Fulton
At 14:45 17/01/2003 -0700, Rick wrote: Bitching and moaning _might_ get something done, or it might just piss the authors off. My god, you're right! Thank goodness there hasn't been any bitching and moaning! Golly, imagine their terrible response! Fire and brimestone, falling from the sky

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-17 Thread Steve Fulton
At 14:27 17/01/2003 -0800, you wrote: please quote, and i mean chapter and verse, any bitching and moaning. i think it's been the opposite. gee, steve fulton did nothing but bitch and moan, right? all that time he spent gathering libraries and researching and then writing an even-tempered and

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-19 Thread Justin Hopper
Sorry, I should have been watching the list a little closer. I may have been responsible for the fts_* functions that are in util.c They were part of the quota integration patch I wrote for QmailAdmin 1.0-1.0.4, and I think it was rolled into the distro some time after that. I develop mostly in

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris.

2003-01-21 Thread Brian Kolaci
Hi Justin, I believe I already removed the fts_* functions in that release that you had and submitted the patch. That was a long time ago... Thanks, Brian > Sorry, I should have been watching the list a little closer. I may have > been responsible for the fts_* functions that are in util

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris. Solution?

2003-01-17 Thread Ken Jones
t; -Original Message- > > From: Steve Fulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, 17 January 2003 1:13 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris. > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Those of you who have

Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris. Solution?

2003-01-21 Thread Steve Fulton
---Original Message- > > From: Steve Fulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, 17 January 2003 1:13 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin & Solaris. > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Those of you who have seen