On 03/02/12 21:33, Bharath Chari wrote:
On Friday 02 March 2012 04:14 PM, Pak Ogah wrote:
On 02/10/12 19:34, Bharath Chari wrote:
On Friday 10 February 2012 11:35 AM, patr...@aofh.us wrote:
4) Exit the mysql shell. On creating a new ID in the domain
example.com,
you should get the ID and
On Monday 19 March 2012 11:59 AM, Pak Ogah wrote:
On 03/02/12 21:33, Bharath Chari wrote:
On Friday 02 March 2012 04:14 PM, Pak Ogah wrote:
On 02/10/12 19:34, Bharath Chari wrote:
On Friday 10 February 2012 11:35 AM, patr...@aofh.us wrote:
4) Exit the mysql shell. On creating a new ID in
On 3/19/2012 1:16 AM, Délsio Cabá wrote:
Hi,
Web based is good for clients that are always on the move and need to
use mobile phones (IMAP), this way the emails will be kept on the server.
But whenever possible try to offer your clients pop3 so that your
server doesn't get out of space.
On 3/7/2012 2:07 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 03/07/2012 01:53 PM, Sys wrote:
Files are Identical, even down to the corredct byte size 8280.
So , how do i force a reinstall SM
Thanks
# rpm -Uvh --force squirrelmail-toaster-*.rpm
If you used qtp-newmodel to update, the rpm will be in
The email messages all have the very tight permission 600.
We have many group accounts whose messages need to be
readable by all. Is there a way to set permission to 644
somewhere in qmailtoaster? Since the /home/user is
already protected with 700, I am not concerned about
privacy or security
Hi,
I only do backup once a week :( and the backups are local to another NAS
As for the IMAP I must agreed that it's safer since they benefit from the
backups of the server.
But there is a downside: As time goes on the user will have a larger
Inbox/Outbox folder and that means loading those
I don't get it. Why do you want to change permission?
What do you mean by group accounts?
On 19 March 2012 19:01, Richard Chen rich...@doubleprime.com wrote:
The email messages all have the very tight permission 600.
We have many group accounts whose messages need to be
readable by all. Is
On 3/19/2012 1:10 PM, Délsio Cabá wrote:
Hi,
I only do backup once a week :( and the backups are local to another NAS
As for the IMAP I must agreed that it's safer since they benefit from
the backups of the server.
But there is a downside: As time goes on the user will have a larger
We archive error emails from web sites which are then
nfs mounted to the eng server so that they can help
troubleshooting issues. The archived emails are collected
by sitenames which act as group accounts. But this
means mails for each site will be readable by that
account alone which is not what
Shortcutting all of the permissions issues, if you have an e-mail
account that is to be shared, why not just use one mailbox that multiple
people can access with IMAP?
There is no limit to the number of users who can be logged into a
single IMAP account -- I do this all the time for bosses
Hi Dan,
You need to take into account important things like:
1 - Clients don't really care if you use open source or monolithic
standars, they only need to know if it works well in a long term and also
the price;
2 - In my case I have hundreds of domains with about 05 email accounts per
domain.
Those are archived (local) files on the servers and therefore
are not available via imap because these servers are web servers
and not email servers. In other words, they are created by
qmail client with email addrs like local_user-all@localmachine.
We just want these email files to be accessible
Dovecot has the capability to define and use shared folders, complete
with ACLs. That is where I'd look for a solution. Be sure to use a
fairly recent (2.0.x) release. IIRC shared folders were introduced in
v1.2, but ACLs came along in v2.0.
On 03/19/2012 10:55 AM, Richard Chen wrote:
Those
On 03/19/2012 11:06 AM, dnk wrote:
Is there a way to get messages that bounce to a particular list to go to
a specific address?
Thanks.
D
Taps?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers
Hi Eric,
Regarding taps, I tried to tal mailer-daemon and it didn't work :(
Any clues?
On 19 March 2012 20:58, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 03/19/2012 11:06 AM, dnk wrote:
Is there a way to get messages that bounce to a particular list to go to
a specific address?
Thanks.
D
What was the regex you used?
(You probably listed it once, but please again)
On 03/19/2012 01:00 PM, Délsio Cabá wrote:
Hi Eric,
Regarding taps, I tried to tal mailer-daemon and it didn't work :(
Any clues?
On 19 March 2012 20:58, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
mailto:e...@shubes.net wrote:
clamav 0.97.4 release was announced 3/15/2012.
clamav-toaster-0.97.4-1.4.0.src.rpm is available for testing. I've built
and installed it on 32,64 bit test machines with no problem. You can
find the rpm at http://qmailtoaster.com/testing/ (old location) or
On Monday 19 March 2012 11:20 PM, Délsio Cabá wrote:
Hi Dan,
You need to take into account important things like:
1 - Clients don't really care if you use open source or monolithic
standars, they only need to know if it works well in a long term and
also the price;
2 - In my case I have
Hi Eric,
I have in /var/qmail/control/taps:
MAILER-DAEMON@my_server_hostname:postmaster@my_server_hostname
Regards
On 19 March 2012 22:13, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
What was the regex you used?
(You probably listed it once, but please again)
On 03/19/2012 01:00 PM, Délsio Cabá
19 matches
Mail list logo
