RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: active sync on linux

2010-05-26 Thread Justice London
Because IDLE is not activesync. I know of plenty of devices that support activesync but not IMAP IDLE. Justice London jlon...@lawinfo.com -Original Message- From: PakOgah [mailto:pako...@pala.bo-tak.info] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 11:40 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: AW: Support OpenSuse 11.2 *SOLVED*

2010-05-25 Thread Justice London
Cent 5.5 works fine... no changes or upgrade required ;) Justice London jlon...@lawinfo.com -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:17 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: AW: Support OpenSuse 11.2

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: active sync on linux

2010-05-25 Thread Justice London
Here you guys go... supports imap as a backend :) http://z-push.sourceforge.net/soswp/ Justice London jlon...@lawinfo.com -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 11:11 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster

RE: [qmailtoaster] existing Blackberry problem.

2010-05-04 Thread Justice London
=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 If you already have these rules you'll need to watch the logs and see if they have a new server IP. Justice London jlon...@lawinfo.com _ From: Bilgehan Poyraz [mailto:b.poy...@logicom.com.tr] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:21 AM To: qmailtoaster-list

RE: [qmailtoaster] Centos 5.3 and qtp new model

2009-08-24 Thread Justice London
Yeah, it doesn't account for kernel-xen so if kernel-xen is being used a 'yum install kernel-xen-devel' or kernel-xen-headers needs to be run. Justice London Systems Administrator E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com Website: www.lawinfo.com Office: 800-397-3743 x105 | Fax: 800-220-4546

RE: [qmailtoaster] vpopmail upgrade

2009-08-19 Thread Justice London
encountered some problems with quotas that were well above 2 gigs on the production mail-server that were then mirrored on a 32-bit server. I think the underlying issue with quotas is simply going to be a long variable issue since it seemed to work fine under the 64-bit system. Justice London E-mail

RE: [qmailtoaster] vpopmail upgrade

2009-08-18 Thread Justice London
I'll install it on a virtual-machine and play with it a bit. Justice London E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com -Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:57 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re

RE: [qmailtoaster] Another qtp-build-unionfs failed

2009-07-08 Thread Justice London
You must reboot your system. The kernel release/devel was updated and won't link properly until the system is rebooted under the new kernel. Justice London Systems Administrator E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com _ From: Steve [mailto:st...@impactpayments.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08

RE: [qmailtoaster] Another qtp-build-unionfs failed

2009-07-08 Thread Justice London
Reboot your system with the new kernel version and try again. Justice London E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com _ From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:apl...@itfor.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:18 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Another qtp

RE: [qmailtoaster] qtp-build-unionfs failed

2009-07-07 Thread Justice London
The script doesn't 'suppose' it's up to date. It should check via an available package tool and update it if it's not. What actual kernel release package-name are you using? Justice London Systems Administrator E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima

RE: [qmailtoaster] VQAdmin survey results

2009-06-19 Thread Justice London
I'll try to take a look at this if I have time in the next few weeks. Due to the necessary complexity of something like this, though, it'll probably be best to read in information from the users database, so it might be a python/perl script rather than bash. Justice London Systems Administrator E

RE: [qmailtoaster] Qmail cluster

2008-12-22 Thread Justice London
number of users, but as those both increase it would be less and less viable. For a large scale install you should look at a drbd or starfish type filesystem cluster. Justice London Systems Administrator E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com -Original Message- From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j

RE: [qmailtoaster] Can QMailToaster Handle 10,000 email addresses?

2008-12-02 Thread Justice London
a system dedicated to only running the Spamassassin daemon process with quite powerful hardware. In addition spamdyke or similar will help with load. The biggest part if you want reliable service, though, will be the LB solution. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Edwin

Re: [qmailtoaster] QControl

2008-09-16 Thread Justice London
and similar against a tool such as this. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:44 -0400, Jake Vickers wrote: We are nearing the final stages of QControl. QControl is a replacement for VqAdmin, written from scratch. I hope to have a final release on October 1st. You can view

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: qtp-newmodel failing on sandbox]

2008-09-12 Thread Justice London
I'm going to work on a fix for this. I have a centos 5 x86_64 machine to play with qtp on. I believe it's mainly due to the highly, highly modified kernel that cent and fedora ship with. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:02 +0200, Wim Godden wrote: Not without

[qmailtoaster] Simscan under Opensuse 11 (glibc issue)

2008-09-03 Thread Justice London
It appears that the version of glibc being used under opensuse 11 is causing issues with compiling simscan properly. Has anyone worked with this at all or determined a patch for this? It appears to simply be making a call to a function that either no longer exists or was replaced. Justice London

Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble

2008-03-06 Thread Justice London
packages. Justice London wrote: Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4

Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble

2008-03-04 Thread Justice London
Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates or anything. Justice

Re: [qmailtoaster] unionfs and fc4 trouble

2008-03-03 Thread Justice London
I should be able to take a look at this mid-week. Justice On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you. Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, as

Re: [qmailtoaster] Newmodel error

2008-02-28 Thread Justice London
Hmm.. other than the use of vmware, is there anything special about how the setup is configured.. such as using multiple partitions or anything similar? Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:05 -0500, Phil Leinhauser wrote: Hey Eric: Here is the output from what you asked

Re: [qmailtoaster] Newmodel error

2008-02-27 Thread Justice London
Please provide the kernel information from: uname -r and then the hardware (i386, x86_64). Justice On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 07:41 -0500, Phil Leinhauser wrote: Thanks for the help justice: Here is what you asked for: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/qtp-mount-sandbox

Re: [qmailtoaster] Newmodel error

2008-02-27 Thread Justice London
Hmm.. I don't have an fc6 machine any longer, but I'll try to find that kernel version. Justice On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:26 -0500, Phil Leinhauser wrote: It's 2.6.22.14.72.fc6 on VMware server 2.5Ghz/ 2G -Original message- From: Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 27

Re: [qmailtoaster] Newmodel error

2008-02-27 Thread Justice London
: Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:15:42 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Newmodel error Please provide the kernel information from: uname -r and then the hardware (i386, x86_64). Justice On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 07:41 -0500

Re: [qmailtoaster] Queueing Server

2007-12-06 Thread Justice London
Yep, that's basically all there is to it! Justice On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:01 -0500, Kyle Quillen wrote: Hey all, I went over this awhile back and found it in the wiki but I can’t seem to find it now. What do I need to edit to create a queuing server on another qmt install

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain

2007-12-06 Thread Justice London
The plan sounds, sound... but I would worry about putting a yum update for this anywhere near a cronjob. There have been enough as far as issues I've seen when dealing with normal system updating via automated yum, let alone mail. If nothing else, I would think it a good idea not to make that

[qmailtoaster] Announcing qtp-newmodel unioned sandboxing

2007-11-29 Thread Justice London
.tar.gz You would extract this to the filesystem root and it will overwrite the running qtp-config, qtp-newmodel scripts and add a few additional scripts and links. Comments, questions, suggestions are all in order so feel free to send them my way. Justice London

Re: [qmailtoaster] Announcing qtp-newmodel unioned sandboxing

2007-11-29 Thread Justice London
for it :P Justice On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 11:33 -0800, Justice London wrote: A while back, I was working with Eric Shubes on a project to add a unioned filesystem method into the sandboxing for the qmailtoaster-plus system. It has been sitting for a while, but I finally had a chance to look

Re: [qmailtoaster] miscellaneous errors

2007-04-11 Thread Justice London
How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You can raise it, but just don't go too high or you'll open up to easy spamming. Justice London On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 14:44 -0500, Michael H wrote: Wow, I just

Re: [qmailtoaster] miscellaneous errors

2007-04-11 Thread Justice London
Yep. Justice On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:01 -0500, Michael H wrote: Justice London wrote: How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You can raise it, but just don't go too high or you'll open up to easy

Re: [qmailtoaster] miscellaneous errors

2007-04-11 Thread Justice London
Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT set to 200 and we haven't really had any great issue. Justice On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:02 -0700, Justice London wrote: Yep. Justice On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:01 -0500, Michael H wrote: Justice London wrote: How many people did he try to send to? By default

Re: [qmailtoaster] miscellaneous errors

2007-04-11 Thread Justice London
You actually don't need to restart qmail to affect changes to cdb files. You can simply run 'qmailctl cdb' and it will update the necessary cdb files. Justice On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:08 -0500, Michael H wrote: Justice London wrote: Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT set to 200 and we haven't really

[qmailtoaster] Spamassassin/simscan 'soft' reject

2007-03-20 Thread Justice London
. Is there a way to instead just have simscan fail the spamassassin test and just pass the message un-checked? Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin/simscan 'soft' reject

2007-03-20 Thread Justice London
Yeah, but it's better than just getting the message rejected, which seems to be happening right now if something happens to spamassassin. This is bad since our clients then call and complain to no end. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 21:31 +0200, Janno Sannik wrote: seems

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin/simscan 'soft' reject

2007-03-20 Thread Justice London
broken in such a way that it seems things can't be worked around. Maybe I'm incorrect in my diagnosis, etc. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 14:59 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote: ping! On 3/20/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The error 451 is a soft reject

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin/simscan 'soft' reject

2007-03-20 Thread Justice London
, that clients be exempted from simscan checks. Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:26 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote: So what are you proposing Justice? Please help me understand. You wanted a soft rejection when spamassassin is down. I am telling you that a 451 error

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin/simscan 'soft' reject

2007-03-20 Thread Justice London
I'll play around with adding a couple more blacklists. I was having issues with a few specific clients using zen, so that's why I wasn't using it for the time being (as you mention it has dynamic addresses). Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:21 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote

RE: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Justice London
Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the dspam stuff. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:38 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam

RE: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-26 Thread Justice London
Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good idea. I'll help how I can. I have a few free systems sitting around I'll try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday

RE: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)

2006-10-26 Thread Justice London
corrupt (revisited) Justice London wrote: What is the ownership of the bayes folder/files? vpopmail:vchkpw on all. 700 on directory, 600 on files. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:30 PM

RE: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt

2006-10-25 Thread Justice London
? I've seen the install instructions for it with qmail-toaster, but it's a bit hackish. Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:29 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting

RE: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt

2006-10-25 Thread Justice London
die from what I can tell... then you end up with lock files for that basically and spamassassin comes to a screeching halt. Justice London -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:03 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com

RE: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)

2006-10-25 Thread Justice London
What is the ownership of the bayes folder/files? Justice London -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:30 PM To: qmailtoaster-list Subject: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited) Ok, so here's my situation. I have

RE: [qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues

2006-08-24 Thread Justice London
. Justice London From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:49 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues Justice London wrote: The permissions are set when the files are created. Directory

[qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues

2006-08-23 Thread Justice London
should be able to handle the auto-expires. Should I look to decrease the size of the bayes_toks file at which it auto-expires anything to modify in the local.cf? Any suggestions would be helpful. Justice London

RE: [qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues

2006-08-23 Thread Justice London
to try. Justice London From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:50 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues Justice London wrote: I might be missing something, but I have searched

RE: [qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues

2006-08-23 Thread Justice London
10:33 bayes_seen -rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 5.0M Aug 23 10:33 bayes_toks Justice London From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 10:32 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SA bayes database issues Justice