Because IDLE is not activesync. I know of plenty of devices that support
activesync but not IMAP IDLE.
Justice London
jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
From: PakOgah [mailto:pako...@pala.bo-tak.info]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 11:40 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Here you guys go... supports imap as a backend :)
http://z-push.sourceforge.net/soswp/
Justice London
jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 11:11 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster
Cent 5.5 works fine... no changes or upgrade required ;)
Justice London
jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:17 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: AW: Support OpenSuse 11.2
YCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",SENDER_NOCHECK="1"
64.38.128.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",SENDER_NOCHECK="1"
If you already have these rules you'll need to watch the logs and see if
they have a new server IP.
Justice London
jlon
Yeah, it doesn't account for kernel-xen so if kernel-xen is being used a
'yum install kernel-xen-devel' or kernel-xen-headers needs to be run.
Justice London
Systems Administrator
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
Website: www.lawinfo.com
Office: 800-397-3743 x105 | Fa
ersions. I
encountered some problems with quotas that were well above 2 gigs on the
production mail-server that were then mirrored on a 32-bit server.
I think the underlying issue with quotas is simply going to be a long
variable issue since it seemed to work fine under the 64-bit system.
Justice Lon
I'll install it on a virtual-machine and play with it a bit.
Justice London
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:57 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subjec
Reboot your system with the new kernel version and try again.
Justice London
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
_
From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:apl...@itfor.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:18 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Another qtp
You must reboot your system. The kernel release/devel was updated and won't
link properly until the system is rebooted under the new kernel.
Justice London
Systems Administrator
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
_
From: Steve [mailto:st...@impactpayments.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
The script doesn't 'suppose' it's up to date. It should check via an
available package tool and update it if it's not. What actual kernel release
package-name are you using?
Justice London
Systems Administrator
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
I'll try to take a look at this if I have time in the next few weeks. Due to
the necessary complexity of something like this, though, it'll probably be
best to read in information from the users database, so it might be a
python/perl script rather than bash.
Justice London
Systems Admin
load or a large
number of users, but as those both increase it would be less and less
viable.
For a large scale install you should look at a drbd or starfish type
filesystem cluster.
Justice London
Systems Administrator
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
From: Jake Vi
system
dedicated to only running the Spamassassin daemon process with quite
powerful hardware. In addition spamdyke or similar will help with load.
The biggest part if you want reliable service, though, will be the LB
solution.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Edwin
s and similar against a tool such as this.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:44 -0400, Jake Vickers wrote:
> We are nearing the final stages of QControl. QControl is a replacement
> for VqAdmin, written from scratch.
>
> I hope to have a final release on Octo
I'm going to work on a fix for this. I have a centos 5 x86_64 machine to
play with qtp on. I believe it's mainly due to the highly, highly
modified kernel that cent and fedora ship with.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:02 +0200, Wim Godden wrote:
> >
&
It appears that the version of glibc being used under opensuse 11 is
causing issues with compiling simscan properly. Has anyone worked with
this at all or determined a patch for this? It appears to simply be
making a call to a function that either no longer exists or was
replaced.
Justice London
ake.
> Otherwise,
> you can continue to use the copied or linked sandbox to
> upgrade your toaster
> packages.
>
> Justice London wrote:
> > Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that
> would
>
Okay.. you managed to find the one release/kernel combo that would
require another union module just for it. Is there any way you can
simply upgrade the kernel release or fedora release? The fc4 release
hasn't been supported for over a year, which means no security updates
or anything.
Justice
I should be able to take a look at this mid-week.
Justice
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 09:34 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Hey, Paco. Nice to hear from you.
>
> Indeed your observation is correct (afaict). Justice would know best though
> regarding the unionfs. That's a bit of a complicated situation, a
Hmm.. other than the use of vmware, is there anything special about how
the setup is configured.. such as using multiple partitions or anything
similar?
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 20:05 -0500, Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Hey Eric:
>
> Here is the output from
--Original message-
> From: Justice London [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:15:42 -0500
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Newmodel error
>
> > Please provide the kernel information from: uname -r and then the
> > hardwa
Hmm.. I don't have an fc6 machine any longer, but I'll try to find that
kernel version.
Justice
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:26 -0500, Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> It's 2.6.22.14.72.fc6
> on VMware server 2.5Ghz/ 2G
>
>
> -Original message-
> From: Justic
Please provide the kernel information from: uname -r and then the
hardware (i386, x86_64).
Justice
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 07:41 -0500, Phil Leinhauser wrote:
> Thanks for the help justice:
>
> Here is what you asked for:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/qtp-mount-sandbox
> qtp-m
The plan sounds, sound... but I would worry about putting a yum update
for this anywhere near a cronjob. There have been enough as far as
issues I've seen when dealing with normal system updating via automated
yum, let alone mail. If nothing else, I would think it a good idea not
to make that def
Yep, that's basically all there is to it!
Justice
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:01 -0500, Kyle Quillen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I went over this awhile back and found it in the wiki but I can’t seem
> to find it now.
>
>
>
> What do I need to edit to create a queuing server on another qmt
>
eld liable for it :P
Justice
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 11:33 -0800, Justice London wrote:
> A while back, I was working with Eric Shubes on a project to add a
> unioned filesystem method into the sandboxing for the qmailtoaster-plus
> system.
>
> It has been sitting for a while, but
sehosting.com/qtp-unionfs/download/qtp-unionfs-0.1.tar.gz
You would extract this to the filesystem root and it will overwrite the
running qtp-config, qtp-newmodel scripts and add a few additional
scripts and links.
Comments, questions, suggestions are all in order
You actually don't need to restart qmail to affect changes to cdb files.
You can simply run 'qmailctl cdb' and it will update the necessary cdb
files.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:08 -0500, Michael H wrote:
> Justice London wrote:
> > Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT s
Also, I have my RCPTLIMIT set to 200 and we haven't really had any great
issue.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:02 -0700, Justice London wrote:
> Yep.
>
> Justice
>
> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:01 -0500, Michael H wrote:
> > Justice London wrote:
> > > How man
Yep.
Justice
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:01 -0500, Michael H wrote:
> Justice London wrote:
> > How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max
> > recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You
> > can raise it, but just don't go
How many people did he try to send to? By default there is a max
recipients specified in the tcprules (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp). You
can raise it, but just don't go too high or you'll open up to easy
spamming.
Justice London
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 14:44 -0500, Michael H wrote:
>
: 11956, t: 0.1055s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.90.1-exp/m:42
Of course, it's worth noting that what I've brought up so far as 'issues' are
all me :).
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:37 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> Okay, I don
I'll play around with adding a couple more blacklists. I was having
issues with a few specific clients using zen, so that's why I wasn't
using it for the time being (as you mention it has dynamic addresses).
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:21 -0700, Eric
to myself, that clients be exempted from simscan
checks.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 15:26 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> So what are you proposing Justice? Please help me understand. You
> wanted a soft rejection when spamassassin is down. I am telling you
> th
pamassassin has broken in such a way that it seems things
can't be worked around. Maybe I'm incorrect in my diagnosis, etc.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 14:59 -0700, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> ping!
>
> On 3/20/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED
gh: -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:03 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> Are you using something more than the stock blocklist? That can reduce your
> scanning load substantially.
>
> Justice
Yeah, but it's better than just getting the message rejected, which
seems to be happening right now if something happens to spamassassin.
This is bad since our clients then call and complain to no end.
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 21:31 +0200, Janno Sannik
right away. Is there a way to instead just have simscan
fail the spamassassin test and just pass the message un-checked?
Justice London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http
for tasks, although not much. I would bet there are others out there that
> do use it on occasion, although maybe not enough to make it any sort of
> priority. It's entirely up to you. If on a personal basis I HAD to have
> it
> and the package wasn't there, I coul
rt of
priority. It's entirely up to you. If on a personal basis I HAD to have it
and the package wasn't there, I could always just manually build it.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:48 AM
To: qm
Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the
dspam stuff.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:38 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailto
I'll try to work on implementation today and hopefully have some sort of
working test within the next week or two. I'll keep you guys informed.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 10:55 AM
T
ter] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)
Justice London wrote:
> What is the ownership of the bayes folder/files?
vpopmail:vchkpw on all. 700 on directory, 600 on files.
>
> Justice London
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good
idea. I'll help how I can. I have a few free systems sitting around I'll
try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
What is the ownership of the bayes folder/files?
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:30 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list
Subject: [qmailtoaster] bayes getting corrupt (revisited)
Ok, so here's my sit
sync die from
what I can tell... then you end up with lock files for that basically and
spamassassin comes to a screeching halt.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:03 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaste
?
I've seen the install instructions for it with qmail-toaster, but it's a bit
hackish.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:29 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailto
release.
Justice London
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
10:49 AM
To:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SA
bayes database issues
Justice London wrote:
The permissions are set when the files are created
160K Aug 23
10:33 bayes_seen
-rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 5.0M Aug 23
10:33 bayes_toks
Justice London
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
10:32 AM
To:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SA
bayes database issues
thing to try.
Justice London
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006
9:50 AM
To:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SA
bayes database issues
Justice London wrote:
I might be missing something, but I have
spamassassin should be able to handle the auto-expires. Should I look to
decrease the size of the bayes_toks file at which it auto-expires…
anything to modify in the local.cf?
Any suggestions would be helpful.
Justice London
51 matches
Mail list logo
