On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
>
> Is it possible to get user interface files for the demos that come along with
> Creator ?
Sure, they're part of the Qt source distribution.
/s/ Adam
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@trolltech.c
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:04:42PM -0800, Ken Ray wrote:
> Please consider adding to Creator, click and drag resize for
> DockWidgets, and adding of Icon buttons to the Toolbar while in design
> mode. Collapsable DockWidgets much like in .Net addons (similar to
> those in VS 2008 IDE) would be a ni
Is it possible to get user interface files for the demos that come along with
Creator ?
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
> however, I think maybe arguing "against" the need for basic file management
> in an IDE is a tad over the top. But I understand limited resources and
> priorities.
I don't think anyone's arguing "against" it, necessarily, although I'm
100% against doing it wrong -- I'd rather not see it at all
Apologies to all for starting a file renaming Jihad!
Qt Creator as an editor is definitely a joy. As elegant as Qt.
I can't argue with Danny's case for reducing those five laborious steps
however, I think maybe arguing "against" the need for basic file management in
an IDE is a tad over the to
On Nov 20, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
>
> Please consider adding to Creator, click and drag resize for DockWidgets, and
> adding of Icon buttons to the Toolbar while in design mode. Collapsable
> DockWidgets much like in .Net addons (similar to those in VS 2008 IDE) would
> be a nice fe
Please consider adding to Creator, click and drag resize for DockWidgets, and
adding of Icon buttons to the Toolbar while in design mode. Collapsable
DockWidgets much like in .Net addons (similar to those in VS 2008 IDE) would be
a nice feature for QT applications.
thanks
_
We're excited to let you know that Lúcio Corrêa has invited you to Dropbox!
Lúcio Corrêa has been using Dropbox to sync and share files online and across
computers, and thought you might want it too.
Visit http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.hCoTkmkz7o/NjUzNzMzODA3 to get started.
- The Dropbox Team
> It's not just 'alt-tabbing to an explorer window', it's:
> 1) Removing the file from project (either manually from the .pro file or via
> the menu which requires dismissing the SVN prompt).
> 2) Closing any open documents for that file as Creator will not do with for
> you (and this is an easy wa
Whoops, ignore this one Danny, I didn't see that Oswald asked you pretty
much the exact same question between your post and my response! I don't
want to make it sound like I'm piling on!
Sean
From: qt-creator-boun...@trolltech.com
[mailto:qt-creator-boun...@trolltech.com] On Behalf Of Murp
It may be 5 laborious steps, but how often do you actually need to do
that? I find that on average I have to rename a .h/.cpp file once in
its lifetime. Usually it is when I was just whipping up a class, so I
gave it a quick name, but then after a few days of working on it and
realizing that it w
Thanks a lot!
2009/11/19
> ext Oleg Shalnev wrote:
> > Good day.
> >
> > May I ask again for one very important feature. I am talking about
> > function parameters tooltip.
> > Is it possible to fix this problem or to extend color tuning.
>
> Thanks for the reminder! I will try to get it fixed f
On Friday 20 November 2009 13:52:00 ext Salvatore Rinaldo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying Qt Creator 1.3 RC and when I want to build a Symbian app for the
> emulator and the only option I have for building is the tool chain GCC, so
> I can't change that to WINSCW.
>
> In the Beta version, 1.2.9
Hi All,
I'm trying Qt Creator 1.3 RC and when I want to build a Symbian app for the
emulator
and the only option I have for building is the tool chain GCC, so I can't
change that to WINSCW.
In the Beta version, 1.2.92 everything seemed to be fine.
Am I missing something obvious?
Thanks for your
On Friday 20 November 2009 13:42:28 ext Abdel Younes wrote:
> André Pönitz wrote:
> > On Friday 20 November 2009 12:01:43 ext GenaCid wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I've noticed a bug(feature?): comment breakpoint doesn't disable it. If
> >> it's a
> >> feature, it's a little confusing especial
André Pönitz wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2009 12:01:43 ext GenaCid wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I've noticed a bug(feature?): comment breakpoint doesn't disable it. If it's
>> a
>> feature, it's a little confusing especially when commenting a big piece of
>> code.
>>
>
> It's not an intentio
Fairly often as I'm working on prototype interface classes and data
frameworks. Lots of refactoring.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:45:00AM +0100, ext Danny Price wrote:
> > Five laborious steps!
> >
> and h
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:01:43PM +0100, ext GenaCid wrote:
> I've noticed a bug(feature?): comment breakpoint doesn't disable it.
> If it's a feature, it's a little confusing especially when commenting
> a big piece of code.
>
that's completely expected. the debugger will set the breakpoint at t
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:45:00AM +0100, ext Danny Price wrote:
> Five laborious steps!
>
and how often do you have to execute those steps (several files at a
time don't count)?
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltec
On Friday 20 November 2009 12:01:43 ext GenaCid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed a bug(feature?): comment breakpoint doesn't disable it. If it's
> a
> feature, it's a little confusing especially when commenting a big piece of
> code.
It's not an intentional feature, it's just what happens if one
Hi Peter,
On Nov 20, 2009, at 11:19 AM, ext Peter Kümmel wrote:
> I have a template member function,
>template SharedPtr createObject();
>
> which is used like this:
> ...->createObject();
good catch, I will try to fix it but i'm afraid it's too late for 1.3.
thanks for the report.
cia
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Robert Caldecott <
robert.caldec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well said. Personally I can live without file system integration as
> anything complicated SVN-wise I can do with the awesome TortoiseSVN
> plugin. Alt-Tabing to an Explroer window when I need to rename fil
On Friday 20 November 2009 10:53:46 ext Danny Price wrote:
> Ah so the sticking point is making it work with source-control?
It's one of the points to consider. If it does not interact properly with
the source control system you'll have a good chance that the wrong
thing is done. That's worse t
Well said. Personally I can live without file system integration as
anything complicated SVN-wise I can do with the awesome TortoiseSVN
plugin. Alt-Tabing to an Explroer window when I need to rename files
is not the end of the world.
Qt Creator is a superb product and I am forever evangelising a
I have a template member function,
template SharedPtr createObject();
which is used like this:
...->createObject();
But all the usage of createObject<*> doesn't show up
when I trigger the relevant popup menu item,
('Verwendung suchen', Ctrl-Shift-U).
Usage of non-template functions are co
Danny Price, Friday 20 November 2009:
> I would consider the abilty to rename a file more fundamental to an IDE
> than supporting every major source control solution under the sun.
> Source-control support in IDEs is generally mediocre, if it exists at
> all, and most developers use dedicated so
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Andre Poenitz <
andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:34:25PM +, Danny Price wrote:
> > I'm fairly certain both VisualStudio 1.0 and Eclipse 1.0 had the ability
> to
> > rename source files.
>
> Danny,
>
> if the developer
yeah Andre...
Your are right and clearly explain us how you make QtCreator best every
day... First let's me say that QtCreator make me fall in love developing
Qt Apps ! So you have done a very good job for Qt and your users. Thank you.
On the other side, in fact, everyone is looking for his own
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:34:25PM +, Danny Price wrote:
>
>> I'm fairly certain both VisualStudio 1.0 and Eclipse 1.0 had the ability to
>> rename source files.
>>
>
> Danny,
>
> if the developers of VS and Eclipse had enough resources to spent to
> integrate cro
29 matches
Mail list logo
