Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX

1999-06-07 Thread Jose Roberto Bulcao
Hey Mike, Worked like a charm by following your sugestion. Thanks again!! Great product, Great support!! Congratulations!! Rgds, On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote: > Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:00:10 -0500 > From: Mike McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jose Roberto Bulcao <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX

1999-06-07 Thread Mike McCauley
On Jun 7, 9:03pm, Jose Roberto Bulcao wrote: > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX > > Hi Mike, > > It seems the the specific clause is working ok, but the auth packet is > being catched by the last DEFAULT clause. Here you are (debug level 4): Yes, its clear that your clause

Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX

1999-06-07 Thread Jose Roberto Bulcao
Hi Mike, It seems the the specific clause is working ok, but the auth packet is being catched by the last DEFAULT clause. Here you are (debug level 4): Tks, Mon Jun 7 20:57:11 1999: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Received from 200.240.25.3 port 1645 Code: Access-Request Identifier: 160 Au

Re: (RADIATOR) Converting mysql to Platypus

1999-06-07 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Richard, In both EMERALD and PLATYPUS, the select statment is mostly hard-wired, but you do get the chance to tweak it. The theory is that you can add extra columns to the Emerald or Platypus tables if you wish. In both of those modules, if you specify AuthSelect, its added to the select stat

Re: (RADIATOR) AuthBy File Problems- Version Differences between 2.13 and 2.13.1

1999-06-07 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Rich, I cant explain that at all. Could you send me a sanitized extract from your users file, so I can test it here? Cheers. On Jun 7, 1:38pm, Richard Cameron wrote: > Subject: (RADIATOR) AuthBy File Problems- Version Differences between 2.13 > Hello Radiator's: > > I have recently

Re: (RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX

1999-06-07 Thread Mike McCauley
Hello Jose, I have just tested your configuration and Time check item. Your configuration and users file looks fine, and it worked OK for me, allowing access only betweeen the times given. Can you send your log file, showing what happens when it should be applying the Time restriction? Cheers.

(RADIATOR) Converting mysql to Platypus

1999-06-07 Thread Richard Hawley
In my ongoing struggle to setup radiator to authenticate off a SQL Server and Platypus, I have the following questions: I'm using the Authby EMERALD because we do have the Radius package add-on for platypus. However, I was looking at AuthbyEMERALD.pm. Can I not specify a custom select statem

(RADIATOR) AuthBy File Problems- Version Differences between 2.13 and 2.13.1

1999-06-07 Thread Richard Cameron
Hello Radiator's: I have recently upgraded from version 2.13 to version 2.13.1, with patches for 2.13.1 applied from tar file dated 7 Jun 99. In version 2.13.1 I am now unable to authenticate using AuthBy File but I can authenticate using the same file using version 2.13. Version 2.13.1

Re: (RADIATOR) Accounting dictionary for netserver card

1999-06-07 Thread O Stockhammer
IgnoreAcctSignature seems to have rectified the accting interference. Thanks, Oliver On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Mike McCauley wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Jun 4, 4:57pm, O Stockhammer wrote: > > Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Accounting dictionary for netserver card > > > > These are from the logfile: > > >

(RADIATOR) Time check item in Authby UNIX

1999-06-07 Thread Jose Roberto Bulcao
Does anybody knows if there is a way to configure time based restriction ("Time" check item) for users authenticated via Authby UNIX ou SYSTEM? Using Radiator v.2.13.1 with latest patches, OS platform is IBM AIX v.4.1.5. The user in question has it group set to "admfin". By looking at the log (

Re: (RADIATOR) static ip customers

1999-06-07 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Paul, Yes, AuthBy SQL (like all AuthBy clauses takes an AddToReply parameter, which is a comma separated list of attribute-value pairs. It will add those attributes to _every_ reply. So if you have a common set of attributes, use AddToReply. There is also DefaultReply, which adds attributes t

Re: (RADIATOR) static ip customers

1999-06-07 Thread Paul Gregg
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mike McCauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Yes, its pretty easy, but the way to do it depends on what type of databse yo |u | have. Basically what you need to do is set up a reply item for the user with | eg: | Framed-IP-Address=192.168.1.1 While we'r