From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:15 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields
From: Resource Description
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:39 AM
[SA]if you have a bracketed date in 264 _1 based on the copyright date, the
264 _4 is optional, if I'm interpreting
I do not know if LC PCC PS is interpreted correctly.
However,
RDA 2.8.6.6 says If the date of publication is not identified in a
resource... record the copyright date, and RDA 2.11 says copyright date
is a core element if...neither the date of publication ... is
identified.
I tend to think in
Transcription of copyright date is a core element (Mandatory) if neither
the date of publication nor the date of distribution is identified. This
is why the LC-PCC Policy Statement tells catalogers to supply a probable
publication date as much as possible, rather than recording date of
A slight tangent from the conversation:
In the interest of trying to learn about the 264 in RDA, I looked at the
MARC Bibliographic to RDA Mapping in the RDA Toolkit, the 264 isn't
there. Likewise, perhaps more surprisingly, the 264 also isn't in the
RDA to MARC Bibliographic Mapping.
Please
] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:55
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields
RDA
2.11http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp2target=rda2-7597#rda2-7597
says Copyright date is a core element if neither
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Monica Boyer
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 3:00 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields
A slight tangent from the conversation:
In the interest of trying to learn about the 264 in RDA, I looked at the MARC
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 4:16 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] question about dates in 264 fields
It is not in RDA Toolkit
8 matches
Mail list logo