Yesterday, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:55:36PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote:
> > What I'd like to encourage is for people to come to redhat-devel-list
> > to make comments, suggestions, complaints, and even patches to the
> > core Red Hat Linux distribution. If you have a pe
preview directory of CD2 of RedHat 7.0 include a glibc package which is
optimized for 2.4 and i686 architecture.
I run actually the official 2.4.0 on my redhat 7.0 fully up2date (very
happy, any functioning).
So i would like to rebuild glibc-2.2-9.src.rpm for i686 and with 2.4
optimisation like
I posted my last message before seeing this one...
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:55:36PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote:
> What I'd like to encourage is for people to come to redhat-devel-list
> to make comments, suggestions, complaints, and even patches to the
> core Red Hat Linux distribution. If you h
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:18:39AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen
> > this, but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth
> > repeating here:
>
> So Zack Brown's an expert on how Re
Matt,
Is it possible to get a simple way to establish IP tunnels built into the
initscripts mechanisim? The Polish Linux Distribution has it.
They also have stuff like Display Postscript setup for the XF 4.0.2 whay
is it not in RawHide?
X Fonts is another thing deserving attention, there are jus
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:48:36PM -0800, Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> I'm not disputing your claim though Bill. I think RedHat is very proactive
> about getting developer import by making rawhide available and having a
> public bugzilla. I would like to see the contrib program resurrected and
> mad
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro.
>
> We don't?
>
> That's the first I've heard of it.
What is the current status of the contrib program. I haven't heard
anything from the maili
Mario Torre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> But RedHat doesn't want from anyone to contribute to its distro.
We don't?
That's the first I've heard of it.
Bill
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/list
On Thursday 04 January 2001 19:18, John Summerfield wrote:
> So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat should do its business?
I don't think the question could be answered only in this way...
The fact that RedHat it's colser that Debian or the other distros is true.
That's not necessarily bad.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen
> this, but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth
> repeating here:
So Zack Brown's an expert on how Red Hat should do its business?
Seems to me that RH has got one or two things rig
On Thursday 04 January 2001 11:40, you wrote:
>
> The only public developer mailing list suitable for actual Red Hat
> development, for example, tends to stay fairly low traffic and
> off-topic.
I could be a little off here or just tired but I've always thought of this
list for th
Ok, most of the people who read Kernel Traffic, have already seen this,
but I think this comment of Zack Brown in Issue #100 is worth repeating
here:
=
(Zack Brown [*]:
Personally, I think Red Hat is not vocal enough about encouraging
people to participate
OK, is some better info:
The Unit Under Test (UUT) has Redhat's embedded Linux kernel (based on Linux/PPC
kernel 2.2.13),
from the Redhat EDK 1.0, running on an embedded PowerPC processor with 8M of RAM, and
is connected
to a LAN.
For my test, I had a TCP Client on a PC, also connected to the
See below.
John Summerfield writes:
> >
> > Svante Signell writes:
> >
> > Maybe my question could be sent to some XFree list but the problem is
> > how to (re-)enable the Voodoo2 to work under X4 and kernel2.2/2.4.
> > There are no header files for 2.2 kernels in rawhide. As a
> > conseq
14 matches
Mail list logo
