On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
- AnotherLevel
Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
In fact people with 16 Megs
On a 486 _S_X? The scalable fonts must have been painful for a CPU
without math coprocessor. It took over 1 minute in a 386DX 40 to
parse them when X started.
You turn them off. Definitely. I also built a custom window mangler for it
Alan
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL
Bill, thanks for the post. I think that the document is definetely a
step in the right direction.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:44:20AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- The various BSD-based network services (telnet, finger, talk,
rsh, ruers, rwall, tftp) have been split into client and
It can be a difficult and onerous task to rebuild lots of server and
client boxes up to a new distro version, or to try to integrate these
into existing infrastructures and configurations when some features
have changed (sometimes radically). To have some decent documentation
available
Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
There will be something along these lines with 6.2 final. I'm
not sure it will necessarily go into all the detail you
This ought to make interpreting the output a little easier by tagging each
changelog with the package name, version, and release:
'rpm -q --queryformat
On Wed Feb 09 2000 at 23:47, George Karabin wrote:
Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of
debate (as this thread died in a
At 18:26 2/10/00 +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
Nice to see a reply so quickly. I hope this issue gets a fair bit of
debate (as this thread died in a pathetic whimper in the lead-up to
rh61, and IIRC, rh60 before that).
if memory serves the last time it was an entirely one sided plea from
the users
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 04:54:50PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
- one to describe the overall changes (eg, the installer, new
or replaced/deleted packages, new features, default desktop
changes, overall stuff like that).
The "WhatsNew" section of the Install Guide has much
Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
pre-releases) of a new distribution. In fact, two CHANGES files...
There will be something along these lines with 6.2 final. I'm
not sure it will necessarily go into all the detail you need,
Thanks for the reply Bill, it's really nice to know that you guys/gals
are quietly listening here...
On Thu Feb 10 2000 at 10:44, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Tony Nugent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
pre-releases) of a new
I've just read on slashdot that the redhat 6.2 beta has been made
available (although I haven't check for it myself). I've asked about
this before, and now would be a good time to bring this issue up
again...
Can a CHANGES file be provided with this and every release (and
pre-releases) of a new
RPM provides a hook that might give you some of what you want. 'rpm
--changelog -p RPM list will dump the changes associated with a list of
packages. You can use 'diff' to compare the changes from an old release
to a new release to see what's changed.
I see two gotchas to this approach,
Oops. The syntax ought to be 'rpm -q --changelog -p RPM package list'. I
should have checked it before I sent it!
George Karabin wrote:
RPM provides a hook that might give you some of what you want. 'rpm
--changelog -p RPM list will dump the changes associated with a list of
packages. You
14 matches
Mail list logo
