Re: What's using port 1026 ? NEVER MIND - GOT IT

2000-04-06 Thread Elliot Lee
On 6 Apr 2000 17:58:11 -0400, Steve Feehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Brian wrote: > >> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Perry J. Blalock wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I have something that appeared and is listening on port 1026, but I >> > don't know what it might be. Is there any wa

Re: Gnome setup in Redhat 6.2

2000-03-28 Thread Elliot Lee
On 28 Mar 2000 16:46:40 -0500, Daniel Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >But how about include The Helix Gnome desktop in futere versions of >Redhat ? Helix Gnome desktop ~= Gnome devel branch plus a splash screen. I'm sure once a stable release is out of it, it'll be something to consider for

Re: Gnome setup in Redhat 6.2

2000-03-28 Thread Elliot Lee
On 28 Mar 2000 15:14:50 -0500, James Intriglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I sure had a tough time figuring out what to do to upgrade GNOME to the next >stable release (RH V6.1?). I'm not alone, as most answers from numerous >Usenet posts suggested I just upgrade to RH6.1, rather than try to f

Re: Gnome setup in Redhat 6.2

2000-03-28 Thread Elliot Lee
On 28 Mar 2000 04:15:39 -0500, Daniel Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Q. Why is the Gnome version on Redhat 6.2 so ancient ? >I was really looking forward to get a real nice default Gnome desktop >(like the Helix one) when >installing my new wonderful Redhat Linux OS. >(I has been a pleasure

Re: Sound, but no midi

2000-03-08 Thread Elliot Lee
On 7 Mar 2000 11:35:39 -0500, Gustav Schaffter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I finally came to it. I dropped in my SB AWE64 that have been laying >around for ages. :-) > >I run sndconfig. It correctly identified my card. I could hear Linus >talk. :-) I could hear the midi part as well. I've looked

Re: Gnome-Enlightenment questions

2000-03-03 Thread Elliot Lee
On 3 Mar 2000 16:12:42 -0500, Julian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >1. Somehow when I startx, it seems to have decided to start up Star >Office every time. Is there a way to cure this annoyance? You probably saved your session once when you were running Star Office. Do you save your session

Re: Gnome crashes on multiple processor machine

2000-03-01 Thread Elliot Lee
On 29 Feb 2000 22:41:02 -0500, Chris \(Ski\) Kacoroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I have redhat 6.1 with the latest gnome patches. I am running it on an >Intergraph server with 256MB ram, a built in matrox millenium graphics card, >and 4 pentium pro processors. Gnome seems to crash when

Re: 64 Bit OS Port

2000-02-24 Thread Elliot Lee
On 24 Feb 2000 07:10:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know of any documentation or definitive website >regarding porting Redhat (or any other distros for that matter) to 64 Bit OS >architechture ? I have only been able to find general information regardin

Re: More 6.1 Woes

2000-02-10 Thread Elliot Lee
On 10 Feb 2000 18:00:54 -0500, Kirk Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On second sight, it's not that it's not starting... it's dying immediately. Have you checked syslog for error messages from xfs? I know when I had a bad /etc/X11/fs/config, it would claim to start up correctly but die soo

Re: GDM

2000-02-09 Thread Elliot Lee
On 9 Feb 2000 12:10:21 -0500, Neil Hollow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I wish to use GDM as graphical log in. GDM return at the term prompt works >fine allowing to login out etc. However, I cannot find any instructions on >how to set up my initib file. Poking around the system in the GDM dir I

Re: GNOME unwanted returning icons

2000-01-11 Thread Elliot Lee
On 10 Jan 2000 14:21:58 -0500, Piet Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I am running RH 6.1, which was actually 6,0 upgraded to 6.1. >I'm running the GNOME desktop environment, and am generally pretty happy >with it. > >I have a gripe about the icons on the desktop, and I'm hoping somebody >can hel

Re: Huge Gnome

1999-12-16 Thread Elliot Lee
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Jyan-Min Fang wrote: > My experience with gnome (on redhat 6.0) was that it initially ran fine, > but after a few days, it felt really sluggish. I don't think the memory > usage was the culprit, since free showed I still had many free memory > available. I recalled some artic

Re: Core Problem from Gnome

1999-12-16 Thread Elliot Lee
On 16 Dec 1999 10:26:19 -0500, Jim Kannengieser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Often under Linux and other Unix clones, when an application crashes, it >"dumps core." Core is memory, and a core dump is a snapshot of what was in >memory for that application at the time of the crash. Application >deve

Re: Midi setup in Redhat 6.0

1999-11-24 Thread Elliot Lee
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Bill Johnson wrote: > Thanks for the response. I want to be able to play midi files (hymns, > particularly). I have a bunch of them, but when I try to play them > (and I tried the exact syntax you provided in your email), playmidi > displays the following: > > [bill@localh

Re: Midi setup in Redhat 6.0

1999-11-23 Thread Elliot Lee
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Bill Johnson wrote: > Here is what it tells me. I'm not up on this operating system yet, so I > don't know how to interpret the results. The answer to your first > question is "Yes - sound is working... it's just midi I'm having > difficulty with." How are you trying to us

Re: Midi setup in Redhat 6.0

1999-11-12 Thread Elliot Lee
On 11 Nov 1999 22:15:55 -0500, Bill Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >$ cat /dev/sndstat >OSS/Free:3.8s2++-971130 >Load type: Driver loaded as a module >Kernel: Linux localhost.localdomain 2.2.5-15 #1 Mon Apr 19 22:21:09 EDT >1999 i586Config options: 0 > >Installed drivers: > >Card config: >

Re: Midi setup in Redhat 6.0

1999-11-10 Thread Elliot Lee
On 10 Nov 1999 17:56:52 -0500, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'm having trouble configuring my Redhat 6.0 system for midi. I have >sound working, but not midi. Here is my configuration: > >I'm running Redhat 6.0 on a Packard Bell L190 machine. (Pentium 200 box) >This machine has a built in

Re: RH6.1 / October-gnome

1999-11-07 Thread Elliot Lee
On 7 Nov 1999 05:07:56 -0500, Mike A. Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Thanks Chuck. Thanks also to Brandt & Barry. You are 100% correct. Getting >the devel stuff solved the problem. I didn't get it originally because of >the following statement on www.gnome.org: > > >The steps for getting G

Re: GNOME Session Management

1999-11-06 Thread Elliot Lee
On 5 Nov 1999 16:47:51 -0500, lloy0076 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The GNOME Session manager appears to be giving me serious grief. It is >giving me so much grief that I'm almost about to give up and shift to >KDE. When I try to connect to my X Server I continuously received: > >GNOME-SESSION-UI

Re: snmpd, I don't want it!

1998-06-15 Thread Elliot Lee
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Mauricio Teixeira wrote: > How do I disable the snmpd daemon to run, but without uninstaling > it? Run 'ntsysv' as root, clear the check box, and select the OK button. -- Elliot When I die, I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather... ...not yel

Re: How do I write an RPC server?

1998-06-11 Thread Elliot Lee
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, KThorpe wrote: > Can anyone point me to a sensible discussion on writing RPC servers? > > I want to call database subroutines on my Linux box from Windows clients > over the internet. I'm looking at DCOM for Linux, but it's a case of using a > steamroller to crack a peanut

Re: X Window Manager Programming

1998-06-08 Thread Elliot Lee
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Robert Hailman wrote: > Does anyone know where I could find a guide to programming Window Managers > for X The O'Reilly Xlib programming & reference manuals. > or recommend a small (< 30k) window manager that I could use as the base > for my own simple window manager? http

Re: qmail in redhat 6

1998-05-28 Thread Elliot Lee
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Trevor Astrope wrote: > This may be closer than you think. There is already work amongst qmail > users and DJB to put together a DJB approved binary rpm distribution. > Red Hat could simply use the DJB approved rpm in future releases. Use zmailer or vmailer. Both do better t

Re: Linux IP clustering

1998-05-22 Thread Elliot Lee
On Fri, 22 May 1998, Shawn McMahon wrote: > So I figure on taking 3 or 4 Linux boxes, clustering them, and being able to > boot a whole bunch at once. Why 3 or 4 Linux boxes? 1 should do the trick... The network is going to be the bottleneck here - it doesn't take a terribly powerful machine to

Re: mupack??

1998-05-20 Thread Elliot Lee
On Wed, 20 May 1998, Chris J. Magnuson wrote: > Anyone know which RPM this guy is looking for? > > | > I need the mupack and other MIME-related programs to get installed to > | > decode binary files. uudecode/uuencode is not sufficient. metamail will do the job. -- Elliot When I die, I want to

RE: BIND 4.9.6-7 security hole

1998-05-19 Thread Elliot Lee
On Mon, 18 May 1998, W. Bryan Caudle wrote: > The redhat update DOES NOT fix the problem I have tested this exploit > against the absolute latest bind RPM's from ftp.redhat.com, and that > version IS VULNERABLE, or I would not have posted this. This > vulnerability is affecting systems across th

Re: Advice for 4000 mail users on a Red Hat 5.0 box

1998-05-15 Thread Elliot Lee
On Fri, 15 May 1998, Peter Chen wrote: > We have a Sun Enterprise 5000 web server that sent several thousands of > mail inquiries in a burst. I am afraid the Linux sendmail server might be > swarmed. I personally saw that there were more than 2000 open sendmail > sessions on the Sun server by doi

Re: cc1 gets fatal signal 11 ???

1998-05-14 Thread Elliot Lee
On Thu, 14 May 1998, Alexei Nefediev wrote: >I am sorry in advance for this long message, but this is the only way > to explain what is going on. >It seems either me or my computer goes crazy. Indeed, I try to > perform a very simple operation - to recompile the kernel. I used to do > it