[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it standard to use -755 nobody.nobody as ownr.group for all their
.html's on their web page ?
No, it's bad, because the nobody account is for use by services that
support anonymous users, and the *last* thing you'd ever want is for
an anonymous user to modify your
Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want something to worry about, worry about GNU software still
using the idiosyncratic "info" format instead of switching to HTML
years ago.
I don't think this is anything to worry about. They use texinfo, which can
be compiled into info, HTML,
"Shawn McMahon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the main difference is the fact that the USR Courier V.Everything is a
Class 1 and Class 2.0 modem, not Class 2.
This doesn't bode well for using it with a V.Everything...
Class 2 was never released as a standard. It was only a draft, and
I wrote:
I beg to differ. Solaris has a huge bloated inefficient pig
of a kernel as compared to Linux. They do wacky things like
Peter Mutsaers [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
We just bought some SUN Ultra's with Solaris 2.6. The Ultra's have
only 64MB of RAM, but still I find them very
"Peter Chen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find a qmail SRPM or RPM package. Moreover, since I don't have much
experience with qmail, I don't want to lose my job and Linux's reputation
as well. But I might switch to qmail after the mail server is up and
running.
Hmmm... I couldn't ever
Mike Blatchley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I'm aware that mgetty will do
"Auto PPP", but all authentication is solely via PAP. There's something
about requiring the normal Login/Password procedure that makes me feel
better.
I'm not sure why it makes you feel better. I prefer CHAP
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some points of the NetWinder:
300 MHZ Dec StrongARM, delivering ~250-260 MIPS
Uhhm... that's an Intel StrongARM. Unfortunately :-(
Still sounds like a nice box though. I've been waiting for a cheap box
based on the DEC StrongArm NC reference
Chris Fishwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone out there got any experience with the Iomega Jaz drives??
Yes. I've got five Jaz drives, and I'd be delighted to sell all of them and
get some of my money back.
They all seemed to work at first, but over a period of a four to eight months,
"Tim Larkins \(EUKSHEL1PO\)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of changing my Host Adapters SCSI ID to ID 15 so that I
can free up SCSI ID 7 for use by another device.. will this cause problems
under Linux? Will I need to make any changes/ re-install or will it happily
cope with
Chris Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
want to filter incoming mail say for example from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] into the mailbox ~/mail/IN.linux-admin.
Currently I do this with procmail, I don't mean how do I call procmail
from qmail as thats how its currently done.
Arguably calling procmail from
Matt Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'd rather have procmail just deposit the mail (by
default) back into /var/spool/mail/matt (my system box) where I can read
it with any mail tool without customization. However, I fear this will
confuse procmail and send it in an infinite loop. The
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. Don't exactly know why the man page states that, but typically
binaries that the superuser uses are stored in /bin. Normal users use
/usr/bin, which is where that should go.
Not quite. Executables intended primarily for the superuser go in
/sbin
Thomas Hubbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will something like System Commander make the dual-boot Linux/NT ordeal any
easier?
PowerBoot will make it easier, and at $25 is less expensive than
System Commander.
http://www.blueskyinnovations.com/
Cheers,
Eric
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ,
George Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would invite you to do the math: 115,200 baud with one start bit, one
stop bit and eight data bits (total of 10) means the computer has to
pump out 11,520 bytes per second to the serial port. I think if a 386
at 25Mhz can handle a hard drive and move
I wrote:
And if I want to run different daemons on the same port number of different
IP addresses? Or the same daemon but with different command-line
arguments? I don't know any way to use ipfwadm to do that, and it was my
primary objective.
"John D. Hardin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
Use
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about my inetd patches:
They never got included for a good reason. This functionality is already
available by using ipfwadm to block access to ports to wish to restrict.
And if I want to run different daemons on the same port number of different
IP
Brian Landers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to configure telnetd and/or ftpd to listen only on
a specific interface on a machine with multiple interfaces? I want to be
able to ftp/telnet into IP address 'foo' but not into address 'baz' (both
on the same RedHat 5.0 box).
I
Thomas Hubbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
Can you use a DVD-ROM drive with Linux?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
Yes, you can use it. DVD is pretty fast and all but it doesn't have
support for reading burned disks which is pain the *ss. If you already
have a decently fast CD-ROM don't buy DVD
"Jeremy Domingue" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to set up my server so that when someone telnets into it, the IP
address they telnet to is the IP that they are "binded" to (i.e, if they get
on IRC they show up as the IP they have telneted to, NOT the main IP address
The easiest way I
19 matches
Mail list logo
