I seem to remember that the issue of mapping a web site was
discussed in this list quite a while ago. For some reason I seem to think
that this can be done with lynx and some switch or other. I don't seem to
be able to find the correct information on how to do this so I ask this
august
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > It really comes down to this:
> >
> > You're either in favor of HTML markup in email, or you're not in favor of
> > email being a very rich method of communication compared to speech.
>
> Oh really? And I say that I *am* against HTML in email and I a
On 2 Jun 1998, Eze Ogwuma wrote:
> > > The sad thing is that it costs $20 for Linux.
> >
> > That's not a sad thing. That's a happy thing. Commercial
> > applications/software is not bad. Everything doesn't have to be free.
> > $20 for a utility that good is a steal.
>
> I thought that $
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Piet Barber wrote:
> The sad thing is that it costs $20 for Linux.
That's not a sad thing. That's a happy thing. Commercial
applications/software is not bad. Everything doesn't have to be free.
$20 for a utility that good is a steal.
---
"Do not meddle in the affa
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Chris Evans wrote:
> Sadly the number of unaddressed security issues in RedHat Linux systems
> is creeping up.
>
> It is becoming difficult for me to keep track of them all. Since I am keen
> they all get fixed ASAP, I've put up a text file of these issues on the
> web.
>
>
On Mon, 18 May 1998, W. Bryan Caudle wrote:
> The redhat update DOES NOT fix the problem. I have tested this exploit
> against the absolute latest bind RPM's from ftp.redhat.com, and that
> version IS VULNERABLE, or I would not have posted this. This vulnerability
> is affecting systems across
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Marco Shaw wrote:
> Typically, one of these Pentiums will do all the work, while the other
> just 'sits around'. With this software the two machines 'listen' to each
> other, and, therefore they can communicate with each other, and when the
> communication stops, the other
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Theo Jones wrote:
> I'm having trouble understanding what controls the default permissions
> set on a file when users connect through ftp. I've looked high and low
> and can't seem to find where these are set. The permissions seem to be
> set differently in ftp-login from t
On Fri, 15 May 1998, Michael Jinks wrote:
> Joe Klemmer wrote:
>
> > it. Look for a file that is close to this name '.axnetipc' and delete it.
>
> That was precisely the name. Thanks much.
Hey, any time. We all are brothers and sisters in Linux. ;-
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Erik Ratcliffe wrote:
> I love this...
>
> Let's see... The price for OpenLinux Base 1.2 in retail stores is $59, and
> it comes with the Netware client (not the admin utilities, but you didn't
> say you needed any). With the $20 rebate retail copies come with, that goes
On Mon, 11 May 1998, Joel Robert Oliveira wrote:
> What job is this ?? and why did I miss this thread ??? And I AM single..
> with no "family" per se. I wouldn't mind looking into this job =).
> Anyways .. where should I be looking for more information because I
> completely missed the initi
On Fri, 8 May 1998, Vidiot wrote:
> >Feel free to show off your web authoring talent by putting your
> >resume on the web.
>
> In my case, my WWW resume would be my expansive web site :-) No need to
> blab a resume on the web. :-) Nothing like showing the kind of work one
> can do by doing
On Wed, 6 May 1998, Zoki wrote:
> I heard a lot of complaints about M'soft not being the issue of this
> list, but I think the next link should be checked anyway because it
> affects indirectly any computer user and especially those trying to get
> some work done instead of trying to make it run.
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> Don't underestimate the power of that. Microsoft is *THE* biggest
> software company in the world. IBM is a close second, but doesn't make
> an emulator.
In 1997, MS was the second (or third, I don't remember) biggest
software company behind
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
> Alternatively, they could stipulate in their licensing that sites may
> not use MS products concurrently with non-MS operating systems within
> the same organization (network, building, computer, whatever). This
> would probably be almost as much fu
On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, Jon wrote:
> TOPIC #2:
> Recently someone questioned me when I spoke to
> them about Linux in general as a wonderful
> alternative to MS's Windoze operating environments.
> I mentioned how Linus is in charge of the kernel
> and code freezes on it, and how public domain
> con
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am looking for the address to subscribe to the
> linux-kernel list.
linux-kernel
This list exists for the discussion of kernel development issues,
including new features, bug reports, and announcements of new kernel
releases.
This l
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> There is a setting in Preferences to specify you Return Address. Did you
> set it?
>
> There does not appear to be a way to set this in pine.
There most certainly is. See my header for the Reply-To: field
then read the man page for pine (
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Beth Gemeny wrote:
> Thanks, Joe, that was very cool. I have something to show my superiors who
> gave me some sideways glances when I set up our webservers and mail server
> on old 486's using Linux. They respect NPR and the material it chooses to
> air, and this broadcast
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Just heard them announce that they'll be interviewing some Linux people on
> >NPR. If you know your station and want to listen, they'll be talking in a
> >few minutes
>
> Transcription please.
I don't have RA installed (no sound card)
On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, Yaron M. Minsky wrote:
> > I suppose that the real heart of the controversy from our point
> > of view is accountability. To the Linux community, it's okay if
> > the user has to resort to uncertain means of support such as the
> > 'Net, users' groups, and e-ma
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Mike Edwards wrote:
> Up until now, I really haven't had the need to custom-compile any
> commands, but I want to look into doing so with nenscript. My question
> is, if I install the src.rpm, will it stomp on the already installed
> nenscript files? I have a feeling it won'
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Walt Hsu wrote:
> Does anyone know where can I find the application software of buliding
> cyberstore with linux? Or, does there have any commercial product?
Check out the into on http://www.htmlscript.com.
---
"Off the keyboard, thru the router, past the hub, over
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Dave Wreski wrote:
> > > SysAdmin has had several articles about Linux in it so far. My only
> > > complaint is that its pretty thin. :)
> >
> > But the content more than makes up for the lack of size.
>
> Isn't it like $80/yr?
It's $39.00 according to the
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Damond Walker wrote:
> >I don't know about Unix Review, but January's SysAdmin leading title was
> >LINUXhttp://www.samag.com/archive/0701/
> >Looks like some people know about Linux already
>
> SysAdmin has had several articles about Linux in it so far. My only
>
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Miroslaw Wodniak wrote:
> I don't know about Unix Review, but January's SysAdmin leading title was
> LINUXhttp://www.samag.com/archive/0701/
> Looks like some people know about Linux already
> Mike
For the last two or three years SysAdmin has dedicated an issue
On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Paul Fontenot wrote:
> try using ical. I think I got it from Calderas site.
It's also included with RH Linux.
---
"Off the keyboard, thru the router, past the hub, over the bridge,
down the line, nothing but net!!"
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Erra
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Damond Walker wrote:
> I'm currently starting the process of looking at some of the RDM systems
> available for Linux that integrate (read: ODBC) well with Wintel setups.
> Anyone have a good place to start looking? Free or commercial...at this
> point it doesn't matter.
On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Mat Serwas wrote:
> 12. There is not OS ready for prime time. Period. We are still coddling,
> feeding, nursing and swearing at them.
This is probably the most sane thing ever said about OS's in the
history of computing. :-)
---
"Whatever women do they must
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Felix wrote:
> Somehow, through documentation, installation procedures, powerful apps,
> GUI's or what-have-you, Linux needs to step beyond the "High end server OS" and
> "garage hobbyist" to appeal to the non-tinkerer types. Only then can it really
> compete with Window
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Craig Kattner wrote:
> There's a lot of talk on this list about using FVWM95 as a default window
> manager because it's familiar, but what about command line familiarity? Is
> there no value to that?
Making the move to Linux means you're going to be exposed to, and
l
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Craig Kattner wrote:
> I'm afraid I need to disagree with this. I picked up linux mostly
> because I wanted to have some understanding of unix, but it does have
> potential to be a desktop os. Think about the ease of use complaints,
> the original poster complained about not
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree. I personaly don't like Windoze, but there are thing
> Linux can learn from MS: mainly, some easy to use interfaces that can
> help those who just bought Linux to configure their machines and learn
> the basics, so they would be able to
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Keith Dart wrote:
> > neglected in most of the distribtuion I seem so far. Perhaps, it is
> > something worth working on? Maybe to entice more people to switch to
> > Linux as an alternative to Windows 95. (It is more feasible now, with
> > Corel WordPerfect, Applixware, I
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Thomas Porter wrote:
> Karnak holds the envelope to his brow and says: "Sometime before the penguin
> lands in Durham, NC."
That's probably the most accurate guess yet. Most of the releases
have coincided with some major expo or show or something. At lease that's
w
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
> >My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
> >list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
> Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as Donnie isn't even on this
> list and Erik only glances at it on
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
> I do have to admit that I'm...disappointed that the RHL user community
> is no longer as privy to the RH development process. I suppose it's
> necessary, though, to maintain a viable commercial software development
> enterprise.
I thi
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
> >My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
> >list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
> Seems to me that most of the RH crew have been absent for some time.
> Do they traffic hurricane-li
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
> > >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> > >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> > >track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
> > >days, weeks, or m
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Ramin Sina wrote:
> I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
> days, weeks, or months?
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Brandt Kurowski wrote:
>
> If we wanted to be more like MS, we would have to squeeze X into the
> name, which I'm suprised nobody has mentioned. GNU/Linux/Xfree?
> X/GNU/Linux? LignuX?
>
Heh, anyone remember the very first CD distribution of linux? It
was called L
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Derek Balling wrote:
> > Heh, anyone remember the very first CD distribution of linux? It
> > was called LGX and later became Yggdrasil.
>
> Want a copy? I still have a copy of that disc sitting on my bookshelf. :)
God, no. I have enough Linux distributions ly
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
> A technical debate is not won with volume, it's won with technical merit.
> Frankly, there are very few people--very few--that are competent enough
> to technically compare Linux to any other operating system. Hell, there
> are few enough peop
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
> > Go to http://www.sendmail.org and read the information there.
> > They are going to provide commercial support for Sendmail. Much the same
> > as RH is ramping up to provide commercial support for Linux. Sendmail
> > itself will still be 100%
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, John Higginbotham wrote:
> Anyone hear (from a good source) if Sendmail is going commercial? A local
> Microsoft Zealot pushed this little tidbit in my face:
[...]
Go to http://www.sendmail.org and read the information there.
They are going to provide commercial supp
On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Enki wrote:
> What sort of newsreader can I get so I can read/write a newsgroup
> on/off line on a regular Dial up computer
tin
---
Microsoft is not the answer. | In a World Without Fences,
Microsoft is the question,| Who Needs Gates?
NO is t
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, I was just wondering if anyone could recommend a good emailer reader
> that has good filtering? No, and I've tried netscape and it doesn't
> seem that good. I mean something like Eudora on windows.
My personal choice is pine+procmail
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Beth Gemeny wrote:
> First my kcore file is located in /proc/, not / (woops :-}). It cannot
> be removed with a normal rm under root. Problem is it is growing! It
> now consumes half of my 100MB root partition. Is this file pertinent to
> my systems operation? I have found
48 matches
Mail list logo
