Is there any way to setup iptables to work with GnomeMeeting/NetMeeting?
Thanks
Marc Boorshtein
--
Marc Boorshtein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I tried your line Mr. Dixon, but to no avail. It only opened holes for
dhcp and ssh. Thank you for suggesting it though (I appreciate your
time).
The kickstart file I started with was generated by the installer after
a manual install and placed in /root/anaconda-ks.cfg. There seems to
be
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 17:42, jurvis lasalle wrote:
> i'm kickstarting some computers and need to open up ports 111 and 6000
> for NIS and x11. i have this line in my kickstart file:
> firewall --medium --dhcp --port=111:tcp --port=6000:tcp --port=ssh:tcp
>
> this does open holes for dhcp and ssh
i'm kickstarting some computers and need to open up ports 111 and 6000
for NIS and x11. i have this line in my kickstart file:
firewall --medium --dhcp --port=111:tcp --port=6000:tcp --port=ssh:tcp
this does open holes for dhcp and ssh, but not NIS or x11. i have
replaced the 111 with sunrpc a
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:34, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
> All;
> I'll be building a new server soon, based on Redhat. What firewalling
> software is good these days? I've heard good things about firestarter.
> Is it worth looking into, or is there something better/easier.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ric
h
www.shorewall.net
And the Bering release of LEAF (leaf.sourceforge.net) includes the
Shorewall package. I'm taking a look at it and it looks great !!!
Josep Sànchez
[papapep]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/ma
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 13:13, gabriel wrote:
> On January 20, 2003 01:34 pm, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
> > All;
> > I'll be building a new server soon, based on Redhat. What firewalling
> > software is good these days? I've heard good things about firestarter.
> > Is it worth looking into, or is there so
On January 20, 2003 01:34 pm, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
> All;
> I'll be building a new server soon, based on Redhat. What firewalling
> software is good these days? I've heard good things about firestarter.
> Is it worth looking into, or is there something better/easier.
i did it the hard way and buil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I still use ipchains... Check out
http://tomii.dnsalias.com/firewall.txt
- -Original Message-
From: Tibbetts, Ric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Redhat List
Subject: Firewalls
All;
I'll be bui
giptables works well for me.
found at openna.com
-Original Message-
From: Tibbetts, Ric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Redhat List
Subject: Firewalls
All;
I'll be building a new server soon, based on Redhat. What firewalling
software is
All;
I'll be building a new server soon, based on Redhat. What firewalling
software is good these days? I've heard good things about firestarter.
Is it worth looking into, or is there something better/easier.
Thanks!
Ric
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subje
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Jorge Luis Hernández Valdivia wrote:
> --- William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 09:05:21PM +0100,
> Jorge Luis Hernández Valdivia wrote:
> > >
> > > The answer for Bill's questions:
[snip]
> > > > 2. Do you want to se
--- William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 09:05:21PM +0100,
Jorge Luis
> Hernández Valdivia wrote:
> >
> > The answer for Bill's questions:
> >
> > > 1. Is the Linux Firewall being used for mail
> *now*,
> > > or are you
> > >setting up an MTA for the first
> On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Jorge Luis Hernández
> Valdivia wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I got a couple of lans joins by a firewall in linux,
> > something like this:
> >
> > -- --- --
> > |Lan 0 |---|Firewall|--|Lan 1|--|Fire
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Jorge Luis Hernández Valdivia wrote:
>
> The answer for Bill's questions:
>
> > 1. Is the Linux Firewall being used for mail *now*,
> > or are you
> >setting up an MTA for the first time?
>
> It has never been used for email before, it's the
> firs
On Saturday, January 4, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Jorge Luis Hernández
Valdivia wrote:
Hi
I got a couple of lans joins by a firewall in linux,
something like this:
-- --- --
|Lan 0 |---|Firewall|--|Lan 1|--|Firewall|
| Linux |
The answer for Bill's questions:
> 1. Is the Linux Firewall being used for mail *now*,
> or are you
>setting up an MTA for the first time?
It has never been used for email before, it's the
first time.
> 2. Do you want to send the file *in* the email body,
> or as an
>attachment, or d
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:52:21PM +0100, Jorge Luis Hernández Valdivia wrote:
> Hi
>
> I got a couple of lans joins by a firewall in linux,
> something like this:
>
> -- --- --
> |Lan 0 |---|Firewall|--|Lan 1|--|Firewall|
>
Hi
I got a couple of lans joins by a firewall in linux,
something like this:
-- --- --
|Lan 0 |---|Firewall|--|Lan 1|--|Firewall|
| Linux | --- | Windows|
-- --
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene
> Subject: Re: ntp behind firewalls (need to open ports?)
>
> >
> >What program do you use so that Windows syncs to Linux?
>
> If you have Win2k or older, you can put a batch file in the
> Startup folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-Oct-2002/15:42 -0600, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:46:11PM -0600 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
>> The short answer is no. I've got my Linu
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> > ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i setup
> > ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
> > clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/step-tickers. then i just had the service
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:42:00PM -0600, Gary wrote:
>
> What program do you use so that Windows syncs to Linux?
http://nettime.sourceforge.net/
With XP, there's a built-in time sync. It's accessed through the
date/time control panel.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:46:11PM -0600 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> The short answer is no. I've got my Linux server behind a Linksys
> firewall and have no ports open. The Linux system initiates the
> connection to t
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i setup
> ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
> clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/step-tickers. then i just had the service startup
On Thursday 31 October 2002 01:55 pm, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> I really have not followed this thread, but based on the above, it sounds
> like ntpd is not synchronizing with your defined stratum server.
>
> Couple of things to try:
>
> 1) Have you run "ntpq" to see if ntpd is synchronizing with your
> -Original Message-
> From: christopher j bottaro
> Subject: Re: ntp behind firewalls (need to open ports?)
>
>
> thanks for your help, guys. i guess how i'm doing is it
> fine. i have 2 computers behind my firewall/router that
> are running ntp, but he
On Thursday 31 October 2002 08:21 am, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> Generally, each network has one box that syncs with an external source
> and all other local boxes sync from that one. The minimizes the load on
> public time servers and makes for a flexible system. *nix boxes can sync
> to the local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-Oct-2002/22:44 -0600, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i
>setup ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
>clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/ste
require a port
to be forwarded. Ports can only be forwarded to a single host, however.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Chad & Doria Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:17:01 -0600
Subject: RE: ntp behind firewalls (need to ope
admin@;redhat.com]On Behalf Of christopher j bottaro
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ntp behind firewalls (need to open ports?)
ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i setup
ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the
ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i setup
ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/step-tickers. then i just had the service startup
at boot time by using redhat's setup utility. my question is do i have to
Please recommend a excellent firewall .
On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 03:25 PM, Mitchell Wright wrote:
On 10/18/02 4:31 PM, "Javier Gostling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:53:29PM +0200, linux power wrote:
I'am new to tripwire so I dont know exactly how to use
it
y default and I think
the syntax is a little simpler. It depends on what you need. I generally
use ipchains on host-based firewalls because it is good enough and I can
set it up relatively quickly.
Iptables is not much harder, but the syntax is a different enough that I
have to keep the man page ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi...
I'm new in internet with linux; but I wonder how do a firewall for my linux
RedHat 7.2... what's iptables, ipchains? what's better??
thanks
- --
Linux User
Registered #232544
http://counter.li.org/
my GnuPG-key at
www.keyserver.net
- --- r
Hi, all -
There's been a couple mentions of Zieglar's "Linux Firewalls" on this list
recently, and I think that maybe I've found a bug in his scripts relating
to the relationship of his mangle policies and the loopback interface.
Both a script that I wrote (very
Hi!
I am trying to get ICQ chat to work through two masquerading firewalls. I
guess I need some auto-/portforwarding rules, but I am not sure of the ports.
Usual ICQ works fine through 2 masquearading firewalls, and even ICQ chat
works as long as there is only one
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, linda hanigan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Someone else asked this question but I never saw an
> answer on the list.
> If I set up a firewall on my Linux computer do I really
> still need to disable print and file sharing on the windows
> boxes when I connect to the internet. I use a d
Hi all,
Someone else asked this question but I never saw an
answer on the list.
If I set up a firewall on my Linux computer do I really
still need to disable print and file sharing on the windows
boxes when I connect to the internet. I use a dial up
connection. My linux box provides print service
At 02:01 AM 7/19/00 , Mark Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I keep seeing comments similar to "someone port-scanned my firewall today,
>and here is who they were..." and I was wondering how you manage to get
>this information (both the fact that someone scanned you, and then the
>info on th
Mark Ivey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I keep seeing comments similar to "someone port-scanned my firewall today,
> and here is who they were..." and I was wondering how you manage to get
> this information (both the fact that someone scanned you, and then the
> info on the originating system). Thanks...
>
the first place to always look is /var/log/secure and /var/log/messages
see what you said.
:Hi,
:
:I keep seeing comments similar to "someone port-scanned my firewall today,
:and here is who they were..." and I was wondering how you manage to get
:this informati
Hi,
I keep seeing comments similar to "someone port-scanned my firewall today,
and here is who they were..." and I was wondering how you manage to get
this information (both the fact that someone scanned you, and then the
info on the originating system). Thanks...
-Mark-
--
To unsubscribe:
Three replies in one:
Bret Hughes wrote:
> Found it. Bug in script. needed to add fi at the end of the last if
> construct.
Confirmed. Thank you.
> message when forwarding is not on suggests to the user that he do the old echo
> "1" > ../ip_forward deal. As this is deprecated in the Red
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I feel somewhat productive today. :)
>
> I've written a few new scripts (and improved an old one) that I'd like
> some feedback on. Some of you might find them very useful.
>
OK Gordon, you asked for it :-)
First off, I've got the vnp working but had a little problem wi
Bret Hughes wrote:
> Bret Hughes wrote:
> I keep getting the following errors when running ifup vpn0. I am getting
>
> Sorry about not mentining the script in the last post. /etc/ppp/vpn-start is
> the culprit.
>
> Pretty sure I checked the orig. to make sure that I did not do it and don't
> re
Bret Hughes wrote:
I keep getting the following errors when running ifup vpn0. I am getting
Sorry about not mentining the script in the last post. /etc/ppp/vpn-start is
the culprit.
Pretty sure I checked the orig. to make sure that I did not do it and don't
really have time to verifiy it now s
Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> I keep getting the following errors when running ifup vpn0. I am getting
> the ssh session but don't know what it the problem with this. I suspect it
> is a configuration issue on my machin but I am stumped.
Found it. Bug in script. needed to add fi at the end of the l
Bret Hughes wrote:
> I keep getting the following errors when running ifup vpn0. I am getting
> the ssh session but don't know what it the problem with this. I suspect it
> is a configuration issue on my machin but I am stumped.
>
> [root@bretdell_linux network-scripts]# ifup vpn0
> Failed to o
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> I would REALLY like feedback on these scripts. Is the documentation
> sufficient/accurate? Does it work for you? How can they be made
> better/easier to use/more secure? (I've really tried for the best
> security possible). If you think that you could benefit from t
I feel somewhat productive today. :)
I've written a few new scripts (and improved an old one) that I'd like
some feedback on. Some of you might find them very useful.
The old script is init.firewall. This sh script should make it
relatively easy to configure your linux firewall (using ipchains
Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> Did you compare the results by using DENY instead of REJECT?
Yes. With DENY, the remote machine sent connection requests until it
timed out. With REJECT, the remote machine sent the connection
requests, and was told (in some way) that the port was unavailable. It
didn
bject of firewalls, I have a question that I'd
> like to ask:
>
> If I have a linux box with no firewalling rules, and I attempt to
> connect from : to :, where dest is
> my unprotected linux box, and the port I'm trying to connect to is not
> open, I see the following traf
not allowed to
connect, but DENY to indicate that the port "doesn't exist" or is not
listening.
If you were already fully aware of that, then please ignore. :-)
Best regards
Gustav
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> As long as we're on the subject of firewalls, I have a question that
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 05:52:13PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> As long as we're on the subject of firewalls, I have a question that I'd
> like to ask:
> If I have a linux box with no firewalling rules, and I attempt to
> connect from : to :, where dest is
> my unpro
As long as we're on the subject of firewalls, I have a question that I'd
like to ask:
If I have a linux box with no firewalling rules, and I attempt to
connect from : to :, where dest is
my unprotected linux box, and the port I'm trying to connect to is not
open, I see the fo
> Any better information out there for configuring RH5 for Firewalling and
> IP masquerading than the HOWTO?
>
> -Paul
Take a look at http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/ipfwadm.html
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin
Is there a specific problem you are having? I set up ours with just the
HOWTOs and one additional piece of information (set the MTU on the dialup
connection to 1500).
--
Ed Jaeger, CFO, Bohlender Graebener Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bgcorp.com
Paul Fontenot wrote:
>
> Any better
Any better information out there for configuring RH5 for Firewalling and
IP masquerading than the HOWTO?
-Paul
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail
59 matches
Mail list logo
