Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Tuesday 01 Apr 2003 12:58 am, David Busby wrote:
The real one:
http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/today/top.avg.html
The downer from that page is that there's not one Linux box listed but there
is 1 Win2K
Yeah, but that win2K is almost certainly an artifact in the d
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Russo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 15:45
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> Louis Sabet wrote:
> > Quite. The proof is in the pudding as they say...
> > Find me a windows box th
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 15:45
> Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
>
> > Louis Sabet wrote:
> > > Quite. The proof is in the pudding as they say...
> > > Find me a windows box that'll do this:
> > >
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 15:45, Ben Russo wrote:
> Louis Sabet wrote:
>
> > Quite. The proof is in the pudding as they say...
> > Find me a windows box that'll do this:
> > 3:22pm up 306 days, 2:18, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 0.09, 0.08
> >
> > This is an apache/mod_ssl machine running a ton of per
The real one:
http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/today/top.avg.html
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Russo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 15:45
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> Louis Sabet wrote:
>
> > Quite. The p
The domains listed don't do any real work...
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Russo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 15:45
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> Louis Sabet wrote:
>
> > Quite. The proof is in t
Louis Sabet wrote:
Quite. The proof is in the pudding as they say...
Find me a windows box that'll do this:
3:22pm up 306 days, 2:18, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 0.09, 0.08
This is an apache/mod_ssl machine running a ton of perl, and a bunch
of log analysis stuff. The day I see a publicly visibl
boots for almost every "Windows Update"
Today's 331953 Security Update made me reboot a server :(
/B
- Original Message -
From: "Neumann, Shannon M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 08:03
Subject: RE: Linux vs Win
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 09:52, Cliff Wells wrote:
> [snip serious comments]
>
> The site is totally tongue-in-cheek:
>
> I'm a Micorsoft user and I play space-cadet! If yoo like linus get off
> my site! I'll sue you!
>
> Pretty funny, but let's not fall into the trap of taking it at face
> valu
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 15:31, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 07:36, Paul Greene wrote:
> > Let me guess; you're the author of this website right?
> >
> > http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
> >
> > brent nicholls wrote:
> >
> > > Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I inst
Journaling!?
- Original Message -
From:
Josef Oduwo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003
16:24
Subject: RE: Linux vs Windows (Ext2 &
Ext3)
"linus was funded by the communists and the drug lords and also the
satanists who hope
have that now can we so buy windows instead." (http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/LinusSucks.html)
Unbelievable *websight*
More than 330,000 security updates to date, "Major" service Paks every 2 weeks, sudden, unexplained reboots, thousands of $$$ for Windoze - the issue of Linux vs
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Fratoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 15:33
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 27 March 2003 06:13 pm, J
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 07:36, Paul Greene wrote:
> Let me guess; you're the author of this website right?
>
> http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
>
> brent nicholls wrote:
>
> > Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows
> > and i only had to reboot once, and you dont ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 27 March 2003 06:13 pm, Jack Bowling wrote:
> ** Reply to message from David Busby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Mar
> 2003 13:17:50 -0800
>
> > Word to business sense
> > Cheers to Linux stability:
> > 2:17pm up 189 days, 14:42, 1 user,
** Reply to message from David Busby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:17:50
-0800
> Word to business sense
> Cheers to Linux stability:
> 2:17pm up 189 days, 14:42, 1 user, load average: 0.31, 0.23, 0.21
> Jeers to Windows reboots for almost every "Windows Update"
> Today's 331953 Sec
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:42:08 -0500
"brent nicholls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows
> and i only had to reboot once, and you dont have to reboot after
> changing your screen rez you newb you set it up so it applys the
> settings with
No way Windows is easier to install than Linux. I run a network with about 100
W2k boxes. If it wasn't for cloning software and sysprep it would take me
forever to do rollouts.
About an 2 hours to install base OS, SP3, hotfixes, and then secure box; a few
minutes to get the nic configured to go
t;Neumann, Shannon M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 08:03
Subject: RE: Linux vs Windows
> Oh, my... Flame war here we come. My question is that if you are such
> an "advit" (do you mean avid) Windows user, then what ar
That site is hilarious!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Greene
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
Let me guess; you're the author of this website right?
Humm, in Windows XP, if you change your computer name, you have to reboot.
I must admit, XP does a lot better with the reboot thing. You don't have
to reboot nearly as much as you did with previous versions. You still
have to do it on occasion.
You give Windows too much credit. I plugged in my
Let me guess; you're the author of this website right?
http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
brent nicholls wrote:
Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows
and i only had to reboot once, and you dont have to reboot after
changing your screen rez you newb you set it up
i think i see a ASCII art competion looming ; )
--
<>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iQCUAwUBPhxERRxoVYCzmrKXAQJK5gP3Y7CTsFyKpEz2p5W4GWI9+qSm+kWfdJ0R
xNlma0Ma9rAL/OBJcZMo5IXyXas+3Edogbv4Al6dIf8lot1WS0Iaxxl/cg2f7gf+
otf7
1. Ever wondered about what does a hard-core M$ Windows user doing on
the RedHat list?
2. Nobody wanted to hurt your feelings. Calm down.
3. We are too strict to Windows. We tell jokes on Windows constantly.
And we are lovin' it. If you cant live with that, try to find a
Windows-related official ma
windows is because it is the domoninat
> >operating system and you just cant afford it. So take your no job ass
> >and go and download Linux and go on a fake windows box...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
download Linux and go on a fake windows box...
From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:38:42 -0500 (EST)
Ever try installing Windows XP on a computer that is not bottable from
CD?
You
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 07:42, brent nicholls wrote:
> Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows and i
> only had to reboot once, and you dont have to reboot after changing your
> screen rez you newb you set it up so it applys the settings with out
> rebooting, if you don
o take your no job ass and go
> and download Linux and go on a fake windows box...
>
>Then go flame on your own os's support list. And learn to spell.
>
>
>
>
> >From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL P
kes a great HW development platform :)
- -Original Message-
From: Tim Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
Wow. I'm convinced. Gotta go get me a windows machine now.
Anyone else?
On Thu, 2003-03
ROTFLOL. one of the best and most hillarious (considering the context)
ascii art I've seen..
-RDB
On Thursday 27 March 2003 11:10 am, T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
> ___
> /| /| | |
>
>
t;
>
>
>
> >From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
> >Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:38:42 -0500 (EST)
> >
> >Ever try installing Windows XP on a computer
ninat
> operating system and you just cant afford it. So take your no job ass and go
> and download Linux and go on a fake windows box...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:42:08AM -0500, brent nicholls wrote:
[...]
___
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do |
/ O O\__ NOT |
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows and
i
only had to reboot once, and you dont have to reboot after changing your
screen rez you newb you set it up so it ap
Wow. I'm convinced. Gotta go get me a windows machine now.
Anyone else?
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 09:42, brent nicholls wrote:
> Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with windows!! I installed windows and i
> only had to reboot once, and you dont have to reboot after changing your
> screen rez you ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tring to start a war? I decline, thanks.
- -Original Message-
From: brent nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
Ovi you are doing somthing wrong with
TED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:38:42 -0500 (EST)
Ever try installing Windows XP on a computer that is not bottable from CD?
You need no less than 6 floppies. AND, Windows doesn't check to see if
your sys
Ever try installing Windows XP on a computer that is not bottable from CD?
You need no less than 6 floppies. AND, Windows doesn't check to see if
your system meets minimum specs until the last floppy. AND, I couldn't
find the program to make the floppies anywhere on the CD. I had to go out
to M
Just remember to reboot after your last clean reboot to make sure
everything is working fine... :D
MP
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 20:57, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
>
> >My last experience installing Windows is just a frustrating attempt. Try to
> >count how many times a Win ma
>The last time I installed Windows, without any applications, it took
>four hours. It took me eight to do the install for a friend... This is
>why things like "ghost" are widely used in the Windows world.
Yes this is true but a newbie can install without having to know a ton about
what is going
Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
My last experience installing Windows is just a frustrating attempt. Try to
count how many times a Win machine has to reboot after install before you can
use it...
"found a new hardware.. video card" -- reboot after installing driver before
win can use it
"found a new
On Wednesday 26 March 2003 02:03 pm, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 06:20, Weekley, Arnold (C)(STP) wrote:
> > > Original body cut out to preserve space
> >
> > While you're right about RH not including mp3 and video apps out of the
> > box turning off many new users, I disagree with ot
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 06:20, Weekley, Arnold (C)(STP) wrote:
> > Original body cut out to preserve space
>
> While you're right about RH not including mp3 and video apps out of the box
> turning off many new users, I disagree with other observations. (BTW, I converted
> all my music to ogg-vorbis
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 08:46:49AM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote:
[ about MSIE ]
> and has a horrible security history. As for CSS, I'm no expert, but I
> *have* heard the same story the other way round as well. Problem for
> me is to figure out which one is true.
IE is the one screwing things up.
Wh
> Original body cut out to preserve space
While you're right about RH not including mp3 and video apps out of the box
turning off many new users, I disagree with other observations. (BTW, I converted
all my music to ogg-vorbis format which gives me better quality and uses less disk
so I no longer
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:16, T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
> > types, a web browser that does really support css and xslt/xml stuff
> > properly
>
> and has a horrible security history. As for CSS, I'm no expert, but I
> *have* heard the same story the other way round as well. Problem for
> me is to figu
Mathew, could you please set you mail program to wrap lines at about
72 chars? That would make reading a lot easier! Thanks!
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 02:01:10PM +1000, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote:
[...]
> Windows and redhat might cost similar regarding the enterprise
> edition of redhat vs windows x
* Mathew J. Mirabella
> However, there is another side to the story. Windows does come with
> full mp3 support, media players that support a wide range of media
> types, a web browser that does really support css and xslt/xml stuff
> properly (netscape and mozilla have a long way to go with css
>
1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; redhat-list list
Subject: Linux vs Windows
This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this
issue, but it includes all of what i essentially think on the topic. Please
correct me if i am wrong on any particular technical issue.
Windows and re
This may not be a very structured and organised piece of prose on this issue, but it
includes all of what i essentially think on the topic. Please correct me if i am
wrong on any particular technical issue.
Windows and redhat might cost similar regarding the enterprise edition of redhat vs
win
50 matches
Mail list logo
