Don't send test messages to this list. If you want to see if your post will
make it to the list, just post it and see if you get a copy back.
Test messages are a waste of time and money. Especially money since
many people on this list are on metered acces and have to pay extra to
download each
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:12:07AM -, Zhi Cheng Wang wrote:
> this seems a very good test, but the system says "[: too may arguments"
Ouch. Sorry, I forgot the quotes. Thanks to everyone who spotted this
and responded while I was on the bus :)
> > how can i test if a directory is empty? at t
On 11:12 07 Mar 2003, Zhi Cheng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|From: Anand Buddhdev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:52:56AM -, Zhi Cheng Wang wrote:
|> > how can i test if a directory is empty? at the moment i use the following method:
|> >
|> > ls -l /dirname | grep
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mike Reed wrote:
> He just missed some double quotes.
>
> if [ -z "$(ls -A dirname)" ]; then echo empty; fi
>
> I prefer the $(shell command) syntax rather than the `shell command`. I
> find it easier to read.
> I believe (someone tell me if I'm wrong) that it is now part o
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mike Reed wrote:
> He just missed some double quotes.
>
> if [ -z "$(ls -A dirname)" ]; then echo empty; fi
>
> I prefer the $(shell command) syntax rather than the `shell command`. I
> find it easier to read.
> I believe (someone tell me if I'm wrong) that it is now part o
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 March 2003 09:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: test empty dir
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:52:56AM -, Zhi Cheng Wang wrote:
dear gurus
how can i test if a directory is empty? at the moment i use the following method:
ls -l /dirname | grep "
this seems a very good test, but the system says "[: too may arguments"
-Original Message-
From: Anand Buddhdev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2003 09:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: test empty dir
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:52:56AM -, Zhi Cheng Wang wrot
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:52:56AM -, Zhi Cheng Wang wrote:
> dear gurus
>
> how can i test if a directory is empty? at the moment i use the following method:
>
> ls -l /dirname | grep "total 0"
> if [ $? ] then
This is not a good test. "ls -l" will not reveal dot-files.
Use "ls -A" w
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 at 10:33pm (-0600), Nezar Freeny wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I ran the up2date -u and it did update all of the packages except to
> kernel-smp-2.4.18-24.7.x.
> It gives me this message:
>
> "Test install failed because of package conflicts: installing package
> kernel-smp-2.4.18-24.7
Michel Donais wrote:
test; please do not answer
Ok.
(sorry, couldn't resist)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No, it's just r slow... (Posts are taking up to 3
days to appear)
The little guy in the back room is typing as fast as he can!
Ric
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject
Title: RE: Test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No, it's just r slow... (Posts are taking up to 3
days to appear)
- -Original Message-
From: Thomas E. Dukes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 7:54 AM
To: Redhat-List@R
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 14:24, Michael Turner wrote:
> Sorry everyone. I wrote an email detailing my problem and it doesn't seem to
> have gotten on the board. I want to make sure they're going through before I
> spend time writing another one.
>
Nope, I can't hear a damn thing over the fans of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:24:03 -0600, Michael Turner wrote:
> Sorry everyone. I wrote an email detailing my problem and it doesn't
> seem to have gotten on the board. I want to make sure they're going
> through before I spend time writing another one.
This one worked. :)
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Michael Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test - can anyone hear me?
Sorry everyone. I wrote an email detailing my problem and it doesn't seem to
have gotten
On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 21:00, Linux Admin wrote:
> Test mail
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subj
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:43:52PM -0500, Periyasamy, Raj wrote:
>
> Hello Linux list
hello and good bye
testing annoyance filter update:
:0
* ^Subject: +(Re: )?test( message| post(ing)?)?$
/dev/null
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsub
I will be out of the office Friday, November 15th. If this is an emergency please
contact the IT help desk.
Thank you,
Jacob Petrie
Web Systems/Information Technology
Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.662.2140
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 03:53:12 -0800 (PST), Gautam P wrote:
>
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
> http://launch.yahoo.com/u2
>
>
>
It is a bad habit to post
Hi Cameron,
> does it for old style crypt() passwords. There should be equivalent code
> for the MD5 stuff. The only thing you've missed is that most of these
> things use a salt, kept with the hash, to make sure that if two people
> have the same password, their hashes _aren't_ the same.
I've b
On 05:17 28 Feb 2002, Peter Kiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I need to write a script (preferably bash, perl if necessary) that can test a
| specified user's password against a test password to see if they have changed
| it or not.
| It should be as simple as running an MD5 over the test passwo
and your response is any better because...?
-Original Message-
From: Clifford Thurber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: test
Do you realize how lame it is to send a test message out to how many
thousand of users
Do you realize how lame it is to send a test message out to how many
thousand of users? Do you realize what a waste of resources that is?
At 07:47 AM 2/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>test
>
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:54:23AM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I would. I recently setup gpg on my machine and am in the process of
> testing and learing everyth
I would. I recently setup gpg on my machine and am in the process of
testing and learing everything I can. I am especially interested in any
compatability issues with other platforms' mailers.
Bret
On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 09:03, Vimol wrote:
> Hi Martin:
>
> I got your test mail for PGP.
> I wou
Hi Martin:
I got your test mail for PGP.
I would like to know some detail in PGP and S/MIME.
How they work?
Which one is more secure?
Vimol
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
yeZ it does make it.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Galgoci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:29 AM
Subject: test. does this make it?
> subject sez it all.
>
> --Matt
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-
I got it
At 12:29 AM 12/4/00 -0500, you wrote:
>subject sez it all.
>
>--Matt
>
>
>
>___
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Fred Edmister
President / Networking Specialist
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:40:36AM -0700, Kirk wrote:
: Yes, definately interested. Let me know how it goes on the 6.2 side. I
: would also be interested to see that spec file or a .src.rpm . I've read
: some interesting things about bind 9 and would like to try it.
Ok, it's built, but be warned
Yes, definately interested. Let me know how it goes on the 6.2 side. I
would also be interested to see that spec file or a .src.rpm . I've read
some interesting things about bind 9 and would like to try it.
Kirk
>On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> I noticed the bind 9.0.0 is now in R
Some of the mail going through this list has been getting backed up.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Eddie Strohmier wrote:
> Is the list up or down??? Receiving no mail from list.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://li
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, wong wrote:
> can i install gnome on server class linux ?
>
I'm not sure I understand the question. If you're asking if it is
possible to select server class install during the installation process
but adding Gnome to it then there is a good chance that you cannot do it,
I
nwell Globalnet
www.bonwell.com
-Original Message-
From: John Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, May 18, 2030 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: TEST- Is the list down again?
>Seems like it.
>
&
On 10-May-00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] opined:
> Is the list down again?
Sent 10 May, received 12 May.
I'd say we're back to the same problem of a week or 2 ago. Sure hope there
weren't any "gotta have an answer right now" queries.
---
It's not a bug, it's tradition!
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
Seems like it.
last couple of days I've been getting only a
few sporadic messages compared to the usual
one to two hundred.
This is getting old.
Jhnny
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: TEST- Is the list down again?
>Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 1
there does seem to be quite a bit less traffic than normal, but I've gotten
about 30 posts.
Hidong Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted two messages to this list today. I haven't seen either. In
> fact, I've hardly gotten any messages from this list today. Has it been
> suddenly deactivated? Thanks
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 05:53:28PM -0800, Hidong Kim wrote:
>
> I posted two messages to this list today. I haven't seen either. In
> fact, I've hardly gotten any messages from this list today. Has it been
> suddenly deactivated? Thanks,
Same here, for the past 24h. What's up?
Thomas
--
Activity is *low*. First I thought that they had been broken in to.
Maybe they didn't apply the lates (p3) patch to the bind package. :-)
But then I noticed that one of my messages took more then twelve
hours(!) to reach the list.
May also be that some people have left the list following the las
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Hidong Kim wrote:
> I posted two messages to this list today. I haven't seen either. In
> fact, I've hardly gotten any messages from this list today. Has it been
> suddenly deactivated? Thanks,
Same here -- since yesterday th
You wrote:
/snip/
"Incidentally, I have yet to subscribe to a list that shows this behavior.
May I
ask which one(s) does?"
(Referring to lists that block accounts.)
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] has really shafted me! I can read their
posts, but I cannot communicate with them, or the list-leader Axalon
g the trouble.
Glen
>> Incidentally, I have yet to subscribe to a list that shows this
>> behavior. May I ask which one(s) does?
>>
>> --
>> From: Glen Lee Edwards[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:38 AM
>> To: '
> The filter that some Linux lists and domains have gone to (I can't mail a
> letter to anyone at moongroup.com as they bounce all mail from dial-up
> Linux accounts (at least last weekend they were)), is a subscription spam
> filter service, http://mail-abuse.org/dul. This particular filter on
>
Yes it is getting through fine
At 06:21 PM 11/22/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Is this message getting through?
>
>
>In the world of PC's. Ken Griffy Jr. is still the best thing in NW Wash.
>
>Brian Schneider [EMAIL PROTECT
sers to
>send through your ISP's MTA)?
>
>Incidentally, I have yet to subscribe to a list that shows this behavior. May I
>ask which one(s) does?
>
>--
>From: Glen Lee Edwards[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:38 AM
>To: '[EMAIL P
hich one(s) does?
>
> --
> From: Glen Lee Edwards[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:38 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: test post
>
> :)
>
> Larry, . The problem isn't with my ISP. They have no
>
Win or Mac desktops.
> >Maybe you need a better ISP?
> >Larry
> >
> >--
> >From: Glen Lee Edwards[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 5:25 AM
> >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >Subject: RE: test post
> >
> >Charles,
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 5:25 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: test post
>
> Charles,
>
> Don't play games. I run a virtual domain and 4 cnames off my linux
> dial-up box, plus I administer several other domains I o
Edwards[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:38 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: test post
:)
Larry, . The problem isn't with my ISP. They have no objection
to me running this configuration. The problem is with select members of
the Linux community (hard to
it,
>all of whom can send mail as themselves from their Win or Mac desktops.
>Maybe you need a better ISP?
>Larry
>
>--
>From: Glen Lee Edwards[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 5:25 AM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: test
I agree, same setup here and she works beautifully. Never had a problem.
- Original Message -
From: Larry Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 1:53 PM
Subject: RE: test post
> Uh,
> I haven't read this entire thread,
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 5:25 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: test post
Charles,
Don't play games. I run a virtual domain and 4 cnames off my linux
dial-up box, plus I administer several other domains I own that are on
other servers from here, and have sever
Charles,
Don't play games. I run a virtual domain and 4 cnames off my linux
dial-up box, plus I administer several other domains I own that are on
other servers from here, and have several users on this box. I've been
told I HAVE to use envelope masquerading and if I don't to get lost.
Envelope
Glen
You have completely missed the boat here. No one is forcing you to not use
your linux box as your MTA. Thousands of us do it every day. You just need
to setup your config properly (as you have been told - and how - already)
charles
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> Mike,
>
>
Hello Glen Lee Edwards,
Once you wrote about "Re: test post":
> >Yes, this policy exists. What above-mentioned servers are doing, is
> >checking mail servers for the relay permissions. You can do it yourself,
> >by completing following telneting to the server o
>Yes, this policy exists. What above-mentioned servers are doing, is
>checking mail servers for the relay permissions. You can do it yourself,
>by completing following telneting to the server on 25th port and trying
>to send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or any other
>obscur
They're one and the same...
-- Juha
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike A. Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 22 November 1999 11:46
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: test post
>
>
> Wouldn't the realtime blackh
Hello Mike A. Lewis,
Once you wrote about "RE: test post":
>
> Wouldn't the realtime blackhole list be a better alternative ?
>
> http://maps.vix.com/rbl/
>
I don't think so. First it is still not that well-known how to use
it for individuals, since
essage-
>> From: Glen Lee Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 2:17 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: test post
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Leonid.
>>
>> I suppose that one way to set this up would be to t
Hello Glen Lee Edwards,
Once you wrote about "Re: test post":
> Thanks, Leonid.
You are welcome anytime ;-)
>
> I suppose that one way to set this up would be to take every list that I
> have mail coming in from; ^TO.*, have this mail sorted to the
> specific
Wouldn't the realtime blackhole list be a better alternative ?
http://maps.vix.com/rbl/
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Lee Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: test post
&g
Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote:
>Hello Glen Lee Edwards,
>
>Once you wrote about "Re: test post":
>> Cool. I'm still here.
>>
>> I have a mail question: I'm trying to find a way to get rid of spam mail.
>> When I pull up the header of the offend
Hello Glen Lee Edwards,
Once you wrote about "Re: test post":
> Cool. I'm still here.
>
> I have a mail question: I'm trying to find a way to get rid of spam mail.
> When I pull up the header of the offending party what specific part do I
> need to add to /e
Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> This is a test post. Today I've been thrown off 3 lists because I have a
> Linux box on a dial up account, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Just checking to see if Red Hat has thrown me off too.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECT
Cool. I'm still here.
I have a mail question: I'm trying to find a way to get rid of spam mail.
When I pull up the header of the offending party what specific part do I
need to add to /etc/deny; From:, X-Sender:, Received from: ?
Thanks,
Glen
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
>T
Test received.
Bye.
sekou
west Africa
---Michael George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
>
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red
Dang.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
66 matches
Mail list logo
