On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:29:55PM +, Alan Harding wrote:
I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running
red-carpet and up2date.
Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given
any problems.
Up2date is run only to do kernel upgrades.
I use
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:37:50AM -0500, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running
red-carpet and up2date.
Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given
any problems.
Up2date is run only to do kernel upgrades.
I
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:37:50AM -0500, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
I use red-carpet exclusively, although I manually install kernel, glibc
and openssl updates because redhat releases i686 binaries for them. If
up2date was smart
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:45, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 00:32, Bill Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:24, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
All I've heard today still makes me feel like I shouldn't mix them.
What specifically have you heard that makes you think that?
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 01:13, Bill Anderson wrote:
Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet and up2date do not seem to mix very well,
so Red Carpet is a solution I am not willing to implement.
How so? I use them both on the same machines w/zero problems.
This is why I said seem to; I have seen
For what it's worth, I've been told by developers at Ximian that it's
really not a good idea to try having both Red-Carpet and Up2Date on the
same machine.
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 07:56, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 01:13, Bill Anderson wrote:
Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet and
that if you only subscribe to the RedHat channel (if that's
even possible) that it may be of some convenience.
my $.02
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: red-carpet and up2date
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 09:50, Rigler, S C (Steve) wrote:
I used to run red-carpet and up2date on the same machine. It seemed
convenient at the time if up2date wouldn't work due to a high number
of users.
The problems I ran into were between the Ximian stuff and the RedHat
stuff. One would
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 09:07, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
For what it's worth, I've been told by developers at Ximian that it's
really not a good idea to try having both Red-Carpet and Up2Date on the
same machine.
Well they are competition. RedHat wants you to pay for RHN, Ximian wants
to you
: red-carpet and up2date on same machine
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 01:13, Bill Anderson wrote:
Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet and up2date do not seem to mix very well,
so Red Carpet is a solution I am not willing to implement.
How so? I use them both on the same machines w/zero problems
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 16:29, Alan Harding wrote:
I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running red-carpet
and up2date.
Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given
any problems.
Up2date is run only to do kernel upgrades.
But again, you are
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:24, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 16:29, Alan Harding wrote:
I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running red-carpet
and up2date.
Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given
any problems.
Up2date is
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 00:32, Bill Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:24, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
All I've heard today still makes me feel like I shouldn't mix them.
What specifically have you heard that makes you think that? Seriously.
Maybe I'm not getting all the posts, but so
13 matches
Mail list logo
