Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-29 Thread Gary Stainburn
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as SNIP 1) carefully avoided laying any specific blame by name, 2) made absolutely *no* mention of the possibility of the use of open source to increase security, and 3) most

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-29 Thread Gary Stainburn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an experiment, I am trying to setup a Linux computer as an office computer running ALL FREE software. It doesn't mean I

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread gabriel
On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote: 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely responsible for the insecurity of the current IT infrastructure, or now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i feel that i have to check this statement for accuracy. in cases like the

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread Cannon, Andrew
See the following to see how hot M$ are at patching their own systems... http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2129418,00.html Andy -Original Message- From: gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Robert Adkins
-Original Message- From: gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote: 1) MS

RE: U.S. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread Randy Williams
snip Home users should also regularly update their personal computer's operating systems (such as Microsoft Windows, Linux) and major applications ... snip I am wary of this kind of association that MS is desperately trying to pull off. It is a 'win' that Linux is associated as a Desktop OS,

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Robert Adkins wrote: Everyone, We can go back and forth all day about how MS creates inherently insecure systems, flame war back and forth about this or that until we are all blue in the face. However, this is a Red Hat mutual support list, not a

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Bret Hughes
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 09:03, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Robert Adkins wrote: Everyone, We can go back and forth all day about how MS creates inherently insecure systems, flame war back and forth about this or that until we are all blue in the face.

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread gabriel
On January 28, 2003 10:38 am, Bret Hughes wrote: I suspect that linux system vulnerabilities don't get the press is that there are not as many of them out there and that the average linux user/admin is WAY more cognizant of what is running on his box and as a result more apt to keep up with

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread ABrady
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:33:15 -0500 gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote: 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely responsible for the insecurity of the current IT infrastructure, or now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Bret Hughes
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 09:46, gabriel wrote: On January 28, 2003 10:38 am, Bret Hughes wrote: I suspect that linux system vulnerabilities don't get the press is that there are not as many of them out there and that the average linux user/admin is WAY more cognizant of what is running on his

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread Ward William E DLDN
] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote: 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely responsible for the insecurity of the current IT infrastructure, or now i'm not a fan of micros~1

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:33:15AM -0500, gabriel wrote: now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i feel that i have to check this statement for accuracy. in cases like the sql slammer the one at fault is definately not the author of the software, but rather the halfwit who's running it

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread Anthony E. Greene
gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote: 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely responsible for the insecurity of the current IT infrastructure, or now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i feel that i have to check this statement

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Buck
]] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as SNIP 1) carefully avoided laying any specific blame by name, 2) made absolutely *no* mention of the possibility of the use of open source to increase security

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Jonathan Slivko
: Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 09:46, gabriel wrote: On January 28, 2003 10:38 am, Bret Hughes wrote: I suspect that linux system vulnerabilities don't get the press

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Jonathan Slivko
This signature is SO true, it's not even funny. snip -- one world, one web, one program - microsoft promotional ad ein volk, ein reich, ein fuhrer - adolf hitler /snip winmail.dat

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Anthony E. Greene
Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an experiment, I am trying to setup a Linux computer as an office computer running ALL FREE software. It doesn't mean I won't pay for some software in the office, but I want to see if I can setup at least one computer in the network in which there is NO software

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmmm.. How do you convert a doc to pdf? - -Original Message- From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as Buck [EMAIL

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Robert Adkins
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as SNIP 1) carefully avoided laying any specific blame by name, 2) made absolutely *no* mention of the possibility of the use of open source

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Murdock, Matt
You need to have adobe writerthe simpliest way. Does Star Office have that capability? -Original Message- From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:15 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as -BEGIN PGP

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Antonio Montagnani
Murdock, Matt wrote: You need to have adobe writerthe simpliest way. Does Star Office have that capability? Why not the easiest way (at least in RH8.0) and print the document to the PDF converter installed as default?? Antonio Montagnani -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Murdock, Matt
That is cool to know. Unfortunately, there is a TON of stuff Linux (RH8.0)can do, and one cant know everything... -Original Message- From: Antonio Montagnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS

2003-01-28 Thread Robert P. J. Day
if i might drag this thread back to remotely where it was when i started it, a brand new posting at linuxtoday.com reports that Dept of Homeland Security Site Switches to Linux from Windows 2000. score one for the good guys. rday -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:49 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as That is cool to know. Unfortunately, there is a TON of stuff Linux (RH8.0)can do, and one cant know everything... - -Original Message- From: Antonio Montagnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread David Winters
-freeware option, the one place it's feasible for me to suggest it. AFAIK, right now the answer is no... D. -Original Message- From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:15 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What rpm is that? I wonder if it would work under 6.2? - -Original Message- From: Antonio Montagnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Dave Ihnat
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0800, Burke, Thomas G. wrote: What rpm is that? I wonder if it would work under 6.2? Well, just install Ghostscript. Print from any PS printer to file, then feed that to ps2pdf. I've got a script called 'printpdf' that handles batches of files, too, and

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Robert Adkins
-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804 -Original Message- From: Murdock, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as You need to have adobe writerthe simpliest

Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Anthony E. Greene
Burke, Thomas G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm.. How do you convert a doc to pdf? My print2pdf script assumes you have a Samba server on the network, and that the clients are Winboxes. You configure a Postscript printer at each client (the script gives references that explain how to

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 kewl, thanks - -Original Message- From: Dave Ihnat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0800, Burke

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wow! Kewl! - -Original Message- From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as Burke, Thomas G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote