"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, bobby wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am running RH 5.1, and I want to update my kernel to 2.2 and glibc to 2.1.
> >
> > Does anyone know how to do that?
> >
> > Thank you!
> &
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, bobby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running RH 5.1, and I want to update my kernel to 2.2 and glibc to 2.1.
>
> Does anyone know how to do that?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Bobby
>
You are better off upgrading to 6.2, instead of trying to upgrade just
part of
Hi all,
I am running RH 5.1, and I want to update my kernel to 2.2 and glibc to 2.1.
Does anyone know how to do that?
Thank you!
Bobby
ÿÿü:¢æÿügÊ«~·ÿ&¡¢Ü¢fv·¬±«a¶Úÿÿù_òj(ýÊ&
___
Red
I am planning on installing RH 5.1 on a 486/33 that I have lying
around. My goal is to get RH 5.1 working (text mode only...no X)
and then install a MUD server. I only (at this time) have
a 200MB hard drive in the machine.
What are your recommendations for the most efficient way to
install RH
Hi, just installed RH 5.1 and noticed that the version of screen it
installed (screen-3.7.4-5.i386.rpm) had about a 2 or 3 second delay when
switching screens. I went back to the screen-3.7.4-1.i386.rpm package and
all works fine.
Anyone know why the 5.1 screen rpm is so slow
Regarding the Wu-FTPD problem with sendmail, the author of the
wu-ftpd admitted that he accidently had that 'feature' set up
in beta-16. He recently released an update , beta-17 that fixes
this (was announced to one of the redhat announced groups.
--
Michael K. Neylon, UM ChE Grad | "..Besid
The method of upgrading the kernel on RH 5.1 described on www.redhat.com
(errata) is not working properly.
I installed RH 5.1 from scratch. Moved the new kernel rpm's to /tmp and
issued: rpm -Uvh *.rpm.
This results in error message:
cannot remove /lib/modules/2.0.34-0.6 - directory not
GateKeepeR News wrote:
>
> hmm, this is odd. It may be sendmail is using a UID that is used by ftp.
I also tought of it, but look at the part after "sendmail:". those are
definitely coming from the ftpd, showing myself logged in anonymously
with my e-mail add. as password, and doing nothing.
>
hmm, this is odd. It may be sendmail is using a UID that is used by ftp.
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Nemeth Laszlo wrote:
|Grant Bayley wrote:
|
|> On thing was, when I checked in the process listing, ftp was showing up as
|> "sendmail", as follows:
|>
|> ftp295 0.0 1.1 1360 756 ? S
Hi,
since I installed RH 5.1, I can't get a new build kernel to boot. I use
the sources from the linux-2.034.tar.gz file that I downloaded from a site
that mirrors nic.funet.fi.
Cnfiguration and compilation work fine. Lilo installation works too. When
booting, I see the following mes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] altered the fabric of cyberspace by
writing:
>> On thing was, when I checked in the process listing, ftp was showing up as
>> "sendmail", as follows:
>>
>> ftp295 0.0 1.1 1360 756 ? S 22:23 0:00 sendmail:
>proxy.cia.n
>> ftp317 0.0 1.2 1376 772
Grant Bayley wrote:
> On thing was, when I checked in the process listing, ftp was showing up as
> "sendmail", as follows:
>
> ftp295 0.0 1.1 1360 756 ? S 22:23 0:00 sendmail: proxy.cia.n
> ftp317 0.0 1.2 1376 772 ? S 22:24 0:00 sendmail: new6as10.hu
> ftp
I made a remark to this list the other day about a problem I had where
the custom boot disk I created was on a dud floppy, and about how
awkward it was that I couldn't make another one.
I was frothing at the mouth again, I think. Having seen how the
installation disk does it (thank goodness fo
Umm actually it looks more like sendmail is running as the user "ftp"..
sendmail sets a default UID to run as, so if it is the same UID as ftp,
well thats what would show up. Someone correct me if I'm wrong..
Bryan
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
|On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Gran
On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Grant Bayley wrote:
> On thing was, when I checked in the process listing, ftp was showing up as
> "sendmail", as follows:
I can confirm this odd behavior. I can't imagine what would cause it.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
Just installed all the various bits and pieces for RH 5.1 on two machines
that were previously running 5.0.
Very smooth upgrade...
I rebooted, the boxes came up fine, and one of them, being a server
started being used immediately. People started downloading from it using
ftp, as they usually
I just installed 5.1 on my home machine as an upgrade from 5.0 and it
went well.
I went on to install it on two machines belonging to a friend and
everything went horribly wrong.
The first machine was fine except for its very small root partition.
Having got through the installation process,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does anyone experience with the problem of rvplayer (realaudio player)
> in RH 5.1?
>
> An SB sound card was installed and passed the audio test with suitable
> settings. However, if the rvplayer executed a .ram or .ra sound file,
> it stopped
Does anyone experience with the problem of rvplayer (realaudio player)
in RH 5.1?
An SB sound card was installed and passed the audio test with suitable
settings. However, if the rvplayer executed a .ram or .ra sound file,
it stopped playing?
If you know the way to fix the problem, please
> has anyone had the problem where they cannot cut and
> paste using the mouse after installing RH 5.1? My old
> RH 4.0 system had no problems, now, with same hardware,
> the mouse works, but I cannot select text with the first
> button and paste it by selecting the midd
until I reboot the system]
SCSI bus contains:
0Segate ST19171W ID 0
5NEC CD-ROm
Kernel built with gcc-2.7.2.3-11 [RH 5.1 stock RPM]
Any help would be appreciated
Cheers,
--
W. Wade, Hampton
Use Linux -- stability, performance, compatibility, flexibility,
scalability, and FREE
CD - The Full
> Story", an excellent story which I wanted to use for burning a bootable CD.
> However, the RH 5.1 ftp tree does not seem to include a file
> misc/boot/autoboot.img (RH 5.0 does), so should I use the RH 5.0 version?
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> --
> -
has anyone had the problem where they cannot cut and
paste using the mouse after installing RH 5.1? My old
RH 4.0 system had no problems, now, with same hardware,
the mouse works, but I cannot select text with the first
button and paste it by selecting the middle mouse button
(emulating 3
Hello. I am currently using the above combination and am getting some
kernel error messages whenever I do a backup. As far as I can tell (by
doing a verify with BRU) the backup completes successfully, but I don't like
having error messages come up when there shouldn't be. Has anyone seen this
b
Isn't possible to install RH 5.1 and to use Metro-X RPM from RH 5.0
cdrom?
Gerassimos
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After upgrading from RH 4.2 to RH 5.1 (I actually wiped everything and
reinstalled), my computer has been giving me seg faults on many different
apps, including:
gcc (compiling normal programs)
gcc (random deaths while compiling kernels)
emacs
fvwm2
make
I know that this usually
Hi all
I can't get my Logitec bus mouse to work with Metro on RH 5.1.
The machine is a '386 with 16M RAM and when I originally installed 4.2 all
was fine. However on upgrading to 5.1 I now find that although the mouse
works OK normally, using GPM, it is totally uncontrollable when Me
Hi,
for about a week ago I upgraded from RH 5.0 to 5.1. RH 5.1 seems to be
stable and works fine, except from one thing that causes me trouble.
The fact is that since the upgrade I can't compile programs using the
QT-toolkit (http://www.troll.no/). The results when I try to build a
pr
MA 01886-0033
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-978-589-7478 (GenRad); +1-978-256-5829 (Home: Chelmsford, MA)
+1-978-589-2088 (Closest FAX); +1-978-589-7007 (Main GenRad FAX)
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 18:19:04 -0600 (MDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:
Hi,
Ever since upgrading to RH 5.1 (actually, I wiped out my RH 4.2 and
installed from scratch), emacs have been giving me seg faults on
occasions. It's not regular, and it seems to occur randomly. The
only thing I noticed is that it has crashed twice when I pressed M-q
to re-just
"Paul Pettit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I can confirm that the same thing happened to me.
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
> Uh guys,
>
> Do you subscribe to the anounce list?
Uh yeah I do and Eric Troan's announcement appeared to me be in
response to posts such as mine the day before. Check t
Hi fellow RedHatters,
I have a dual processor capable Pentium Pro motherboard, and have just
ordered a 2nd P-Pro to fill it (for $94 how could I pass it up!). I have
been running RH5.0 problem free since it was released last December.
I've also just ordered RH5.1, and my plan is to install the 2nd
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Jeff Corwin wrote:
->Hi fellow RedHatters,
->I have a dual processor capable Pentium Pro motherboard, and have just
->ordered a 2nd P-Pro to fill it (for $94 how could I pass it up!). I have
*** Pt...you sure you didn't forgot 1 or 2 digits in the PPro price!?
In case of
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Liddington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 1998 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: fstool and usercfg in RH 5.1
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using RH 4.2 and have recently *installed* RH 5.1 (I
> wiped the hard drive before starting). After the installation, I was
> running first control-panel and then linuxconf to set all the system
> parameters, etc. as root. I
Hi,
I have just installed RH 5.1, and I have been using RH 4.2 for a while.
I have noticed that egcs and gcc both give internal compiler errors from
time to time, and emacs sometimes die with seg fault. I know that this
looks like one of these hardware problems, but it seems unlikely because
Hi,
I have been using RH 4.2 and have recently *installed* RH 5.1 (I
wiped the hard drive before starting). After the installation, I was
running first control-panel and then linuxconf to set all the system
parameters, etc. as root. I compiled a kernel, rebooted, and did a few
other things
Using a default install of RH5.1, Xconfigurator seg faults at the very end
right when it seems like its writing out the config file. Any ideas??
Since the program runs as root, I don't think it dumps a core file.
TIA,
Steve
--
Steven Krikstone
Network Engineer
GCIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLE
Hi,
thanks a lot.
cu
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> "irger" == irger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
irger> how can i change the passwd system to shadow
Use pwconv5(8).
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsub
Hey all,
The IPX setup with linuxconfig is kind of broken. The IPX net number is
not remembered. Unfortunately the auto detect settings will not work
because of some kind of weird thing happening between the windows and
netware machines on the network. I have not been able to find where to
mak
Found a bug in the RH5.1 /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit file.
It is exercised when you compile your own kernel and reboot. The
problem is that depmod does not get run due to a typo in this file.
Note that it checks for the existence of the "preferred" symlink, but
then does the same thing regardless. The
Hi,
how can i change the passwd system to shadow
please help.
cu armin irger
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Is anyone else having a problem with the 5.1 install colors? I am only
getting grey, white and black. The title on each dialog and all of the
buttons are blank. This is on an old 486 with a S3 card that has been
running 4.2 nicely for quite a while. I wanted to test on this old
system before p
>If you see this and happen to know the correct bug report address will
> you forward it on the the RH team? Thanks! Also, if you succeeded at
> doing an NFS install from another RH5 box, or another UNIX using the same
> tcpd conpiletime options, let me know how you did it... huh?
i just di
Hello every body,
Because I was unable to restart my RH5.0, init did not wanted to do the
job any more (after trying during 5 days !!!). I decided to make a backup
and to make an upgrade to RH5.1.
So I started to upgrade in FTP mode, that one started after a small
problem with the name server, si
error with the
server - *ALWAYS*! I spent over an hour and a half playing with this
before giving up and successfully installing via FTP... I'm pretty sure
the reason is that the RH 5.1 client program is sending a bogus hostname
to portmap and mountd on the server. portmap fails the mount reque
Hi,
who does the update from RH 5.0 to RH 5.1 ?
Is it worth it ?
cu armin
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Mike Wangsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:22:46 -0500 (EST), Ramin Sina wrote:
>
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> >track record, how
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Paul Anderson wrote:
>> well what is "...how long in advance do they give the release date?"
>> supposed to mean?
My rule of thumb is when the web and ftp sites cease to function for a
whole day or more. That is a pretty good clue they are mass-updating
everything.
--
Bruce Tong
Systems Programmer
Electronic Vision / FITNE
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ev.net/fitne
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
[snip]
>I seem to remember sometime during last november (around the middle of
>the month), someone from redhat posted a message to this list that indicated
>a release was very near. This was no official announcement, but it was an
>announcement nonetheles
On Thu, Mar 26, 1998 at 12:21:35AM -0600 Usama Wazeer
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+
|
| Redhat 5.1 will be released sometime between May 28-30th during the
| Linux expo to be held at Durham, NC - Redhat's home state. See
| http://www.linuxexpo.org/ for more details on the expo
On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:32:30PM -0500 Mike Wangsmo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+
| None of the above. We don't pre-announce release dates at all.
You did last time. :)
--
Phil Humpherys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Iomega Corporation/DriverSoft
Systems Administrator
On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 10:31:24AM -0800 Matt Nelson
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+
| RH never pre-announces releases. once the product is actually available,
| you will here from them something along the lines of "Red Hat Software
| is proud to announce the release of...".
Ac
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I seem to remember sometime during last november (around the middle
>of the month), someone from redhat posted a message to this list that
>indicated a release was very near. This was no official announcement,
>but it was an announcement nonetheless. T
Redhat 5.1 will be released sometime between May 28-30th during the
Linux expo to be held at Durham, NC - Redhat's home state. See
http://www.linuxexpo.org/ for more details on the expo.
Ok.. thats purely a guess on my part :) ... I'll be waiting to send an
"I told you so" followup if my predic
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Eric Wood wrote:
> Uhh... who is Donnie and Erik?
You must be lost. THis is the redhat mailing list not debian;-)
Donnie and Erik are two extremely helpful and talented employees of
Redhat. As for thier specific job functions I am not sure. I can still
remember when I first in
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:12:46 -0500, Paul Anderson wrote:
>
> >My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
> >list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
> Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:12:46 -0500, Paul Anderson wrote:
>
>>My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
>>list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
>Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as Donnie isn't even on t
Mike Wangsmo wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:12:46 -0500, Paul Anderson wrote:
>
> >My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
> >list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
> Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as Donnie isn't even on
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Thomas Porter wrote:
> Karnak holds the envelope to his brow and says: "Sometime before the penguin
> lands in Durham, NC."
That's probably the most accurate guess yet. Most of the releases
have coincided with some major expo or show or something. At lease that's
w
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 22:55:35 -0500 (EST), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do have to admit that I'm...disappointed that the RHL user community
> is no longer as privy to the RH development process. I suppose it's
> necessary, though, to maintain a viable commercial software development
> enterpris
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
> >My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
> >list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
> Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as Donnie isn't even on this
> list and Erik only glances at it on
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:12:46 -0500, Paul Anderson wrote:
>My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
>list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as Donnie isn't even on this
list and Erik only glances a
On 26 Mar 1998, Bryan C. Andregg wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 22:55:35 -0500 (EST), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I do have to admit that I'm...disappointed that the RHL user community
>> is no longer as privy to the RH development process. I suppose it's
>> necessary, though, to maintain a viable
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 22:55:35 -0500 (EST), "Steve \"Stevers!\" Coile" wrote:
>Something like the devel tree freezes and the RH folks disappear from the
>mailing lists. As I recally, it was actually a very accurate predictor
>of 4.1, 4.2, and 5.0. However, it appears that the devel tree hasn't
>
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
> I do have to admit that I'm...disappointed that the RHL user community
> is no longer as privy to the RH development process. I suppose it's
> necessary, though, to maintain a viable commercial software development
> enterprise.
I thi
Usama Wazeer wrote:
>
> Redhat 5.1 will be released sometime between May 28-30th during the
> Linux expo to be held at Durham, NC - Redhat's home state. See
> http://www.linuxexpo.org/ for more details on the expo.
>
> Ok.. thats purely a guess on my part :) ... I'll be waiting to send an
> "I
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
> >My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
> >list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
> Seems to me that most of the RH crew have been absent for some time.
> Do they traffic hurricane-li
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
> > >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> > >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> > >track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
> > >days, weeks, or m
Eric Wood wrote:
>
> Uhh... who is Donnie and Erik?
>
> -eric wood
>
That would be Donnie Barnes (my bestest friend in the whole world) and
Erik Troan. They are responsible, at least as part of the development
team, for the Red Hat that you run. I guess they really *haven't* been
around the
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Ramin Sina wrote:
> I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
> days, weeks, or months?
Uhh... who is Donnie and Erik?
-eric wood
>>My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
>>list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
>Seems to me that most of the RH crew have been absent for some time.
>Do they traffic hurricane-list more now-
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Paul Anderson wrote:
[...]
>My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
>list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
Seems to me that most of the RH crew have been absent for some time.
Do they traffic hurricane-list more now-a-
Matt Nelson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
> > Mike Wangsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:32:30PM -0500:
> > > >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> > > >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based o
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Scott McDermott wrote:
> Mike Wangsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:32:30PM -0500:
> > >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> > >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> > >track record, how
Mike Wangsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:32:30PM -0500:
> >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> >track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is i
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Ramin Sina wrote:
> I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
Red Hat is inexpensive enough compared to other alternatives (SCO, NT, OS/2,
etc) that there is no reason NOT to go for "instant gratification".
> yet announced when 5.1 will be re
Mike Wangsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:22:46 -0500 (EST), Ramin Sina wrote:
>
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> >yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> >track record, how
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Ramin Sina wrote:
> I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
> yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
> track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
> days, weeks, or months?
0 (handy.
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 13:22:46 -0500 (EST), Ramin Sina wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
>yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
>track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
Hi everyone,
I am deciding whether I should buy 5.0 or wait for 5.1. Since RH has not
yet announced when 5.1 will be released, I was wondering based on their
track record, how long in advance do they give the release date? Is it
days, weeks, or months?
Thanks,
Ramin Sina
--
PLEASE read the
83 matches
Mail list logo
