very interesting. Are there any downsides to running one of these on say a
500mhz AMD athlon with 256MB of ram? In other words, do these
"enterprise" optimizaions hurt you if you aren't running some serious
iron? Would I be better off just getting the patches i am most interested
in (like 64-bit f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm not 100% positive this will work, but try the "enterprise"
> > version ofthe kernel:
>
> is there something unique about the enterprise kernel, or does it
> come pre-configured with special settings that you could select
> from a stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not 100% positive this will work, but try the "enterprise"
> version ofthe kernel:
is there something unique about the enterprise kernel, or does it
come pre-configured with special settings that you could select
from a standard kernel, if you knew which settings
I'm not 100% positive this will work, but try the "enterprise" version of
the kernel:
rpm -qip kernel-enterprise-2.2.16-22.i686.rpm
Name: kernel-enterpriseRelocations: (not relocateable)
Version: 2.2.16Vendor: Red Hat, Inc.
Release: 22
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Robert Fausey wrote:
|You should not have to recompile the kernel in 7.0 for it to recognize the
|4G of memory, unless there is something wrong with the kernel that ships.
Are you sure?
Anybody else can strengthen this statement?
|6.2 will recognize 4G
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Red Hat 7.0 and 4 GB memory
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Nitebirdz wrote:
You should not have to recompile the kernel in 7.0 for it to recognize the
4G of memory, unless there is something wrong with the kernel that ships.
6.2 will recognize 4G of memory out of the box
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Nitebirdz wrote:
You should not have to recompile the kernel in 7.0 for it to recognize the
4G of memory, unless there is something wrong with the kernel that ships.
6.2 will recognize 4G of memory out of the box with no recompile (been
there done that). The 6.2 kernel and I
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, John Indra wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 01:06:13AM -0500, Statux wrote:
>
> |You'll have to recompile your kernel one way or another... Linux 2.4.x
> |supports memory that high natively, I think... but 2.2.x will have to be
> |patched... no clue where to get a patch from
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:09:38PM +0700, John Indra wrote:
: Then, the only visible solution is to upgrade to 2.4.x?
There ARE patches for 2.2, but the 2.4.0-test series has been pretty
stable overall..
: Is the kernel upgrading process to 2.4.x easy on Red Hat 7.0?
Very easy. Pretty much a "
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 01:06:13AM -0500, Statux wrote:
|You'll have to recompile your kernel one way or another... Linux 2.4.x
|supports memory that high natively, I think... but 2.2.x will have to be
|patched... no clue where to get a patch from though.
*sigh*
Then, the only visible solution
You'll have to recompile your kernel one way or another... Linux 2.4.x
supports memory that high natively, I think... but 2.2.x will have to be
patched... no clue where to get a patch from though.
Simply specifying mem=4096M will do nothing if the kernel doesn't support
it. Once the kernel is pat
Hello everyone...
I manage a server with this spec:
4 (Quad) Pentium III Xeon 700 MHz
4 GB PC100 RAM
After I installed Red Hat 7.0, the system only recognized 896 MB of the
installed RAM (dmesg snippets following):
-- dmesg snippet --
Linux version 2.2.16-22smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
12 matches
Mail list logo
