-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 23:58:05 -0700, Hirendra Hindocha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a stock RH 9.0 2.4.20-18.9smp kernel installed. It boots
> fine and everything works ok. I'm now trying to install alsa and
> ivtv packages. When I try and run configure in t
Hi,
I've a stock RH 9.0 2.4.20-18.9smp kernel installed. It boots
fine and everything works ok. I'm now trying to install alsa and
ivtv packages. When I try and run configure in the alsa-driver
directory, it insists on thinking that it should compile modules
for 2.4.20-18.9custom kernel as oppose
king, you can ignore the spurious IRQ7 message.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 11:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SMP kernel gives "lost interrupt"
Hi all!
I have recently upgraded from RH 7.2 to RH 9.
Hi all!
I have recently upgraded from RH 7.2 to RH 9. I have an old HP vectra
with dual P133's and was running the SMP kernel just fine under 7.2,
but am having problems getting the SMP kernel to boot with RH 9.
Specifically, I am getting the message "hda: lost interrupt"
Whoops. Only got the i386 upgrades included to my patch-archive. Should have
know RedHat would not include these patched in CPU architectures that are
not really used for SMP configs
thanks!
maarten
> > Anyone know's why RedHat does not include new SMP kernel with its
> >
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 04:09:49PM +0100, Maarten wrote:
> I am running RH8 on a multiprocessor system. When freshening my RPM's, I
> noticed that RedHat's kernel updates do not include a new SMP kernel. In my
> case, when updating the kernel, my smp 2.4.18-14 was updated an
Hi,
I am running RH8 on a multiprocessor system. When freshening my RPM's, I
noticed that RedHat's kernel updates do not include a new SMP kernel. In my
case, when updating the kernel, my smp 2.4.18-14 was updated and replaced
with a newer UP kernel. Nevertheless, that felt more like a
Hi,
I've recently added a 2nd CPU into my AcerAltos 930
server.
The server is correctly configured for DUAL CPU mode.
I've updated the stepping codes to correctly support
the Pentium II CPU's (both 300MHz).
I've installed the latest kernel-2.4.18-27.8.0 SMP
kernel, but when
ot.
I followed what some people had to say about it earlier, and added things
like:
noapic
to the kernel parameters and then booted but to no effect.
When I added maxcpus=1 as a kernel parameter to the smp kernel, it did
actually boot and gave me a bunch of APIC info though, like it just didn&#
L97-DS, had suse 7.3 on it, when I tried to upgrade
to 8.0 it locked up hard on the SMP kernel(UP kernel worked fine as in your
case), I traced it to the ACPI code, recompiled the kernel w/o acpi and
it was fine(trying the various apci options to disable the driver didn't
work for me). Dual 300
Hi,
I've just recently installed RH8.0 on my third server, but this one has 2
300MHz CPU's and won't boot the default SMP kernel that is installed upon
RH8.0's installation.
Upon booting, grub lists the two kernels I can boot:
title Red Hat Linux (2.4.18-14smp
, 2002 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 8.0 SMP kernel system freeze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Just installed two new Dell PowerEdge 2650 servers: dual Intel Xeon
2.0
| GHz processors, 5x drive SCSI RAID (5). Self-installed RH8.0.
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Just installed two new Dell PowerEdge 2650 servers: dual Intel Xeon 2.0
| GHz processors, 5x drive SCSI RAID (5). Self-installed RH8.0. Systems
| run for about 4 hours then completely freeze - no messages in log files
| a
Just installed two new Dell PowerEdge 2650 servers: dual Intel Xeon 2.0 GHz processors, 5x drive SCSI RAID (5). Self-installed RH8.0. Systems run for about 4 hours then completely freeze - no messages in log files after boot-up. If we run single processor kernel everything is fine. We can't re
Any particular reason why single cpu kernels are getting updated (currently
at 2.4.18-10) while smp kernels are not (currently at 2.4.18-3) ?
--
H | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+
Ashley M. K
Title: Cant' get working SMP Kernel on Epox EP-D3VA
Hi, I’m having lots of problems getting my Epox-D3VA with two 933Mhz Pentiums to boot correctly with Redhat 7.3. The default canned kernel 2.4.18-3 fails, as does the later 2.4.18-10. I have tried to compile my own kernel with 2.4.19
Whats the best way to upgrade to the SMP kernel? I was thinking id just
install the SMP kernal off of the 7.2 CD then run up2date to make it update
its self, would this work? Its a redhat 7.2 install with just the one 1.0
Ghz P3 cpu installed.
Thanks
Jason Adams
I'm trying to run up2date for the first time on a 7.1 box. When I run
up2date -u, it claims I need to allow kernel-smp to be installed.
It's a single processor machine!
Advice? Not ready to upgrade her to 7.2 right this second, thanks.
charles
The following Packages were marked to be skipped
Hello all,
Please forgive the newbie question but, I have not noticed this before.
If you take a look at the directory listing below you will notice this is an
SMP machine. I am concerned about the links. System Map is linked to the
SMP version but, why are module-info and vmlinuz not link
> > > > >> if i change the value in the head file,must i recompile the kernel?
> > > > >> is there any way to change it in the /proc directory?
> > > > >> thanks for your help.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > >
On Wed, 3 Apr 1996, Xiong Zhao wrote:
> hello,now i run into a problem after launching with redhat linux 2.2.16 smp kernel
> on a dell machine(4xCPU,4G memory).i can only see about 900M memory using top command
> or in /proc/meminfo.however,the total 4G memory can be seen if i la
hello,now i run into a problem after launching with redhat linux 2.2.16 smp kernel
on a dell machine(4xCPU,4G memory).i can only see about 900M memory using top command
or in /proc/meminfo.however,the total 4G memory can be seen if i launch with enterprise
kernel.in addition,when i run lotus
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Can somebody suggest a reason why the kernel sources packaged with Red
> Hat 7 would compile for SMP, but not for single-CPU?
>
> After a successful compile, I made one change, which was to move the SMP
> option from "yes" to "no", and th
Hi, all.
Can somebody suggest a reason why the kernel sources packaged with Red
Hat 7 would compile for SMP, but not for single-CPU?
After a successful compile, I made one change, which was to move the SMP
option from "yes" to "no", and the whole thing breaks. I'm at a loss
for how to even star
Thanks to Peter Skensved for this tip: to switch from an SMP to a
non-SMP build, you have to do a "make mrproper", which will erase all
config information; move that .config out of the way first.
Probably equivalent to just untarring a fresh tree, I imagine.
Anyhow. Did that, it works.
-m
Cha
I had to do a make clean or clobber, or perhaps both before the kernel
would compile for me.
hth
charles
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Can somebody suggest a reason why the kernel sources packaged with Red
> Hat 7 would compile for SMP, but not for single-CPU?
>
>
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 04:02:44PM -0700, Brian Schneider wrote:
> I have a SMP machine and think I remember reading that there was
> problems using ipmasq with this kernel. Is this the case, or can I
> use this machine as my gateway box etc?
>
> I am running 6.1
No problems here.
--
Hal B
[E
I don't have any trouble with mine. (other than getting icq to work right,
but that's is a different problem)
Carl
- Original Message -
From: Brian Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Red Hat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 5:02 PM
Subj
I have a SMP machine and think I remember reading that there was problems
using ipmasq with this kernel. Is this the case, or can I use this machine
as my gateway box etc?
I am running 6.1
TIA
In the world of PC's. Ken Gri
"T. S. Collins" wrote:
>
> Is it a known problem that even if the .config file has 'CONFIG_SMP=y'
> the kernel doesn't configure as an SMP? Has anyone else found this issue
> and is there a workaround?
Not that I've seen, I've built SMP kernels for both 2.2.12 and 2.2.13.
What kernel were you b
Is it a known problem that even if the .config file has 'CONFIG_SMP=y'
the kernel doesn't configure as an SMP? Has anyone else found this issue
and is there a workaround?
--
T. S. Collins
QA Engineer
VMware Inc.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
I've got a Providence (Intel PR440FX) motherboard with dual PPros
installed. I've edited the Makefile to allow SMP and rebuilt the kernel.
Problem is, it refuses to init my ethernet on boot and I can't activate it
manually now, it goes down immediately.
I was very careful not to edit anything el
32 matches
Mail list logo
