. So my primary DNS is acting as gateway also...
In this scenario to configure secondary DNS server shall I need to
register secondary DNS server name???
Shall I need to assign both Public & private IP addresses for
secondary??
Please suggest..
Thanks for replies..
Regds,
santosh
-
cify some steps it would be great helpful..
>
> Thanks & Regds,
> santosh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Alexey Fadyushin
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
disaster recovery???
If you specify some steps it would be great helpful..
Thanks & Regds,
santosh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alexey Fadyushin
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secondary DNS
You do not need two NICs in the secondary DNS. However, you secondary
DNS server should be accessible in the case of primary DNS failure.
For example, if you will place your primary DNS on the router, which
connect your secondary DNS server to Internet (I think that you use such
a configuration
Hi everyone,
Have small doubt about secondary DNS. I have a primary DNS server with
redhat 7.2 which is configured with 2 NICs, one for public IP & other
for local IP. My doubt is to configure secondary DNS shall I need again
2 NIC cards & how to promote a secondary DNS in case of Pri
How big is your zones ?
-Original Message-
From: Szemerédy Gábor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 February 2002 19:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Secondary DNS
Hello!
I need a secondary DNS out of my address space.
Do somebody know such a free service somewhere ?
Thanks
secondary.com
xtremeweb.de
zoneedit.com
/j-p.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
> Hello!
> I need a secondary DNS out of my address space.
> Do somebody know such a free service somewhere ?
> Thanks
>
---
JUSTATEST Art Online
ww
Hello!
I need a secondary DNS out of my address space.
Do somebody know such a free service somewhere ?
Thanks
begin:vcard
n:Szemerédy;Gábor
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.srce.net
org:Zavod za informatiku i AOP Subotica;HW-SW
adr:;;Adolfa Singera 12;Subotica;Vojvodina;24000;Yugoslavia
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:52:32AM +0200, Nathalie Boulos a ecrit:
>
> 2. I changed my /etc/named.boot so it became the following:
Hang on, this should be /etc/named.conf if you're using bind 8+ .
I was thinking of bind 4.
> 3. I rebooted the server
Ugh. `killall -HUP named` or `service named
x that was running as a cache-only name server. I changed
>the /etc/named.boot file and set the DNS as secondary DNS for the zone.
>
>How can I know that it's acting as a secondary DNS now? Is there a way I can
>test this?
>
>
I just want to make sure that I configured my secondary DNS in the right
way:
The DNS was running as cache only, so,
1. I commented the following:
# Name Server Cache Demon
#if [ -x /usr/sbin/nscd ]; then
#/usr/sbin/nscd -q
#fi
in the /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit file
2. I changed
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:24:18PM +0200, Nathalie Boulos a ecrit:
>
> i have a linux box that was running as a cache-only name server. I changed
> the /etc/named.boot file and set the DNS as secondary DNS for the zone.
>
> How can I know that it's acting as a secondary DNS
Hi everyone,
i have a linux box that was running as a cache-only name server. I changed
the /etc/named.boot file and set the DNS as secondary DNS for the zone.
How can I know that it's acting as a secondary DNS now? Is there a way I can
test this?
I would greatly appreciate any help
: Re: How can i know my secondary DNS server is running normally
to backup the primary one ??
nslookup
>server
>
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, timothy wrote:
> How can i know my secondary DNS server is running normally to backup the
>
nslookup
>server
>
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, timothy wrote:
> How can i know my secondary DNS server is running normally to backup the
> primary one ??
>
>
>
> ___
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> h
How can i know my secondary DNS server is running normally to backup the
primary one ??
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Sorry folks,
I made an assumption (you know what they say when you assume something..)
about the same style of connections on my mail server. While some were
from apache, the majority of them belong to sendmail. It's nowhere near as
noticable as the web server though.
They still are being crea
Hey Folks..
> What about going down to the packet level on both machines? A good
> combination of traces and netstats may find the problem.
Well I fired up a copy of tcpdump and did some work with my cut and paste
skills with netstat..
It appears that this problem only happens when the DNS s
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Stale UDP connections to the primary/secondary DNS servers
> > Just so you couldn't say that no one answered you, I came up with a few
> > diagnostic questions/things you might want to try:
>
&g
> My initial thought was that it had something to do with glibc, but I could
> find anything conclusive to prove this theory.
sorry.. s/could/cound't/
Joshua Hirsh
efni CONNECT
UNIX Systems Administration
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (705) 474-3364 ext. 2557
Fax: (705) 472-9202
PGP KEY: http://users.e
> Just so you couldn't say that no one answered you, I came up with a few
> diagnostic questions/things you might want to try:
Thanks Bob ;)
> 1. Can you perform DNS lookups on the web server?
Yup.
> 2. Does anything show up in the httpd log files?
Not a word. I've been looking very frequentl
ections.
>
> When I took a look this morning, the count was up to roughly 2500 UDP
> sockets to the primary and secondary DNS servers being listed in
> netstat as being connected.
>
> I verified the owning process using fuser and found that the majority
> of them were owned by
ine again.
>
> Today I found the reason for the problem. It appears as if the
> processes on the machines are retaining their connections to the DNS
> servers, thus using up file descriptors for the connections.
>
> When I took a look this morning, the count was up to roughly
for the problem. It appears as if the
processes on the machines are retaining their connections to the DNS
servers, thus using up file descriptors for the connections.
When I took a look this morning, the count was up to roughly 2500 UDP
sockets to the primary and secondary DNS servers being
So far i still can't seem to
get the secondary name server
to get retrieve the zone (is that
right way to call it) from the primary
server. i pointed the named.conf
as the secondary zone, and also made the
SOA point to the primary name server.
also made the serial less than the
primary.
what did
When the serial #, the one the zone file, in the primary server, is > the
secondary server a refresh will take place based on the interval specified
in the zone file. The first few lins in a zone file typically have this
info.
Remember that Zone transfers require TCP connections to work on the
pr
> what do i do to update the
> secondary nameserver. ??
> i have it all setup but now
> i need to set it up to
> update.
>
> Thanks.
>
It should automatically update itself. If you look in the SOA values for
each zone you provide name services, these configure your slave server's
behavior:
what do i do to update the
secondary nameserver. ??
i have it all setup but now
i need to set it up to
update.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
28 matches
Mail list logo
