RH 9
kernel 2.4.20-20.9
cisco vpn 3000 linux client 4.0.1
Optonline Cable Internet connection
I have been trying on and off for months to get the Cisco VPN 3000
client for linux configured. I have followed all the cisco
documentation concerning this install and configuration to t with no
success
Le 17/09/2003 03:07, « Ravi Verma » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I managed to solve.
>
> Thanks for help.
>
> Regards.
*** I don't get it: Why is it so difficult to post a short mail like this
one WITH the solution!?
The good ol' habbits are getting lost gentlemen! Too many "Thanks I fou
I managed to solve.
Thanks for help.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows VPN Behind Linux Firewall
Friends:
I ha
Friends:
I have setup a Linux firewall using iptables. I am working on allowing
VPN connections using Microsoft VPN client from my to a Microsoft VPN
server at one of clients. The Microsoft VPN client initiating the
connection is behind the firewall and the Microsoft VPN server is
outside.
I am
All,
can anybody recommend any VPN software for Linux. I wish to VPN'ify' two
home networks, each network has a linux router to connect to their ISP and
they each have a domain name that provides a constant interface into their
dynamic IP addresses.
Ideally I would like to have it loo
http://poptop.sourceforge.net/dox/
-Original Message-
From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Software
At 8/21/2003 11:05 -0400, you wrote:
>I have been using it for over two years and no major is
At 8/21/2003 11:05 -0400, you wrote:
I have been using it for over two years and no major issue yet. Setup was
good that the windows clients all come with the VPN client so there's no
extra cost. I wouldn't try using it to link to networks together just client
access. If your looking f
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:31, Benjamin wrote:
> Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, Windows XP includes IPsec support via the MMC/Security
> plugins.
> Unfortunately, it's a hideous mess to setup/maintain, IMHO.
> Folks with
> more experience runni
haven't tried it yet.> > > > Hmm. I am about to wade into the windows -> linux vpn connectivity at> our office. We have used simple ssh tunneled ppp conncetions for years> betwen two linux boxes. It was my understanding that there is "builtin"> ipsec capability i
topped selling it retail and now only offer it through
> > resellers/rebranding. Softnet's Soft-PK is supposed to work nicely on
> > Windows and comply with the open source IPsec implementations, but I
> > haven't tried it yet.
> >
>
> Hmm. I am about to w
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:59, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 10:55, bruce wrote:
> > Hi...
> >
> > A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any
> > recommendations for good/solid/secure Open Source VPN software that you've
>
I have been using it for over two years and no major issue yet. Setup was
good that the windows clients all come with the VPN client so there's no
extra cost. I wouldn't try using it to link to networks together just client
access. If your looking for network linking then you want Ips
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: VPN Software
POPTOP pptp works great
-Original Message-
From: bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN Software
Hi...
A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 10:55, bruce wrote:
> Hi...
>
> A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any
> recommendations for good/solid/secure Open Source VPN software that you've
> actually installed/used or been exposed to!!!
On Linux, I've used Fr
POPTOP pptp works great
-Original Message-
From: bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN Software
Hi...
A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any
recommendations for good/solid/secure Open
Hi...
A quick (or not) question about VPN software. Does anyone have any
recommendations for good/solid/secure Open Source VPN software that you've
actually installed/used or been exposed to!!!
We're looking at VPN as a secure way to get back to our network, but we're
curious a
no - unless, of
> course, you are using the Cisco VPN client for Linux.
>
> Now does anyone else have an answer if Linux allows IPSEC passthru?
>
AFAIK, IPSEC passthru is not a function of Linux per se, but rather the
IPSEC implementation you use needs to support passthru. FreeSwan does
Ooops. But then again, I went off about the difference without directly
answering his question.
Almost any NAT device will allow isakmp nat-traversal to take place.
However, does RedHat directly support said feature? Dunno - unless, of
course, you are using the Cisco VPN client for Linux.
Now
ilt. This
is a common feature of the Linksys firewall (and other) products.
This approach is really terrific if you are ONLY ONE user behind such a
device that supports NAT.
However, if you have mulitiple devices on the inside of that
proxy/firewall then your HOST VPN target device (Cisco PIX, Cisc
Can anyone tell me (briefly please) the difference between IPSec pass through and
NAT traversal?
Do RedHat 7.2 or later support them? Note: the RedHat box is a router, and is not
running any VPN servers or clients.
Edwin Humphries,
Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks for the help mike!
Steve Howard
Software Trainer
Information Technology Services
Kennesaw State University
770-423-6895
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/05/03 04:04 AM >>>
A google search on Linux vpn brings 755,000 hits including HOWTOs.
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.oshe
Hi Sudh,
I'm currently implementing VPN stuff here. I don't
recommend you to use CIPE because all the versions of CIPE shipped from Red Hat
have a "small packets
bug" which could bring you some trouble.
I'm using the PPTP protocol. You can le
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 03:53:06AM -0400, Sudh Peram wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a VPN solution with Red Hat Linux. I'd appreciate fi you
> gurus can point me to some links to implement VPNs with Red Hat Linux.
You can find detailed instructions in the Offficial gu
A google search on Linux vpn brings 755,000 hits including HOWTOs.
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux CDs and Stuff
- Original Message -
From: "Sudh Peram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 3:53 AM
Subjec
Hi,
I'm looking for a VPN solution with Red Hat Linux. I'd appreciate fi you
gurus can point me to some links to implement VPNs with Red Hat Linux.
I'd appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Peram
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate
earning
> in the beginning, but now that I've got it running, I can
> set up a vpn under freeswan in about 30 seconds... whereas
> it takes me countless mouse clicks and bewildering numbers of
> properties menus under windows and about 15 minutes to setup
> one end point and I s
I think that your office server is a pptp one
install the pptp client for linux (see the PopTop site at
http://www.poptop.org/)
hth
A 09:51 13/06/2003 -0400, vous avez écrit :
>I need some direction on setting up a VPN client for my home Linux boxes. I
>am running RH7.3 on one and
I need some direction on setting up a VPN client for my home Linux boxes. I
am running RH7.3 on one and RH9 on another. Both machines connect to the
net through a Linksys router. I would like to connect to my work VPN
server. The server at work is running Linux 6.2 but I do not know how the
uch you've worked
with vpns before and how familiar you are with key exchange,
certificate generation etc... I wasn't so it was hard learning
in the beginning, but now that I've got it running, I can
set up a vpn under freeswan in about 30 seconds... whereas
it takes me countless mou
Hello all,
I'm looking for a linux based VPN, and I'm hoping you all can help. I'd
like it a VPN solution that meets the following criteria:
Must work well with Windows Clients (NT, 2000, and XP) Must be easy for
users to use(one or two click VPN startup) Currently our PIX based
Hello Folks,
I hope that you are well, where can I find a decent VPN client software
that would work with close to any VPN server ? Prefer a free one over a
pay commercial one. :-)
Any pointers ? I see some from Cisco but have no clue whether it is
something for Cisco ones only or will work
Most VPN clients are free. In most cases, the client will only work
with their server. i.e. Cisco VPN clients will work with their server.
david
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> I hope that you are well, where can I find a decent VPN client softwar
"Peter J. Bonitatibus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I been trying to install the CiscoVPN Client also on my RH 9 machine and I
> keep getting install errors, it is looking for the directory for the source
> code for the kernel. Can someone point me in the right direction on
> this...
>
> Pete
Check out www.poptop.org. I'm using it for my VPN and has done me well so
far.
Jason Cordes
LeTigre Computing
713.681.8844
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remo M
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 10:48, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:19:30PM -0700, Remo Mattei wrote:
> >
> > Guys does anyone have any suggestions or location for vpn? I have a firewall
> > at work linux rd 8 and windows inside, and I have linux and windows and
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:19:30PM -0700, Remo Mattei wrote:
>
> Guys does anyone have any suggestions or location for vpn? I have a firewall
> at work linux rd 8 and windows inside, and I have linux and windows and mac
> at home and I wonder if anyone has done some setup on vpn like t
Guys does anyone have any suggestions or location for vpn? I have a firewall
at work linux rd 8 and windows inside, and I have linux and windows and mac
at home and I wonder if anyone has done some setup on vpn like this
scenario?
Thanks,
Remo Mattei
Network Security Engineer
cell 801-209-8554
Poptop pptp works well too.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Watt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steve Howard
Subject: Re: Microsoft to Redhat 8 VPN
At 11:55 AM 19/02/2003, you wrote:
>Does anyone know of the best source
At 11:55 AM 19/02/2003, you wrote:
Does anyone know of the best source of information on setting up a VPN
with Redhat 8 that windows road warriors can use? I would like to CIPE
since it comes with RH8 but will use other if I can find a good explanation.
Not only doe CIPE work quite well, it&#
Does anyone know of the best source of information on setting up a VPN with Redhat 8
that windows road warriors can use? I would like to CIPE since it comes with RH8 but
will use other if I can find a good explanation.
Thanks,
Steve
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 12:04:44PM +0100, Vincent Couvreur wrote:
>
> I want install a vpn between a linux server and a windows pc.
> I want use PPTP.
PPTP server for Linux: http://www.poptop.org/
PPTP client for Linux: http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/
That and the VPN-Howto
At 12:04 19/02/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hello,
I want install a vpn between a linux server and a windows pc.
I want use PPTP.
Please, how to configure this:
-->Kernel
-->What rpm
-->...
Can you give me an example of configuration under a redhat 8.0.
Thank U.
Hello,
I want install a vpn between a linux server and a
windows pc.
I want use PPTP.
Please, how to configure this:
--> Kernel
--> What
rpm
-->
...
Can you give me an example of configuration under a
redhat 8.0.
Thank U.
Regards.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 11:39am (-0800), James D. Parra wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Using "pptp-linux-1.1.0-1.i386.rpm", I can't stay connected for longer than
> 1 minute before getting a "Connection reset by peer."
>
> Is anyone familiar with how to resolve this issue? Below is my log.
>
>
>
> Feb
Hello,
Using "pptp-linux-1.1.0-1.i386.rpm", I can't stay connected for longer than
1 minute before getting a "Connection reset by peer."
Is anyone familiar with how to resolve this issue? Below is my log.
Feb 14 09:38:46 rg pppd[22218]: local IP address 192.162.4.2
Feb 14 09:38:46 rg pppd[22
Jason Costomiris writes:
> On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 01:38 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
>
> > A DMZ accessed _only_ over a VPN isn't much of a DMZ. The usual
> > purpose for a DMZ is a place to locate bastion hosts that provide
> > public services and run
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 01:38 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
Jason Costomiris writes:
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:11 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
Giving a remote site access to the DMZ over the VPN is exactly the
example intended.
Ok, if that's the case, what's wrong wit
nly runs IPsec, then you
too have to run IPsec. However, in the sense that I think is more
important, all VPN technologies are interoperable, because it doesn't
matter how you connect networks.
An IPsec-based VPN and a CIPE-based VPN can be joined by putting a
CIPE-speaking box on a DMZ segment o
Jason Costomiris writes:
> On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:11 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
> > Giving a remote site access to the DMZ over the VPN is exactly the
> > example intended.
>
> Ok, if that's the case, what's wrong with RFC 1918 space in the DMZ???
>
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:11 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
Giving a remote site access to the DMZ over the VPN is exactly the
example intended.
Ok, if that's the case, what's wrong with RFC 1918 space in the DMZ???
If this DMZ is only ever accessed over a VPN, using globall
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 03:51 AM, Christopher Lyon wrote:
I am sure AH and ESP doesn't care if the IP checksum changes because
that is just down one layer. ESP and AH are separate from TCP and UDP
so
most firewall's won't even perform NAT on these packets.
Unfortunately, AH does care.
;ll grant that's
> > > imaginative ... kinda useless though.
> >
> > Useless? Hardly. Most ISPs aren't handing out lots of IP space,
> > particularly to small customers these days. You do NAT for the
couple
> > of boxes that you stick in the DMZ, un
OK, now that we have come down to publishing the who's who in the network
community... I'd like to take advantage of this great opportunity to pose a
question. Since M$ came out with PPTP and had it incorporated into their
server products, why did they migrate to IPSEC on Win2k? Is the fact that
g out lots of IP space,
> particularly to small customers these days. You do NAT for the couple
> of boxes that you stick in the DMZ, unless the systems are being
> accessed over the VPN. In this day & age, when ISPs are handing out a
> /28 or even a /29, do you really want
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 14:41, Dick St.Peters wrote:
> Jason Costomiris writes:
> > On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 09:31 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
>
> > > Oh yee of little imagination ... start with the obvious case: two NICs
> > > on the gateway, one in net2, the site's DMZ, another in net3, it
ys. You do NAT for the couple
of boxes that you stick in the DMZ, unless the systems are being
accessed over the VPN. In this day & age, when ISPs are handing out a
/28 or even a /29, do you really want to blow additional IPs by further
subnetting an already small IP space? I'd
e or two
> extra routes in what would most likely be a fair number already. In
> our example here, we've been talking about doubling or tripling the
> size of his routing tables.
Routes are not the issue. You need multiple routes with any VPN
technology, but routes are cheap, an
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Larry Brown wrote:
I
would like to see RedHat pick up this software for inclusion to its
distro's. The hardest part of implementing FreeSWAN is the
installation.
Configuration is not bad at all.
It's not even hard to install at this point! Take a lo
My mentioning FreeSWAN was just to let the original list user know the fact
that it is a solid option. It is not as easy as most to install but after
being familiar with how it works and how to add/remove tunnels to subnets,
it is highly configurable. Plus the fact that you can add/remove tunnels
t
the
same thing as good network planning. Other VPN technologies fit into
the network you have ... or that you may want to have for other
reasons.
That's silly. Planning your network so that you can aggregate the
networks at each site into a single network has nothing to do with
planning y
Kerry Miller said:
> another office on our network, securely (we don't trust their users yet),
if you don't trust them you could always do a 1 way VPN :)
that is, you have full access to their network but they have no access
to yours ..I did that a few years ago, work
I didn't mean to start a running battle, but I'm really enjoying this VERY
interesting discussion! Thanks, guys!
Actually, we both (both net admins at our office) have a little VPN
experience, mine in Win2K and the other guy using vtun on Linux. I wanted
to get other peoples'
the
> > same thing as good network planning. Other VPN technologies fit into
> > the network you have ... or that you may want to have for other
> > reasons.
>
> That's silly. Planning your network so that you can aggregate the
> networks at each site into a si
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 03:17 PM, Dick St.Peters wrote:
net1 <--> net2/net3
This requires good network planning.
No, this requires planning your network around IPsec, which is not the
same thing as good network planning. Other VPN technologies fit into
the network you have
nate said:
> adapt it into my network the way I want then it won't get used. That said,
> at my last company we did deploy IPSec gateways but the only reason we did
> this was for the win32 users. IPSec/PPTP seemed to
> be the only modern(e.g. can run on newer versions of win32
Dick St.Peters said:
> There may be times when recommending vendor VPN solutions is
> appropriate, but in my opinion this is not one of them.
I agree. the original poster seemed to have very simple requirements.
IPSec(IMO) over complicates things a great deal. It's a good technolog
you've
> setup the site on the right properly, you only need one tunnel
> definition.
>
> net1 <--> net2/net3
>
> This requires good network planning.
No, this requires planning your network around IPsec, which is not the
same thing as good network planning. Other V
most VPN technologies in ways
that are counter-intuitive. IPSEC tunnels are not just virtual wires,
they also include access controls.
IPsec by itself does not include access controls beyond the shared
secret or the x.509 certificate used to authenticate the tunnel. In
most cases, IPsec is p
EC for some reason.
IPSEC is considerably more complex than most VPN technologies in ways
that are counter-intuitive. IPSEC tunnels are not just virtual wires,
they also include access controls. For example, consider:
net1 --- gateway1 -- {internet} -- gateway2 --- net2 --- net3
A FreeSWAN tun
, 2003 7:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: More VPN info
I appreciate all the prompt replies with lots of great info. Here's a
little more information about what we're trying to do. We want to use it
to link a remote branch office with our main office, there's a network on
both
27;t be any users of
any kind, just a box at either end linking the 2 networks. I've used W2K's
VPN for letting users get in, but there won't be any users on this link.
It sounds like Cipe might do a good job, but I'm open to
suggestions. Thanks again for all the great
nate writes:
> also, depending on your needs, a full VPN may be overkill. Many remote
> server to server communications are usually about a specific service or
> services. In the case of a TCP service, e.g. mysql traffic, or LDAP
> traffic, I use stunnel to link machines. This is a sim
I'm using some Symantec Firewall/VPN appliances to maintain a VPN including the U.S.,
Denmark, and South America for a company I work for. They are flawless, though pricey.
There are extensive configuration options.
Paul
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROT
kmiller01 said:
>
> I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between
> a couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows
> machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other
> to link 2 ne
kmiller01 said:
>
> I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between
> a couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows
> machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other
> to link 2 ne
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:12:01PM -0600, kmiller01 wrote:
>
> I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between a
> couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows
> machines or any other clients, just the 2 m
kmiller01 writes:
> I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between a
> couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows
> machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other to
> link 2 ne
Are the computers you want to connect on networks?
I bought two Netgear VPN Firewalls to do that. Unfortunately the two
routers/firewalls are 25 miles away and I have not succeeded in getting
the remote access to the firewall working so I can setup the vpn feature
without driving across town all
I'm looking for opinions on VPN's. We're planning to set up a VPN between a
couple of our offices, they won't have to interoperate with any Windows
machines or any other clients, just the 2 machines talking to each other to
link 2 networks.
Do any of you guys have an op
Dear all,
Anyone got any idea on what tools can use to
monitor VPN tunnels?
Include the traffic and services???
Please help to advise..
Thanks,
gary
Tom Kovalcik <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Saturday, 11
January 2003 07:47:
> I have a Linux machine which serves as an internet server for several
> windows machines. I need to open a VPN connection from a windows box
> through the Linux server. I had this working usin
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Kovalcik
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:47 PM
> Subject: Windows VPN problem
>
>
> I have a Linux machine which serves as an internet server for several
> windows machines. I need to open a VPN connection from a windows
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 13:47
Subject: Windows VPN problem
> I have a Linux machine which serves as an internet server for several
> windows machines. I need to open a VPN connection from a windows box
> through the Linux server. I had this working using RH 6.x
I have a Linux machine which serves as an internet server for several
windows machines. I need to open a VPN connection from a windows box
through the Linux server. I had this working using RH 6.x kernel (which was
set up and patched for me). After a disk crash and upgrading to RH 8.0 the
in the 1.2.3.0
network:
i.e.:
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p udp -m udp -s 1.2.3.1 --sport 53 -d 0/0 -j
ACCEPT
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p udp -m udp -s 1.2.3.2 --sport 53 -d 0/0 -j
ACCEPT
where 1.2.3.1 and 1.2.3.2 are the dns servers.
I found this out when I noticed the cisco vpn sotware was renaming
I have tried to get the right iptables rules to work for a vpn
connection.
Usually anything going out this rh8 box works fine. Why do I need to
punch a hole for the vpn.? I have noticed that holes need to be punched
for the dns and bootp, but why - when this box is the originator of the
traffic
CD> Is anyone using VPN with RH8? What is available? What do you recommend?
My configuration; RH 7.3 as firewall/gateway for internal net with workstations
(win2k, rh8, mac)
Win2k is VPN server (Microsoft VPN), so client must be also win machine (win2k or
winXP) or you can use stand alone
h the list too regularly.
On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 01:57, Chuck Dutrow wrote:
> Is anyone using VPN with RH8? What is available? What do you recommend?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
hould need.
-Original Message-From: Chuck Dutrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:57
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: VPN
question
Is anyone using VPN with RH8? What is available? What do you recommend?
Thanks
Chuck
Do you Yahoo!?Y
Is anyone using VPN with RH8? What is available? What do you recommend?
Thanks
ChuckDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
.
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:06, Chuck Dutrow wrote:
> Does anyone know of a VPN solution for RH8 that I can use for my
> wireless network?
>
> Thanks
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yah
Does anyone know of a VPN solution for RH8 that I can use for my wireless network?
Thanks
ChuckDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
PPTP, because I think that MS servers/clients use that protocol.
>
> What type of VPN? IPSec? PPTP?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VPN
$PPTP_SERVER -j ACCEPT
But IPSEC will be something different.
Cameron.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 05:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: VPN masq
>
>
> That's correct. Basic
> I have tried to unsubscribe myself 10 times, both by replying to the
> auto address as well as by emailing the human./ No reuslt, I still get
> this stuff.
If you're that desperate, you should have read the archives - this has been
answered at least ten times!!!
Use the second link below - scro
I have tried to unsubscribe myself 10 times, both by replying to the
auto address as well as by emailing the human./ No reuslt, I still get
this stuff.
Please, can I be unsubscribed?
Mike
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Rigler, S C (Steve)
wrote:
> That's correct. Basically, it looks like:
Use RedHat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.19 and read VPN-MASQ
howto.
Ricardson.
--- "Simpson, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu: > The VPN client is part of your three node
network,
> yes? It is VPNing to
> another network?
> Thanks,
> Doug
>
> -Original Me
That's correct. Basically, it looks like:
VPN Client --> (eth0) RH Machine (eth1) --> Internet --> Extranet Switch
I didn't put anything special into my rules to enable this. Aside from the rules I
have setup for paranoia, misc port-forwarding, and other traffic, I bel
The VPN client is part of your three node network, yes? It is VPNing to
another network?
Thanks,
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN masq
No.
The redhat box is
No.
The redhat box is dual homed, and is firewalling a small (3 node) network. The VPN
client is a W2K machine running the Nortel EAC client.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:43 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROT
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
