I've ran sensors-detect and this is what i got:
" I will now generate the commands needed to load the I2C modules.
Sometimes, a chip is available both through the ISA bus and an I2C bus.
ISA bus access is faster, but you need to load an additional driver module
for it. If you
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:23:40AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Can anyone please tell me what's up, what should I do, is there an
> easy way to install lm_sensors (if that's my problem)? I know Linux is
> supposed to be more low level, but this is becomi
Now, I read the lm_sensors INSTALL file, and, for Xt's sake's, what
is going on? It can't be that hard.. All I can remember is how easy that
kind of thing was on Windows.. and if you look at that shitty little
window, it's like 1 x 1 inch (heatload)..
Can any
> They should be part of the kernel package.
> I have 21 modules in
> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/i2c/
>
> My chipset isn't supported, of course, but that's another story. ;)
> I do have several machines where 'sensors' just works.
Whoops - you're right - they're there - misread the er
entered it works fine.
NOTE on i2c: with RedHat 8 it is built into the
kernel although I don't think the chip support is complete yet; with 7.3 I
had to download and compile i2c from the lm_sensors site to get it
working.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:23 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> > Anybody else messing with sensors?
>
> I wasn't until you rang.
>
> I ran up2date lm_sensors, ran 'sensors-detect' and allowed it to go
> through the
> Anybody else messing with sensors?
I wasn't until you rang.
I ran up2date lm_sensors, ran 'sensors-detect' and allowed it to go through
the hoo ha.
Unfortunately my kernel modules drivers section doesn't contain the
necessary i2c-* drivers (modules).
I can't seem
I have recently upgraded some machines to RH8
(from 7.3) and I have a definite problem with lm_sensors in RH8: it just will
not work!
On the first pc I thought it might be a problem
with the sensor chip, so I tried windoze for a day, and the chip was fine. I
gave up on that one (for now
Yes, I have it working on a couple of different machines. First, take a
look at the /usr/share/doc/lm_sensors*/FAQ file. It has some fairly
useful information. Then, run the "sensors-detect" command and record
the output. It gives some ominous warnings, but I have never had
I've installed the 7.3 distribution from CDROM and was pleased to find
it included lm_sensors-2.6.1-1. I ran sensors-detect, modprobed the
appropriate modules, lsmod shows the modules, but output from "sensors"
says "No sensors found!".
The kernel seems to have modula
again, and got the same errors as
I got when I tried to compile lm_sensors.
Apparently, having the symlink /boot/kernel.h ->
/usr/include/linux/kernel.h is a "Very Bad Thing." :) I can see why
now too, because the kernel.h in .../linux contains some of the macros
that were apparen
recompiling with gcc again,
and got the same errors! Now I'm removing the source tree, and
untarring it fresh. I found something on Google that might be the
answer to my whole problem (with lm_sensors too). I created a symlink
from /boot/kernel.h -> /usr/include/linux/kernel.h. I thought
main.c:590: `KERN_CRIT' undeclared (first use in this function)
init/main.c:590: parse error before string constant
init/main.c: In function `prepare_namespace':
init/main.c:798: `KERN_ERR' undeclared (first use in this function)
init/main.c:798: parse error before string constant
init/main.c:
At 22:35 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> > OK, fine - I was just trying to point out that there are two compilers on
> > a rh7.2 box (which many folks are unaware of).
> >
> > But how about trying to use kgcc? It might be the fix and e
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> OK, fine - I was just trying to point out that there are two compilers on
> a rh7.2 box (which many folks are unaware of).
>
> But how about trying to use kgcc? It might be the fix and every time I've
> come across this parse error
compiler (gcc-2.96-85)
> > >I'm using to compile lm_sensors.
> >
> > Not quite. On linux 7.2 there was a "kernel compiler" installed as
> > /usr/bin/kgcc - the default Makefile for a redhat kernel on rh-7.2
> > will call kgcc. There were known
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:15:49PM +0100, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> At 07:24 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >I don't understand how that could be my problem because I just
> >successfully compiled the kernel with the same compiler (gcc-2.96-85)
> >I'm using to compile
At 07:24 29/07/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Here's the response I got from the lm_sensors folks:
>
>"You must have some incompatibility between your kernel headers and
>your gcc or libc headers.
>
>"Sorry, it will be quite difficult for us to diagnose it for you.
Hi, all.
I am running Redhat 7.1 and just compiled kernel 2.4.18, in part so
that I could run lm_sensors (I was running kernel 2.4.13-ac8 which I
compiled myself, and didn't compile it with I2C support). Since you
have to have an lm_sensors compiled for your exact kernel version, I
downl
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lm_sensors modules
Anyone know the current status of lm_sensors vs. ThinkPad computers?
Ron.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Anyone know the current status of lm_sensors vs. ThinkPad computers?
Ron.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
what do I do if I have downloaded a newer kernel version and compiled that
myself? I guess I could download the lm_sensors source and compile the whole
thing myself, but then what would I need the lm_sensors rpm for then? Sounds
like that already answers my question :)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:34:20PM -0500, Nicolas Bock wrote:
>
> I hope this is not a stupid question, please don't stone me immediately if it
> is :) I would like to use the lm_sensors package. I can't find the kernel
> modules though. Do I have to compile those myself or
Hi,
I tried to post this before, but I think unsuccessfully, so let me try this
again: I am trying to use lm_sensors to monitor my cpu's temperature. As far
as I understand the documentation of this program I will need some kernel
modules that can read out the sensor hardware of my comput
Hi,
I hope this is not a stupid question, please don't stone me immediately if it
is :) I would like to use the lm_sensors package. I can't find the kernel
modules though. Do I have to compile those myself or are they somewhere in the
lm_sensors rpm and I just can't find them? Tha
Hi,
I tried to post this before, but I think unsuccessfully, so let me try this
again: I am trying to use lm_sensors to monitor my cpu's temperature. As far
as I understand the documentation of this program I will need some kernel
modules that can read out the sensor hardware of my comput
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 10:46
Subject: Re: Missing lm_sensors modules?
> > lm_sensors-drivers. You may have to get the source RPM, and compile it.
> > It is kernel dependent.
> >
>
> It was actually somewhere listed way
> lm_sensors-drivers. You may have to get the source RPM, and compile it.
> It is kernel dependent.
>
It was actually somewhere listed way down in the ~lm78 subdirectory as an
RPM for 6.2 2.5.0.
It loads properly now, and the /proc entries have values in them (Yay - it's
measur
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using RedHat 6.2 with all updates, lm_sensors 2.4.5-3 RPM, and I
> even tried installing the kernel-i2c RPM for the 2.2.14-5.0 kernel I have to
> no avail.
>
> sensors-detect tells me I need a i2c-piix.o module
Hi,
I'm using RedHat 6.2 with all updates, lm_sensors 2.4.5-3 RPM, and I
even tried installing the kernel-i2c RPM for the 2.2.14-5.0 kernel I have to
no avail.
sensors-detect tells me I need a i2c-piix.o module, as this is a BX board.
I've checked the /lib/modules/misc directory
Hi all,
I've installed lm_sensors-2.5.2.rpm and lm_sensors-devel-2.5.2.rpm on my RH7.0
system and run the sensors-detect program successfully.
Now it says I need to modprobe i2c-isa and via686a. The i2c-isa module loads
OK but there is no via686a module anyplace.
Do I have to rebui
Hi all,
I've installed lm_sensors-2.5.2.rpm and lm_sensors-devel-2.5.2.rpm on my RH7.0
system and run the sensors-detect program successfully.
Now it says I need to modprobe i2c-isa and via686a. The i2c-isa module loads
OK but there is no via686a module anyplace.
Do I have to rebui
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:07:54AM -0400, Jon Knews wrote:
> I followed your instructions below to the letter (I believe). I
> downloaded the i2c-2.5.0.tar.tgz and lm_sensors.2.5.0.tar.tgz, and
> unpacked them in to the /usr/local/src directory to make two
> subdirectories of the
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 10:00:02AM -0400, Jon Knews wrote:
> Does anyone know how to get lm_sensors and all it requires,
> installed on kernel 2.2.14-5.0smp (RH6.2)
> PLEASE be specific, and please let me know download site,
> instructions, etc.
First, you h
alled called LM_SENSORS.
Well, I have kernel 2.2.14-5.0 and downloaded lm_sensors 2.30 from gz file
format, and it compiled ok and created all the .o files, but insmod x.o
comes up with a lot of errors, so that is not working. Also found a rpm
version lm_sensors 2.50 along with kernel i2c RPMs bu
Thanks Hal, I'll give it a try with a little more confidence.
Bret
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:15:31PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > When installing the rpm for lm_sensors I get the following output.
> > Should I be worried about the missing /dev/i2c-*
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 11:15:31PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
> When installing the rpm for lm_sensors I get the following output.
> Should I be worried about the missing /dev/i2c-* devices? I will try to
> build the thing tomorrow but If anyone has some information about this
When installing the rpm for lm_sensors I get the following output.
Should I be worried about the missing /dev/i2c-* devices? I will try to
build the thing tomorrow but If anyone has some information about this I
would appreciate it.
I do have /dev/i2co and /dev/i2c1 I guess we'll see if th
> - added I2O DPT SmartRAID V driver 109 by request of Sander Steffann
> - upgraded to Alan Cox's 2.2.15pre15 patch
These two will fight over the I2O controller.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Does any one know of an lm_sensors rpm that will work with 6.1?
Thank you,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
40 matches
Mail list logo
