I have samba working on some drives, but I would like to look into using NFS
client on Windows PCs. Anyone know of a free NFS clienta for windows. I don't
jabe Win2K or XPpro, so I can't use that M$ UNIX services software.
Thanks,
Apolinaras "Apollo" Sinkevicius
web-site:
First caution: NFS has and continues to have a number of security
issues. Do not run NFS on a machine that is not protected by other
means. 'nuff said on that.
NFS requires two ports. First, the portmapper needs to be available;
that is port 111, UDP and TCP. NFS itself requires port 2049,
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 00:32, Forest King wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to be a client of a network file system server. The server
setting is fine.B ut when I try to mount on my machine, get a RPC
problem. I think the problem is about the ports I opened when
installation do not support NFS
Hello,
I am trying to be a client of a network file system server. The server setting is
fine.B ut when I try to mount on my machine, get a RPC problem. I think the problem is
about the ports I opened when installation do not support NFS (I only enable ssh,
http, and dhcp). So, which por
lly compiled kernel
> 2.4.19-pre7 (same behavior seen with 2.4.18) with Linux Virtual Server
> patch. NFS client is the same set up. On the server a directory is
> exported with the options (rw,no_root_squash). Our web application is
> in this directory along with apache. After mountin
I have a machine showing a high load with no cpu usage. The basic set
up is this. NFS server machine is dual 1Ghz pentium III with 2 Gig
RAM. OS is RedHat 7.2 with updates and locally compiled kernel
2.4.19-pre7 (same behavior seen with 2.4.18) with Linux Virtual Server
patch. NFS client is
Try you: www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/NFS-HOWTO/index.html
Atte.
Marcelo Pavez.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ecked.
I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs is
not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server
I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP
ME
Syed Masuduzzaman
IT Support & Analyst
Mennonite Central Comm
lesystems but nfs is missing
>
> I further look in to ntsysv BUT nfs is checked.
>
> I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs
> is not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server
>
> I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client
also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs is
> > not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server
> >
> > I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP ME
> >
> >
>
> I hope this helps.
> Mikkel
>
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
s
support loaded. (The nfs.o module.)
>
> I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs is
> not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server
>
> I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP ME
>
>
I hope thi
is checked.
I also checked /proc/filesystems in to different Linux machine and nfs is
not also present there BUT it can easily mounting from linux server
I want to configure my linux machine as nfs client CAN ANYONE HELP
ME
Syed Masuduzzaman
IT Support & Analyst
Mennonite Central C
Don't bother, the performance is lousy, and their tech support
offers no suggestions for improvements. So I guess Samba is the
only viable option.
--
Edward Schernau,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Architect http://www.schernau.com
RC5-64#: 243249 e
I'd like to avoid Samba partly on polical grounds. I'm sick
of people comparing Win to Linux and saying that Linux is almost
as good. I want people to make Windows talk to Linux natively,
not make Linux jump through hoops trying to pretend its an NT
server.
Also, Samba has limitations, i.e. no
Hi Edward,
I know this doesn't directly answer your question... but...
Have you thought of using samba? If you are looking for Win/Linux
connectivity, there is no equal. You may even get performance increases over
NT (I did) and it allows for printer sharing as well.
If you are only after NFS a
Anyone have any experience with this? It's a $49 package
that allows you to mount NFS exports as drive letters, has
a Network Neighborhood interface, etc.
however, performance is lousy - pulling files from
my server running NT gives me 1480 KB/sec, while pulling
files via NFS on same machine run
Last night I installed RHL6.1 and mounted an NFS share from another 6.1
machine; everything worked fine. This morning when I rebooted that first
machine I got:
Mounting NFS filesystems mount: RPC: Program not registered
What the heck does that mean?
I don't know if this has anything to do with
as better features and better
> performance. However, I heard that Linux compares _very_ poorly with
> FreeBSD as an NFS client.
>
> Is that true? I don't want to start a religious war. I just would like
> to get some serious documented facts. Possibly even some benchmark
>
On Fri, 15 May 1998, David Villeger wrote:
> I'd prefer Linux as I think it has better features and better
> performance. However, I heard that Linux compares _very_ poorly with
> FreeBSD as an NFS client.
I wouldn't say that it compares VERY poorly. The 2.0 kernel is a lot
pares _very_ poorly with
FreeBSD as an NFS client.
Is that true? I don't want to start a religious war. I just would like
to get some serious documented facts. Possibly even some benchmark
comparisons.
Thanks for your insight.
David.
_
DO
20 matches
Mail list logo
