RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-06 Thread Bill Anderson
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:45, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 00:32, Bill Anderson wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:24, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > > > > > All I've heard today still makes me feel like I shouldn't mix them. > > > > What specifically have you heard that makes you t

Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-06 Thread Kevin MacNeil
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:37:50AM -0500, Kevin MacNeil wrote: > > > I use red-carpet exclusively, although I manually install kernel, glibc > > and openssl updates because redhat releases i686 binaries for them. If > > up2date was

Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-06 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:37:50AM -0500, Kevin MacNeil wrote: > > I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running > > red-carpet and up2date. > > > > Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given > > any problems. > > > > Up2date is run only to do kernel up

Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-06 Thread Kevin MacNeil
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:29:55PM +, Alan Harding wrote: > I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running > red-carpet and up2date. > > Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given > any problems. > > Up2date is run only to do kernel upgrades. I use

RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 00:32, Bill Anderson wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:24, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > > > All I've heard today still makes me feel like I shouldn't mix them. > > What specifically have you heard that makes you think that? Seriously. > Maybe I'm not getting all the posts, but

RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Bill Anderson
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 23:24, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 16:29, Alan Harding wrote: > > I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running red-carpet > > and up2date. > > > > Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given > > any problems. > >

RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 16:29, Alan Harding wrote: > I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running red-carpet > and up2date. > > Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given > any problems. > > Up2date is run only to do kernel upgrades. But again, you are

RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Alan Harding
AIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine > > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 01:13, Bill Anderson wrote: > > > Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet and up2date do not seem to mix very well,

Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Bill Anderson
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 09:07, Richard S. Crawford wrote: > For what it's worth, I've been told by developers at Ximian that it's > really not a good idea to try having both Red-Carpet and Up2Date on the > same machine. Well they are competition. RedHat wants you to pay for RHN, Ximian wants to you

RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Bill Anderson
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 09:50, Rigler, S C (Steve) wrote: > I used to run red-carpet and up2date on the same machine. It seemed > convenient at the time if up2date wouldn't work due to a high number > of users. > > The problems I ran into were between the Ximian stuff and the RedHat > stuff. One w

RE: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Rigler, S C (Steve)
at if you only subscribe to the RedHat channel (if that's even possible) that it may be of some convenience. my $.02 -Steve -Original Message- From: Rodolfo J. Paiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: red-carpet and

Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Richard S. Crawford
For what it's worth, I've been told by developers at Ximian that it's really not a good idea to try having both Red-Carpet and Up2Date on the same machine. On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 07:56, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 01:13, Bill Anderson wrote: > > > Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet an

Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-05 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 01:13, Bill Anderson wrote: > > Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet and up2date do not seem to mix very well, > > so Red Carpet is a solution I am not willing to implement. > > > > How so? I use them both on the same machines w/zero problems. This is why I said "seem to"; I have

red-carpet and up2date on same machine

2003-02-04 Thread Bill Anderson
> > Oh. Unfortunately, Red Carpet and up2date do not seem to mix very well, > so Red Carpet is a solution I am not willing to implement. > How so? I use them both on the same machines w/zero problems. -- Bill Anderson RHCE #807302597505773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list