Sorry to have sent it in HTML
Silva, Eduardo [EMPRL:4611:EXCH] wrote:
Well, more of the same,
Now I just installed the new kernel released by RH using up2date:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -q kernel
kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0
kernel-2.4.18-26.8.0
I have done the kernle upgrade before and when I am sa
Well, more of the same,
Now I just installed the new kernel released by RH using up2date:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -q kernel
kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0
kernel-2.4.18-26.8.0
I have done the kernle upgrade before and when I am satisfied with the
new kernel I usually unistall the previous one. So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 05:22 pm, Mirabella, Mathew J wrote:
> a further question. does anyone know what this type of fault or
> warning is: warning:
> /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice_1.0.2-2_i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature:
> NOKEY, key ID 897da07a
Y
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RPM upgrade segmentation fault
Hi all,
I want to upgrade openoffice.org from my current openoffice-1.0.1-8 to
openoffice_1.0.2-2.
Whether I use apt-get for RH8.0 or rpm -Uvh to upgrade the three
openoffice rpm's I get a seg fault:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]# ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 17:25:46 +0100, Eduardo Silva wrote:
> >"rpm --help|less", see section "Signature options". ;)
> >
> >
>
> Caught me there! Read through the man page too quickly over to verify.
> Didn't think to verify the signature.
>
> rpm
Michael Schwendt wrote:
"rpm --help|less", see section "Signature options". ;)
Caught me there! Read through the man page too quickly over to verify.
Didn't think to verify the signature.
rpm -K output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] archives]# rpm -K openoffice_1.0.2-2_i386.rpm
openoffice_1.0.2-2_i386.r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 16:38:18 +0100, Eduardo Silva wrote:
> >Have you verified the package with rpm yet?
> >If it verifies fine, try increasing verbosity to -Uvvh or strace
> >the installation attempt.
>
> rpm -V for this package gives me a package no
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Have you verified the package with rpm yet?
If it verifies fine, try increasing verbosity to -Uvvh or strace
the installation attempt.
Michael:
rpm -V for this package gives me a package not installed stuff. Don't
know how to verify telling rpm to not look for the me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 15:02:05 +0100, Eduardo Silva wrote:
> I want to upgrade openoffice.org from my current openoffice-1.0.1-8 to
> openoffice_1.0.2-2.
>
> Whether I use apt-get for RH8.0 or rpm -Uvh to upgrade the three
> openoffice rpm's I get a
Hi all,
I want to upgrade openoffice.org from my current openoffice-1.0.1-8 to
openoffice_1.0.2-2.
Whether I use apt-get for RH8.0 or rpm -Uvh to upgrade the three
openoffice rpm's I get a seg fault:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]# apt-get install openoffice
Reading Package Lists... Done
Collecting Fi
I know a decent amount about mrtg but it's all to do with cisco, not linux.
Sorry...
Bret Hughes wrote:
On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 09:43, dogface wrote:
i sent out this email earlier in the week. i sent it to 3 lists.
rpm list, redhat list, and the mrtg list. i did not get any kind
On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 09:43, dogface wrote:
> i sent out this email earlier in the week. i sent it to 3 lists.
> rpm list, redhat list, and the mrtg list. i did not get any kind
> of a response what so ever from any of the lists.
>
> here are my questions
>
> was it the way i wrote the email
in some way rude?
was the subject not informative enough?
was i rude in the email or in some other way less than nice?
was the body of the email less than informative?
basically, what was it that compelled no one to respond to my email?
thank you.
eric
i did a rpm upgrade on a system to get the
in some way rude?
was the subject not informative enough?
was i rude in the email or in some other way less than nice?
was the body of the email less than informative?
basically, what was it that compelled no one to respond to my email?
thank you.
eric
i did a rpm upgrade on a system to get the
i did a rpm upgrade on a system to get the up2date working on it.
the upgrade broke the snmpget for the mrtg. i get the following errors.
snmpget -m /root/common.mib 207.14.76.1 monitor diActive |cut -c 42-
snmpget: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/librpm.so.0: undefined
symbol: fdio
Howdy,
I am a little curious about the "philosophy" of doing upgrades with RPM.
For example, I just did the "New initscripts packages..." upgrade.
Since I had slight modifications to a couple of files (for example, mods
to /etc/init.d/network, because my DSL pppd connection needed to be
shu
Devon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 25 January 2002 10:54 am, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
>
>>Hi list,
>> I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of
>>RH6.2. The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that.
>>The problem i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 January 2002 10:54 am, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of
> RH6.2. The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that.
> The problem is that when I try to inst
Hi list,
I have a newly installed RH7.2 box that was installed on top of RH6.2.
The installation did not upgrade RPM, so I am left to do that. The
problem is that when I try to install the popt stuff I get:
[root@bohr src]# rpm -Uvh popt-1.6.3-1.03.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
The easiest way I've found to hunt down missing dependancies with RPMs is on
www.rpmfind.net. This has yet to fail me in my search for dependancies.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: gary@umc
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 5:33 AM
Subject: rpm upgrade??
Dea
You need the db3 packages from the same update archive as where you
prolly found rpm 4 :)
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, gary@umc wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> How to upgrade rpm?
>
> My machine with:
> RH6.2 2.2.14-5.0
> rpm-3.0.4-0.48
>
> I downloaded rpm-4.0.2-6x.i386.rpm and install as below:
>
> [root@mail
Dear all,
How to upgrade rpm?
My machine with:
RH6.2 2.2.14-5.0
rpm-3.0.4-0.48
I downloaded rpm-4.0.2-6x.i386.rpm and install as
below:
[root@mail gary]# rpm -ivh
rpm-4.0.2-6x.i386.rpmerror: failed
dependencies: libdb-3.1.so is
needed by rpm-4.0.2-6x
any advise? where can I get
Hi Erik,
Whether you decide to go to 3.0.6 or 4.x, read a message that Jeff
Johnson at Redhat posted to the RPM list a while back Read it a few
times.
http://www.execpc.com/~bgkuhn/linux/upgrade_to_rpm_4.html
I helped me dig myself out of a hole after I screwed up the RPM 4
install.
T
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
> Convert your RPM database to db3 format
Ok,
I did install db3 when I upgraded, it was one of those dependency
issues. Could someone enlighten me on how to convert my rpm database to
db3?
Thanks so much,
Erik
___
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Erik Mathisen wrote:
> Hi,
> I just upgraded to rpm 4 and glibc 2.2 at the same time. I had to
> download a few other rpms to satisfy some dependencies. After the
> upgrade, according to rpm -qa, I do not have any packages installed. I
> tried a rpm --rebuilddb, but
Hi,
I just upgraded to rpm 4 and glibc 2.2 at the same time. I had to
download a few other rpms to satisfy some dependencies. After the
upgrade, according to rpm -qa, I do not have any packages installed. I
tried a rpm --rebuilddb, but it didnt fix the problem, still no packages
install
Hi all,
Whenever I do an upgrade of an rpm, from release 1 to 2, my x file
(from earlier version) which was changed by me, remains as x and the
new file is not installed. what I need is x file should remain same, as it
is doing now, and new x from latest version should be saved as x.rpm
The
Hi all,
Whenever I do an upgrade of an rpm, from release 1 to 2, my x file
(from earlier version) which was changed by me, remains as x and the
new file is not installed. what I need is x file should remain same, as it
is doing now, and new x from latest version should be saved as x.rpm
The
On 6 Feb 2001, Rupert Heesom wrote:
> On 04 Feb 2001 16:32:42 -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> > > database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs.
> >
> > Red Hat
On 04 Feb 2001 16:32:42 -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> > database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs.
>
> Red Hat Linux 7 also includes newer version og glibc and
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001, Rupert Heesom wrote:
> I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. Supposedly an
> upgrade to RPM 4 is possible without upgrading the entire distro to RH7.
>
> I downloaded the RPMs for RPM 4:
On Sunday 04 February 2001 15:18, Rupert Heesom opined:
> I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. Supposedly an
> upgrade to RPM 4 is possible without upgrading the entire distro to RH7.
>
> I downloaded the RPMs
Rupert Heesom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
> database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs.
Red Hat Linux 7 also includes newer version og glibc and many other
libraries - upgrading just rpm is not sufficient.
--
Trond
I'm running RH6.2, and RPM 3.0.5. I'm trying to upgrade the RPM
database to RPM 4 so that I can handle the new RH7 RPMs. Supposedly an
upgrade to RPM 4 is possible without upgrading the entire distro to RH7.
I downloaded the RPMs for RPM 4: rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm, and the devel rpm.
When I tried
Hi,
I have a RH 7.0 install on stand alone machine without errata installed -
yet. I am trying to upgrade several libraries and rpm so I can install the
dynamically linked version of codeforge 1.6.x. When trying to upgrade rpm
[current version 3.0.5] I receive the following dependency proble
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpm upgrade
Hello:
I have rpm-3.0-6 and want to upgrade to rpm-4.0-4, but when I try it
says:
only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
error: rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm cannot be installed
How could I upgrade?
Thanks in advance...
Upgrade to rpm-3.0.5-9.6x first it understands rpm-4 format, then you
should be able to upgrade to 4 from there.
Kirk
>On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, J. Carlos Cristobal wrote:
> Hello:
>
>I have rpm-3.0-6 and want to upgrade to rpm-4.0-4, but when I try it
> says:
>
> only packages with major num
Hello:
I have rpm-3.0-6 and want to upgrade to rpm-4.0-4, but when I try it
says:
only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
error: rpm-4.0-4.i386.rpm cannot be installed
How could I upgrade?
Thanks in advance...
J. Carlos Cristobal
Kevin Diffily wrote:
> I seem to be getting caught in a chicken and an egg dilemna here. I
> have RPM version rpm-3.0.4-4x. I am trying to upgrade to
> rpm-3.0.5-13k and eventually 4.
> When I run rpm -Uvh rpm-3.0.5-13k.i586.rpm I receive
> error: failed dependencies:
> libbz2.so.1 is
I seem to be getting caught in a chicken and an egg dilemna here. I
have RPM version rpm-3.0.4-4x. I am trying to upgrade to
rpm-3.0.5-13k and eventually 4.
When I run rpm -Uvh rpm-3.0.5-13k.i586.rpm I receive
error: failed dependencies:
libbz2.so.1 is needed by rpm-3.0.5-13k
I am using rpm 3.0.4-0.48 this is what came with rh6.2... should I have
upgraded this?? If so to which one?? I sometimes get sag faults when installing rpms
and have to reboot
thanks
Rob
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lis
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Adam Sleight wrote:
> rpm -Uvh kernel-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
It's usually a good idea to use -ivh with the kernel, so the old kernel
stays in place. You never know when some weird driver issue is going to
make your system unusable :) It's good to be able to boot with something
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Adam Sleight wrote:
> rpm -Uvh kernel-source-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm kernel-headers-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
>
> rpm -Uvh kernel-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm kernel-ibcs-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
>kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
> --force
>
It is safer to do:
rpm -Ivh kernel-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm kernel-ib
rpm -Uvh kernel-source-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm kernel-headers-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
rpm -Uvh kernel-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm kernel-ibcs-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm
--force
cd /boot/
/sbin/mkinitrd initrd-2.2.16-3.img 2.2.16-3
vi /etc/lilo.conf
**make sure to change the following to l
Steve Ki-Won Lee wrote:
>
> After I had upgraded my kernel to 2.0.34 using rpm, upon reboot (but was
> not able to compile the new kernel-see my previous post please) my NIC is
> not being recognized. There isn't that mention of Mr. Becker at nasa and
> of my card, "3Comboomerang...etc, etc.
After I had upgraded my kernel to 2.0.34 using rpm, upon reboot (but was
not able to compile the new kernel-see my previous post please) my NIC is
not being recognized. There isn't that mention of Mr. Becker at nasa and
of my card, "3Comboomerang...etc, etc..".
I use a dhcpcd to manage my IP
>Greetings!
>Has anyone had any problems upgrading PAM via rpm with respect >to this
>error message?
>[root@HAL apps]# rpm -Uvh pam-0.64-2.i386.rpm
>failed dependencies:
>libcrack.so.2 is needed by pam-0.64-2
It gives you the cause. Update libcrack. Of, one good hint : Never log out
wh
Greetings!
Has anyone had any problems upgrading PAM via rpm with respect to this
error message?
[root@HAL apps]# rpm -Uvh pam-0.64-2.i386.rpm
failed dependencies:
libcrack.so.2 is needed by pam-0.64-2
Also, I can't login as one of the users I've created and I think it's
because of th
I was here the last couple of weeks asking for advice on how to upgrade some
of my packages. I was having problems with installing/upgrading some rpms.
I burned all the rpms I was having problems with onto a CD and then tried
glint, and everyting worked perfect. I couldn't install from the comm
49 matches
Mail list logo
