]
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 12:03
AM
Subject: Re: Alito Views SCOTUS Doctrine
as Giving Impression of HostilitytoReligious _expression_
In a message dated 11/4/05 12:38:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If the state can celebrate gay pride week
Jim Henderson wrote on 11/04/2005 12:39:02 PM:
> I found the NYAG's myopic failure to
> recognize the value of hospitals, universities, savings and loan
> institutions, soup kitchens, vocational rehabilitation programs,
> benevolence funds, etc., to be offensive.
It sort of reminds me of the
In a message dated 11/4/2005 1:23:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The idea
that religion must be the basis of any good morality--concern and respect for
others--is question begging, and I must say, with all due respect, offensive.
And, of course, it completely
In a message dated 11/4/2005 12:51:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there
are voices on this list who doubt the value of religions in which they place
no faith, that is all well and good for them, but every time an all too human
impulse to pulverize someone o
St.
Austin, TX 78705
512-232-1341 (phone)
512-471-6988 (fax)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:15 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito Views SCOTUS Doct
In a message dated 11/4/2005 12:32:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My
organization represented CEF in the Stafford case. Prof. Volokh
iscorrect that the school district argued that the Establishment
Clauserequired it to deny CEF benefits available to other co
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 12:15 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito Views SCOTUS Doctrine as Giving Impression of
HostilitytoReligious Expression
I suspect that Alito's response was in large pa
