Bob Dengler wrote:
>
> This is why SoCal is on an inverted 15 kHz bandplan in the 146-148 MHz
> range: every 15 kHz the offset is inverted, so in our bandplan you'd
> be on 146.325 (+) & the other system would remain at 146.91 (-). Then
> your distant user would be TXing on 146.925 & not bother
Can anyone tell me where I can find comb # information on mastr II
repeaters.
Thanks!
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*
At 03:48 PM 2/25/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>I had a guy in Topeka, KS check in on our machine July 6 of last year. He
>was using a mobile rig, and a 5/8 wave mag-mount stuck to a filing cabinet
>in his office. Wicked opening... only QSL card I have ever sent for a
>repeater contact.. LOL!!
<
At 2/25/2005 04:47 AM, you wrote:
>No, the frequency that I am on is 146.925, and he is on 146.910, we are 15
>Khz away, a user was attempting to use my repeater where his signal passes
>through their repeater, he was using about 160 watts of power with a beam
>to get into the system.
OK, so
Mike Perryman wrote:
I had a guy in Topeka, KS check in on our machine July 6 of last year. He
was using a mobile rig, and a 5/8 wave mag-mount stuck to a filing cabinet
in his office. Wicked opening... only QSL card I have ever sent for a
repeater contact.. LOL!!
I remember that
Look for inserted text...
At 02:48 PM 02/25/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Mike Perryman wrote:
>
> >Yep,
> >
> >I use a mkIIg turned down as low as it will go, and constantly bring up
> >Kevin's Mays Hill repeater (KQ3M I think?) from my QTH in Stafford, VA
> >while trying to access our local machine.
H? Change PL and the problem goes away! Simple fix! Your freq pair is
coordinated, but you can select any PL you like. Go for it!
73 de Tom/W4OKW
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe
HI Matt,
It seems to me that if one of your users (not a very informed one, at that!) is
interfering with another repeater, that is between him and the other repeater
owner. The interfering user should learn to use his CTCSS!
I'd toss this hot potato back into the coordinator's court! He's t
Mike Perryman wrote:
>Yep,
>
>I use a mkIIg turned down as low as it will go, and constantly bring up
>Kevin's Mays Hill repeater (KQ3M I think?) from my QTH in Stafford, VA
>while trying to access our local machine. I also seem to open his machine
>a lot running mobile from around 40 miles S
skipp025 wrote:
>
> The 7330 has a lot of built in bells, whistles and
> radio ports. Hope it gets out on time as advertised.
>
> cheers,
> skipp
>
...and the rumor is that it will be a bit cheaper then a loaded 7K also...
;c}
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To vis
My thoughts exactly Jim... but repeater controllers
are a "season to taste" item. I was sad to see the
SComm 7K get phased out of production, trying very
hard with Vyex Dave to get Bob to do one more
production run. Alas we were not able to convice
Bob to make another last run, even with pr
Downbanded some T Band Fleetcom II's by adding abt 1/2 turn of #12 solid
copper wire to the existing helicals. Worked just fine. Steve NU5D
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this
try brassies first and if that doesnt help much, add the wire. The
helicals I had I used 1/4watt resistor lead.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:09:24 -0600, Brent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the front end is from a standard RPT-21
> there is approx 4 complete turns of wire the size of a 1n4001 diode
I need to take this off the thread, so if all that are interested, please
email me directly. I feel there is more to this than meets the common eye,
so lets take it off the thread and I will let you know where it all stands.
Thanks.
Mathew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jim
Mathew Quaife wrote:
> No, the frequency that I am on is 146.925, and he is on 146.910, we are 15
> Khz away, a user was attempting to use my repeater where his signal passes
> through their repeater, he was using about 160 watts of power with a beam to
> get into the system. His signal then caus
Yep,
I use a mkIIg turned down as low as it will go, and constantly bring up
Kevin's Mays Hill repeater (KQ3M I think?) from my QTH in Stafford, VA
while trying to access our local machine. I also seem to open his machine
a lot running mobile from around 40 miles South of Wash. - D.C. I have
milguy111 wrote:
>
>
> I have two controllers available for sale.
>
> Pictures are on request TO SERIOUS PARTIES ONLY.
>
> I have upgraded to LINK-COMM controllers throughout our systems...
>
>
> First is a Scom 7k, with voice and phonepatch - has most recent
> firmware in it (V2.03). Thi
Bob Dengler wrote:
> At 2/23/2005 03:46 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it
>>that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater
>>I've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move.
>>
>>Not sure how well all t
Sounds like politics to me. The coordinator should have first
stayed out of this, per FCC guidelines, and recommend that the repeater
owners work it out between themselves. Then, if the situation is
not resolved, the coordinator should step in. The coordinator then
must determine if the spec
No, the frequency that I am on is 146.925,
and he is on 146.910, we are 15 Khz away, a user was attempting to use my
repeater where his signal passes through their repeater, he was using about 160
watts of power with a beam to get into the system. His signal then caused the
91 repeater
20 matches
Mail list logo
